clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Worrying rumors swirl around possible Robinson Canó trade to New York Mets and Yankees

New, 407 comments

There’s a way for a Robinson Canó deal to work, but This Ain’t It Chief Dot Gif.

Roc Nation Summer Classic Charity Basketball Tournament Photo by Nicholas Hunt/Getty Images

Note: The Mariners are currently under investigation by MLB regarding Dr. Lorena Martin’s charges of racism and sexism in the organization. For background on this situation, our site statement, the most up-to-date news, and to offer comments and discussion on this subject, click here.

The offseason of rebuilding retooling reckoning reimagining began by moving a pair of longtime Mariners with cheap contracts and positive production. But the Mariners only have a few more players like that - if they had a greater number they probably wouldn’t be tearing the roster up to begin with - and the latest rumors seem focused on dumping salary - specifically, the salary of Robinson Canó.

Hmm. Sure, mysterious rumor man, but what would that look like?

Okay... This has long been the most sensible option for moving Canó - returning him to his original home, with a competitive roster around him, and a team that has nearly infinite profits it can dig into if willing. The deal would also bring Jacoby Ellsbury back to the Pacific Northwest where he was raised, and give him a chance to play for a team that has a space in left field if they so choose. Both players have no-trade-clauses, but a one-for-one deal would save the Mariners money long-term in exchange for drastically worse production in the next two seasons. Eating more money could allow the M’s to add on a prospect from the Yankees as well, which is appealing if ownership is willing to place a down payment on potential future production.

What does the other New York team have to offer?

Get out. Now.

Look, I know it’s a rumor, and much like the ludicrousWil Myers for Mike Leake and Jean Segura” tidbits the Padres leaked recently, there’s only so much to be gleaned from “discussion”, especially when we’re only hearing one sides’ perspective. I do not think a deal close to what’s listed above would come to pass, if for no other reason than because in 2018 teams are smart enough to know that freeing up payroll isn’t the most direct path to improving your team - improving your farm system and developing players in their early-to-mid-20s is. Maybe (hopefully) that balance will change somewhat in a new CBA in a few years, but for now the path to competing is run through having a crop of 22-29 year-olds arrive and thrive simultaneously, and augmenting externally from there.

As LL alum Brendan Gawlowski put it recently, there are wholly justifiable reasons to move Canó and his contract for a team looking to 2021 as their next point of competition, but not at the expense of sacrificing an opportunity to acquire young talent. The rumored proposal with the Yankees, while unremarkable, at least frees up money for extending and augmenting the core that will hopefully develop in the next couple seasons without weakening anything else. The deal supposedly in discussions with the Mets would do dramatic damage to any efforts to improve the team’s future further (by trading Edwin Díaz and/or Mitch Haniger) solely in aid of avoiding paying more money.

The reason it hasn’t happened is obviously that the Mariners understand that! It’s unsettling that something in that vein is being discussed, even as it’s fair to acknowledge nothing has come of it, and nothing may. But Canó has a no-trade-clause, and if Dipoto is determined to move him (or ownership has mandated he do so), the Mariners’ choices may be limited to Robi’s former team and the team run by his former agent. That’s a bad spot to be in, and the rumors thus far don’t inspire confidence in Seattle’s options. Prove us wrong, Jerry.