83-72
Because this has been a foregone conclusion bereft of any suspense for a while, now, I'm pretty well psychologically prepared to say the following:
Congratulations to the Angels, a very well-run organization from top to bottom that deserves to be where it is. They're the best team in the division by a comfortable margin, and, thanks to a strong system and a reasonably young Major League core, stand to have targets on their backs for the next several years. I don't like them, but I respect them, because they do a lot of things well, and serve as a pretty good model of how one should go about building a successful and self-sustainable franchise. As much as we joke about Darin Erstad, Reggie Willits, and some of the things they value in a player, I don't think there's a single one of us who doesn't wish our front office were even half as competent.
I'm not going to wish the Angels the best of luck in the playoffs, because I hope they lose, and I hope they lose quick. Should they go on to win the Series, though, it won't be an accident. With their topheavy rotation, awesome closer, and contact-driven lineup, they're built right to go a long way. Don't let the Boston/New York hype fool you - the team that the Angels are taking into October is plenty good enough to beat anyone else before they even know what hit them. When (I dunno) Scot Shields or Gary Matthews Jr. are your biggest question marks going into the postseason, you know you're sitting pretty.
It's a good time to be an Angels fan. It's a good time to be an Angel.
Biggest Contribution: Ben Broussard, +11.7%
Biggest Suckfest: Sean Green, -14.4%
Most Important AB: Broussard double, +11.4%
Most Important Pitch: Izturis homer, -13.5%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): -26.9%
Total Contribution by Hitters: -26.5%
Total Contribution by Opposition: +3.4%
Walks aside, Sean Green has to be the unluckiest son of a bitch I've ever seen.
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sean Green
Unrelated note
There was a shot of McLaren in the dugout....
McLaren and CO...
Which will probably be
Oh, and McLaren always seems to look like that when he's not talking for some reason.
Yankees magic number
Whenever I see him make that face...

Unfortunately my Google skills aren't helping me find images similar to what I'm talking about -- this is as close as I can find.
by PositivePaul on Sep 25, 2007 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions
If we somehow had gotten into the playoffs
Felix is OK at 1...
by eponymous coward on Sep 23, 2007 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Actually, you really only need the #2
Granted these numbers are for last year, but I don't think they'll have changed all that much. Washburn and Batista are perfectly servicable 3 and 4 starters. What you need is that second stopper, a guy who will give you a good outing 8 times out of 10 or so.
I think Wash and Batista are both #4s.
by SethGrandpa on Sep 24, 2007 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions
they're really not
Felix is okay at #1?
Go look at his FIP/xFIP.
If we had someone on the staff with a good potential to run a 4.0-4.3 FIP/xFIP, we'd be fine, because the staff would look like this FIP-wise,m even assuming King Felix does NOT take a step forward:
King Felix: 3.7-4.0 FIP
Mythical 2: 4.0-4.3 FIP
Beluga Tits: 4.4-4.7 FIP
Washburn* 4.6-5.0 FIP
Back of Rotation 5.0-5.5 FIP
* But Washburn generally has his FIPs a touch over his performance, like Moyer.
by eponymous coward on Sep 24, 2007 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
If we had a realistic #5
Even if we get some mix of RRS, Morrow, Campillo and Baek next year for the 5 slot, I'll be happy.
For whatever reason
That reliever? Jarrod Washburn.
In 2003
by Rollo Tomasi on Sep 24, 2007 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Oops, then maybe it was 2004.
One of Scioscia's relatively rare lapses
Mike probably should have just put in Percival
Good time to be an Angels fan?
by Manzanillos Cup on Sep 24, 2007 8:30 AM PDT reply actions
At least it wasn't as embarassing as....
Milton Bradley. Tore his ACL while arguing with an ump.
I wonder what that ump said to him that pissed him off so much? I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict something really, really racist, otherwise that just makes no sense.
I hope the league takes action on that, the ump shouldn't have been baiting him like that at all.
why do you assume the ump was bating him?
and if I had stayed up to date on that
One thing I've never understood
Why doesn't baseball? They slap hands with each other and congratulate themselves if they win, with the other team just leaving the field in disgrace. Japanese pro leagues are very good at sportsmanship, almost every other sport has some sort of congratulatory ritual. Baseball seems to be the odd man out here.
by TIF @ Lookout Landing on Sep 24, 2007 1:59 PM PDT reply actions
I've always wondered that myself. Seems odd.
i hated that part of youth sports
I think making it compulsory diminishes its value to nothing. When there really is a close, heated game/match, one of those "neither team deserved to lose" things, and the winning team wanted to acknowledge that, how would you differentiate it from when you blew the other team out?
Is it really good sportsmanship when it's mandatory?
For kids, it is
Absolutely, for little kids. It teaches them (or is supposed to teach them) that no matter what happens in the game, it's important to be respectful of your opponent, because they're out there fighting just as hard as you are.
"Absolutely, for little kids."
I held a door open for a lady this weekend and she backed away from it like I was some kind of serial killer.
does it really teach them anything?
Kids learn by watching how others behave, I feel. If you want to teach them good sportsmanship, then be a good sport yourself (and that means many things). Forcing them to go shake the other team's hands doesn't teach squat on its own.
A lot of kids use it as an opotunity
I don't think it teaches much once you hit double digits.
by JI on Sep 24, 2007 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions
That's why coaches should be present
If we had done that when I was growing up in sports, we would have been benched for the next game. Unfortunately, from my experience with my nephew's teams, I can tell that's not how it works anymore... :(
Now I'm going to go yell at some kids for being on my lawn.
but even if a coach is present
But that's teaching a kid anything.
Parents (and adults in general) need to stop using the "it only works when I'm there to enforce it" excuse as a reason not to even attempt to teach their children respect and proper manners.
(I'll get down off of my high horse now, the air is getting thin up there)
i think we agree on the goal
Even a better argument to say that
It's like my girlfriend's young son asked me the other day after the Seahawks game: "Why are they shaking each others hands, right after they were hitting each other?" I explained to him that the hitting was part of the sport, but that the players on both sides had respect for each other, and showed that by shaking each other's hands.
I remeber when the Cards and Dodgers
by JI on Sep 24, 2007 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Yup.
"Being a hockey fan, you watch teams in the playoffs beat the daylights out of each other and then they shake hands when it's all over," Walker said. "I brought it up to Tony the last time we played here in the regular season and I said, 'Take it or leave it.'"
by JI on Sep 24, 2007 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Congrats to the Angels for being a well run team.
Ahh...you know
I'm with you
And yes, I know it won't happen. but still.
Any style collapse by the Yankees would be cool.
Jones on DL
by eponymous coward on Sep 24, 2007 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions
So with the Padres losing today, not only is the
say what you will about the NL, but there are still a ton of interesting races going on there.

by 










