Open Thread Of Apprehension
Might as well kill two birds with one stone. For one thing, the trade deadline's tomorrow at 1pm PDT, and the Mariners are currently calling everyone about everyone, with Wlad being the most desirable and available bartering chip. In my grossly underinformed opinion, odds are about 60% we do nothing, 25% we get a reliever, 10% we get a position player, and 5% we get a starter. And in the event that Bavasi does pull the trigger, odds are about 80% that we won't like what he did. And while we're speaking in terms of probability, odds are 100% that at least one person calls him the worst GM of all time, regardless of what he does or doesn't do before the deadline officially hits.
As for the second thing, we get this quote from John McLaren prior to tonight's game:
"When you're a professional and you're not having a great year and you're still going out there and giving it your all, and not hanging your head and battling, that means something to your teammates, and that's important to me," McLaren said.
Raul Ibanez: .255/.307/.394, .511 OPS in July, horrible defense.
Richie Sexson: .204/.304/.404, .619 OPS in July, horrible defense.
When you're not having a great year, and you're still going out there every day and giving it your all, what that means to your teammates is that your all isn't good enough. I'm sure the clubhouse would respond more positively to winning than they do to fruitless effort, so it's high time that somebody cut through the chemistry bullshit and get Adam Jones and Ben Broussard into the lineup. Quit dicking around and make this team better. You'll be glad you did. I promise.
399 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
we have no chance of being a contender
I just hope that we don't make a shitty trade, or any trade really, and that the management wakes up, does their morning ritual, and goes to work on making this the team that it should be.
Pathetic
Never has a team so needed Billy Martin.
by NBarnes on Jul 31, 2007 2:00 AM PDT reply actions
I'm probably more sympathic to McLaren's attitude
BUT here's the two things that really trouble me:
- In the last two weeks--a very crucial time for this team and a time when their jobs may have been rumored to be in jepordy--Richie and Raul haven't turned it on. Unlike Vidro, who is hitting for a bit more power and getting key hits, our left fielder and first basement don't seem motivated by their team needs or their jobs.
- McLaren is sending a admirable, movie worthy message about sticking with guys and believing in them--but what about the message he's sending to Adam Jones? Or Ben Broussard? Essentially: you can do everything that a team can ask of you in AAA and big situations and still not get the chance on the team you deserve.
by mary on Jul 31, 2007 4:15 AM PDT reply actions
Taking only Sexson for the time being
Given that, you must surely sympathise with the back office wanting to do everything they can to get him back on the rails.
Sunk costs
And....in fact
Granted, it may not be the best team they could ultimately put out there, but why mess with something that won't necessarily work.
In the long run, next year, things might be better, but honestly I don't think Adam Jones will make the team win this year. Yes, he is good and yes, he will be good. This year, in trying to make the playoffs, will be too much pressure on him. If he were moved up, it would seem like he is the one needed to get it done. Honestly, I think he would fail and flail with that chance.
The same thing happened last year when they tried to make him the CF of the future. He didn't cut it. Yes, he has gotten better, and still could be the LF or RF of the future (since they have the CF locked up now). However, due to all the writings and everything else around, it will not be for Adam Jones to be the future but the right now. I just don't think he is ready to be the right now.
Just my two cents....
Yes,
The Yankees are on a hot streak too, does this mean they shouldn't bring up Phil Hughes because they shouldn't "mess with something that won't necessarily work?"
Adam Jones would be an upgrade over Raul in every way possible.
You started your post with "Granted, it may not be the best team they could ultimately put out there......" and that says it all. It SHOULD be the best team they can put out there, that's the point.
In sports, results matter
GM's of teams that are performing well, like the M's are right now, don't sit there and think "well, we COULD be doing a lot better, if we just did this". All they're thinking is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", and, on aggregate, the M's ain't broke.
There are individual parts that are broken, yes, and I wish they'd get fixed too, but I can see why nothing's happening in that regard.
I dunno...
That's thinking agressively. That's taking the initiative, forcing others to react to you.
Taking advantage of every edge you can is the sign of a winner. I don't think "It's not broke, don't fix it" is the sign of a winner's mentality. It's certainly not in business, and I truly doubt it is in sports.
The 2006 Cardinals say hello
Again, I'm not defending it - I wish it would change too - but I understand it.
The Sexson-Broussard
Broussard is a veteran that's been in the majors for a while and has shown he can swing the bat, giving him more PT doesn't hurt anything, sitting Sexson a little more doesn't hurt and might even motivate him a little.
The Ibanez/Jones swap I can understand why that isn't happening. The prevailing thought is that Jones doesn't need to hit to make this team better, just his defense alone, that's only something that we fans think of, not players and management, defense is secondary to offense... and rookies have a tendency to come up and if they don't start on a hot streak get overwhelmed by frustration because they're trying to impress in order to stay up with the big club. Add in the pressure of replacing a noted clubhouse favorite in Ibanez, and the high expectations placed upon Jones by the fanbase, and then the pressure of the the pennant race. It would be a tough thing for Jones if he didn't hit once he came up.
by MfaninAlaska on Jul 31, 2007 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions
The problem is....
If the team is in first, sure, hold on to what you've got as long as you can, but at this pace, finishing 5-6 games out of the race isn't good enough. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Fine with me, but this team IS broken.
By essentially punting every 5th game (when it's on the road especially), punting LF defense (in order to get a crappy hitter into the middle of the lineup, no less), playing an inferior offensive and defensive 1B 90% of the time....this team is handing its opponents advantages that it can't afford to give up.
Of the 5 teams in the race for 3 playoff spots, none are perfect, but the Mariners have the most obvious holes. And the worst part is, those are holes that should be pretty easily filled (mostly from within). By making a few incredibly obvious moves, this team tightens up the talent gap with the other 4 teams.
You're right, results matter most, but right now, the results aren't good enough, so why is the team insisting on sticking with what's not working?
by AnotherAaron on Jul 31, 2007 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Managers say things for effect
The material action in this case is making changes to the (active) roster for position players, and we remain the only side of 30 still to make any such changes, in spite of certain poor performers.
What, of course, we don't know is what Mc is saying to Sexson and Raul in private. For all we know he might be saying the same things, else he may be a lot harsher. There isn't, though, any public threat any perhaps that's just his way. Maybe he's a more clinical decision maker who wants to give players every last chance before committing because, as much as anything, he doesn't wish to do an about-face if Broussard or Jones (in this example) don't cut the mustard once given a regular start at 1B/LF.
As much as anything, Mc is also still finding his feet in a first managerial role at this level and he also needs the right amount of time to judge such decisions and isn't likely to rush them.
The right decisions pay the bills, but at the same time they also determine the success of a season. The fact that McLaren has highlighted these two players does, at least signal the fact that he recognises their struggles and it's not like he's putting out propaganda insisting that they're doing well on the field when they patently are not.
I'd rather judge him by the decisions he makes rather than the lack of them at such an early stage in his managerial career.
Mac says he has a lot of Lou in him.
by BrettJMiller on Jul 31, 2007 7:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Successful managers
The decision (or lack of one) to change about the roster for said players will be best judged in retrospect and for now all we can do is speculate. What happens in the next two months remains and open path.
McLaren might stick with Richie/Raul and they both flunk
McLaren might stick with Richie/Raul and either/both of them come good
McLaren might make changes to one, both or more positions that negatively or positively adjust the performance of the team for the remaining time.
"Coddling your players just doesn't help."
I'm sure that most people managers (in all walks) would disagree with that - in some cases it does work and who are we to judge unless we know these people well enough? Personally I'm not a big fan of lambasting your own team in public. If Pinella did it then bully for him, but what works for some isn't necessarily best practise, is it?
if there's no hope for Raul and Richie
Fuck Fuck Fuck
Oh, good god...
Watch what he does. He does enough questionable things there to talk about...
I prefer this McLaren comment....
Cardinals trade for Jo-El
i guess they really like our trash.
Steroid and Player A can reunite and bond together, hopefully involving superglue
About the Clement for Al Reyes rumor...
Did I say hilarious? I meant hilariously tragic.
by Slozbury Stouvre on Jul 31, 2007 9:22 AM PDT reply actions
Here's the always good Larry Stone's take
by G_ on Jul 31, 2007 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions
This is one rumor
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Pena
Could also be downgraded to Rob Johnson
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions
I do that.
by JI on Jul 31, 2007 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions
It's a shame that TB is flush with OFers
make it a big trade?
i think i'd do that trade right quick.
by jimmimoose1 on Jul 31, 2007 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
basically
i think pena upgrades us in two capacities, much as adam jones in left would do, too.
by jimmimoose1 on Jul 31, 2007 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions
I still find it hilarious
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Jul 31, 2007 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions
haha yup
Don't get wrong, I'd do the trade in a second, I just find it funny.
to be fair
man were we wrong, lol.
by jimmimoose1 on Jul 31, 2007 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd take 2003 Sexson.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions
Could you imagine?
DH-Vidro / Ibanez / Sexson / Broussard (Obviously not all of them in the 2 hole)
1B-Pena
3B-Beltre
RF-Guillen
LF-Jones
C-Johjima
2B-Lopez
SS-Betancourt
Thats quite the 1-7...
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 9:52 AM PDT reply actions
I'd go:
Ichiro
Beltre
Pena
Guillen
Johjima
Ibanez (DH)
Jones
Lopez
Betancourt
vs. Lefties:
Ichiro
Vidro
Beltre
Guillen
Johjima
Sexson
Jones
Lopez
Betancourt
Broussard would be gone. And we'd have a pretty good bench, with lots of ability to mix and match.
I don't like Beltre in the 2-hole.
by bpdawg24 on Jul 31, 2007 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Steroids McPineiro ---> Cards
by Slozbury Stouvre on Jul 31, 2007 9:52 AM PDT reply actions
Uh ohs, looks like someone's gonna rebound
Not a bad move.
by AnotherAaron on Jul 31, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Betemit for Proctor???
MOTHERFUCKER
Why can't I be a fan of ONE baseball team with a decent front office?
Fucking pathetic. FUCK!
DePodesta wouldn't have made that trade.
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Jul 31, 2007 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions
The Yankees so won that deal
Maybe not bench
Betemit has a .231 average, he must suck.
by Mariner John on Jul 31, 2007 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I think we'll do something, Jeff.
well
i don't think bavasi is feeling forced to act. i don't THINK.
by jimmimoose1 on Jul 31, 2007 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, well
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I hate Bavasi
are there stats for that too?
Bavasi gets a -5 in GM Efficiency Rating
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions
What did his dad get?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions
I prefer to use VORGM
by Slozbury Stouvre on Jul 31, 2007 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions
No way!
by jimmimoose1 on Jul 31, 2007 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions
I have a feeling
like Jones for Torres?
Fuck.
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Sticking with Ibanez and Sexson
What annoyed me to no end was that they insisted on batting Raul 3rd in the lineup, no matter what.
If you're going to run black holes in the lineup position said black hole where it does the least amount of damage...down in the order, and in one spot. It took seven straight losses to figure this out and now we've one four straight since changing the lineup for the better.
Ultimately, I always knew that things were going to come down to how Raul and Richie perfomed while we contend for the playoffs.
I know it's MLBTradeRumors, but still...
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/07/nats-relievers-.html
Will a desperate team offer a top flight prospect like an Adam Jones?
fuck that. not a fucking chance
Really starting to doubt anything
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 10:52 AM PDT reply actions
Read this else where
Congratulations, Boston!
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Gagne to Boston..
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 11:03 AM PDT reply actions
Steve Phillips reporting
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 11:06 AM PDT reply actions
There is no way we get through this deadline
Honestly, as we cross over the 2 hour mark
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
I'll take it,
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
If the M's deal for Morris
I'm all for a Sexson - Morris trade
I trade richie for matt
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions
Sexson for Morris straight up?
B..Bu..B.B..Bu..But
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
KJR
Dave "Softy" Mahler.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
LL needs more feuds with KJR
No you don't
I just turned on KJR
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Working on the wrap-up
90 minutes and change left.
DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE DO NOT TRADE ANYONE ESPECIALLY WLAD
Except for Sexson or Ibanez.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Phillips just said
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 11:40 AM PDT reply actions
Who's more pathetic
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't know if any of you read
Baker has lost all my respect
He also says
He's lost your respect?
by Dylan @ Lookout Landing on Jul 31, 2007 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
There is a difference
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't think he's ignorant at all.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Probably the wrong term to use
Baker has his belief systems
Baker didn't really change. He just didn't say anything you strongly disagreed with until recently.
How can you really defend
I am not sure that Reyes
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Reyes is damn fine.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Exactly,
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Reyes is damned fine?
He's a good reliever.
The problem is that good relievers are almost never worth trading for.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
The rate stats were sliding before...
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Baker's not perfect
Please show me
Baker >>> Finnigan
Baker is a good reporter. His idea of value is skewed in my eyes.
And yes, Reyes is a decent reliever. But like Jeff said above, we have a lot of those already.
I hate
The Brewers have a rookie in the 3 spot of the lineup and a rookie is currently their ace. The Yankees called up Hughes, possibly before he was ready. Oakland has been running out AAA guys all year and done very well despite the injuries. The Red Sox with Gabbard and Lester... the list goes on and on.
Thoughts on Proctor for Betemit?
He's absolutely correct
I'm with Dave and Trent
I'm sad that the Farnsworth/Proctor Dugouts
by Mariner John on Jul 31, 2007 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Big improvement for their bullpen
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Dotel for Davies...
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
He is?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions
So, how the heck did
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions
hold on let me go call Dayton Moore
Just wondering out loud.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Figure it out yourself.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I think when they were passing out
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Almost, but not quite.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Actually
Meanwhile, the Royals have no real use for Dotel. Might as well swap him for someone they have use for.
Kyle Davies is
by rfloh @ Lookout Landing on Jul 31, 2007 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
actually they are kinda right
Fwack.
Damn you, Japan Standard Time...
Favor the Bold
ONE HOUR LEFT!
And Bavasi please don't screw this up.
Just saw the name "Engel Beltre"
by Slozbury Stouvre on Jul 31, 2007 12:05 PM PDT reply actions
That'd be as bad as...
Holy shit
I don't know if that's true
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
The moderator
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Ahh I see now
I will still hope it happens. Glaus' avg has quickly gotten to a more comfortable zone lately.
OMG I'd LOL if that trade was for real
Karl Ravich "The O's are done"
Teix Trade Official
Favor the Bold
So is the Dotel deal
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Ah MAN....Ensberg off the market now
That ballpark is going to kill him.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I thought...
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't have park factors on me
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Here we go
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/home-run-park-factor-a-new-approach/
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions
That just makes me depressed...
Safeco RF is Coors Field!
Pah.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Even the TD has East Coast Bias.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:16 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
But why chose 4:00 Eastern time?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Your sig does not suit you.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
It should be 5 AM east coast, 2 AM west coast
That's funny.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
WYSIWTF.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Well...
Damn it.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
If anything
"that is time zones"?
If you get up here at 10:00 in the morning here
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Getting up at 10:00 in New York is the same
Are you that fucking dumb?
I can assure you...
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Regardless of the time
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
What would you rather have?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I really hope that you're trolling
stop talking/typing
Go ponder this...what came first, the chicken or the egg?
Ah, so the solution is...
Nonsense. A deadline is a deadline, doesn't matter if it's at 4am so long as everyone has a fair crack. Or does everyone actually wake up at 10am on one of the biggest business days of the year in your world?
Stop making sense.
...I mean, feeding the goat.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Coach is right
You know what?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Joke anyways.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Prove I was serious.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Stop please.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
you should ban him
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
scroll up
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
You think I meant all that?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions
For every stupid post you write
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions
EVIL! EVIL!
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah? Well how about I start talking
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Al Martin looked like a fish.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Gil Meche looks like a fish.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions
What is wrong with you?
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Who's your
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Jose Cruz Jr.
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Jim Edmonds
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Jim Edmonds SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions
That's why he tied the AL record
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions
You're going to stop, right?
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Get 'em Sparky
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I would pay good money to watch Jeff do standup
3pm Flagpole
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Seriously.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions
your dad?
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't ban him
Also John Olerud was sucked.
yes you are
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
No I want to hang this over your head
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
We don't need you to tell us to do that.
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
How about we ignore that you ever say anything?
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 31, 2007 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
interesting how the thread started going back
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
how is that fun?
Drinking --> killing pedestrians
Trade deadline --> example of east coast bias
John Olerud --> proof that all players get better after leaving the Mariners
which to choose?!
shouldn't we just freeze the rotation?
west coast GMs could also
crap I screwed it up last post
ok, nevermind
But surely now...!
Gagne to Sox Agreed to in principal...
Favor the Bold
Phillips said something about
oh snap
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
That just means the A's are involved...
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Jul 31, 2007 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions
wait Bavasi
Does he?
by Scruffy Lefty on Jul 31, 2007 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
we get cupcakes? hahaha
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Bavasi in a 3-way
I know, horrible imagery there.
Dont include the bike in the deal!
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm convinced
Steve Phillips
I think he was saying that
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Re-watch the episode
ding-ding-ding
While I dislike Bavasi
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
Steve just got the Zambranos confused
I was thinking the same thing
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
While I have extreme disdain
by rfloh @ Lookout Landing on Jul 31, 2007 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Great
Well those were both Woody Woodward
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Both Randy Johnson trades were good.
by Mariner John on Jul 31, 2007 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I hope that whenever GMs call one another
heh
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Is it like the Comcast Housemates ad?
So anything flying around
Mariners interested in Loeretta.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
they love them some wife beaters in Philly
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions
I love me some Philadelphia...
What? Where? Who? How?
As the end nears....
Looks like Gagne to the Red Sox
ESPN chat:
Jonah Keri: (3:48 PM ET ) Julio Mateo is not a good pitcher. Phils could've done better.
LOL
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
Did they get anyone?
that I haven't found yet
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
26 year old AA hitting SS
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions
We got nothing for him
addition by subtraction
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
by David Piper on Jul 31, 2007 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions
God, in that park too...
We didnt get anything for Mateo
Especially with what RP are going for!
by kentroyals5 on Jul 31, 2007 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
re: Mateo
hostage???
The hostage situation:
M's: We're not giving him up easily. We want a WHOLE package of Jolly Ranchers. A grilled cheese. And if you want to be generous a professional baseball player.
MLB Gm's: We've deliberated and the Phillies will take him. (Other gms snicker)
by andyboi on Jul 31, 2007 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions
White haired guy on ESPN2
Seattle and Cleveland do not exist.
Apparently
Notre Dame will always be a good team
by andyboi on Jul 31, 2007 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Notre Dame Football
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
wrong answer
Even if they lose 121 games next year.
by Coach Owens on Jul 31, 2007 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions
YES. NO MORE WIFE VULTURE.
Bavasi is an Idiot!
WE ARE SCREWED!!
Last place here we come!!!!
Yep - season is over..
by seattlesundevil on Jul 31, 2007 12:58 PM PDT reply actions
maybe we should donate that card to the phillies
Bavasi is an idiot for not being an idiot!
Hello last place, we're back home again!
Bill Bavasi
Maybe I'm just not getting the sarcasm
He was not a good guy, and not much of a pitcher
Prophetic Jeff
Swallow... don't go there, but it would explain how he lasted as long as he did
Seagull... waits until near the end of the game, then comes in and shits all over the field
Generic broken winged...?
Reitsma is a bird
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
Apparently Hicks offered Teixerira a 8 year
idiot
Also, is Scott Boras the most annoying motherfucker or what. I wouldn't want him anywhere near my kid.
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
When do rosters expand?
Well, so much for Sexson leaving.
Baffling
I'm not sure I understand the happiness
Sure we didn't trade any of our top prospects, but we still have the dead weight of Sexson and Ibanez and Ho-Ram, so while its good that Jones and Wlad are still in the organization, this team didn't do anything to make the chances of the post season any better.
Who was available that was better
I don't know who was available
matter of fact it was something everyone used to blow a gasket over when we were in the middle of that hot streak in the early 2000's.
Now we're elated by not making deadline moves to improve the club?
by MfaninAlaska on Jul 31, 2007 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Can you assure us
No More then you can
I'm not saying we needed to gut the farm system for a mediocre player... heck I'm not even saying there was a deal that would have made sense to improve the club.
But doing nothing and being happy about doesn't make sense either, when your club has the chance to make the playoffs but as quite a few obvious flaws to it.
by MfaninAlaska on Jul 31, 2007 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions
So what could we have gotten?
You also have to think of marginal utility. How much better does Al Reyes make us? Or Matt Morris? Or Mark Loretta? How many extra ballgames does one of those guys win you? Do these guys help you beyond this season? Will you have to eat a large contract in subsequent years, for a guy who may go from helping you now (maybe) to being a Raul-like liability in a year or two? And is that worth punting a #2 or #3 prospect, or any key prospect that likely covers a need in 1-2 years?
You have to think a little deeper about this stuff. Ye,s the M's have oles. That doesn't mean a trade would have necessarily filled them, or done so without creating new holes, if not now then in the future.
I don't have to think
And for this team, when its making a push, to do absolutely nothing just leaves everything at status quo like it was back in the day when Lou was here and we were all complaining about Stand Pat not doing diddly squat to push this team to the playoffs.
Would someone like Reyes have helped this team win a few extra ballgames? We'll never know because nothing happened to bring in any talent. Even if they brought him in and he'd helped put one more win in the win column vs. the status quo could have meant the differnece between the playoffs or not.
Again, I don't know what was available and what was being asked for, just as much as anyone else doesn't know that we overpaid, the fact is, we did nothing, so we don't know what we could have had and what we would have paid for it, other then the rumors that were out there.
The fact is, this year's team is no different now, and has no better chance of reaching the playoffs then it did yesterday or last month.
Not trading a bunch for very little is something to be happy about.... doing absolutely nothing is not something to be happy about.
by MfaninAlaska on Jul 31, 2007 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions
If that's the case
Then you should be ecstatic that the M's did nothing. There were no good rent-a-players available, and the only M's players with trade value are guys I wouldn't want to trade during a pennant race - which, oddly enough, we're in.
Sometimes, nothing's as good as something.
I, too, care about this season
We already know that Reyes would have been redundant and completely unnecessary. Loretta? Was he going to help us at all? Not likely. Unless we were somehow going to get someone like Dunn, there just wasn't anybody worth having.
As for the team not being better than yesterday, I don't really care. If you add a Reyes or a Loretta, you're still not any better than you were yesterday, and you've given up a chip that may help you in the future.
Addicted to Quack SBN's Oregon Ducks Blog
I'd say...
Not all deadlines are created equal.
Do you honestly think anybody wants Sexson
And there just wasn't anybody out there worth getting that made sense.
No one was taking Sexson, Ibañez or HoRam
There just wasn't a good deal to be made that didn't involve a disproportionately high sacrifice. I for one am glad the M's didn't bother.

by 












