A Challenge
Let's cut through all the bullshit for a minute.
-Carlos Silva is an average pitcher, and nothing more
-Carlos Silva is an improvement
-Carlos Silva's contract isn't a good one
-Carlos Silva's contract isn't going to cripple the team on its own
There. This isn't a genius way of addressing a roster that we all want to see contend next year, but it's better than trading nigh everything we have in the upper levels for two years of Erik Bedard (which, granted, may still happen). So it could've been worse.
With that out of the way...
In 2008, the Mariners will be paying ~$51m to the likes of Richie Sexson, Carlos Silva, Jarrod Washburn, Miguel Batista, and Jose Vidro.
Identify any other non-Yankees teams who will be spending that much (gross or by proportion) on such a thoroughly mediocre group of players, and report back on how well they're doing.
Use this as your salary resource.
0 recs |
85
comments
Comments
Why just baseball?
Favor the Bold
by IcebreakerX on Dec 21, 2007 1:06 AM PST 0 recs
You're right.
by Jeff on
Dec 21, 2007 1:13 AM PST
up
0 recs
Jerome James
by Slica on
Dec 21, 2007 1:20 AM PST
up
0 recs
Ugh....
by Ben in Va on
Dec 21, 2007 6:35 AM PST
up
0 recs
Foyle and Brian Grant in the NBA say hi
by kentroyals5 on
Dec 21, 2007 10:00 AM PST
up
0 recs
And 100% of the New York Knicks
by pdb on
Dec 21, 2007 10:13 AM PST
up
0 recs
Any white boy who wins a McDonald's
by bpdawg24 on
Dec 21, 2007 10:39 AM PST
up
0 recs
It's a tough one
Delgado, who did not put up great numbers last year at .258/.333/.448 ($16M)
Pedro Martinez, injured most of '07 with poor numbers in '06 ($11M)
Moises Alou, in his age 41 year, can only play half the time even if he does hit .341/.392/.524 like he did last year ($7.5M)
Orlando Hernandez ($6.5M), increasing his walks from '06 to '07 despite about 10 fewer IP, in his age 42 season according to BBReferece.
Luis Castillo ($6M), who had a lower OPS in '07 than our own Jose "Turbo" Vidro.
That rounds out to $50M, which is close to the M's fab five, but I'm not sure what to make of Alou's half-time and Pedro's injuries.
by tworsandtwols on Dec 21, 2007 1:14 AM PST 0 recs
Good guess
by Gomez on
Dec 21, 2007 7:21 AM PST
up
0 recs
Delgado was plan A for Sexson, but...
Sexson's going to be given $14M this year and his deal is done.
Delgado's OPS, last 3 yrs: .981, .909, .781
Sexson's: .910, .842, .694
In retrospect, whose deal do you take?
by tworsandtwols on
Dec 21, 2007 1:12 PM PST
up
0 recs
That doesn't really tell the whole story
I'd much rather have Delgado. Especially with his being a lefty.
by Jeff on
Dec 21, 2007 1:16 PM PST
up
0 recs
CS52
Carlos Silva 52?
by tkballer22 on Dec 21, 2007 1:27 AM PST 0 recs
Um
by Gomez on
Dec 21, 2007 7:16 AM PST
up
0 recs
//Channels Vada Sultenfuss...
by PositivePaul on
Dec 21, 2007 8:52 AM PST
up
0 recs
ChiSox
Some are debateable. Buehrle isn't that great, Thome is old and injury prone, Dye is declining, Contreras sucks and AJ isn't that great.
The answer: not well.
Tigers:
Rodriguez (13), Guillen (12), Willis (6.45), Rogers (8), Jones (7), Inge (6.2), total of 52
Pudge is declining, Guillen doesn't hold as much value at 1st IMO, Willis sucks, Rogers is old and injury prone, Jones isn't that great and Inge is all D and likely a backup now.
The answer: Better than us
Giants:
Zito (14.5), Rowand (~12), Winn (8), Durham (7.5), Roberts (6.5) for ~48.5. You could add in Vizquel and Molina and take out Rowand for about the same figure
Result: shit
Angels:
Anderson (12), Garland (12), Matthews (9), Speier (4.75), Figgins (4.75), Shields (4.25) for 46.75
This one is pretty arguable, I'll admit, but you could potentially argue for Hunter being included.
Result: Better than us
Dodgers:
Schmidt (12), Kuroda (12 (including 7 mill bonus)), Kent (11.5), Garciaparra (8.5), Pierre (8) for 52
Result: probably the same or slightly better
So that's 5 teams that have about the same collection of talent for the same price, with two doing well because of good investments and prospects, two doing poorly for shitty investments and one doing average. Texas is in this field in 09 with Young's deal starting and Houston, Philly and the Cubs are in the periphery
That was probably more work than it was worth. Don't be too harsh.
by Mariner John on Dec 21, 2007 1:58 AM PST 0 recs
I thought about SF
by tworsandtwols on
Dec 21, 2007 2:02 AM PST
up
0 recs
Paying for star level production is not a problem
The Seattle group is the worst.
by G_ on
Dec 21, 2007 10:18 AM PST
up
0 recs
Thome? Rowand? Figgins? Guillen?
by Jeff on
Dec 21, 2007 10:55 AM PST
up
0 recs
Like I said
by Mariner John on
Dec 22, 2007 1:23 AM PST
up
0 recs
The Cubs spring to mind immediately.
by TIF on Dec 21, 2007 6:00 AM PST 0 recs
I am getting used to being mocked
"Well, it occurs to me that if Silva is worth ... worth ... forty ... I can't even type it into my laptop. My hands shake. Anyway, if he got that much, then Johan Santana's value just shot out of the stratosphere and into orbit."
by KC on Dec 21, 2007 6:00 AM PST 0 recs
Anybody know
Is this just a matter of Notre Dame hype and the fact that the Cubs had to pry him away from football? I have to give him credit for one thing, though: He has an amazingly ridiculous fan website.
by Nadingo on Dec 21, 2007 7:07 AM PST 0 recs
I'm pretty sure
by bluemax on
Dec 21, 2007 11:44 PM PST
up
0 recs
The Mariners must make
by Gomez on Dec 21, 2007 7:22 AM PST 0 recs
Ridiculous
At first I thought he was talking about Bedard, but after rereading this he was indeed talking about Silva. A man with a career opponent batting average of .299 "gets American League hitters out." A guy who the league hit .324 against (with a 5.94 ERA) in 2006, "gets American League hitters out."
GIVE ME A BREAK!!!
Here's a good breakdown of how the M's rotation compares to the league avg: http://marinerlog.blogspot.com/2007/12/whats-good.html
by PP on Dec 21, 2007 8:55 AM PST 0 recs
Maybe he just meant
by pdb on
Dec 21, 2007 8:56 AM PST
up
0 recs
Even better!
We wanted to add some power to the rotation.
Silva. Power.
One of those things is NOT like the other...
by PositivePaul on
Dec 21, 2007 9:01 AM PST
up
0 recs
Power!
by PP on Dec 21, 2007 9:09 AM PST 0 recs
Okay, how about Boston?
Varitek: 9m
Julio Lugo:9m
Dice K: 8m (not counting posting fees)
Then you add the bench and some so-so guys:
Covelli (!) Crisp: 4.75m (great defense, but expensive for a glove) Alex Cora: 2m.
Then after that I'm realizing it's not as bad as it looked at first glance. Still, some of those contracts would kill other teams.
by Thingray on Dec 21, 2007 10:43 AM PST 0 recs
I think the posting fee should count for DiceK
I don't care if it "comes from a different budget" or whatever, Daisuke cost the Sox 103M for a 5 year contract.
by Matthew on
Dec 21, 2007 10:52 AM PST
up
0 recs
I agree, it should be taken into consideration.
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 10:55 AM PST
up
0 recs
Posting fee
Drew: 14m
Varitek: 9m
Lugo: 9m
Dice-K: 18m
Which adds up to a nice round 50 million for those 4 players. Unfortunately, when you add in Dice-K's posting fee, the Sox are spending like $160 million next year, so you take away that $50 mil and you're left with roughly the M's payroll. When you've got that kind of money to throw around, you can afford more mistakes.
by TheOptimist on
Dec 21, 2007 4:25 PM PST
up
0 recs
Hmmm
$13m to Tejada
$6.25m to Woody Williams
$5m to Kaz Matsui
That's much less than the M's have tied up in mediocrity, but their payroll is lower (not THAT much lower) and that's pretty damned mediocre.
St.L have:
$12m to Scott Rolen
$10.5m to Chris Carpenter
$6.5m to Juan Encarnacion
$6.5m to Mark Mulder
$5m to Joel Pineiro
$3.5m to Adam Kennedy
$2.3m to Player A
$2.25m to Ryan Franklin
That's a total of $48.55 for a bunch of ex-stars and ex-M's, out of a total payroll of $90.3m (2007 figure). That's well over 50%, whereas the M's total is just shy of that.
Cardinals 'win.'
by marc w on Dec 21, 2007 11:05 AM PST 0 recs
I know : (
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:10 AM PST
up
0 recs
That's pretty good.
The bottom line being, bad teams have money tied up in mediocre players.
by Jeff on
Dec 21, 2007 11:15 AM PST
up
0 recs
oh yeah, Texas
Padilla: 11
Blalock: 6
Young: 5 (jumps to 16 next year for the next 4! hahaha)
Cat: 4
Broussard: 4
that's nearly 40M of their 70M payroll. You know, frankly all of Texas is pretty mediocre.
by Matthew on
Dec 21, 2007 11:18 AM PST
up
0 recs
Michael Young
by Graham on
Dec 21, 2007 11:19 AM PST
up
0 recs
Worst contract in the division.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:22 AM PST
up
0 recs
Barry Zito.
This seems like it needs a new entry.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:29 AM PST
up
0 recs
If a player just sucks (Zito)
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 11:37 AM PST
up
0 recs
Disagree.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:40 AM PST
up
0 recs
Was he that bad before he was injured?
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 11:41 AM PST
up
0 recs
That's WITH the A-Rod subsidy coming off the books
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:23 AM PST
up
0 recs
2006 was the luckyest season ever
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:21 AM PST
up
0 recs
The thing about the Cards though
Whatever's left of Scott Rolen will still be getting paid, as will Mulder/Encarnacion/Carpenter, all of whom are coming off of serious injuries.
Then, you've got the escalators on Pineiro's deal (mmmphrphHA HA HA HA!) and another year of Franklin.
Wow. They better hope Reyes figures some shit out, that Rasmus is ready quickly and that Ankiel's fairy tale isn't over.
by marc w on
Dec 21, 2007 11:24 AM PST
up
0 recs
Encarnacion is (literally) finished. Can't see.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:29 AM PST
up
0 recs
I thought I'd heard that but didn't know if it
What's up with Mulder? Any word on how his second rotator cuff surgery went?
You've got a lot of faith in CC, which is fine - and yes, TJ surgery is generally easier to recover from (somewhere Jesse Foppert is banging his head against a wall), but I'm not sure about a guy who's got both a surgically repaired shoulder AND elbow. He may in fact return some value in 08, but the fact that he's under contract for three more years would really scare me.
by marc w on
Dec 21, 2007 11:32 AM PST
up
0 recs
I've lived through the mark Mulder
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:37 AM PST
up
0 recs
Encarnacion is (literally) finished. Can't see. ??
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 11:38 AM PST
up
0 recs
Line drive to the face.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:42 AM PST
up
0 recs
Here we go:
On August 31, Encarnacion was struck in the face by a foul ball hit by Aaron Miles while he was on the on-deck circle. Encarnacion suffered multiple fractures to his left eye socket and an injury to his left eye and missed the remainder of the 2007 season. [7] The injury was regarded by the Cardinals' head team physician, Dr. George Paletta, to be the the worst injury he'd ever seen to the face on a baseball player. The future of Encarnacion's career is unknown and could be in serious jeopardy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Encarnacion
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:42 AM PST
up
0 recs
Damn!!
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 11:57 AM PST
up
0 recs
He has one hell of a wiki entry
I do wish him the best, (even though getting him out of RF really helps the team).
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 12:00 PM PST
up
0 recs
He needs to learn to duck:
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 12:02 PM PST
up
0 recs
About the funds....
by PositivePaul on
Dec 21, 2007 11:47 AM PST
up
0 recs
I miss 2000-2005.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:53 AM PST
up
0 recs
It's worse
$4.25 to Tony LaRussa
$3.5 to Braden Looper
That bumps the total closer to $50m.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:26 AM PST
up
0 recs
Yeah
3.5 to Braden Looper isn't a terrible deal. Or is he hurt or something?
by marc w on
Dec 21, 2007 11:29 AM PST
up
0 recs
just plain sucks
Not a bad deal, but there are guys just like him in the minors that can suck for free. He's their Chris Reitsma.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:31 AM PST
up
0 recs
He's been solid out of the pen
by marc w on
Dec 21, 2007 11:33 AM PST
up
0 recs
Have you seen that rotation?
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:35 AM PST
up
0 recs
He did?
125 ERA+, 3.33 FIP, fairly standard LOB%. That's pretty good. Maybe not amazing, but I'd take that.
by marc w on
Dec 21, 2007 11:45 AM PST
up
0 recs
He gave up a lot of hits
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:52 AM PST
up
0 recs
Giving up a lot of hits
Low K's, low walks, GB tendencies, not a bad contract... again, I don't think it's a crippler, and I don't think he sucked in 2006.
He wasn't good in 2007, but for 3.5m, he's not exactly the problem.
by marc w on
Dec 21, 2007 1:12 PM PST
up
0 recs
I can't figure out what the Astros are doing.
And wow, the Cards really are throwing a good chunk of their payroll at bad and/or questionable players.
We think we have it bad, but there are many people in other cities who have to feel the same way. Of course, even Yankee and BoSox fans are never happy.
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 11:30 AM PST
up
0 recs
They are in complete win now mode.
by JI on
Dec 21, 2007 11:34 AM PST
up
0 recs
Win now??
by Thingray on
Dec 21, 2007 11:40 AM PST
up
0 recs


