Because This Needs A Thread
I promised myself I wouldn't get caught up in all this, but, well, yeah. It's Manny freaking Ramirez, for God's sake. You can only stay composed for so long.
0 recs |
134 comments
Comments
It must be asked
Do we want his bat? Hell YEAH we do. Do we want his nightmarishly bad defense in LF? Not so much.
by Gomez on Dec 4, 2006 7:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
For one thing
For another, who knows, maybe he'd DH.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 7:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Perhaps the Mannyisms we all remember (notably the cleats getting caught in the grass on the sliding catch in the 2004 playoffs(?) and his role in the Beltre inside the park HR) are simply isolated incidents
He's also supposed to have a gun out there, but this too may be boosted by playing in front of the monster
by DCMariner on Dec 4, 2006 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sexson, Putz, AND Jones?
by I'm NOT Corco on Dec 4, 2006 7:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sexson, Putz, and Jones for Manny and Lowry?
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 7:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He can't be that much worse than raul
by tkjinak on Dec 4, 2006 7:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I would have thought . ..
I have to ask if one could envision a better trade that involved Putz. It would seem logical that other teams would line up to top each other's offer.
by eknpdx on Dec 4, 2006 7:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Giving up Putz?
by anotherjeff on Dec 4, 2006 7:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If Putz is gone, then Soriano simply becomes
Yeah, he wouldn't be as awesome and as dominating as Putz, but Manny's walks and bombs would more than make up for that.
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 7:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny would be awesome...
I'm not sure I want to see that much more of Mateo.
by Happybelly on Dec 4, 2006 7:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It wouldn't be crippled.
Plus, if there's one things the Mariners have shown they are good at, it's finding good relievers. And there is help on the way in the minors.
It's well worth it.
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 8:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure how solid it would be
I do agree that they've been good at finding relievers and do have some solid arms in the minors.
I would probably do the deal, Manny is too good to pass up. I just hate losing JJ.
by Happybelly on Dec 4, 2006 8:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good points
I would love to see Huber get more high leverage innings, but we know they will go to Mateo.
If Raffy went down, I would assume Sherrill would step in.
by MFAN on Dec 4, 2006 8:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We still have Sherrill
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If there's one thing I've learned...
Fruto will be better than he was. Feierabend could be eased into the rotation by starting in the 'pen. Lowe could return. There's a ton of options for filling out those innings. Losing Putz would definitely hurt. But for the gain of Manny, it's a no-brainer for me...
by PositivePaul on Dec 4, 2006 8:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ho. Ly. Cow.
That would make me a very happy camper. Of course, I'd like to keep Reed around as Ichiro flight insurance. And that would make Broussard the first baseman, likely.
Fill a hole in the rotation, getting some trade value out of our bullpen stockpile, and swapping a semi-star with a HOFer would be a HUGE step forward for Seattle.
by PositivePaul on Dec 4, 2006 7:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'd do it
If we get Lowry I'd do that. As much as we love JJ, Soriano can step into the closers role with a pretty low drop off from Putz. And like everyone has said...its Manny!!
This would all be so much easier if Lowe was healthy.
by MFAN on Dec 4, 2006 8:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
but just think
4 years from now though, they might be pretty chipper about their CF Jones who is hitting 35 home runs every year.
by LC on Dec 4, 2006 10:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good point
actually if he just gets us to the playoffs I wont complain.
by MFAN on Dec 4, 2006 10:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Evem if it's a good deal
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 8:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
I'm not even sure if I'd take Manny for free if it meant four-year guaranteed contract.
by Josh on Dec 4, 2006 8:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Are you crazy?
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 8:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, he's not.
Second question: can you think of any potential Mariner free agents who are going to make $Texas if they resign next year, considering what Juan Pierre, Brian Roberts and Gary Matthews Jr. just got?
We're gonna NEED cheap young players in the years to come if we takeon boat anchor contracts like Manny's and/or resign Ichiro. Jones
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
By that
by chrisisasavage on Dec 4, 2006 8:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the good children of Mariner slept ...
by Steve Nelson on Dec 4, 2006 8:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On the one hand
But Putz, it's just hard to lose him, especially to the Red Sox whose fans didn't even want to acknowledge his awesomeness last year. I've been a Putz fan since he was brought up (even when he was giving up gopher balls, although I never expected him to become this awesome). I just, I dunno. It'd be sickening to listen to Bill Simmons gush about Putz after insinuating he was a roider last season.
Sexson is whatever, and Jones kinda feels like the next Jose Cruz Jr to me to a degree, although he's in reality probably nothing like him.
Baseball is a funny game.
by bluemax on Dec 4, 2006 8:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I know what you mean.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny and the No-Trade Clause
Fact #2: Manny is currently guaranteed $18 million next year and $20 million in 2008. ($4 million of each salary is deferred until 2011 at the earliest). He gets $1 million if traded.
Fact #3: Manny has two club options at $20 million each for 2009 and 2010.
Manny being Manny and all, speculation has that to waive his no-trade clause Manny would require one or both club options to be picked up. Two years of Manny are great, but that third and fourth year (ages 37 and 38) don't look so hot.
by Trev on Dec 4, 2006 8:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I dunno about that.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Moving him to Safeco would be the way to do that.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny would probably survive here.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cameron still got some decent numbers in here.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cameron never hit at home.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd put him in a range from Cammy to Eric Davis.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll grant you
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Silly Duquette.
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 8:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but there's the minor matter...
This isn't a case where you're getting unexploited value. You're paying through the nose for your elite hitter.
So, OK, if this is a great deal Bavasi to make that it's very easy to see why he'll win it, why is Theo Epstein stupid enough to make it? What's his angle?
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 9:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Epstein's angle
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, duh.
If Theo wants to dump his overpaid DH to clear some salary space, he can damn well pay us for the privilege and get prime prospects, or take lesser prospects. This is ESPECIALLY true if the booby prize is Manny Ramirez cashing 20 million checks fromus at ages 37 and 38.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 9:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because Drew doesn't want to play here.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny seems to me to be one of those
Look at the numbers Edgar put up at age 37 and 38. Manny is obviously a better hitter than Edgar, so he could probably do even better than that.
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't Boston give some money though?
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Shit
That is one hell of a trade rumor.
I would hate to see Jones and Putz go, but Lowry and Manny would be a pretty sweet package.
Wow.
One question: Suppose that this package was acceptable to all parties, and the deal was waiting on the M's. Would a deal of Lowry for Sexson straight up be a better deal?
I am just wondering.
But Manny would be pretty sweet.
Also, why would Manny necessarily have to play LF for the M's at all? Couldn't they stick him at DH, move Ibanez to 1B, and have Snelling in LF? That seems like the best overall lineup to me, although it is quite righthanded.
Wow. That is a pretty crazy rumor.
Aren't the winter meetings fun? Even if this doesn't go down, it is still fun to talk about.
by Jerry on Dec 4, 2006 8:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Simple Answers to Simple Questions.
Yes.
This has been another edition of Simple Answers to Simple Questions.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sold on that.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Right...
Assuming the team signs Schmidt, we're going to have 50 million in payroll this year tied up in:
Manny Ramirez: age 35
Jason Schmidt: age 34
Ichiro Suzuki: age 33
Jarrod Washburn: age 32
Add in Beltre and Ibañez and that's 70 million, easy.
Under those circumstances, resigning Ichiro is criminally negligent for your franchise (because you'll be tying up an obscene amount of money in longterm contracts, and putting yourself at extreme risk of being the Baltimore Orioles or NY Mets of a few years ago), and you've already dumped your young CF prospect who could play cheap. And don't forget Lopez and Betancourt will want arby raises before too long as well.
The more I look at it, the more I suspect Ichiro and Manny are mutually exclusive options, unless you DON'T sign Schmidt.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a definite concern
I don't think the situation would be as dire as the Orioles' was so many years ago, but it would have to be navigated carefully, and the organization would need to be able to trust its young, cheap players to produce for a while until some of that money goes away.
At the same time, though, we're already currently paying Sexson, Ichiro, Washburn, Beltre, and Ibanez, so it's not like this is creating a whole new problem - subtract Schmidt and it's actually relieving it a little bit, since Manny's a much better investment than Sexson is.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Giving up on Schmidt
Which makes me think that the talk could be aimed more at getting Schmidt's asking price to drop than actually pulling the triggers on moving guys like Sexson, Putz, Jones, Manny.
by david h on Dec 4, 2006 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thing is...
You mean like Adam Jones? Or did you have any other cheap OF'ers in mind who look like they'll be ready in the next year or two?
Also, Manny adds at least 1 more year on top of Sexson, probably three, because he likely insists on options becoming guaranteed or vetoes a deal based on 5/10 rights (which he does have). Granted, he's a better player (which is why a deal that essentially becomes Sexson for Manny is a no-brainer for me,even with some kids involved,though extra years past 2008 make it less palatable). I'm just REALLY not interested in dumping Jones at this point, unless Manny comes with lots of cash so I can buy a replacement CF.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well hey, what about
Reed's got one foot out the door, but he's not gone yet, and he still may stick after all.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So why isn't Reed+ adequate return for Manny?
A-Rod fetched Soriano AND a bunch of cash in return, for Pete's sake, and Soriano made 7.5 million.
It sounds to me that Epstein's angle is that he thinks he's going to play therole of Branch Rickey and risk making a trade a year early instead of a year late. As such, I don't think he's paying NEARLY enough for the privilege of ridding himself of a 20+ dollar salary.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The asking price will come down.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny is...
Does this not worry anyone else? I know he's a first ballot HOF'er, but there's got to be a potential for decline, right?
Granted, he won't fall to replacement level or anything. But if he goes from amazing to just good, at the price of $20M no less, the loss of Putz and Jones will really, really hurt.
It also seems like too many eggs in one basket -- if Manny gets hurt significantly, then guess what? We gave up our best prospect, the best closer in baseball and $20M for an ass on the bench. OUCH.
ALSO, what if he walks after two years? We gave up all of that for just two years of Manny? Because honestly, I could totally see him wanting to jump into the nutso free agency waters.
by oneiric232 on Dec 4, 2006 8:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
What if Adam Jones becomes Jeremy Reed?
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 8:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of people were down on Lopez last year, too.
Like I said, go look at the contracts people have been handing out to CF's like Juan Pierre- and figure Ichiro for $15-20 million next year, easy.(Especially if Manny's making $20+ here.)
I think we'd better be thinking REALLY hard before coughing up prime prospects to Theo Epstein for a guy he tried to waive two years ago- and nobody took the bait on.
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 9:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What happened two years ago doesn't matter.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not judging him based on 100 ABs
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 9:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Then
by Josh on Dec 4, 2006 10:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have a proven player than him.
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 10:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
While
by Josh on Dec 4, 2006 10:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was being serious though
by Josh on Dec 4, 2006 10:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I only like it
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 10:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
All right
When you look at it in isolation, getting Manny for the rumored deal makes very little sense.
by Josh on Dec 4, 2006 11:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Putz
But I think that biggest loss in this deal could be Adam Jones. He is a much better prospect than people in the mainstream prospect pundits seem to acknowledge, mainly because the M's have rushed him at a breakneck pace through the minors.
Losing Putz would be a bummer, but relievers just aren't that hard to develop. At this time last year, Putz was a very mediocre pitcher.
If the M's did pull the trigger on that deal, they could probably go after a guy like Octavio Dotel to hedge their bets. He is healthy and looking for a job where he can close. Bring him in, and, with Soriano, the M's would still be OK with power relievers.
You know what? The more I think about this, the more sense it makes.
by Jerry on Dec 4, 2006 8:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
What a name
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 8:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
By the way, in case you missed it
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
One can only hope
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, they can have Jones.
Oh, don't like that, Theo? Too bad, so sad. You can have Jeremy Reed, then. Here, I'll toss in Michael Wilson, too. Or maybe you'd like Wlad Balantien?
by eponymous coward on Dec 4, 2006 8:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we come out of this
by Garces on Dec 4, 2006 8:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
BOLLOCKS!
Sexson i care snot about. Shedding his salary as part of this deal means we're effectively replacing him with Manny for two years for 4 mil more, which rocks. Then it gets expensive. But Putz? Pork that.
Adam Jones I'd rather hang on to as well, but if Putz is out of the equation I'm still ok with it.
Here's a question. All this noise about getting a HOF bat and so on and so forth. What about Bonds? He wouldn't be paid as much, and he wouldn't get more than two years, max. Now, I hate the little motherfister as much as the next guy, but if it had to be him or Manny, and Putz is gone in the Manny scenario, well, I think I'd go for Bonds.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Dec 4, 2006 8:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sure, I would too.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose
by Bearskin Rugburn on Dec 4, 2006 8:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
MANNY BEING MANNY
I really like Adam LaRoche and Noah Lowry, though.
by Deanna on Dec 4, 2006 8:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
About Noah
by Bearskin Rugburn on Dec 4, 2006 8:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Very Very Injured
Take a good look at those health reports Bavasi.
by Trev on Dec 4, 2006 9:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is all so exciting.
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 9:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Nothing's going down tonight.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If this deal does go down
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 9:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
HAHA
by Gomez on Dec 4, 2006 9:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
O RLY?
by Gomez on Dec 4, 2006 9:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know of people who don't like them at all.
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 9:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
by Slozbury Stouvre on Dec 4, 2006 10:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, they aren't in the blogging community
by Mariner John on Dec 4, 2006 10:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was a joke
by Slozbury Stouvre on Dec 5, 2006 12:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*puke*
Dear god, let it be a Boras ploy.
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 9:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 9:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you saying
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 9:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever Zito does
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 10:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jarrod Washburn syndrome
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 10:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Washburn had one good year
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 10:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty much
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 10:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I agree he's overrated, but since everyone on this market is also overrated, it's not necessarily worse than signing a guy like Schmidt.
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and you think
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 10:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Possibly
by Rollo Tomasi on Dec 4, 2006 10:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Zito is very, very overrated
That said, something working in his favor so far has been his high infield fly/fly ball rate, a function of Oakland's huge foul territory. Leaving that is going to hurt. Same with the outfield dimensions. Best-case scenario is that he's a low- to mid-4's ERA pitcher over the life of his contract.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 4, 2006 10:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well his huge curveball
THAT BEING SAID,
Zito's mean BABIP, while not .300 isn't .250, it's probably something like .280-5. And a decent portion of that is likely pitching in Oakland's vast foul territory.
You take him out of Oakland, return his BABIP to a .285-.290 rate, and drop his LOB% back to down to established levels (~71%) and you have a guy who is going ot give you an ERA closer to 5 than 4.
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 10:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That same article says the Mariners
Even if they are interested(which hopefully they aren't) they wouldn't get him anyways.
by Goose on Dec 4, 2006 9:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's probably a couple things
Boras wants to get Zito a 6 year deal. The Rangers are the only team showing some interest and Zito doesn't necessarily want to pitch there. The Mets are out for now, as are the Yankees and Dodgers. Zito's losing suitors with his stupid demands. Having an AL West competitor enter the mix might just make Texas panic and the M's might not worry about Zito going to Texas with that park and that heat.
Now ask this; at similar money and similar years, who has the better chance of posting consistent numbers?
It's smart on multiple levels for the M's to get involved.
by Trent on Dec 4, 2006 10:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
its smart if its to drive up the price for Texas
You know who had better FIPs and xFIPs than Zito? Jarrod Washburn.
Barry Zito has been sliding downhill since 2001 and the only reason his ERA hasn't followed is insanely good luck on BABIP in 2005 (.~250) followed by insanely good luck on LOB% in 2006 (78+%)
I would rather have Gil Meche over Barry Zito at similar cost and length.
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 10:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, we're on the same page
by Trent on Dec 4, 2006 10:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But
Career LOB%: 74.9
Career BABIP: .269
Years w/ BABIP over .300: 0
by david h on Dec 4, 2006 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
career numbers are far inferior
by Matthew on Dec 4, 2006 11:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
.294 73.5%
.254 80.7%
.248 71.8%
.300 71.2%
.252 72.2%
.280 78.5%
it's more like flipping a coin 700 times, getting 70% heads, and then doing 6 more sets of 700 and getting close to 70% each time. At that point, I'd consider possibility that that maybe this guy knows how to flip coins. I certainly wouldn't bet on tails.
Since Zito is inducing outs and not flipping coins, I'm even more inclined to allow that this guy knows what he's doing, since I think we can all agree a person has a better chance of beating the odds as a pitcher than as a coin flipper. We know there are people who consistently beat their peripherals (Knuckleballers, Tom Glavine), and there are people who will do worse than them (Joel Pineiro), and it is not due to luck but due to their particular skills (or lack).
I agree that Zito is not worth the boatload of mony he'll get, and am glad the Rangers might be the ones to give it to him. I just think you cannot look only at FIP and xFIP and know what a pitcher will give you.
by david h on Dec 5, 2006 2:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
guh
For reference, the following stats were brought up in this thread alone:
BB rate
K rate
HR rate
Hit rate
IF/F rate
BABIP
LOB%
EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM points to Zito
A) being mediocre/average
B) having a luck driven ERA in 2005 and 2006.
Oh, and you're BABIP data is wrong. Furthermore, Barry Zito's good BABIP years aren't even that good in context. He had fantastic defenses behind him those years. The years he didn't shock his BABIP spiked. Barry Zito beats his team average BABIP by about 5-10 points a year. That's it.
Barry Zito is not a consistent .250 BABIP guy. He's a consistent .280 BABIP guy who has played in a favorable park and in front of some favorable defenses.
by Matthew on Dec 5, 2006 10:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You can tell
by Graham on Dec 6, 2006 12:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Again, I agree that Zito is not a top shelf starter. I just think you are overstating his mediocrity, especially by focusing on peripherals over which it appears he has more control than most pitchers.
by david h on Dec 6, 2006 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What?
You know who had better FIPs and xFIPs than Zito? Jarrod Washburn.
I mean, gee, I didn't know the standard for "on and on" was so low now.
And you completely missed the point. I'm conceding Barry Zito has better BABIP and LOB% than most pitchers. You are ignoring that EVEN IF you grant him nominal improvement over standard rates there, that he still posted fluke ERA seasons in 2005 and 2006. Barry Zito is now, under normal circumstances, at best a low to mid 4 ERA pitcher.
by Matthew on Dec 6, 2006 8:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Please No
He doesn't even want to DH, so it isn't wise to pencil him in there...
He isn't likely to waive his no-trade to come here. But let's say he does, and he does so because he likes Hargrove. CRAP!, why do we want that kind of relationship? The team's biggest flake married with the manager we all want fired??!!...
No thanks.
by KC on Dec 4, 2006 9:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Zito + Broussard = guitar jamming
by Egaas on Dec 4, 2006 10:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe we can trade for Spiezio
Wait, did I just put those two in the same sentence? Pulley >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandfrog
by Slozbury Stouvre on Dec 4, 2006 10:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My man Bavasi:
by KC on Dec 4, 2006 11:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
According to Baker in the Times...
Try Putz, Jones AND Clement.
AND a pony.
And the source code to Windows Vista.
Clearly Theo wants to see who's going to fall for this. No thanks.
by eponymous coward on Dec 5, 2006 1:32 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Woa, now we're crossing the line.
The price either has to come down, or he isn't going anywhere.
by Goose on Dec 5, 2006 1:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Swap Clement with Rob Johnson
by BrettJMiller on Dec 5, 2006 2:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Clement is probably the player they want the most.
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 5, 2006 8:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NOOOOOOOOO
by Deanna on Dec 5, 2006 2:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 5, 2006 7:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
M's arent giving up Clement
by phil333 on Dec 5, 2006 8:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
by PositivePaul on Dec 5, 2006 8:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rotoworld says Sexson AND Beltre offered for Manny
The report states that the Dodgers are willing to part with Brad Penny and two prospects, while the Mariners have offered both Richie Sexson and Adrian Beltre. There's little chance of the Red Sox taking back both players from the Mariners, but they could conceivably take one along with J.J. Putz.
Source: ESPN Deportes
I can't imagine Boston having a need for Sexson but with Lowell getting old it's not hard to imagine them coveting Beltre...
Given that our current back-up third baseman is Willie Boom-Boom I'm feeling somewhat worried at this present moment.
by Alex B on Dec 6, 2006 9:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but Putz and Sexson?
I'm having trouble believing this. It doesn't make sense for the Red Sox.
by Jeff Sullivan on Dec 6, 2006 9:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














