Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Release Point & Joel Pineiro

One of the most frustrating things about developing a new study is that you don't have any kind of baseline to which you can compare your initial results. So, when I attempted to quantify Felix's release point a few days ago, I thought the resulting data was interesting, but, lacking numbers for other pitchers, I had no way to know for sure.

So I got to thinking. And, as is usually the case when I'm thinking about something difficult and Mariner-related, I asked Dave what he thought. His suggestion: look at Joel. The Mariners were playing around with his mechanics all year, so if anyone was going to turn up some interesting results, it'd be him.

And so I looked at Joel.

Series of pictures and numerical analysis below. The methodology is the same as it was for Felix, only this time I looked at three starts instead of one - April 15th, May 24th, September 22nd. Remember, the release point dimensions listed represent 95% confidence intervals.

Star-divide

4/15, FASTBALL

4.6x4.1 in., 20.3 square inches (area)

4/15, BREAKING BALL

7.5x5.4 in., 40.4 square inches (area)

4/15, OVERALL

4.0x3.2 in., 12.7 square inches (area)

5/24, FASTBALL

3.7x3.2 in., 11.8 square inches (area)

5/24, BREAKING BALL

4.3x1.8 in., 7.7 square inches (area)

5/24, OVERALL

2.8x1.6 in., 4.5 square inches (area)

9/22, FASTBALL

3.2x2.5 in., 8.1 square inches (area)

9/22, BREAKING BALL

5.1x4.7 in., 24.2 square inches (area)

9/22, OVERALL

3.7x3.4 in., 12.5 square inches (area)

FOR FELIX:

Fastball: 4.9x2.6 in., 13.0 square inches (area)
Breaking Ball: 4.0x2.4 in., 11.0 square inches (area)
Overall: 3.0x1.6 in., 4.8 square inches (area)

----------

What I'm most interested in is that last number - by finding the area of the box formed by the overall x,y 95% confidence intervals, we can get a real good idea of the variability of a guy's release point. So, let's just look at those:

Felix, 10/2: 4.8 square inches
Joel, 4/15: 12.7
Joel, 5/24: 4.5
Joel, 9/22: 12.5

In two of the three games I studied, Joel had nearly three times as much release point variability as Felix - which makes sense, because Felix is awesome, Joel isn't, and release point plays a large role in that. This is valuable information to have, because now I can go forward knowing that I'm not wasting my time with this stuff, that even on the Major League level, there is some significant degree of inconsistency.

But look at the May 24th number. You may recall that, after that game, I criticized Joel's mechanics and Dave criticized his release point. As it turns out, he was a little more consistent than Felix. What does this mean?

Go back and read Dave's post again. I'm going to quote (at some length) the relevant bits:

In the first inning, Pineiro was clearly attempting to get more velocity on the ball. Brian Roberts led off the game and saw a 91 MPH fastball up and away, with Pineiro clearly releasing the ball early. The second pitch was nearly identical, a 90 MPH fastball away. The third pitch was a 91 MPH fastball that Pineiro was able to get into the strike zone and actually released the ball at a semi-normal time in his delivery.

He then faced rookie Jeff Fiorentino, and the mechanics went to hell again. Early release, fastball up and away. Early release, fastball up. Early release, curveball up. Early release, fastball away. Four pitch walk.

He wasn't "missing his spots". From when he released the ball, it had no chance of being a strike. His fastball was getting out of his hand before his body was in proper position at least 60 percent of the time.

Pineiro had more success with the curveball, allowing his body to rotate before letting the pitch fly, but even still, he was early at least a quarter of the time. Whether it was a clear revelation that his release point was more consistent on the offspeed stuff than with his fastball or not, he threw significantly more of them as the game went on.

Main points: (1) Joel's breaking ball release point was more consistent than that of his fastball, and (2) he repeatedly released his heaters early.

What do the numbers bear out? As far as point #1 is concerned, Dave was right - Joel's release point was more consistent when he threw breaking balls, as you can gather from looking at the confidence interval areas listed above (7.7 square inches for the breaking ball, 11.8 for the fastball).

But point #2 brings up something that bears mentioning - release point consistency is good and everything, but if you're consistently releasing the ball in the wrong place, then you're screwed, because you won't be able to throw strikes. Understand that what I'm doing isn't at all a measure of release point quality. Studying something like that would require very specific knowledge of where a guy's trying to throw the ball and how much his pitches tend to break, which is just impossible. All we can do is point out how often a guy lets go of the ball within a certain area. Joel's fastball release point against Baltimore on May 24th was awful, way early, but it was consistent, which makes it look good in the numbers.

It's also worth mentioning that this is only a 2-D analysis; we can't really be sure about the z-axis location of a ball upon release, because all we're given is an image from behind a pitcher's back. So, again, we can look at how consistently a guy releases the ball within an x,y plane, but the only way we can know if he released too early or held on too long is to watch where the pitch ends up.

One last thing before I finish: look at the September 22nd game against Toronto. Not only was Joel inconsistent with his breaking ball release point, but further analsis of the numbers reveals that his curveballs and fastballs were released at significantly different (95% confidence) points. If the batters were able to pick up on this - and we're talking a matter of inches, here - it would go a long way towards explaining why he got lit up for seven runs that day.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What would be interesting to me...
Jeff, perhaps you could look at those games where Joel did well and use the release point box in those games as an 'ideal' fit for where Joel should be releasing the ball.  Then you can plot the variability of how a pitchers release point changes from game to game.  A lot of work, but that would be interesting to me.

Anyway, I think it'd be a great project to come up with a software program to take the work out of coming up with these plots.  This is immensely entertaining stuff, but can you imagine if we could plot the release point for a pitcher across seasons?

by manyoso on Nov 20, 2005 12:29 PM PST reply actions  

As nice as that would be...
I'm having a ton of trouble trying to adjust for different camera angles between different games. Plus, it's a friggin' lot of work. This post alone took six hours.

It'd be great if someone took this idea and decided to develop a way to automate it. I don't have the knowhow, though.

by Jeff Sullivan on Nov 20, 2005 1:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Jeff
You are the man. Thank you for giving me a reason think about the Mariners after a horrible season.

Side note - do you have the link to the new win probability numbers you said you would use starting this year?

by phil333 on Nov 20, 2005 2:25 PM PST reply actions  

a question
It seems to me that if a release point is off but consistent, that is a more "fixable" problem.  If they are just are all over the place, it would seem that would take a lot more effort to fix that.  Can anybody with more in depth knowledge than me confirm this?

by gumbostu on Nov 20, 2005 3:25 PM PST reply actions  

I lack in-depth knowledge
But my guess is that the pitching coach should work with the pitcher on making the mechanics more consistent, then on releasing the ball at the same point during release.

by Gomez on Nov 20, 2005 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Re: a question
I'd say it's actually the other way around. If you have a consistently bad release point, then those mechanics are rather firmly engrained in your muscle memory. That takes a lot of work to overcome. On the other hand, if your release point is all over the place, then that indicates that you haven't committed to a single delivery yet, meaning that there's less prior technique to correct.

by Jeff Sullivan on Nov 20, 2005 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

RE
If you learn the mechanics wrong, you have to unlearn it before you get to where you started from.

by Graham MacAree on Nov 20, 2005 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

This is fun
Jeff, I previously mentioned it may be interesting to see this tool used on Jeff Weaver - who I believe would fit in well behind Felix on the M's staff, at an "affordable" price.  But, if it takes 6 hours to complete the work on one pitcher, sheesh, I won't be pushy!
It is fun to look at and read through.  Would be really interesting if this developed into a valuable scouting tool down the road.

by KC @ Lookout Landing on Nov 20, 2005 9:03 PM PST reply actions  

How do Camera Angles affect data?
Hi Jeff,

Great work.  I wonder how much camera angles and positions affect the data.  I know you are adjusting for that within each game, but what about comparing one game to another?

I started this comment to ask if you could compare the release points between games--that might show that Pineiro's release point in the May game was indeed consistenly early, or at least consistently off from his usual delivery.

So I started playing around with the photos on this posting in photoshop, and noticed that the camera angles for the first and last games are fairly similar, but the May game camera is much closer to dead center.

Thinking more about it, if the centerfield camera is more off center, you're going to be closer to looking at Pineiro from the side (incorporating that z-axis).  It makes sense that the less you see from the side, the less of a z-axis component is in your data.  Taking away that z-axis data would naturally cause a smaller variance.

The one problem with this theory is that it seems like moving the camera more off center would create more oblong boxes that are wider than they are tall--you'd be capturing more of Pineiro's forward arm movement--but the opposite is true of your analysis.  The game with the more on-center camera has wider boxes.

(I can email you the photos that would demonstrate graphically what I'm talking about, fi you like.)

by poorartists on Nov 21, 2005 6:48 AM PST reply actions  

To compare between games
I think I'd have to stick with Seattle broadcasts of home games, since they use the same camera angle. On the road, I don't have much trouble figuring out the angle the camera makes with home plate (relative to a straight line pointing from home to the mound), but I just can't really wrap my head around the kind of universal adjustmend I'd have to make. I'm sure there's a way, but I'm not getting it yet.

by Jeff Sullivan on Nov 21, 2005 7:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Why it's hard to compare game-to-game
If anyone wants to better understand what I'm talking about, I've posted a composite image, along with an explanation, that helps show why comparing game-to-game is difficult.

http://poorartists.blogspot.com/2005/11/tracking-pineiros-mechanics.html

by poorartists on Nov 21, 2005 9:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Thanks.
That explains my dilemma a hell of a lot better than words ever could.

I don't know what it is, but I'm a sucker for superimposed baseball images.

by Jeff Sullivan on Nov 21, 2005 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
Everything I Know About Jesus Montero

Recent FanPosts

Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
OTDOD - Early February Edition
Agentejebaox3_small
A Statistical Analysis of Mariners' Fan Support
Small
Who will have a better season?
Claw_small
BA's Top 10 M's Prospects
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Munenori Kawasaki Predictions!!!
Small
The Longevity and Future Success of Felix Hernandez.
Small
The present vs future conundrum

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew