Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Felix Hernandez & A New Approach To Studying Release Point

I love a lot of things. Talking about Felix Hernandez and analyzing pitching mechanics are two of them. Now, combining two things you love into one isn't guaranteed to produce something you'll love even more (like, say, a peanut butter and golf ball sandwich), but I think this might be one of the cases where it works out pretty well.

People who've read this site for, well, about a day know that every so often, I'll take some screenshots of pitchers from MLB.tv footage and break them down if I think I'll find something interesting. It's a pretty good way to spot mechanical flaws, but one of its shortcomings is that it's difficult to study release point consistency, because to do so you'd have to look at a group of images from different pitches and try to eyeball whether or not the ball is being released in the same place. It's a tedious, inexact procedure that isn't really worth the effort.

Well, yesterday I was feeling a little adventurous. Maybe it was the high I got from posting the Burnett piece, since talking about delivery always makes me feel all warm and fuzzy, but I thought to myself, "to hell with eating, I'm going to figure out a way to study release points." After a little brainstorming, I came up with my procedure.

Take this screengrab of Felix, just prior to release:

The ball's a little fuzzy, but you can still see it - it's definitely there, in his hand, about to fly forward towards the plate. Now here's the cool part: copy that picture into MS Paint and move your cursor over the center of the ball in the picture. On the bottom of the screen, towards the right, you'll get a set of coordinates - for me, it reads 472,325. Think of this like a set of coordinates on any generic x,y plot. The center of the ball is 472 x units (pixels?) from the left, and 325 y units from the top.

The plan, then: get a bunch of screenshots of Felix just prior to release, find those coordinates for the center of the ball in each picture, then put them into a spreadsheet to analyze for variation. Ideally, I'd be able to end up with a few neat little 95% confidence intervals for Felix's release point.

(I realize that reading the methodology is less than invigorating, but bear with me.)

Note that:

  1. I analyzed Felix's release point for 9 fastballs and 10 curveballs separately first, then as a group.
  2. I only chose images from one game (the last of the season, vs. Oakland) so that I wouldn't have to account for significant differences in center field camera angle.
  3. The 9 fastballs and 10 curveballs were chosen randomly (I had 10 fastball pictures, but deleted one because the image sucked, and I didn't really feel like going back and replacing it with a new one).
  4. To account for any differences in camera angle and image scale, I chose two reference points (opposite corners of home plate) and made an adjustment accordingly.
  5. Once I had 95% confidence intervals in x,y units, I converted to inches by using the fact that the diamater of a baseball is about 3 inches in real life and 11 units on the screen. Simple multiplication and division.
Results:

FASTBALL

The red(dish) box around the ball represents the 95% release point confidence interval - based on the collected data, Felix will release 95% of his fastballs with the center of the ball somewhere within that box. The dimensions of said box: 4.9 by 2.6 inches.

CURVEBALL

Same deal - red box=confidence interval. 95% of the time, Felix will release a curveball with the center of the ball somewhere within a 4 by 2.4 inch box.

FASTBALL AND CURVEBALL TOGETHER

The box is smaller because the sample pool is larger - now I'm going by the total sum of 19 pitches. Based on this data, the center of the ball when Felix throws either a fastball or curveball will be released somewhere within a 3 by 1.6 inch box 95% of the time.

Now, without a baseline or league average, we can't really say for sure whether or not Felix's release points are picture perfect or wildly inconsistent. However, imagine if you will a box that's 3 inches by 1.6 inches - just going by things I have around me right now, I'd say that's roughly the size of a cell phone. With 95% of his fastballs/curveballs, Felix releases the ball somewhere within an area the size of a cell phone. That's seems incredibly consistent to me, and probably serves to explain in no small part why Felix's control was so good when he was promoted to Seattle.

Something else of note - Felix's curveball release point was a little more consistent than that of his fastball. Again, it's a limited data sample, but that seems to support the prevailing notion that the heater isn't Felix's best pitch.

Have I mentioned recently that Felix Hernandez is totally awesome?

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Just think
Of what you could do in the M's video lab....

Great work again, one of the reasons why I love this site.

by Grubbie on Nov 17, 2005 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

So I guess the question is...
have you eaten something yet and how does this compare to other pitchers on the M's staff, say Matt Thornton?

by basebliman on Nov 17, 2005 11:04 AM PST reply actions  

Re: So I guess the question is...
I had a muffin and several coffees. And it's all coming right back up if you make me spend more time watching Matt Thornton pitch.

Seriously though, that's something I intend to get around to, although this obviously isn't something I can just hammer out on impulse whenever I feel like it. It's a new field for me (for all of us, actually), and it takes a long time. But analyzing Thornton's release point would give us a pretty good idea of what a "worst-case scenario" looks like, so it'd definitely be worthwhile.

by Jeff Sullivan on Nov 17, 2005 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Challenging...
You must also have keen hand-eye coordination for precise freeze-framing.  I'm not familiar with the specifics of MLBTV, but I am quite familiar with the art of screen capture and digital imaging, and from what I know, capturing screens to take measurements for calculation could be quite challenging.  It impresses me equally that you were able to figure out a way to rub out that variable, as well as the result of Felix's consistent numbers...

by PositivePaul on Nov 17, 2005 11:12 AM PST reply actions  

MS Paint.....
I can barely draw a smiley face in MS Paint, and Jeff is analyzing release points.
Mariner Magic http://www.marinermagic.blogspot.com/

by BaltimoreMarinersFan on Nov 17, 2005 11:48 AM PST reply actions  

Also totally awesome...
Is your idea of delta-ing the release point.

I'll bet you that Gil Meche shows differences in release point that allow the hitters to read the pitches.  The batters just very seldom seem "caught in between" when reacting to Gil's pitches.

The older I get, the more I think that "tipping" via the release point has more and more to do with the difference between a Gil Meche and an AJ Burnett, a Barry Zito or ... somebody lesser.

Some pitchers, the hitters just seem to be able to read them early; other pitchers, the hitters don't read them until way too late.

by DrDetecto on Nov 17, 2005 12:19 PM PST reply actions  

Classic example BTW...
Is George Sherrill.

He fans 10, 11 men per nine innings, and doesn't really do anything much ;-) except hide the ball well.

When hitters can't read the ball by the time the pitcher is about to release, they've got little chance.

by DrDetecto on Nov 17, 2005 12:21 PM PST reply actions  

Do Gil Do Gil Do Gil!!!!
While I think it would be informative to do Matt "Wild Thing" Thornton, I think a better study would be Meche.   For one thing I think the camera is always over the right shoulder so it would be significantly different angle for a leftie.  Also I think Meche and Hernandez have similar pitches (I think off the top of my head) although with dramatically different results.  Or maybe analyze one of Felixes wild days.  After you eat of course.  

Good work

by dahut on Nov 17, 2005 12:49 PM PST reply actions  

Great work as always Jeff.
If anything I would say that Felix's fastball is his worse pitch...if you wanna call it that.
Who else but Quaqmire? giggity, giggity, giggity, giggity Let's Have SEX!!

by Goose on Nov 17, 2005 1:26 PM PST reply actions  

Humongous
What a pleasure to see this. And read the analysis.
The only difference I see is in the height of his shoulders (which are always as square as the Capitol building anyway) between the fast ball and that go-to-hell curve: higher shoulders on the fastball, with a slight back arch. With the curve he's totally aligned (check out his back belt loop in relation to his feet and head).

Coming soon to your local stadium: McCain and Bunning to propose a bill banning the never to be seen Hernandez slider.

JPWood

by JPWood on Nov 17, 2005 3:40 PM PST reply actions  

Wow!
Jeff, you've 'wowed' me before with your video pitching analysis, but you've outstripped all your previous efforts this time.

An amazing piece of work!

by Tom2000 on Nov 18, 2005 2:26 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
Everything I Know About Jesus Montero

Recent FanPosts

Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
OTDOD - Early February Edition
Agentejebaox3_small
A Statistical Analysis of Mariners' Fan Support
Small
Who will have a better season?
Claw_small
BA's Top 10 M's Prospects
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Munenori Kawasaki Predictions!!!
Small
The Longevity and Future Success of Felix Hernandez.
Small
The present vs future conundrum

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew