Mariner Shortstops Throughout the Years
Shortstops have had the third highest positional sOPS+ for the Mariners and it's no secret why. Getting monster seasons from Alex Rodriguez helped offset some of the worst hitters ever. Still, it's been a below average position for hitting and Brendan Ryan isn't going to help that, though his glove helps mitigate the pain.
Alex Rodriguez was without a doubt one of the best players the Mariners have ever had in uniform and he was here for quite a while, over five full seasons. It doesn't sound like much, it's less time than Felix Hernandez already has as a Mariner for instance, but it's more than Adrian Beltre had and it was long enough to provide a lasting footprint on the history of the team.
What makes a player a legacy favorite for a fan base? In recent history, I'd say there are four incredible hitting talents that have stopped in Seattle for a considerable time, with varying impressions: Ken Griffey Jr., Alex Rodriguez, Edgar Martinez and Ichiro Suzuki. If you had favorable/unfavorable poll ratings for those six amongst Mariner fans my estimate for their breakdown would be along these lines:
Martinez: 95% favorable
Griffey: 90%
Ichiro: 70%
Rodriguez: 30%
Those are off the cuff guesses to be sure and I honestly am not that clued in any longer to how the general fan base feels. Feel free to debate the above in the comments; it might make an interesting conversation. However, I think the ordinal ranking is probably correct and it got me thinking about the aspects that lead to a more favorable view. Memorable plays, especially in the postseason, are a big driver I'd think. Edgar was a grinding type player, and mostly didn't play the field, but The Double provides the nail to hang your memories of him on. Griffey has his catches in center and his home run swing. Ichiro and Alex lack those.
There's also perceived (as opposed to real) loyalty of which, again I think, only Edgar fully qualifies and weirdly, Griffey gets points for. Edgar is obvious as he stayed a Mariner. Ichiro, in the same boat and in a lot of ways very similar to Edgar, suffers from star player on losing teams syndrome and bias against his salary and (all opinion) race. I believe many people actually do have a notion of "Ichiro is selfish" in their minds and so team loyalty isn't going to register with them with Ichiro, especially considering many of those might see, rightly or wrongly, the Japanese ownership of the team as the only reason Ichiro is here. I'm not sure why Griffey gets a pass since he basically sold the team down the river on his way out, but his return (which he waffled on for months! Why isn't that brought up?) healed a lot of those wounds I bet.
In Alex's case, people clearly view him as a sellout, even though by many reports the team's front office expressed little desire to sign him after 2000. His actions throughout his post-Seattle career haven't exactly proved that a mischaracterization though. But I wonder how much quality of play factors into all of the above. All four were (or are) Hall of Fame talents, but Alex is probably the best. In the five full seasons, Alex Rodriguez led American League hitters in WAR and other high-minded metrics twice (1998, 2000) and was second only to a teammate (Griffey) once (1996). Alex Rodriguez never won an MVP award while a Mariner but a solid argument could be made that he should have won a whopping three. Would doing so have cemented a more positive impression of him in the Seattle fan base?
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Six?
The other two are Alvin Davis and Buhner?
Brett Boone and Tino
I would argue.
by sofa_king on Sep 26, 2011 9:43 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Just looking at time spent in a Mariner uniform and OPS+, I'd put Davis ahead of both of them.
No matter where you go, there you are.
I'm guessing that's sarcasm, but to be clear I'm talking about Alvin Davis.
No matter where you go, there you are.
This is exactly what I came in here to ask.
I would think Buhner would be one, but I have no idea what the the sixth would be.
Umm....
Johh Olerud.
Come on how the heck do you all forget about him?
Or maybe Raul Ibanez
As a hitter, he wasn’t too bad either.
I think Davis' offensive numbers are still ahead of those two.
His OPS+ is higher in a Mariner uniform and he played in more games as a Mariner.
No matter where you go, there you are.
If Alvin "Mr. Mariner" Davis was not such a nice guy
he would find every Mariners fan who could not list him as one of the six best hitting talents in team history and politely hand them printouts from Baseball-Reference and Fangraphs showing that he was one the six best Mariners hitters of all time.
by G_ on Sep 26, 2011 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I really think what hurts A-Rod the most (among many things) is that he was the last out the door.
Sure, Buhner and Edgar stayed past the 2000 season, but A-Rod was one of the big three guys on the team (along with Griffey and Johnson) who were supposed to be the nucleus that finally delivered a World Series to Seattle. Fans loved Edgar and Buhner, but those three guys were the brightest stars on the team and from what I remember, in my opinion were the most popular. When Johnson left the fans still had Griffey and A-Rod to root for. When Griffey left A-Rod was it. Fan frustration over not keeping talent from leaving finally boiled over with A-Rod and he took the brunt of it. I don’t think winning a MVP would have changed that. In fact, I think winning a MVP might have hurt him more because, well he’s A-Rod and somehow I think that would have been used against him.
To be fair to the Mariners, I remember the team offering him a pretty lucrative (at the time) extension while he was still under team control but he passed. However, to be fair to A-Rod, who can blame him? He was putting up monster numbers and watching salaries explode every off season. I’d have wanted to test the market as well.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Totally disagree
He said it wasn’t about the money, it was about winning championships.
He then went to Texas.
by surfmonkey89 on Sep 26, 2011 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
He said it wasn't entirely about the money
implying that “hey, $252M later, I’ll be a very happy person”
by seattlebruin on Sep 26, 2011 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Texas was a year removed from back-to-back division titles.
The team had a new ballpark and the owner was spending money like a drunken sailor, the idea that Texas was going to win wasn’t that ridiculous that off season. Sure, a lot of it was about the money and that was one of the first of many times A-Rod would say something cringe worthy. Still, holy fuck $252 million.
No matter where you go, there you are.
by KC Mariner on Sep 26, 2011 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
If I remember correctly, the reported Mariners deal was shorter than the Texas contract and had a lower average contract value
doesn’t make much sense to sign for less money and less years when someone else is willing to back a pickup truck full of twenties into your garage once a week for ten years
by seattlebruin on Sep 26, 2011 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions
In doing some digging USSM had a good write up about this topic (to include contract offers) a few years back.
Link.
No matter where you go, there you are.
There are Mariners fans who would vote unfavorably for Edgar?
My mind doesn’t accept that idea and just outright rejects it.
5% of all Mariner fans really loved Jim Presley back in the day.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Geoff Baker's ego is that 5%
"Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly, the ill deeds along with the good and let me be judged accordingly. The rest is silence." ~ Dinobot
by beastwarking on Sep 26, 2011 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Wow. Just, Wow.
I know A-Rod is a great player, but … that graph is just astounding.
What’s funny is I remember when A-Rod, Jeter, and Nomar all came up – people started talking about how shortstop had changed forever, and the all-glove, no-hit types just weren’t going to cut it anymore. HA! Shows what they knew. We were all just fortunate to see three incredible shortstops all surface at roughly the same time.
Nothing against Brendan Ryan, for sure – I love watching him in the field. But… man, A-Rod was awesome.
I still wish
the M’s had tried to keep Guillen. While he wasn’t quite as good as we had hoped, we would have gone many years w/o worrying about shortstop. No Aurilia, no Betancourt… And while I love Ryan, it sounds like he doesn’t have too long, either.
Matthew, I think the approval of Alex Rodriguez is closer to 29% than to 30%
rounding error? Something else?
Did you do internal polling numbers as well?
"Satisfaction is the enemy of success." SanFranPreps Twitter: @d_quazzo
by perfectstrat on Sep 26, 2011 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions
My Dad's Opinion on A-Rod
I was a kid right during the Omar/A-Rod transition. I used to tell my dad “I’m going to grow up and be SS for the Mariners” and he used to be like “You can do it!” and then A-Rod took over and I’d say “I’m going to grow up and be SS for the Mariners” and my dad would say “Hmm. Maybe you should learn to play the outfield instead…”
I think part of it is Seattle's inability to keep our talent.
Except for a small handful, elite players always seem to leave in the middle of their peak. It’s just that Griffey and Johnson were traded so we can blame the front office for them and say at least those players told us ahead of time so we could get something for them. A-Rod left as a free agent so there was no one to blame but him and no excuses to make about him leaving.
I don’t think I could ever hate him though, he’s the player that made me want to play baseball.
I liked A-Rod. And his insane numbers. Until he put on the Yankee uniform, at least.
So count me as one of the 30 percent.
My quarter-baked guess is that you overestimated his and Junior’s approval ratings.
Oh and I should add...
I classify myself as one of the people that doesn’t like him. I boo him when he comes to town, and I don’t tend to boo players. However, anytime I play a fantasy style manager game like a franchise mode in MLB the Show or the excellent Out of the Park game’s MLB mode, I almost always at least check in on the cost of trading for Alex. I do it less as he ages, but he almost always made a dramatic return to the Mariners for me. So. I’m not sure what that says about me and my opinions on A-Rod.
Personally
I didn’t like the way that Rodriguez left. It would have been one thing for him to say he took an offer he couldn’t refuse (Ok) but for some reason I felt he was trying to put down the M’s organization as well. Comments about the money not being the most important thing to him, how professional the Rangers organization was (in contrast to the M’s), and then the disastrous decision to sign the petition to move Boeing out to Texas.
Alex always seemed more worried about his image than anything else, but couldn’t get out of his own way. Plus, he came to the team during the promising years as opposed to Griffey (for example), who fought through many crappy years in Seattle. Liked him as a Mariner, really don’t like him otherwise.
Benno
I never really understood how people didn't hate Griffey but felt personally attacked by ARod's move to Texas
Griffey broke my heart as a kid. I dealt with it. Johnson left and I was sad. Alex left and I was use to it at that point. I still thought they were awesome and loved watching them play after they left. I never was truly angry or bitter. Mostly just felt regret. I did hate the M’s FO. That was most of the focused hatred.
For me it isn't so much his move to Texas as to why I hate him.
Sure I was pissed when he left to Texas, but when Griffey and RJ left I was pissed as well. But I got over it, realised they aren’t our slaves and have a right to go play where they want to play, and now I like Griffey and RJ again for the joy they brought me in their good years with Seattle. But with A-Rod whenever I’m about ready to forgive him, he does something else that reveals himself to be one of the least likeable people in all of baseball. Maybe once he retires and disappears from public view for a while I’ll finally be able to move on and think fondly of his years with us.
But I don’t know. At this point he has so many blotches on his record… It isn’t just about leaving us for Texas anymore.
Doug Fister. :(
Griffey went to Cincy, and no one cares about Cincy.
He was on a mediocre NL team and so he wasn’t in our face, rubbing our noses in the fact that he left us all of the time. Plus he battled with injury problems which made him easier to sympathize with. It only took a year or two before the wounds had healed for me and I had started liking Griffey again. A-Rod, on the other hand, went to division rival (and a crappy one despite pontificating about wanting to play for a winner as I recall) first and we had to see him countless times, and then he went to the most evil, soulless team of all in the Yankees.
I think if A-Rod had gone to some random NL team and stayed there, he wouldn’t be nearly as hated. Probably still moreso than Griffey as he isn’t nearly as likeable as a guy naturally, but where he went was a huge part in it.
Also when Griffey left, it wasn't about the money
He took less money than what he would have made as a FA. It was clear that he was going to CIncy for his family. I think most people found this to be more forgivable.
by niceguysfinishlast on Sep 26, 2011 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I strongly believe it the hate for Alex Rodriguez was actually caused by his clutch problems starting in 1996.
I’m going to go with tOPS+ because it’s easier and available.
1996: tOPS + of 22 with 2 outs and RISP, tOPS+ of 55 in September.
1997: tOPS + of 80 in September.
1998: tOPS + of 80 with 2 outs and RISP.
1999: tOPS+ of 40 in September. tOPS+ of 58 with 2 outs and RISP, Huge splits when ahead/behind (worse when behind.
2000: tOPS+ of 80 in September,
I’m know I’m picking and choosing my stats so I’m not using them to discuss whether he was actually good or bad, but my memory of A-rod was that he wasn’t that well liked when he was here period, even though he was a nice guy, mostly because he always seemed like he was choking in September and wasn’t coming through in clutch situations. I wish there was a way to compare clutch scores in September, but I don’t know how to do it. Then when he left it was just another excuse to hate him more. He did blow ass in September with Seattle, at least compared to his career norms – and even his season norms. He also always seemed (in my memory, not necessarily in actuality) to only hit home runs when the score was out of reach. I doubt that was true but anything and everything clutch related was what caused most of my own hate when I was growing up.
Also his swing, while really effective, was really ugly compared to Griffey’s. I don’t think that was in his favor either.
...and now I'm here
I clearly remember:
I was already resigned to the idea that we couldn’t afford A-Rod and that he was leaving. But they were mostly talking about NL teams — the Braves or Dodgers? Don’t remember. But I was at the bar and a picture of him came on TV wearing a Rangers cap. The Rangers! He left us for a Division Rival! That made me hate him right there, and as someone said, the fact that he ended up with the Yankees and it becomes more and more obvious he’s a rotten person makes him my least favorite player. I really wanted him permanently banned for gambling just after he hit his 599th homer. The little rat.
"There are only two geniouses in this world: Willie Mays and William Shakespeare." -- Tallulah Bankhead (presumably not related to Scott)

by 




















