Mariners Hitters as Movies
I guess boredom really set in for me today. I don't even remember how my idea to do this started, and it only just happened about an hour ago. What started out as "I wonder how I could compare the Mariners situation at third base to a movie" has turned into this. Whether that will turn into a regrettable decision or not has yet to be seen. If it is regrettable, it's because I've poured some of my own opinions in movies into what you'll see below. And if there's one thing I've learned about movies, it's that everyone has their own opinion and sometimes that opinion is strong.
People get really offended if you hate a movie they like, but people get even more offended if you like a movie they hate. Nevertheless, I took a leap of faith and created the following list. I hope you like it and that it kills 10 minutes of your work day with some enjoyment, or at least with blind hatred entertainment.
Miguel Olivo - Howard the Duck
I remember being younger and liking this. I don't remember a lot about it, but in my memory it actually had some good moments and at times did some good things. Then as I got older and re-visited it, it turned out to be much worse than I remembered and then it turns out that all adults hate it and see it as terrible. If you're youthful and watching with just big eyes of excitement, you'll get joy because on the surface it seems perfectly acceptable. But once you mature and look again, you'll realize how dumb you were for ever liking it in the first place.
Justin Smoak - War of the Worlds
All the elements are there to make this highly anticipated before first viewing. You know it's got to be good and definitively this shouldn't disappoint in entertaining you. At times, you really are taken aback and think "Yeah, this is excellent and lives up to my expectations" but then it starts to slow down and then all of sudden it's stopped. You still know all the elements are there to make this good, and you've enjoyed watching it, but the more you watch it the less impressed you are. Still, if you go without watching it for 6 months, you'll watch it again if its on, and you'll go into it thinking "I'm going to be entertained"
Dustin Ackley - Super 8
It just came out this year and you knew it was going to be good. Maybe if anything you went into it thinking "I can only be disappointed, because it just seems like its got all the tools to be great. So I have nowhere to go but down from here." Then you watch it and you're potentially more impressed than you thought you'd be. It reminds you of some of your favorites from the 80s and 90s. When you were just a kid and gives you that tingly feeling all over again. Even at times when it drags, it still impresses you with highly attractive visuals.
Brendan Ryan - Avatar
(I'm going to step outside the box right here and just say that I love Brendan Ryan and Avatar is a terrible movie, but hear me out) It's not great. It's got flaws. The elements seem like they could be there to be much better, but ultimately there is a letdown. However... you get an A+++ for effort. Nobody is trying harder. Even though you know that the end product is terrible, you'll still go see it because you like to watch it. And don't get me wrong, half of what goes into it is very good to excellent. That element is the part you're paying to see. It's the other half that is average to below-average, but you're more than willing to put up with it because of the other elements that go into making this.
Chone Figgins - Any Transformers movie
Why the fuck did we put so much money into this garbage? It sucks.
Kyle Seager - Bridesmaids
"Honey, do you want to go see Transformers?"
"Oh, sure... Oh, looks like its sold out. Should we go see Bridesmaids?"
"Ehh... I don't know. Bridesmaids?"
"Come on, give it a chance."
"Okay fine"
(Leaving theater)
"Hey, that was actually pretty good. I think I'd rather see this again before ever seeing Transformers"
Franklin Gutierrez - Heat
No matter what anyone says about it as a whole, you can always go back to that one part and say "That part kicked fucking ass" No matter what you think about it as a whole, no matter when it drags, there's always going to be that one part that "kicked fucking ass."
Ichiro Suzuki - The Shawshank Redemption
It's on, you watch it. Even as the years pass, its still really good. As time goes by, it will still be one of your favorites. Most everyone can agree that it makes you feel great when you watch it. The quotes are timeless. It's so good, you only have to refer to it in one word.
Michael Saunders/Carlos Peguero/Mike Wilson/Greg Halman - Final Destination movies
They keep rolling a new one out there, and its still the same crappy product. But hey, at times its very entertaining.
Mike Carp - Kick-Ass
I didn't know what to expect going in. I wasn't sure at first. But the 2nd time around it gets better. I look forward to seeing more from this and I hope it continues to get better with each viewing.
Jack Cust - Grownups
I see what you were going for. Parts of this have worked before and you thought maybe it could work again. But that was pretty much just a failure. Don't worry, most people will forget this ever happened.
Milton Bradley - Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Well, you kind of fucked up trying to make that work again, huh? You should have never re-visited this. As much as I like the character, holy shit, we didn't need that.
Adam Kennedy - Eagle Eye
I went into this expecting nothing and got more than nothing. I didn't get much, but I got more than nothing. Years from now, I will remember that I watched this, like "Oh yeah, I did see that" and that will be my only memory of this and I won't miss it. But I got more than nothing.
Jack Wilson - Zack and Miri Make a Porno
You remember years ago when this guy did something good. There's been some good sprinkled in with some bad. Waiting for this to end though is getting painful. Looking at this isn't visually satisfying. Just end already. We get that you're trying, but this just needs to end. If we didn't like you, we would have walked out long ago.
121 comments
|
30 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is a message for everyone who isn't Jeff. I believe that includes most of us.
If you are going to bite Jeff’s shtick, have the common decency to at least do it somewhere else and even then, ehhhhhhhhhhhh.
I get it. It's like Mariners as things in my apartment. That wasn't my intention. But I get it.
follow @casetines
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 25, 2011 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
I just want to tease you for watching a movie called Bridesmaids
Now I have to go look this up for ammo to make fun of you with. Like a godawful movie poster
From what I've heard it's a pretty funny movie.
"Satisfaction is the enemy of success." SanFranPreps Twitter: @d_quazzo
by perfectstrat on Aug 25, 2011 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions
It was great, but I am in love with Kristen Wiig too.
follow @casetines
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 25, 2011 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Bridesmaids was a great movie.
It’s man humor with a female cast.
Also this was pretty funny. I would like to see Casper Wells, Wily Mo Pena, and Trayvon Robinson too.
It reminds me more of Mariners as Simpsons Characters
by Dewey N on Aug 25, 2011 12:59 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Didn't see that one.
If I was inspired by Jeff because I read LL every day, I hope he takes it as “Imitation as flattery”
I didn’t wake up today thinking “How can I rip off Jeff?” and if I did wake up that way, why would I do it on the website where everybody is aware of Jeff’s writing?
follow @casetines
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 25, 2011 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions 11 recs
I know I figured it was meant as imitation as flattery.
I also enjoyed it a lot. This is the kind of thing I read LL for, I don’t really care if you wrote it or if Jeff did. It’s definitely the best FanPost of the past month or so
by nemo1 on Aug 25, 2011 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Just a few days ago
Jeff was asked a few questions including what movie represents the 2011 Mariners.
Just for Fun:
MLBDD: What film best represents the 2011 Mariners? I’ll go with Paul Blart: Mall Cop. I didn’t expect much, but wow. ;)
JS: Leap Year. There’s a handful of interesting actors and actresses, but those who have watched it should actively discourage their friends from doing the same.
Having actually seen Leap Year, this description sounds about right.
This came up at BP in April too
Here.
I think the Nick Swisher one’s pretty much dead on. I sort of agree with the Randy Johnson analogy, but sort of hate it.
Actually Final Destination 5 wasn't all that bad.
Only 3 and 4 really were. I guess that means only Wilson and Halman suck.
I am ashamed to admit that my Miguel Olivo equivalent was Batman and Robin.
It’s really a godawful movie. I have zero idea what I saw in it.
Batman and Robin was a pretty bad movie but
I find it puzzling that the “movie geek community” (for lack of a better group of words) has pretty much officially named B&R the worst movie ever made. Campiest movie ever made, sure. But worst? Just off the top of my head, Battlefield Earth is much worse. At least B&R had a little fun in it.
by Kip Earlywine on Aug 26, 2011 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Zach and Miri Make A Porno is one of Kevin Smith's funniest comedies.
Other than that, you’re pretty much spot on.
"Perhaps the worst comment I've ever seen on LL." - sanford_and_son.
by Ride the Apocalypse on Aug 26, 2011 7:44 AM PDT reply actions
Zach and Miri was Smith's attempt to do a Judd Apatow feature.
Straight down to casting Seth Rogan. I have no time for that movie.
by katal on Aug 26, 2011 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
It was his attempt to attract the Apatow crowd, but it was definitely a Smith movie.
Besides, even though Apatow is hit and miss, the crew of actors that he usually recruits are pretty damn funny; especially Seth Rogan.
"Perhaps the worst comment I've ever seen on LL." - sanford_and_son.
by Ride the Apocalypse on Aug 26, 2011 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Dude has only directed three movies, so I'm not sure what an "Apatow feature" is.
He’s produced a ton more, directed by others, written by others, most of which suck.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 26, 2011 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, I said that.
I’m just curious as to whether or not any of those count as movies that have his particular flare. I haven’t watched a lot of them, but the ones I have watched sucked.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 26, 2011 8:43 PM PDT up reply actions
The ones that he has produced that are more stereotypical of him are Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Pineapple Express, Superbad, etc.
by Mariner John on Aug 27, 2011 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions
All you need to know is that Apatow is the reason for freaks and geeks.
If you are too young or too old that show was ridiculously phenomenal in identifying and relating the problems high schoolers deal with, I know big fucking deal, problems in high school, but if you have seen it you’ll understand, plus martin is fucking hilarious.
by Seahawks4life on Aug 29, 2011 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions
It's easy to miss things when you live in the greatest city in the USA
by Craptastic-J on Aug 26, 2011 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Also, I liked the fanpost.
In case Humbled Fan missed that as well.
by Craptastic-J on Aug 26, 2011 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Congratulations on compeltely missing the point of my comment
by seattlebruin on Aug 26, 2011 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions
It's okay, things will work out for you.
by Craptastic-J on Aug 26, 2011 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions
In spite of the passive-aggressive responses, I found this amusing.
by redwolf75 on Aug 26, 2011 12:00 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
HE DID SOMETHING SIMILAR TO JEFF! STONE THIS MAN!
Seriously guys,yeah need to lay off the whole “nobody can ever post anything similar to Jeff” thing.
RIP Dave Niehaus.
by Goose on Aug 26, 2011 4:37 PM PDT reply actions 33 recs
Although we could just start stoning Jeff when he rips off other people for post ideas
That could be fun. He is left handed so he probably couldn’t throw the rocks back at us too hard.
by Edgar for Pres on Aug 26, 2011 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions
I am more annoyed by this post than by the fanpost itself
by OlSalty on Aug 26, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Why? It's a perfectly legitimate point.
All I see are a cadre of non-sexy people attempting to enforce their own perceived standards upon the rest. If Jeff is annoyed, let him communicate it instead of speaking for him.
If this was unarguably terrible and a shameless ripoff, then perhaps the reaction would be justified. As Andrew points out, that’s not the case.
Oh no, I'm not getting roped into this again
That’s one of the reasons I am annoyed, because now people have to defend the moderation yet again and drag it out into some long back and forth that goes nowhere AGAIN for no good reason. It reopens a can of worms none of us want to open.
Jeff doesn’t want people running his material into the ground, he’s said as much before many times, it makes it so he can’t do the bit anymore because it is no longer a funny bit to do if enough people start to do the same type of thing. That’s bad for all of us because Jeff does his bits better than anyone (no offense Humbled Fan, it’s not that this is that bad by itself it’s that it potentially opens up the door for other people to do the same thing by imitation, and eventually that means no more Mariners As Things posts from Jeff). When people are moderating to get this message across, it’s a message that is put across for the sake of Jeff’s material and therefore the good of the site. It wasn’t even done in a overly dickish way this time. The message appeared to have been received, people appeared to have moved on. Yet this post here blows that message away. It’s extremely annoying when people do this. Don’t undermine people making good points in the comments.
God damn it I got roped into a moderation argument again. That’s all I have to say on this subject. I am so not doing this again.
by OlSalty on Aug 26, 2011 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
...
Jeff does his bits better than anyone
Indeed.
That’s one of the reasons I am annoyed, because now people have to defend the moderation yet again and drag it out into some long back and forth that goes nowhere AGAIN for no good reason. It reopens a can of worms none of us want to open.
God damn it I got roped into a moderation argument again. That’s all I have to say on this subject. I am so not doing this again.
If you’re going to attempt to uphold an unwritten rule, then you will have to constantly reopen the “can of worms” in order to enforce it. There’s no other way around it. Not everybody is consistently active enough in the comments sections to be picking up on such subtleties. I for one had no idea of this:
Jeff doesn’t want people running his material into the ground, he’s said as much before many times, it makes it so he can’t do the bit anymore because it is no longer a funny bit to do if enough people start to do the same type of thing.
by redwolf75 on Aug 26, 2011 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Let's be fair
While Jeff is really good – better than most, really – at creating fake dialogue between people and comparing players to inanimate objects or ideas, it’s hardly his material. If anything it’s a tired shtick that should have been retired years ago.
I think you're actually arguing OlSalty's point here.
If it’s becoming tired (which I’d disagree on), then the more people who try the schtick hasten its retirement and ruin its effective use by Jeff et al.
Well, I am sort of.
I do wholeheartedly agree that, in the wrong hands, people beating this kind of humor into the ground only devalues its comedic intent but, in the same regard, treating it like some sort of venerated, unduplicated canon is just as wrong. It’d be one thing if Humbled Fan created a Win Expectancy Chart or giffed a bunch of hilarious baseball moments but he merely riffed on a trope that Jeff neither created nor perfected.
This has nothing to do with my opinions on how this site is moderated (which is moderated amazingly, mind you), just that calling this Jeff’s material is a bit disingenuous and deflates the argument in general.
by ThomasG on Aug 26, 2011 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
It's material he often employs, or did, to great effect
It doesn’t matter who did it first for the sake of this argument. It’s one thing if other people have done it before somewhere else where it’s not being read by LL readers, it’s quite another to do it here, right next to what he does.
I guess I should say something, but I have chosen not to get roped into an argument and let other people say what they feel.
And I’m not even picking a side, other than the fact that I created the post. But I created the post because I was bored, it came to mind, I wrote it, and who else would I share it with?
Jeffs work actually didn’t even come to mind until after I posted it. I mean, when people said something thats the first time I was like “Oh yeah, how about that” but I wrote it so that maybe a few people would chuckle, giggle, potentially laugh out loud… not for the dialogues on whats appropriate for the site. And a few people enjoyed it, so that makes me feel good, and if certain members hate it, oh well. (Not that you said you hate it and I see your point, but as far as whats allowed to be posted, I leave that up to Jeff and Matthew and not me, so thats why I havent gotten involved in any of the arguments)
follow @casetines
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 27, 2011 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Simpsons did it!
Except this time its, “Sullivan did it!”
by twelveoutof10 on Aug 27, 2011 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions
As with everything, my guideline is do it if you can do it well
I found this fairly amusing. It’s not like it’s entirely derivative and adds no humor of his own.
by AndrewMcQ on Aug 26, 2011 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions 11 recs
Thank you.
I enjoyed the FanPost. While it’s really annoying when people try to one-up Jeff, I don’t think that was the case here.
I enjoyed this.
And then LL kind of happened, and all of the wannabe mods got pissed and etc.
Don’t let it ruin a fun post.
by Woodinville_12thMan on Aug 28, 2011 6:48 PM PDT reply actions 20 recs
Good post.
I don’t participate a lot in the comments, but I do read LL every day. It seems to me that a lot of times, there are unnecessary arguments that take away from the original post. We are all Mariners fans, and it is nice to see something as creative as this that somebody has taken a lot of time and thought to put together. Think about it, it could be a lot worse. We have a great site here with great and informed fans that love baseball. We don’t need to argue about whether somebody else did it first, do we? Just enjoy the post, and the site. That’s my two cents anyways…
I'm kind of a big deal...
by Benny Boy on Aug 29, 2011 11:51 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
You seem to have missed the vast majority of the reason there is discourse over this FanPost
it is nice to see something as creative as this
Jeff has already done this on more than one occasion; even though Humbled Fan has taken a slightly new spin on it, it has already been done several times, most recently just before the All-Star break this season.
What we should be complimenting is how Humbled Fan has handled this – he has shown an amazing amount of grace w/r/t to this FanPost and I give him a lot of credit for it, even if I didn’t find the original post groundbreaking.
by seattlebruin on Aug 30, 2011 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd love for you to listen to Led Zeppelin for a while
Then tell me that riffing on something “already done” is, by default, unoriginal and without value.
Not that I am accusing you of saying that, but your’s is the most recent comment and this seems the analogy that is most apropos at the moment.
by twelveoutof10 on Aug 30, 2011 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I understand the discourse, sir.
My problem is that even thought the idea/setup of this post may not have been original, the content in it was. Why do we care if somebody has done this format before? I just don’t see what the big deal is. This is a FanPost, done for fun by the author. He is not trying to take anything away from Jeff or anyone else. He had an idea for a post that he thought would entertain the readers on this site. Mission accomplished, especially looking at the traffic on this post and on in the responses by the fans. It just seems to me that there is a line of thought on this site that the frequent commentors have to “haze” the infrequent participators. I’m not saying everyone does this, but like I said, I read this site every day and have noticed a trend. I just ask everyone to please give us less frequent posters/commentors a chance to participate in this AWESOME site without having to face the barrage of “snarky” comments this post generated. And well done HumbledFan for dealing with this graciously.
I'm kind of a big deal...
A) this post has like 90 comments, which is not very much on Lookout Landing
B) you are lumping Humbled Fan in with people who post less, which would not be true of him
C) intent is almost completely irrelevant
D) you ask us to “take it easy” on new posters while the new posters tell the established community what is and is not OK to post? No, that’s OK
by seattlebruin on Sep 3, 2011 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oh, we're going to do the "point out things that I know are facts" but are actually very subjective format?
Okay…
A) Fact. You stole this response format from somebody else, I’m sure of it. Should we barrage you with a bunch of negative comments for this? Maybe I’ll make a response Fanpost…
B) Fact. This topic has generated a response post, and over 150 combined comments. That is a lot for a fan post other than the OT threads.
C) Fact. This is an entirely subjective and irrelevant comment.
D) Fact. You are now lumping in a few new posters with all new posters, which would not be true of most. We are not telling you what or what not to post. I think I presented it in a very peaceful and easy to understand way.
My intent here is not to argue or to see who can come up with the most clever comeback. Just take it easy, that’s all I’m saying (asking). Maybe we should start a thread on this topic, and everyone can get together and come to some sort of agreement. I’m too lazy to make a fanpost though, so who knows?
I'm kind of a big deal...
We do this every year - it's called LL QC
and then we do it again when Matthew or Jeff decides to have a spring cleaning. Every year, the same posting guideline gets set – be original.
by seattlebruin on Sep 4, 2011 1:52 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Are you telling me to be original?
Maybe then instead you can be “helpful” and guide people to these posts instead of what is going on here. Seriously?
I'm kind of a big deal...
by Benny Boy on Sep 5, 2011 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I found the last three using the search function!
by Mariner John on Sep 5, 2011 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Holy shit!
And would you look at this! http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2011/3/1/2023751/ll-qc#
I think that about sums up what I’m trying to say, somewhat. Some of you can be like children, I swear. You would think that having the ability to review what you are posting would make people rethink what they are saying sometimes…
I'm kind of a big deal...
I meant to link to this comment.
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2011/3/1/2023751/ll-qc#60555274
I'm kind of a big deal...
Mileage can vary.
We’ve had a number of people with very different posting styles come in and be accepted almost immediately, some of them lurkers, some of them just people that have looked at the page a few times and decided to dive in. These people often work their way in slowly and have a good idea of what will fly here and won’t. There’s some trial and error sometimes, and yeah, there is some nasty piling on sometimes, but we’ve both accepted newcomers and old posters who were initially treated with hostility and made a stronger effort at understanding why things didn’t go right the first time around.
That’s just how existing posting communities are. This might be the kind of forum for x, or it might not be. There are standards and certain expectations that people expect of you (subject lines, proper capitalization, no “that’s what she said”) and either you adjust or don’t. I would say that my posting voice here is way, way different from what I would put up at USSM because I know the expectations of both communities, and my posting behavior is probably different still at a third site. Sometimes, I’ll admit we do pile on a bit and we’ve been working on that, but we still have a whole lot of people coming in with the “I’ll post however the fuck I want and you’ll just have to deal” mentality. That just doesn’t fly.
Know your audience. If you aren’t well-received by it, it’s not necessarily their fault.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Sep 6, 2011 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
I haven't really been as active lately as in the past but here's my take on what's going on.
I didn’t see why there was so much outrage over this post, even if somewhat in jest. Humbled Fan is in decent standing in the community and this use of a Jeff idea (which he admitted he didn’t think about until after posting it) wasn’t bad. However, the problem is that when Jeff does something funny like conversations or (Type of thing) as (Type of other thing), people try to add on or make their own that generally aren’t as funny as what Jeff does because Jeff is an extremely talented and humorous writer. I don’t think there has been a fake conversation of Jeff’s that hasn’t had a comment that also had a fake conversation. Nor has there been a Mariners as ______ thread where commenters haven’t suggested something else that ended up not being very funny. The community as a whole can only let these go unmentioned for so long and that’s where the reaction in here and the subsequent post by katal came from.
The reason the people who “post here every day of their life” police the site as they do is because they have seen all the shitty shit that people have posted in the past and want to prevent that from becoming a thing repeatedly. Perhaps this thread wasn’t the correct target of it but it was more the attempt (or the appearance of an attempt) to elaborate on a funny thing Jeff did than anything else. There have been far worse examples than this post.
The reguLLars don’t hate everyone. The site just has higher standards because good God the internet can suck. Sometimes it leads to some less than pleasant comments but sometimes that needs to happen. I’d rather that happen than this become a Bleed Cubbie Blue or, God forbid, Halos Heaven or any other lesser commenting site. If you look at the OT threads, most of the comments in there are rather civil. Someone can correct me if I’m wrong about any of this.
by Mariner John on Sep 6, 2011 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
I'll just throw this remark in here for not knowing where else to drop it in.
The enormous reaction to this fanpost wasn’t a reaction to this fanpost or Humbled Fan. It was a reaction to a lot of fanposts or comment threads of this type that have been prevalent this season. As was katal’s entry.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Sep 6, 2011 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Mariner John and JY, thank you.
This is refreshing. I’m not trying to force anyone to think one way or the other. I was just trying to be somewhat of a voice of reason when I thought things had maybe gone a little too far. Maybe that’s not my place, but that’s just how I am. I don’t like it when people pile on other people especially when its on the internet. It seemed to me that I presented a proposition in a pretty acceptable manner, and then one comment lead to another and I felt like I was being attacked. Obviously I’m going to go on the defense there, and I usually am not one to back down. These responses by both of you are more along the lines of where I thought this would originally go, with reasonable and intelligent thoughts on the matter.
So hopefully some of you know me a little better, and we can move on and get along in the future. I don’t really hold grudges. Even outside of the internet, when I meet new people I sometimes rub them the wrong way (not literally), but I end up being a lot closer with them. I would like to participate in this community more in the future and I hope maybe some of the people who are afraid of posting can feel welcome here.
I'm kind of a big deal...
You're welcome if you want to try.
Just to further illustrate that we aren’t a gated community, seattlebruin’s LLemmies at the end of the season include a rookie of the year category (last year’s trio had widely variant posting styles too!) and pdb or someone usually throws up a “hey lurkers, why you lurk so much?” post in the early part of the year.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Sep 6, 2011 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions
The response to this fanpost is basically the reason I am no longer a regular here.
I read a funny time killing fanpost about the Mariners and movies. Two of my favorite things then go to write a thanks for a fun read and I’m faced with all these comments attacking Humbled Fan. I’m literally just sitting here sighing and slowly shaking my head. But whatever, no one cares.
Fear the NPE
by thewyrm on Aug 31, 2011 5:37 PM PDT reply actions 7 recs
I'm right there with you
I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. Ugh
Then speak up.
It may be (obviously) like pulling teeth ^ , but I think if enough of us say something it can help change the way things go. Everyone here should be able to get along without all the sarcasm.
I'm kind of a big deal...
by Benny Boy on Sep 5, 2011 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Again, you do not get to define what is acceptable just because you post here sometimes
Speaking up in a thread is not the way to go to get the rules changed, in fact it’s really annoying because it undermines the type of moderation we do here. If you have an issue with the way things are run flag the comment in question and address your concerns to the moderators directly.
Yes.
I would love to see the reaction to a flagging. Also, just because you post here probably every day of your life, it does not give you the right to what I see as unacceptable behavior. Some of us can’t be on this site all the time. We don’t have the benefit of a certain camaraderie that you guys have. Think about it this way. Look at some of the reactions to the original post, and to the subsequent comments. Is this how you would talk to somebody you didn’t know, if you just met them at a party/on the street? No, obviously polite humans do not behave this way. Just because people don’t want to deal with a backlash from you guys whenever something like this is questioned, doesn’t mean you should keep behaving this way.
I'm kind of a big deal...
Posting here a lot does not give you the right to dictate what is acceptable either
Posting here a lot makes it easier to understand what Jeff and Matthew want and to repeat it to new people. If you don’t understand what Jeff and Matthew want, then you shouldn’t try to moderate. Community moderation does not mean the community makes it’s own rules based on what people like, it means the community is allowed to repeat the rules and standards as outlined by the powers that be to new posters if they understand them.
It shouldn’t be done in a dickish way because that allows people to just write us off as assholes instead of listening to what we say, but if you’re not interested in changing and stick around doing the same things we told you to stop doing many times anyway we are going to resent it also, there are two sides to the asshole coin and sometimes it is warranted if people are not open to hearing what they need to hear and try to force us to change to suit them. Most of the time, moderation can be and is done in a respectful manner if it was simply a matter of not knowing any better. Sometimes, people slip up and get a little bit disrespectful to a person who doesn’t deserve it, most of the time though we are willing to acknowledge it and do a little better next time. I think you are blowing up the intended hostility of these comments if you think that’s what happened here to a great degree.
Yeah, this got a little out of hand.
Maybe I’m just in a volatile mood right now. My dog just died, I can’t grow sideburns, I drive a Volkswagen Jetta, and I use women’s deoderant. So I apologize for all the fuss…
I'm kind of a big deal...
So glad to meet someone who hates the Transformer movies as much as I do.
...and not a single fuck was given that day.
Ichiro and Shawshank is perfect
I will always watch it because I know it is one of the all time greats (and can be referenced in one name!) but I am starting to get a little bored…
by Eeyore hates figlet on Sep 1, 2011 9:06 PM PDT reply actions
Figgins and Transformers?
My problem with Figgins being Transformers is that Transformers 1 wasn’t so bad, and had exciting elements to it. What’s so exciting about Figgins? He’s fast…and um…
He plays lots of positions terribly and switch-hits.
He transforms in his shittiness on a regular basis.
by thehemogoblin on Sep 3, 2011 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Great post! Even though I really like Avatar, your description of it still worked with Brendan Ryan really well.
Also not to really get into this argument, but I didn’t even think of Jeff’s “Mariners as things” series until someone brought it up in the comments. Humbled Fan wrote a fun post. I wonder if anyone had ever done a fake conversation before Jeff did? Or maybe compared athletes to something else that isn’t an athlete? People should just enjoy the post for what it is, and quit complaining that someone has done something similar before. If you don’t like the idea of the post, you don’t have to read it.
Doug Fister is Dexter. R.I.P. Dave Niehaus
I don't have anything to say but everyone appears to be checking this post like crazy so I'm commenting here so that you suckers "z" all the way down here for no reason.
Dance, puppets. Dance!
...and now I'm here
by CapSea on Sep 6, 2011 6:23 PM PDT reply actions 4 recs
You're a bad person and ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Or maybe you’re a good person and did something bad, it can be confusing

by 
















