Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Ryan Langerhans/Mike Morse Reflections

Ryan Langerhans is gone now. He's been traded to the Diamondbacks for cash considerations, which is the nice and complicated way of saying he's been sold like goods. He had to be moved to make room in Tacoma for Wily Mo Pena, and while the Mariners have run the risk of losing Langerhans before, this time it looks more permanent. This time, Ryan Langerhans may never come back.

Langerhans brought us some great memories as a Mariner, two of which are embedded below this post on the front page, and overall he was just fine for what he is. This move, though, provides an opportunity for people to look back on the day he was brought in for Mike Morse. Morse has blossomed into a fine hitter with the Nationals, and given that Langerhans was little more than an unspectacular backup outfielder, there are a lot of people out there who think that was a dumb move, and wish it had never been made.

Well, those are two separate things. As for the latter, all right. It's sensible to wish this trade had never been made, given what Morse has turned into, and given how this organization is light on hitters. Of course, there's no guarantee that Morse would've followed the same development path with the Mariners. That's impossible to know.

As for the former, though, no. As we've said a million times, a front office can only operate with the knowledge it has at the time of a move. When Morse was traded for Langerhans, the Mariners were in the AL West running, but they were down a speedy left-handed outfielder after Endy Chavez got obliterated by our shortstop. The team had a need, and Langerhans fit as a guy who could get on base and play all three positions.

To get Langerhans, the Mariners gave up a guy who wasn't highly thought of at the time. Morse was a poor defensive 27-year-old infielder in triple-A hitting for a high average. He wasn't much in the field, he didn't walk, and his power was limited, meaning his value was mostly tied up in singles and doubles. That wasn't much of a package. Morse had his supporters, but it did not look like he had a Major League future - at least not as a starter. It was easy to see him as a pinch-hitter or something.

And then, in 2010, Morse kicked it up. To illustrate what happened, here are Morse's PA per home run (combined) in triple-A and the Majors:

2007-2009: 36.0
2010-2011: 20.1

Morse was always projectable. He was always toolsy. Morse is a big dude, and big dudes are expected to be able to hit the ball a long way. In isolation, it is not surprising that Mike Morse is a decent power hitter now with the Nationals.

But when he was traded away, Morse hadn't yet shown that ability on a consistent basis. Granted, he missed almost all of 2008 after surgery, but he was a 27-year-old line drive hitter who was hitting home runs about as often as the old Mike Carp. He wasn't what he's become, and there were only faint glimmers that he'd be able to make this leap.

You could argue that he shouldn't have been jettisoned specifically because he was so projectable and toolsy, but, how long do you hang on to those guys? How highly do you value them? How long do you wait for a guy to hit for big power before you give up on him hitting for big power? Morse, to that point, had nearly 1,400 plate appearances in triple-A and the Majors. He had 28 home runs. Things didn't look good.

Obviously, they've worked out. Obviously, Morse has improved, seizing an opportunity in Washington and establishing himself as a big league hitter. He still doesn't walk, and he still doesn't play a lot of defense, but he hits the ball hard enough often enough to stay in the lineup.

I just don't think you can blame the Mariners for letting him get away. The deal doesn't look great in hindsight, but you can't evaluate these things by hindsight, because that isn't fair. You can be happy for Morse. You can wish the Mariners didn't deal him. But I don't think it's fair to say they screwed up. They dealt a guy of limited value for a guy of limited value who fit an immediate need. That's the right thing to do.

Comment 15 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I liked Morse...

but I wasn’t “in like” with him. I always had hope he would be consistently played and good. But I had that hope for Willie Bloomquist too… I’m glad he’s succeeding.

by Belom3 on Jul 29, 2011 4:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Two things I remember

He was out of options and passed thru waivers when he was sent to AAA and again when taken off the 40 man the year of the trade.

More than 80% of bloggers (both on this and the paper sites) seemed to feel about him at the time of the trade the way Tui is discussed (and not discussed) today. Do I hear any Tui for 3rd chants? (Chirp, Chirp)

by jaketrash on Jul 29, 2011 4:55 PM PDT reply actions  

To me, this is similar to how Matt Thornton turned out.

Not in my feelings of the player, per se, but in a way that they blossomed into something valuable sometime after they were traded away when the odds were against them.

We also didn’t expect offense to go downhill to the point where what Mike Morse is doing looks real inciting at the moment. The team finished with a .313 wOBA (which is obviously not very good) in 2009, the year Morse was traded. Who knew we’d be talking about our offense putting up just a collective .280 wOBA in 2011?

We found guys like David Aardsma, Jason Vargas, and potentially Mike Carp just lying around in other organizations so it’s not like it’s just a one-way thing.

by ThundaPC on Jul 29, 2011 5:07 PM PDT reply actions  

Is the problem Tacoma?

Wouldn’t you, as a AAA player, almost sign your soul over to Satan to get out of Tacoma, the veritable armpit of the world? Seattle having their AAA in Tacoma has the equivalent stupidity of a Chicago team having their AAA team in Gary, Indiana. Except, there is no minor league team in Gary..
In short, it’s no wonder that marginal guys hit the crap out of the ball when their in Tacoma; anything to get out of that hell-hole.

by Mike.H on Jul 29, 2011 10:33 PM PDT reply actions  

here's the problem

the fact is that Morse became a good player, one we’d love to have (someone who can hit for average and power), but we gave him away. so either we misjudged his talent or failed to develop it, right? either talent analysis or coaching failure.
it happens to every team probably.

but can we think of any players we’ve gotten recently who started achieving more with us?
yes on some pitchers, (Aardsma comes to mind, for example), but any hitters who actually improved once they got to us, or minor league position prospects we picked up who started to hit in the bigs? I can’t think of any.

by Wally Moon on Aug 1, 2011 7:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY