Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Is Eric Wedge Causing Fewer Walks?

It may not have appeared that way at the time, but the Mariners offense in April looks scorching now compared to what fans have had to witness since. Scoring an average of 3.9 runs per game, the team was on a 631-run scored pace. That's not magnificent, but is downright heavenly compared to last season and not altogether ugly given the league-wide offensive recession. Run scoring is down to 4.2 runs per game this year from 4.4 last year.

If the Mariners ended the season 46 runs below average on offense, we should be ecstatic. They are already well under that mark and the reason is because the offense cratered. From 3.9 runs a game in April to 3.25 since. The May and June 2011 Mariners have hit just about as well as the 2010 Mariners did. That's a scary thought and that the team is 25-23 over that span is a remarkable testament to the run prevention group.

Why has the offense nose-dived? There are many factors, and I intend to explore them in separate posts, but for now, I wanted to focus on walks because the downturn there has been getting notice lately. In part, that is because of Eric Wedge's comments about hitters being more aggressive. The team was certainly the opposite of aggressive in April and many of us were praising their disciplined approach at the plate and resulting side benefit of increased walk totals. I even updated my perennial post about the Mariners pitches per plate appearance.

They finished that month with a 10% walk rate, good for third in the American League. That walk rate dropped to 7% in May and stands at just 6% in June. That's the sort of damning numerical evidence that seems sufficient on the surface to decry the swing happy approach, but I wanted to dig a little deeper.

Namely, what concerned me is that comparing walk totals or runs scored totals across months ignores the changing nature of the Mariner roster. To investigate, I broke out not only the team totals by month, but also each Mariner hitter's totals and looked for trends. The sample sizes aren't fantastic of course, but I compensated by looking at their plate discipline samples such as O-Swing% rather than just walk totals. As it turns out, Adam Kennedy, Chone Figgins, Ichiro Suzuki and Jack Cust have maintained roughly consistent swing rates on pitches outside the strike zone. The other three regulars, Miguel Olivo, Brendan Ryan and Justin Smoak have all seen increases ranging from moderate (Ryan and Smoak) to extreme (Olivo), but the crux there is that those increases came in June for all three cases, not in May.*

*Miguel Olivo swung at ~35% of pitches outside the strike zone by my numbers in both April and May. He's over 50% in June. Say hello to why his walks dried up.

What has changed is the makeup of the rest of the roster. Ryan Langerhans is gone. Milton Bradley is gone. Michael Saunders is gone. Jack Cust has seen his playing time reduced. Those were probably the four most patient, cautious hitters on the Mariners roster in April and were occupying three lineup spots with regularity. Is it any wonder that the walk totals would go down when that quartet is replaced by Greg Halman, Carlos Peguero, Franklin Gutierrez and Mike Carp/interleague play?

Laying the blame on Eric Wedge because of this strikes me as putting oneself on shaky ground. I cannot speak to what level of influence Wedge had on Langerhans' demotion for instance and given the current crop of position players, he doesn't have a lot to choose from to work counts. It's not as if Carlos Peguero or Greg Halman were turned into aggressive hackers solely thanks to Wedge's doctrine. I don't think Wedge has helped by any means, but what I take out of my look at the monthly splits is that the team's offense has fallen off for reasons that are likely largely out of Wedge's control and that if the Mariners want to draw more walks then they should get more naturally patient hitters into the lineup.

Comment 38 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This depresses me.

I was so happy when they were walking a bunch in April. It was so nice and refreshing after the lack of walks in past iterations of the Seattle Mariners. Sigh.

by the tourist on Jun 25, 2011 3:26 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm strangely comfortable with it

Watching this team in April was torture because they watched far too many pitches. I’m much happier with the team when they have been actually doing something with the balls they hit.

Election Reference Off Topic Blog

by etowncoug on Jun 25, 2011 4:07 PM PDT reply actions  

It feels like the team has hit more homers

My bad. Team OPS is down.
April: .656
May: .614
June: .634

But team slugging is up in June:
April: .339
May: .325
June: .357

Ultimately this team needs better hitters.

Election Reference Off Topic Blog

by etowncoug on Jun 25, 2011 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

When has he ever said this.

Since when is “being aggressive” a direct conducive to not walking? What coach in the universe asks players to swing at balls?

I’ve always taken the idea of aggressive as simply trying to hit a pitch you can actually hit instead of letting it sail right on by you. It would lead to fewer walks, because in any typical at bat where you let a belt high fastball over the plate whiz past you could also take enough pitches after that to get on base with a free pass, but I don’t see how it’s necessarily bad overall philosophically speaking.

Pitches that you can hit should be at least attempted at. If you can’t hit it, don’t.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jun 25, 2011 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wedge's quote

From Baker:

“A good AB is going up there ready to hit,‘’ Wedge said. "When you get a pitch, you don’t miss it. I’ve got nothing against it (taking a walk). But that’s not the way you’re going to win. That’s going to be a part of it."

Which, yeah, I don’t really see a problem with that statement. It certainly doesn’t imply that players shouldn’t draw walks.

by ThundaPC on Jun 25, 2011 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you for finding that.

I keep wondering why in the balls DC is up in arms about Wedge and now I realize he’s just pulling a JAC.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jun 25, 2011 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hitters

Wedge doesn’t have much to do with it. The lineup now is just full of more aggressive hitters. Smoak, ackley, and Gutierrez are really the only patient hitters on the team.

by zmoney on Jun 25, 2011 4:12 PM PDT reply actions  

"if the Mariners want to draw more walks..."

Maybe they simply want more extrabase hits. I think the change from Cust & Co. to Halman & Co. has been a precise choice by Wedge (that I share). I suppose he realized that roster was anyway unable to score on a regular basis by consecutive singles and he went towards the long ball option. Given the lineup is still poor-talented as for hitting there’s no guarantee of success of course so it’s been a choice between two different approach and Wedge went for what he believed to be the minor illness – and he’s still working game after game to find the best lineup possible. Obviously having the Rangers lineup would help a lot, unfortunately the M’s offense is what it is however you shake it.

by paracorto on Jun 26, 2011 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Probably Wedge

had another point of view regarding that. What if a pitcher has a bad outing or the relievers implode, what if Figgins and Ichiro struggles again, what if Smoak faces a slump, in other words what if something does not go perfect to win close games ? Season is long and many things can happen. The longball option – even if occasional by certain hitters – can win games with a couple of swings. At the end I think Wedge knows he has a poor lineup and he’s just trying something different, something in which he trusts more.

by paracorto on Jun 26, 2011 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thoughts

Offense certainly has been performing like the 2010 Mariners…..at least to a point.

76 games in:

2011: 3.49 R/g
2010: 3.45 R/g

Remaining 86 games:

2011: TBD
2010: 2.92 R/g

Last year’s team seriously went off the deep-end towards the 2nd half. Then again, even maintaining a rate of 3.25 runs a game for the rest of the year lands us at about 545 runs which oh god what have we done to our offense…

As far as Wedge’s preaching of aggressiveness, I think his intended definition got simplified to “swing-at-everything and screw walks.” Although I have trouble summarizing what he means by “be aggressive.” I interpret it as don’t pass up hittable pitches. He also talks about “quality at-bats” which I can only interpret as non-crappy at-bats.

Ultimately, I don’t think too much about the whole “aggressive” angle Wedge is taking and just see it as his way to get this offense to score closer to 4 runs a game. Naturally, he can only do so much with the team’s current talent level.

by ThundaPC on Jun 25, 2011 4:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, his original statements led me to believe he wanted guys to work a hitters count

Then take advantage of the situation, which was an understandable point. He didn’t mention specific players, the circumstances at the time had me leaning towards Saunders and Cust as being the targets, if that’s even fair to say.

by Kermit. on Jun 25, 2011 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pretty sure Langerhans was a target too,

what with a jillion walks and two hits early on.

Losing him and Cust (MIA) is a huge reason why walks have dropped off. You can see Wedgie’s point, to a point, but those walks helped. If there is no “hitter’s pitch” to hammer, by all means take the walk.

by Dave Paisley on Jun 26, 2011 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Like Kermit, I had been thinking that Wedge's comments were indirectly directed more at certain players

Now I may be way off in some of what I’m about to write, but I’ve been thinking about this topic (in regards to Cust’s playing time) the last few days and thought of writing a fanpost, but ultimately since I don’t really have any numbers or definite conclusions I decided against it, but maybe a few of these thoughts could spark some discussion.

Jack’s power is obvious, when he hits the ball it’s hit hard – whether it’s leaving the park is another story. His other skill is drawing a walk, but what I was thinking and maybe what Wedge is thinking is that the value of a Cust walk is lower than that of say an Ichiro walk. Cust will not be moving past 1st base without the help of a teammate lower in the lineup than him. In the beginning of the year (when Bradley was around) Smoak was below Cust and I think that helped. It’s no secret our lineup is top heavy and by putting Cust at the end of the top half it’s almost ensuring that he won’t be making it very far around the bases on a walk. It’s going to take a gaper or big line drive to move Cust from 1st to 3rd, a fleeter runner may be able to make that play on a ground ball through the hole (something the bottom of our lineup is more likely to produce). So without any numbers to back up what I’m saying I’m suggesting that the odds of a Cust walk turning into a run scored are lower than that of Ichiro, Figgins, Ryan, Ackley, etc…

If this is the same line of thought that ended with Wedge benching Cust then the way I see it there are two possible solutions from a managerial standpoint. Put Cust higher in the order where the more competent hitters behind him can square up the ball and move him along the bases with more success or tell Cust to be “more aggressive”. Cust watches a lot of strikes and hittable pitches fly right past him, if he were less selective and could instead turn up the doubles a few notches the bottom of the lineup may be able to turn that into a run.

Easier said that done obviously, but the whole time Wedge has been talking about being aggressive with at bats, I assumed it was a general comment directed at a select few, mainly being Cust and at one point Saunders (who was also watching a lot of strikes go past him)

by BaronVonBullshit on Jun 25, 2011 4:59 PM PDT reply actions  

What about tracking swing rate early in the count?

Is there any place that tracks how often players swing at early pitches? Because that would impact walk rate as well.

by Kip Earlywine on Jun 25, 2011 6:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Wedge sets the lineup

He’s responsible for the reduction in Cust’s playing time. At least in this respect, he’s to blame for the reduction in walks. And I think Dave Cameron’s critizism of Wedge is caused by that.

by vj on Jun 26, 2011 2:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY