A Cubs' Fan's View Of Milton Bradley
Have at it.
about 1 year ago
Al Yellon
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Good work. That was more thoughtful than I was expecting.
The community hear was petty or worse when Silva was released, so I wouldn’t be surprised by a bit of gleeful catharsis by Cubs fans at MB’s dumping.
Your lesson on contracts isn’t that surprising, but it did make me realize how many unsuccessful big money contracts the Cubs have handed out (Soriano, Fukudome, Zambrano, maybe Aramis). Here’s to Carlos Pena only stinking for one year and Marlon Byrd being good (and not for an M’s rival).
Maybe I'm only speaking for myself.
But trades should be evaluated at the time, and the Silva for Bradley swap was fantastic in every way. If Bradley had any baseball skills left I don’t think anyone here would give a shit about his attitude. In reality, I still don’t care about the attitude. The rest of the Mariners team wasn’t bad because Bradley was here. They are bad because they are bad. Milton Bradley’s personality was and is meaningless, and so the trade, at the time, when indications were that Bradley would be a good hitter with a bad attitude, was phenomenal.
But then he came here and he sucked at the game of baseball. That’s it. His bad attitude didn’t do anything. He got suspended for a game. Oh fucking well, he wasn’t very good anyway. He’s also on the last year of a contract of a team he won’t play a role on in the future, and so keeping him around was completely pointless.
Most Cubs fans and Indians fans said his bad attitude would be a serious problem for the Mariners. It wasn’t. It was completely meaningless. What mattered is that he sucked at baseball more than he’s ever sucked at baseball in his life, and so he gets to go away. Anyone that’s gloating because “they were right” are being idiots, because you weren’t right. His attitude was barely a presence. The only way he affected the Mariners was being bad at baseball, which was absolutely not the argument that any Cubs or Indians fan had against keeping him on the team.
...and now I'm here
by CapSea on May 9, 2011 5:28 PM PDT reply actions 18 recs
That pretty much covers it.
And for good measure, here’s the “cliff-notes” edition:
Milton Bradley was released because he sucked at baseball and is not part of the the team’s future. He was not released for being a malcontent.
Five years from now, we'll still get driveby posts from Cubs fans bashing Bradley
He’s gone. We don’t care what you think of him anymore.
(Not that we ever did.)
As I opened this thread I thought to myself "Hey a post by Al Yellon, this will go over well."
About as well as a post by RevHalofan would go anyways.
RIP Dave Niehaus.
haha, he's got a hardon for Bradley. Before the trade, he posted crap about him pretty much everywhere he was being rumored to land.
Quite sure he just hates him because he was a ‘thug’ or a ‘cancer’, for lack of a real reason.
Proof Matthan admitted he was wrong: http://www.draysbay.com/2011/3/18/2058018/ottotd-for-3-18-2011-thursday-night-t-v#61697767



















