Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Today's Michael Pineda Fun Fact

I was skimming over a Baseball Prospectus chat with Mike Fast today when I happened upon the following question and response:

Lucas Apostoleris (Massachusetts): Would you be able to elaborate on your issues with HR/FB?

Mike Fast: There are issues with classifications of fly balls for one thing, and ballparks play differently, and very few people or published stats account for either of those.

The other big issue that I have is that directionality of air balls matters a lot, and pitchers have been shown to have a repeatable skill for this. Pulled air balls go out of the park quite frequently, and opposite field air balls almost never do.

Fast's overall answer is certainly interesting, but I want to focus on the second part of his reply real quick and pull it out of a simple discussion about HR/FB. Directionality of batted balls allowed doesn't get a whole lot of talk, but it's pretty damn important. It should come as little surprise that the most damage is done on batted balls that are pulled, with the following being the 2011 AL breakdown:

Pulled: .387 average, .708 SLG
Up the middle: .284 average, .402 SLG
Opposite: .277 average, .392 SLG

It stands to reason, then, that a pitcher who allows more pulled balls will be less successful, and a pitcher who allows fewer pulled balls will be more successful, relative to the average. So without taking up any more of your time, here's a table comparing a bunch of baseball's top righties this season (note: all balls, not just fly balls):

Pitcher Pull%
Pineda 21%
Lincecum 24%
Weaver 24%
Johnson 24%
Verlander 26%
2010 Strasburg 27%
Halladay 29%
Felix 30%
Haren 33%
Shields 35%
Beckett 35%
Cahill 35%

In first, by a healthy margin, we get our own Michael Pineda. And while I don't know if he's first overall in the league - I didn't check everybody - he's at least first among this elite class of righty starters. And this is a big reason why batters haven't been able to do much damage against him on the balls they've put in play. If they can't pull the ball, they can't hit the ball with maximum bat speed.

I don't know if this is going to continue. I'd assume it'll regress at least a little bit, just because of how far away it is from the rest. But given Pineda's real velocity, perceived velocity, and breaking ball, it makes sense that batters would be off-balance and behind, so he may always allow fewer pulled balls than the average pitcher. And that would limit his home runs and extra-base hits.

Take a step back, and Michael Pineda is amazing. Take a step forward, and Michael Pineda is amazing. Michael Pineda is amazing.

Comment 28 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Lookout Landing

The Ugly Side Of Rooting

Mar 2012 by Jeff Sullivan - 133 comments

The Brett Lawrie Rumor

Jan 2012 by Jeff Sullivan - 192 comments

A Little Trade Background

Jan 2012 by Jeff Sullivan - 136 comments

Trade's Official

Jan 2012 by Jeff Sullivan - 65 comments

Comments

Display:

This "Fun Fact" is actually fun.

I am surprised, and sort of disappointed.

by georgmi on May 23, 2011 12:23 PM PDT reply actions  

He seems to pound balls up and a way too, but that's just an impression I get and i haven't checked any heat maps

But this would also limit pulled fly balls. Pineda is awesome, who’d have thought he’d be pitching like a cy young winner out of the gate? My favorite part about him is how everyone raves about his work ethic and his desire to be better and learn the ins and outs of smart pitching. He’s already special and it can only go up from here.

by Shmelix Shmernandez on May 23, 2011 12:41 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

This is an interesting angle to take on the usual HR/FB discussion

It certainly makes sense that categorizing the fly balls as a whole would go a long way towards better understanding what a pitcher is doing and even just differentiating between pull/middle/opposite seems to give a decent picture of what is going on.

by tootthekazoo on May 23, 2011 12:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes

There are obviously ways to automate this but I don’t know how. Data Fairy?

by Jeff Sullivan on May 23, 2011 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

Yeah

Its cool. It would be a useful stat to be able to look up. I haven’t thought about it much but it makes a lot of sense.

by Edgar for Pres on May 23, 2011 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

How is this not a Small Sample Size problem for Mr. Pineda?

It just seems like he’d have a lot less statistical history to judge this on; compared to many of the others in the list. (Not that I’m complaining about the resulting data, mind you!)

by NWade on May 23, 2011 1:25 PM PDT reply actions  

I would imagine that, if studied enough, it would be found that this is probably something that stabilizes pretty quickly

I mean, unless he stops throwing hard and generating poor contact/pullable balls, what is there to change?

by tootthekazoo on May 23, 2011 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

These are all single-season numbers

I’m pretty sure there’s a sample size issue at play here, hence the expected regression, but it also makes intuitive sense that batters would pull the ball less often against Pineda than the would against most others.

by Jeff Sullivan on May 23, 2011 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember when he hit it, and Jeff alluded to this in his game recap...

But the more data that pours in, the more impressed I am with Hardy’s home run off of Michael in Charm City.

"you ain't never been no virgin kid you were f@$%ed from the start"

by BW Kropotkin on May 23, 2011 1:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Mmm how I love him so

Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, WORLD CHAMPION SAN FRANCISCO GIANT
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
11/1/10

by bondslegend on May 23, 2011 1:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Michael Pineda is amazing!

So amazing I just added his name to my google chrome dictionary! No more red line for your name, no sir.

by JamMasterJesus on May 23, 2011 2:04 PM PDT reply actions  

This is fascinating

Has anyone studied year to year correlations in pull% or the correlation between pull% and HR/BIA? Thems could have implications on understanding the value of some flyball pitchers

by Dewey N on May 23, 2011 4:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Based on Fast's wording

The other big issue that I have is that directionality of air balls matters a lot, and pitchers have been shown to have a repeatable skill for this

…it would seem this has indeed been studied. I want links!

by Jeff Sullivan on May 23, 2011 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY