In the end, Bradley lost the media game
Milton Bradley has his fans.
They're here, here, here, here and here. Just a sampling. (I freely admit the third link is lame. But still applicable.)
Anyway. This seems like a lot of fandom calories dedicated to a guy who has the reputation not just for sowing seeds, but planting entire crops of discontent wherever he lands. He played 216 games with the Dodgers, and that was the most he logged with any one team over a 12-year career. Easy to do if you're Jamey Wright. Harder to do when you lead the AL in OPS in 2008.
Well, to offer a slight understatement, Milton hasn't made best friends with everyone at every stop.
"You understand why they haven't won in 100 years here," is how he described the environment in the Chicago Cubs organization.
"You wonder what his problem is," one ex-teammate reportedly said.
Eric Wedge is personally aware of MB's uncuddly side.
There's plenty more along those lines. You don't need the whole resume. It's fun/maddening to remember he threw the ball in the stands after two outs against the Twins a couple years ago. Use that googly thing if you want more anecdotes.
Milton inspires a wide range of emotional reactions. It's not so hard, in the game of baseball, to become a villain, a laughingstock, or a feared offensive force. It's not so easy to pull all three off.
I'm not sure that the apparent trichotomy -- if it even exists -- comes from MB being somehow deranged, bipolar, manic depressive, although one of those may well be a real condition of his. Not a shrink here. Let me repeat: I'm not capable of telling if anything ails him, mentally. What I do know is that he treated the media like dogshit year after year after year, and he paid the price.
Milton Bradley spent his career losing the media game. Maybe he cared too much about what people thought of him; maybe he cared too little. Those are equally valid theories. What's not in dispute, though, is that he made it very, very easy for people who covered him to dislike him. The consequence: bad press. Simple cause and effect.
I don't know that individual reporters across the country deserved his disdain. Maybe they did. Speaking as a former sports reporter, journalists are just as capable of being jerks as the next guy. Humans!
Point is, you can treat the media like stinky stinky doo-doo if you're anonymous little me. Works less well if you're a public figure of any kind.
That being said, Milton earned some of the unflattering words printed about him.
An arrest for what might or might not be domestic violence (no charges were filed) doesn't make him any more endearing or defensible to those who would work to endear him to us or defend him in the court of public opinion.
But digging a little further, why should any of us rely on the impressions of any media member to form a judgment on a player's inner qualities and deficiencies? Why should any of us try to ascertain if a socially distant guy is someone we'd like, or wouldn't? And by socially distant, I don't mean reclusive. I mean, if we can't get to know our sports idols (and very few of us fans get to do so), then why should we act like we do?
Come to think of it, that explains why I can't stomach comments from people who purport to know the guy beyond the player. Get over yourselves.
To conclude with a non-conclusion, our lack of understanding of Milton, the man, is why Jeff's piece from Monday is so spot-on. He admits he bought a view obstructed ticket to Milton Bradley: The Show.
We all did.
P.S.: Read this Drayer piece. Great stuff: compassionate and straightforward.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm probably going to look like an idiot for asking this, but I can't really tell what you're saying here.
...and now I'm here
It's complicated... I sort of diarrhead this post and it has a lot of unsharpened points and loose ends.
I think I’ll clean a couple things up, maybe add a couple new paragraphs in the morning. In the meantime, you don’t get to receive idiot status just yet. Thanks for the feedback.
by fiftyone on May 11, 2011 2:49 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I'm more than happy accepting idiot status for saying I was going to ask something and then not asking a question.
...and now I'm here
I think the heart of it was this
I mean, if we can’t get to know our sports idols (and very few of us fans get to do so), then why should we act like we do?
And it’s a valid question. Why do people care that players on their favorite teams might be assholes? In Bradley’s case, I can see it, because his actions directly cost his teams games on more than one occasion, but the garden variety jackhole probably doesn’t deserve the amount of scorn he usually gets.
I hesitate to bring this name up, but look at Barry Bonds. Even without the steroids, he was a world-class jerk by all accounts, and fans hated him – but fans never knew him. The average fan gets no closer to a superstar athlete than they do to flying to the moon, and yet we expect them to be not just good athletes, but good citizens, to pet kittens, and to generally be nice all the time. Which to me is a bit unrealistic.
I get that people want heroes. I get that people want role models. I just don’t get the vitriol when a rich, young, entitled, coddled, sheltered individual that you and I will never meet turns out to be an ass.
It even goes well beyond the realm of sports/idolatry
We want to perceive the world as being strictly black and white or good and bad; we’re not hardwired to accept that shades of grey are universal and absolutes are exceptions, not the rules. Absolutes are easier to accept, easier to interpret, and easier to quantify/define.
Speaking to Bonds
I lived in the Bay Area when he was breaking records and everyone knew he was on ‘roids. San Francisco fans loooovvveeed him and, maybe, still do. I can’t say that anyone has loved Milton Bradley.
I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. Ugh
No offense, but this really didn't go anywhere and didn't say anything that hasn't been said better by multiple writers.
Namely Sullivan and Drayer.
Not really sure what your point was.
by sanford_and_son on May 11, 2011 12:46 PM PDT reply actions
I know. And I realize that came off as dick-ish, but I just appreciate the level of quality most fanposts have here, but this one just didn't add anything to discussion.
by sanford_and_son on May 11, 2011 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions
In the end, sanford_and_son lost the media game.
by ThomasG on May 11, 2011 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
No offense taken, sir.
Not my best piece of writing ever, and I owe the community my best efforrt, but maybe I wasn’t quite ready to let MB fade away. And every time someone professed their hate for him, I seethed… shouldn’t you at least know a guy before you hate him?
(Hey, that should find a place in the post somewhere, to sharpen it a little. Thanks for the therapy.)
by fiftyone on May 11, 2011 2:56 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I hear you. I was a huge fan/defender of Bradley while he was here.
Despite how badly he’d been playing, I’m sad to see him go.
by sanford_and_son on May 11, 2011 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Sports media adores the bad boys of basketball and football, not so much in baseball.
"It's our money," owner Arte Moreno said.

by 



















