Mariners Reportedly Trade For Aaron Laffey, Consider Second Pile
Update: trade's official, and it's Matt Lawson going the other way. Lawson came over in the Lee trade and posted an .811 OPS in AA last year as a second baseman, but he's also 25 - only months younger than Laffey - and kind of the infield version of the guy we just got in terms of the very limited upside. Lawson and Laffey were born to be PCL heroes. Recall that Lawson was available in the Rule 5 Draft, and was passed over.
Shawn Kelley's off to the 60-day DL to make roster room for the new guy.
-----
According to The Plain Dealer's Paul Hoynes, the Mariners have reportedly traded for Aaron Laffey. Upon seeing this news, it took me several minutes to remember that, as part of a trade, the Mariners must be giving something in return, which should tell you something about Laffey's value. Laffey's been a left-handed pitcher for the Indians, by the way. Maybe I should have led with that. No word yet on the return.
I'm going to show you some numbers. The first are Laffey's combined strikeouts and walks over the last two seasons in the minors as a starter and reliever:
Strikeouts: 25
Walks: 28
Now I'm going to show you Laffey's combined strikeouts and walks over the last two seasons in the Majors as a starter and reliever:
Strikeouts: 87
Walks: 85
Laffey does not miss bats. He walks too many guys. He generates a fair number of groundballs, although his groundball tendencies aren't what they were earlier in his career. And it's not like his repertoire is one rife with upside. He throws a sinking fastball in the mid- to high-80s, and his offspeed offerings are a slider and a changeup, neither of which is anything special. He's extremely limited, and even when he's going well, his ceiling is lower than one of those ceilings in a really old European church.
If he sounds like someone out of the Jamey Wright or old Sean Green mold, that's about right. A key difference, though, is that he's left-handed, meaning it's more difficult to spot him against same-handed hitters. And while he's pitched well against same-handed hitters - as you'd expect of a sinkerballer with a low arm angle - it's not like he's been great. Over the course of his career, Laffey has allowed left-handed batters to reach at a .342 clip. That's not enough outs.
So, whatever. I don't mean to convey that Aaron Laffey is terrible. He's remarkably mediocre, and earlier in his career he was a little bit better than that. He offers the flexibility of being able to both start and relieve, though he isn't particularly good at either. As a former Indian, he's familiar with Eric Wedge, which might explain why this trade was made in the first place. I don't know what he'll come to camp looking to do, but he's just another name on the pile, or possibly the first name in a second pile.
Aaron Laffey fun fact: Aaron Laffey is only the fourth 468th overall pick to make the Major Leagues. He is also the best of them.
121 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dave Cameron likes him
I actually like Aaron Laffey. Call me weird.
Laffey, vs LHB, career: 2.86 BB/9, 6.39 K/9, 46.9% GB%, 3.77 FIP. At worst, he’s a decent left-on-left reliever.
The FIP belies a suppressed HR/FB rate
Aaron Laffey is all kinds of bad. Literally every kind
Pretty much anybody left-handed in AAA or the Majors would be a decent left-on-left reliever
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 4:46 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
USSM vs LL smack talk!
We’re fighting in the empty lot at 10:30. Chains and fists only. No knives/guns.
I'm not saying he's wrong
It just isn’t a selling point.
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 4:49 PM PST up reply actions
I think saying Laffey's floor is a decent LOOGY is wrong.
Laffey is bad.
This is the best part of Laffeys wiki page:
Laffey went into spring training in 2008, competing for the fifth spot in the rotation, however Cliff Lee won the job and Laffey was sent back to Buffalo
by Kenneth Arthur on Mar 2, 2011 4:46 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
You should remember him
As the man who jacked off at the sight of a Russel Branyan homerun.
Steel Nick
Ahhh,
that’s why the name sounds familiar.
Mariners/D Broncos/BSU Broncos fan in Seattle
The first rule of Lookout Landing is...
You'll recall that he was exposed in the Rule 5 Draft and unselected
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 4:56 PM PST up reply actions
Me too but I can't conjure any sort of emotion over these guys
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 4:59 PM PST up reply actions
Feels like we need middle infield depth more than we needed a 14th guy to compete for the 5th SP/LH RP role
by Matthew on Mar 2, 2011 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
That's what Rodriguez is for.
If Lawson can’t play SS, then his value as middle IF depth isn’t all that great. Sort of OK guys you can stick at 2B are everywhere in the minors. This org clearly still has Tug Hulett’s phone number, and Tug can sort of play SS.
Cash + Matt Lawson to make this deal?
I’m no longer indifferent and into this trade is bad territory
I bet Aaron Laffey has good eyes.
by Eyebrows on Mar 2, 2011 4:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Zduriencik is the one that made the trade.
If Wedge had input it’s a pattern and his failing as a GM.
by Aaron Campeau on Mar 2, 2011 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 6 recs
I'd still take Zduriencik's "meh" bad trades than the alternative.
At least it wasn’t anyone TOO special we gave up.
by Mariner John on Mar 2, 2011 4:59 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
If this was Bavasi we would've traded Dan Cortes.
Yes, we have a coupon.
by Crystal for DH on Mar 2, 2011 5:31 PM PST up reply actions
Laffey Time!
Wedge probably asked for Laffey for back of the rotation help. Good move, i like it.
If Wedge asked for Laffey and Zduriencik got him because the M's need "back of the rotation help"
then Jack Zduirencik is not very good at at least one part of his job.
by Aaron Campeau on Mar 2, 2011 5:00 PM PST up reply actions
The not understanding that there are 83 identical options to fill that same role are a problem too
by Aaron Campeau on Mar 2, 2011 5:05 PM PST up reply actions
Oh I don't know.
Luke French, Fabio Castro, Chris Seddon and Royce Ring don’t have a lot of big league experience like Laffey does.
I fear more awful attempts at puns more than anything.
I wish it was Aaron Smith or something relatively unpunnable/wordplayable.
Relax, it's not like we're talking about Laffey's favorite type of candy.
by Eyebrows on Mar 2, 2011 5:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Or his favorite Looney Tunes character.
by Eyebrows on Mar 2, 2011 5:07 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Or his favorite children's singer.
by Eyebrows on Mar 2, 2011 5:08 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I'm stumped on this one
Mariners/D Broncos/BSU Broncos fan in Seattle
The first rule of Lookout Landing is...
Big time illuminating words from Zduriencik
“With Aaron, we felt we had the opportunity to acquire a left-handed pitcher with Major League experience,” general manager Jack Zduriencik said in a statement released by the club. “We will bring him to Spring Training and give him a chance to compete for a position on our pitching staff.”
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 5:06 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Subtext: No Australians need apply.
by Eyebrows on Mar 2, 2011 5:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Is this an actual quote?
It sounds too boilerplate to not be made up.
Mariners/D Broncos/BSU Broncos fan in Seattle
The first rule of Lookout Landing is...
Sounds very Bavasi-ish
Cue the Fett42 gif.
2010 Safeco Field Record: 2-1 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 12-5
by Fin on Mar 2, 2011 8:04 PM PST up reply actions
Thanks, Matthew

2010 Safeco Field Record: 2-1 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 12-5
by Fin on Mar 2, 2011 8:06 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Seems almost negligible to me.
Matt Lawson isn’t much of a prospect right? And Aaron Laffey is not likey to contribute much of anything. The cash seems like the only relevant part of this deal to me, but at worst its a small negative. I feel pretty indifferent.
NO THIS OBVIOUSLY MEANS NO PLAYOFFS AND FUCKING DOOM
This is the most boring trade ever.
It's hard to hit a ball that is still - Ichiro
by the other side on Mar 2, 2011 5:21 PM PST up reply actions
The Mariners have no tree
for that would require rings
by Matthew on Mar 2, 2011 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 13 recs
It is a magic tree with magic talking sticks
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Shape shifting into fire would be scary
Everyone’s trying to kill you!
I have always dreamed of being inside of one
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 2, 2011 5:37 PM PST up reply actions
But would you become mingled with the lava properties?
I’m worried about you becoming a basaltic rock down the line
Meh.
Lawson looked decent, but they already have Ackley and Seager. I thought Laffey was better and was excited about the deal, but it looks like we’re just getting HoRam 2.0. The difference is we’re not giving up a talented, young reliever with major league experience.
Yes, we have a coupon.
Aaron made the point above that Laffey is replacement level and we have plenty of him already.
Lawson and Seager are about all the org has for moderately ready depth in the utility role. We know Tui is not good and we know Josh Wilson is not good.
That's absolutely true, but we have a million Lawsons as well.
Lawson is older than Tui, doesn’t play a premium position and hasn’t made it out of AA yet. Tui sucks, but Lawson’s going to have to work pretty hard to follow in his footsteps.
If you don’t like the Tug Hulett comparison (I think it’s insulting to Hulett), here’s another. The M’s briefly had Travis Denker in AAA last year. Denker’s been in the minors for 8 seasons, and in 3 years at AAA, he’s hit for a not amazing OPS of .722, not that different from Lawson’s career MiLB mark of .758. Denker plays 2B/3B, had a decent cup of coffee with the SF Giants, and is the very definition of freely available. Oh, and Denker and Lawson are about the same age.
The M’s have some depth at 2B. What they need are shortstops… but as Lawson isn’t one, it’s not relevant.
The thing about Lawson that I forgot was how old he is
I thought he was 23ish. At 25, I’m back in the meh territory except for the fact that Aaron Laffey really blows
Well, no argument there.
It’s just that Lawson has a 1:3 chance or so of being as ‘valuable’ as Laffey is. Which isn’t really saying much of anything, so yeah.
Just following a successful precedent
In the past the M’s have been able to get useful players like Ben Broussard and Eduardo Perez from Cleveland in exchange for lesser-known prospects, and this never blows up in the team’s face. I like it.
by Suburban Shocker on Mar 2, 2011 5:53 PM PST reply actions
Weird.
There have been 112 comments on this apparently unremarkable trade, and I read every single one of them.
Here’s what I have to add: Laffey has an option left. This probably true of 42 and the right arm of one of the 83 indiscernible guys like Laffey, so it’s not actually worth anything. However, it significantly increases the chance that he will drive back and forth between Seattle and Tacoma this year.
Source on the option left?
I’ve been hearing he has no option left
Baker was my source.
His twitter, 5:08pm, March 2.

by 


















