Milton Bradley Is The Current Favorite To Start In Left Field
Last season, after coming over in a bad contract swap, Milton Bradley left the stadium in the middle of a game, was placed on the restricted list while undergoing personal counseling, struggled at the plate upon his return, and then injured his knee and had surgery, finishing with a .641 OPS over 73 games. Already seemingly on thin ice, Milton then went and got arrested not too long ago, and a lot of us figured that his time with the Mariners might be up.
Jack Zduriencik, meanwhile, has developed a reputation for saying nothing of substance to the media, and is known for building entire press conferences around the words "at", "end", and "day". He keeps his cards close to his vest, and while that isn't necessarily a bad quality for a general manager of a baseball team to have, it can be frustrating when you're listening in and hoping for some glimmer of insight.
So you can imagine my surprise when, during an on-air interview with Kevin Calabro this afternoon, Zduriencik said the following about Bradley, word for word:
Right now, he's the leading candidate to be the left fielder.
Bradley isn't only still with the team - as of this moment, he's in line to be one of its everyday players, standing beside Franklin Gutierrez and Ichiro. We weren't really planning on that.
I don't know that this was the idea coming into camp, and Zduriencik made sure to say that an awful lot can change between now and the end of the month. Just because things are a certain way on March 10th doesn't mean they'll still be that way on March 31st. But Bradley and Michael Saunders have gone in opposite directions since reporting. When talking about Bradley, Zduriencik made three references to energy, and also called him excited and upbeat. When talking about Saunders, meanwhile, Zduriencik said this:
We would like to have had Michael come in and do some things differently.
Clearly, the organization is happy with how Bradley has looked in the early going, and it's frustrated with Saunders. I gather they're still trying to make adjustments to his swing, which isn't really where a starting candidate wants to be in the middle of March. Barring injury, it seems like Saunders is really going to have to come on strong over these final few weeks if he wants to win the job.
So let's say Bradley gets it. Where does that leave us? Saunders, Ryan Langerhans, and Gabe Gross would be left in a fight for the fourth outfielder slot on the bench. I can see the argument for keeping Saunders up, since he could work with Major League coaches, but he also has an option and could get everyday action in Tacoma, which I think would be the more likely course. Langerhans or Gross could handle the job just fine.
And then we'd get to see how Bradley does. Here's the thing. The instinctive response to something like this is to be upset, because the Mariners are a rebuilding ballclub, and rebuilding ballclubs should play their young guys as often as possible. But sometimes those young guys aren't ready, and furthermore, the way things are on Opening Day doesn't have to be the way things are in August. If Bradley wins the left field job, he'll only keep it for as long as he's producing and is clearly the best option. If Bradley sucks, or gets hurt, and Saunders finds his game, then a switch can be made. These things aren't permanent, or even anywhere close.
So that's the situation. Saunders could still end up the starter come April, but he's the underdog right now, and I'd be lying if I said I weren't disappointed. But I'm not so much disappointed in the team as I am disappointed in Saunders, and his lack of progression. He's one of my favorite players in the system, but he needs to play better than he has, and he doesn't deserve to have a job handed to him. Youth isn't a good reason on its own to let a guy start.
And Bradley? Who knows. As a starter, he could be terrible, he could be awesome, or he could be somewhere in between. What he wouldn't be is boring. Unpredictability can be fun if you look at it right.
127 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can't disagree.
While spring training stats aren’t that indicative, nothing I’ve heard about Saunders’ approach at the plate makes me feel confident about him as a starter.
Leave it to K-Cab to get the scoop!
I like this turn of events. At best this lights a fire in Saunders, he puts the time in to improve, and he starts to hit considerably better. If that doesn’t happen and Saunders’ struggles continue, then maybe starting the season in Tacoma will be a kick in the pants for him. At least he would play there every day, and would be able to work on his swing without the pressures of doing so in the Majors.
As for Bradley, he’s done all that could be asked for him this spring. If he starts & performs well for the Mariners in left field, maybe we can flip him for something shiny come summer.
How did Saunders get this slacker rep?
Has he said or done something that indicated he needs a fire lit in him, or a kick in the pants? Yes, he’s certainly failed to hit major league pitching, but maybe that’s because, well, it’s hard to hit major league pitching? Not everybody makes the jump to the majors and immediately tears the cover off the ball; most, in fact, do not. I haven’t been following things closely this off-season, so maybe I missed something, but is there some reason to think the problem with Saunders is not that he is struggling with this final step, but instead he lacks motivation or competitive spirit?
by Ugly Dickshot on Mar 11, 2011 12:02 AM PST up reply actions
Jack Z called him out in public
“We would like to have had Michael come in and do some things differently.”
Is executive speak for real disappointment
I would think most who have their swing significantly changed when they make that jump probably fail at first much more often too
With those changes they are making and have been making with his swing, another half season or more in the minors might just do him a lot of good.
Maybe Bradley will impress and become tradable.
Saunders…I dunno, I guess he’s only had 400 major league at bats, but then again they were some pretty dreadful at bats.
Yeah, probably
Carlos Silvelite
by OceanBird on Mar 10, 2011 10:33 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 5 recs
Then we coast to a WS victory
On Alex Liddi’s 20 post-season slams.
While I get this, I'm a bit confused why Jack Cust apparently has the DH position locked down.
I’d rather see Milton there than in the field. Though, after last year, I’d rather see two good bats at LF and DH over just one, so I’m fine with it at this point.
Because Jack Cust has consistently been a .340-.370 wOBA hitter for three season.
If Jack Zduriencick hired Jack Cust for a few million dollars to come fight for a role in Spring Training, he should be fired. You can do that with a guy who has a couple definsive positions. You don’t do that for DH.
If Bradley's still going to be on the team, it makes a lot of sense to start him.
1) He has a lot of upside still, even is less likely now to live up to that potential.
2) If he gets injured, who cares. He’s off the team at the end of the year.
3) Milton Bradley is a re-sign candidate, since no other team seems to want him.
4) We still have a chance to compete in April. It’s May, June, July that we’re probably out of it. May as well stick the “more ready” player there and see what happens.
I’d rather him be there. It puts him at greater injury risk, but that’s not really our concern anymore since it was supposed to be a rebuilding year anyway. If he gets injured, just replace him with the young kid. I’m pleased with this announcement.
...and now I'm here
by CapSea on Mar 10, 2011 9:05 PM PST reply actions 5 recs
I totally agree with this
Saunders has really floundered in his stints up here so even without MB on this team i think saunders could use some time to go back to Tacoma.
And hey, maybe we’ll have a good April, and baseball will be interesting for awhile
Or maybe we’ll have a shitty April, and Milton bradley will throw a water cooler at a fan. Either way it’s going to be worth watching.
by Sambearpig on Mar 10, 2011 10:19 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
He must have summed it up twice as well as that which you hadn't yet thought out.
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die, anymore than it ceases to be serious when people laugh." - George Bernard Shaw
by Tyler Jorgensen on Mar 12, 2011 1:38 AM PST up reply actions
As long as Saunders has an option
I agree with most people here, there just isn’t a down-side.
No one would be blocked, Michael could get more at-bats in Tacoma and come up later in the season, and Bradley might actually earn his keep.
If not? Release Milton two months later then initially planned.
I am not that upset with this
even though, like you Jeff, Saunders has found a special place in my heart. The only thing I don’t want happening is Saunders sitting on the bench. In a year where we are not likely to compete, there is no reason to not have our prospects playing somewhere, even if that somewhere is in Tacoma.
Milton Bradley is a reason to watch this team
If we are gonna lose some games, I want to have fun doing it.
by Edgar for Pres on Mar 10, 2011 10:33 PM PST reply actions
Every road game with Bradley in the field
Will be an adventure. We may see Good Milton charming the hecklers and giving that huge grin; but we’re also one insult / thrown object away from Bad Milton going totally postal. Whatever happens, the gifs will flow.
In all honesty I would be rather pissed if someone threw a beer bottle at me
"Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly, the ill deeds along with the good and let me be judged accordingly. The rest is silence." ~ Dinobot
by beastwarking on Mar 11, 2011 5:28 AM PST up reply actions
How has Smoak been doing during Spring Training?
Last I heard he has had a pretty slow/not good ST to this point.
If so, what are our options there? Is he THE GUY to get the 1B job come opening day, and we just hope he starts to click? Or does he have an option for Tacoma and we do something else?
Here’s to hoping he can get it going soon. I really want the guy to succeed.
Smoak's going to start
Might get some breaks, but he doesn’t have much in the way of competition.
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 10, 2011 11:51 PM PST up reply actions
"...and I'd be lying if I said I weren't disappointed."
Not only would you be lying, but you’d also be grammatically incorrect.
You're wrong.
And even if you weren’t, does that sentence really detract from your comprehension or enjoyment of the post?
by Mataya on Mar 11, 2011 12:49 AM PST up reply actions 8 recs
I wasn't.
And even if I was, didn’t you enjoy my comment?
Yes, you were wrong, and no, I didn't.
Your intended correction seems pointless (there was no confusion about what Jeff meant) and nit-picky.
Worse, it was incorrect. Jeff’s sentence appears to be a correct use of subjunctive mood, referring to something that he imagines happening but is not certain to happen (because he doesn’t actually plan on saying that he is not disappointed).
OK, I wasn't going to get into this, but
the subjunctive applies to the main verb of the clause, not to the indirect quote contained within it — i.e., to “I said,” not to the content of what Jeff might have said. As such, fiftysix is in fact correct.
For my part, I’m just glad to see someone trying to use the subjunctive mood.
by The Ancient Mariner on Mar 11, 2011 9:09 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
My mistake, sorry.
I was just stoked to see the subjunctive too, and fiftysix’s comment came across as a bit douchey.
My apologies if I’ve done the same by attempting to correct him or her.
Apologies for my perceived douchery.
I’ll go back to keeping my mouth shut and just reading. It has served me well around here for the past four years.
With such a subtle point...
And one easily confused for a more common grammatical failing (not knowing about the subjunctive, which many don’t)… It would be best, perhaps, to explain.
I wish I would have known what the hell a subjunctive was...
back when I taught English Lit.
Might have helped. Then again, might not have.
I was in Cali at the time, those Halo fans aren’t so focused on grammar.
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die, anymore than it ceases to be serious when people laugh." - George Bernard Shaw
by Tyler Jorgensen on Mar 12, 2011 1:41 AM PST up reply actions
No worries. I need to not be so quick to jump next time.
And, who knows, I might even make accurate corrections in the future. Oh well…
Ms fans have a tendency to over rate our prospects
Remember all the enthusiasm about Snelling, Adam Jones, Rob Johnson, etc. Saunders may be another one who just isn’t what we hoped for. It happens in baseball. They are called prospects, not sure things.
by New England Fan on Mar 11, 2011 3:44 AM PST reply actions
I still have irrational hope for Erik Bedard.
This is something I try to keep in the dark because I’m afraid it will die in the light.
ignacio
Snelling wasn't overrated
just fragile.
by The Ancient Mariner on Mar 11, 2011 6:25 AM PST up reply actions
Saunders is not overrated by us
He was in BA’s top 100 two times before ’09 and ’10, rating 65 and 30 respectively. He always had good tools and plenty of potential. Jones did not turn out too badly considering the burnout rate of prospects, just not with us. The ones that really hurt in recent times are Balentien and Clement. Both had contact and plate discipline issues though, which means they were more likely to be boom or bust players when they reached the majors. It is not too late for Saunders but he still suffers from similar contact issues that the others did.
by tdot mariner fan on Mar 11, 2011 6:42 AM PST up reply actions
Every team's fans overrate their prospects.
It’s a natuaral bias.
by ThomasG on Mar 11, 2011 7:06 AM PST up reply actions 4 recs
I always overrated Greg PeeWee Briley.
Really thought he was gonna be something.
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die, anymore than it ceases to be serious when people laugh." - George Bernard Shaw
by Tyler Jorgensen on Mar 12, 2011 1:43 AM PST up reply actions
We certainly seem to have an astronomically high failure rate with our prospects but maybe that's just me.
I don't think so and it's definitely not "astronomical"
Things would look a LOT different from this perspective if it weren’t for Bill Bavasi.
Shin-Soo Choo, Asdrubal Cabrera, Adam Jones, Rafael Soriano.. these players did most of their development in the M’s organization. A guy like Jeremy Reed did not. Guys like Jose Lopez and Yuniesky Betancourt actually proved to be more beneficial than most prospects for a considerable amount of time.
Pitcher attrition right is super high, so just the fact that Felix has come this far, balances off failures like Blackley and Nageotte somewhat.
by Kenneth Arthur on Mar 11, 2011 8:54 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I think a lot of it is just because
You are paying attention to our prospects mostly, If you were doing it to other teams it would be noticeable how many of their prospects get washed out as well.
They can’t all be stars.
by ambrosia2112 on Mar 11, 2011 10:44 AM PST up reply actions
Oh, but they can.
Did you watch the all star game last year?
Maybe but I realize that they can't all pan out.
I should probably just be more patient as Zduriencik continues to bring in and develop young talent but it’s difficult to be patient with a team I’ve been waiting on for years. Bavasi traded away so much young talent, it makes me want to vomit. I’m so thankful we found somebody competent after that bafoon.
Besides, this could be they year of Milton Bradley's Perfection
He certainly has and can get on base and hit for power. What’s more, he is bound to be putting his best bat forward in this contract year, or he’d likely done in MLB. Maybe he’s made his money, but I’d like to see what a motivated Milton can do. I also haven’t fully gotten over the amusing names of Milton Bradley (no relation) games including “Frustration”, “Trouble”, “Splat!”, “Shrunken head apple sculpture”, and my favorite “Bradley’s Toy Money complete with Game of Banking”. No relation indeed! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Milton_Bradley_Company_products
The trouble with this line of thinking is that it assumes Bradley was not putting in effort before.
That doesn’t seem fair or likely.
Oh, you're right
I’m sure he was trying/putting in the effort, and I feel bad for insinuating otherwise. But I am still enthused that whatever it was that happened to him in Texas happens again. He finds a good book to read, the winning atmosphere in Seattle just makes coming to work fun again, or just knowing that Michael Saunders wants something he’s got—I hope something works for him while Saunders figures out how to spin hay into gold.
by goyo70 on Mar 11, 2011 6:25 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I hope you're right.
I also like your image of Saunders feverishly trying to spin hay into gold, probably all the while regretting the deal he made with that greedy king.
Don't forget Headache.
Also, apparently there is one called Mr. T. Awesome.
I am going to come into your house at night and rec up the place.
This screams trade chip
The Mariners are going to be dealing lots of players come June. They’ll eat Bradley’s salary and hopefully get a useful piece or two out of him. Others to go will be Jack Wilson, David Aardsma, another bullpen piece, and maybe even Olivo. I say Olivo because there are at least three teams right now who need a catcher as that position is extremely thin.
With Bradley and some of the others it is a classic case of play the veterans for half a year to keep the team from being totally out of contention in May. This will drive up there values for trades and then they play the kids in the second half.
I would hazard a guess that Bradley has close to zero trade value.
by ThomasG on Mar 11, 2011 7:07 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Trade value for Bradley
If he hits like he has in the past and the M’s are willing to pay him the rest of the year don’t you think some team would give us something for him?
Not in the slightest.
He’s worn out his welcome with nearly a half-dozen teams, has a reputation for being an erratic malcontent, is oft-injured, and is coming off one of the worst-hitting seasons in recent memory. It’s going to take a lot more than a half-season worth of decent hitting for him to build up any kind of tangible value for a team to overlook all the negatives.
That said
Could Bradley be traded? Sure, I could see it. But I seriously doubt anything of value would come back the Mariners’ way. Probably something along the lines of a mid-20s quasi-prospect or a PTBNL.
You're probably right...
I was hoping that teams would see past that stuff like so many teams have in the past like the Mariners, Cubs, and Rangers did among others. Then again, as you said, he’s running out of teams that might take a chance on him.
If he was cheap and hitting, he could conceivably fetch something.
His contract is going to make it tough to move him (unless the M’s kick in a bunch of money).
Think there's any chance that a productive Bradley could be traded solely as a salary dump?
Moving a productive Bradley in July would save the Mariners about $5M, and give our trading partner a solid hitter, and presumably an upgrade. That seems even.
I have a hard time seeing a team taking on Bradley's salary.
He’s just too big of a risk at this point even if he is hitting well come June.
No matter where you go, there you are.
If he has an 850-900 OPS in June or July someone will give us something decent for him
even though we may have to kick in a lot of money
My post was poorly phrased.
I don’t see us trading Bradley as a salary dump. I don’t think anyone will take on his salary based on the risk he represents. That being said, if he’s putting up great numbers come June, I do think he could be moved if we picked up all or nearly most of his salary.
No matter where you go, there you are.
And if we're picking up all/most of his salary, it's unlikely we'd trade him anyway...
…because he’s probably more useful to us than a salary dump. That’s just my opinion. If he’s productive and our offense is still woeful, having a teeny bit of pop is better than giving him away for basically nothing.
I am going to come into your house at night and rec up the place.
Yes, there's no point in a real salary dump as he's only signed through 2011.
You’d save a few months of salary. The M’s probably wouldn’t get much in trade, and they wouldn’t save anything for 2012, so I just can’t see that making sense for anyone.
Olivo's never had the ability to walk
What makes you think he’ll be able to in June?
by nathaniel dawson on Mar 11, 2011 6:01 PM PST up reply actions
And Aardsma's ability and walks seem to coincide much too highly.
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die, anymore than it ceases to be serious when people laugh." - George Bernard Shaw
by Tyler Jorgensen on Mar 12, 2011 1:50 AM PST up reply actions
This is what I would have wanted to happen if Bradley was going to stay on the team.
I mean, hes making 11 million dollars and he’s still on the 40 man. If he was going to be cut because of last season and off the field issues, it should have been done a month ago. When it wasn’t, my hope would be to see Bradley as the primary left fielder. Even as a rebuilding ball club, I don’t think Saunders progression will be hurt by going back to Tacoma and it might even be good for him. And Bradley is an enjoyable player to watch, unlike past albatross contracts like Silva.
Absolutely.
I’m not really one of them, but he was an intriguing player a year or two ago as a platoon guy. Then he just stalled out; otherwise known as pulling a Shealy.
I have mixed feelings about this.
On the one hand, I like Saunders and hope he succeeds. His slow progress during his MLB experience has been one of the bigger disappointments, for me, of the last couple years.
On the other hand, I’ve liked MB ever since he came over, and hope he takes the chance to prove the haters wrong.
They're still working on Saunders swing aren't they?
If its still a work in progress theres no point to have Saunders up in the Majors flailing away. Especially if we have good Milton.
What a semi-colossal waste of time...
I mean, I know it’s spring training, and you kinda want to cover all the spots on the roster and this is a semi surprising/disappointing event. But a post this long on Milton Bradley being the starter— in the second week in March?
I don’t think I’m revealing any big secrets here, but the odds are, sometime in the next three weeks, that Bradley will get hurt or display behavior that makes it impossible for management to look the other way.
I’m pretty good at reading between the lines of taciturn comments— it’s s skill you develop when Eric Wedge is your manager for most of a decade. Zduriencik seems to be saying “Milton is hitting .310 with some extra stuff and Saunders isn’t doing anything.”
(It’s the use of the words ‘right now’ and ;leading’…. Zdyrencik-speak seems to be a dialect that anyone fluent in Wedge can unpack.)
If I were running the team, I’d want Saunders to start 2011 in left— to the point where I’d be willing to put my thumb on the scales when I’m weighing both players.
But you can’t give a job to a player hitting .150 in spring— when he’s also hit .214 (.625 OPS) in 456 plate appearances. They can’t even say "He looked like he was putting things together late in the year (he hit .128 and .184 in the last two months.) Plus, if Bradley does play well, there are still a few suckers who might trade you something for him (I’m thinking Phillies with Brown out).
All you can really do is grit your teeth and hope the situation changes more to your liking.
The first and most important point is that if there's something you don't want to read, you are free to make that decision and ignore it.
To complain about the amount of thought put into a post regarding a starting position for a team in a competition that involves a moderately beloved prospect and a controversial player like Bradley? When Zduriencik has been consistently vague in the press regarding any and all roster moves, a statement like this (as Jeff clearly pointed out) is out of the norm and worth discussing. In fact it’s quite hypocritical given that you wrote 1900 words on a guy with a chance to be a LOOGY. The rest of your complaint revolves around your opinions of Bradley and Wedge and are not some agreed upon fact. The Mariners will not just assume that Bradley will be injured or act out “sometime in the next three weeks” and to do so would be bad management on their part.
If you think Saunders should be handed the job as you more than allude to, that’s your burden to justify it instead of state it as fact and use it as a point of argumentation. In fact, I’m certain what you were getting at there since you say you’d hand him the job if you were running the team and then contradict yourself in the next paragraph.
I know you are a fan visiting from another site, but please show more respect towards authors and commenters of this blog and not both insult and talk down to us. You’ll find Lookout Landing is very receptive to arguments made with solid logic and/or fact behind them but you will not get a favorable response through rudeness and unsupported opinion.
by abender20 on Mar 11, 2011 12:25 PM PST up reply actions 20 recs
There’s a minor difference between profiling a seven-year professional career (which involved some bizarre decision-making) and trying to turn a one-sentence comment— an assessment of less than 30 at-bats— into a major policy statement.
Bradley is hitting .310; Saunders is hitting .150— what else would Zdurencik say if asked? You can’t be non-committal if one player is eating the other one’s lunch. Had the comment been “It’s very early and we’ll see what happens” people would write "Bradley’s spring hasn’t been good enough and the M’s must not want him to get the job " Which, because he is Milton Bradley, would be an issue.
And since you were so confused by my comment, I’ll explain it more clearly: If I were running a rotten team, I would want a 24-year to play, but I wouldn’t hand the job to him. If Bradley hits .310 and Saunders .295, that’s one at-bat in a split-squad game.and I’m willing to show bias toward youth to that degree. Ten times that difference? No.
by Geoff Beckman on Mar 11, 2011 11:56 PM PST up reply actions
There is a minor difference, Jeff's take was informative.
Furthermore,
I don’t know
lot can change
doesn’t mean
I gather
it seems like
Let’s say
I can see the argument
I think
could handle
sometimes
If
are not the words of someone trying to turn “a one-sentence comment” into a major policy statement. They are words used to qualify what that one sentence might imply and then explore how one scenario could play out. Which, of course was not actually a one sentence comment in the first place, but two quoted sentences plus a reference to several others in which Zduriencik praised Bradley’s energy on the field.
Don’t assume what people here would write. Especially when you try to invent a scenario in which so many declarative words (“hasn’t been good enough” “Ms must not want him”) would be uttered about an actually non-committal quote rather than the one Zduriencik actually said.
by Matthew on Mar 12, 2011 7:47 AM PST up reply actions 8 recs
Not to pick on you personally
But I am curious as to where to sentiment comes from. Bradley is maybe the last Mariner I’d describe as awesome
by Poochie on Mar 11, 2011 3:24 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I like him too.
I don’t agree with everything he does off the field, but I seem to remember an overall good sentiment towards Milton Bradley from the commenters here last season.
by Kenneth Arthur on Mar 11, 2011 4:21 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Agree. The infamous smile GIF wasn't made in jest...
…it genuinely brightened our lives. I, for one, wish him all the success in the world. I’d just prefer he stop getting arrested and stops allegedly abusing his wife.
I am going to come into your house at night and rec up the place.
What Humbled said
He’s made good comments about the city, hasn’t been a big distraction, and continues to be an interesting character to watch.
His trip to the restricted list and comments regarding it showed a lot of maturity and his dealing with own struggles didn’t ignite any sort of controversy within the clubhouse last year.
To me he seems to be a likable guy who is terrible at dealing with his own problems, which is easy to empathize with.
I see
I know he’s been treated unfairly by the media, but wheter he intends to or not, whether he regrets his actions or not, he still does horrible things of the field. Added to that he is injury prone, unreliable, and bad. I don’t get it. I guess I’ve just been over him for a long time.
by Poochie on Mar 11, 2011 5:45 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I think it makes a great deal of sense to dislike him too.
But it’s for me to not root for a player who’s trying to succeed despite himself.
I know Milton Bradley has a rather large track record in negative issues to conclude that he does horrible things.
I have trouble falling in line with this however. I don’t know what kind of person Bradley is right now. After checking himself into counseling, Bradley hasn’t had an on-field issue ever since. As far as off the field since then he has this divorce dispute. We know very little about the relationship with Bradley and his soon-to-be-ex-wife and divorces are never pretty. It’s certainly not pretty for someone who may or may not be trying to get over anger issues and personal demons.
I don’t know what Milton Bradley does off the field these days. The organization has a better idea than I do. All I know about is stuff that he reportedly did off the field in years’ past. I hate automatically assuming Bradley is a bad person based on stuff he did in the past. I need to see current examples of how he’s still terrible at life to make that conclusion. And since his counseling, I’ve been genuinely curious what kind of person Milton Bradley is at this moment.
I’m also curious as to what kind of player Milton Bradley is at age 33. It was only last year that Bradley was bad. The year before, simply not very good (while having to deal with drama during his Cubs tenure). Prior to that, some various forms of average (if not above average). Is he really finished? I dunno.
Given his history, I don't know that Milton Bradley deserves anyone's benefit of the doubt.
I hope dude hits dingers, but I don’t like him.
by Aaron Campeau on Mar 11, 2011 11:00 PM PST up reply actions
I feel bad for him and all but I think he's probably finished as a ballplayer
Spring Training results be damned.
Milton has a message for you Poochie...

by Patrick Stites on Mar 11, 2011 9:46 PM PST up reply actions
Apologies if the image is too big, realized after posting it might have been.
by Patrick Stites on Mar 11, 2011 9:48 PM PST up reply actions
He does on occasion.
But I had texted him about your comment , and he had me post this for him.
by Patrick Stites on Mar 11, 2011 11:11 PM PST up reply actions

by 



















