Sergio Santos And The Closer Market
These are bewildering days we're living in. These are bewildering days on a larger scale, and these are bewildering days on a baseball scale, and specifically on a baseball closer market scale. Absolutely bewildering. I am so bewildered!
It has looked for a while like the closer market was inflated. There was the Jonathan Papelbon contract. There was the Heath Bell contract. There was the rumored Ryan Madson contract, there was the Joe Nathan contract, and there was this report from Jeff Wilson, saying that the A's are asking way too much for Andrew Bailey. Teams have been behaving as if closers are worth more than the numbers have always suggested they are.
But then this morning, just a little while ago, the White Sox traded Sergio Santos. They traded Sergio Santos to the Blue Jays in exchange for prospect Nestor Molina. Last year, Santos struck out 35% of the batters he faced. He's 28 years old, he obviously throws sharp stuff, and he's under a guaranteed cheap contract through 2014, and then has club options through 2017. Santos looked like a great value. All Kenny Williams got in exchange was a pitching prospect, and while Nestor Molina isn't a bad pitching prospect, and while he put up crazy numbers last season, he doesn't seem to have the stuff to stay an ace as he climbs. He could, of course, but his realistic ceiling is less than that.
In conclusion, Molina is desirable. But he doesn't seem like enough of a return for Santos, who is inexpensive and really good.
So one has to wonder what this means for the market now. And the reason it's relevant to us is because the M's have reportedly been sniffing around Bailey, and because there exists the option of the M's dealing Brandon League to add value and free salary. Does the Santos trade make Bailey cheaper? Does the Santos trade make League cheaper, and therefore the thought of trading League less appealing?
Here's the big finale: I don't know! I don't know the answers to these questions, or to a lot of questions, really. There are so many questions to which I don't know the answers, and these are some of them. I think this might be the first sign of a closer being undervalued this offseason. That could be meaningful. But it's really hard to figure out what effect one move could have on subsequent moves - especially when that one move is made by Kenny Williams, who makes decisions based on advice from a leprechaun in his pocket.
The Santos trade will change some conversations. We'll see if it changes the results of those conversations. Kind of. We won't really see, but we'll see results, and then we'll be free to speculate on what the results might have been. You ever do something for half an hour and then wonder why you did it at all? Welcome to this blog post. God, I'm bewildered, and sleepy.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
FWIW
Sickels is really high on Molina — he gave him a B+ and ranked him #2 in the Jays’ system. I don’t think it requires a leprechaun to explain this deal, just that the White Sox brain trust sees Molina the way Sickels does.
by The Ancient Mariner on Dec 6, 2011 10:54 AM PST reply actions
I came here to say this.
And for those who aren’t aware, Sickels has one of the better prospecting records.
Maybe Kenny Williams just undervalued Santos and came to the conclusion that this pitching prospect was worth it.
Hopefully this is an outlier if Z decides to trade League or the beginning of a trend if the A’s want to move Bailey
"Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly, the ill deeds along with the good and let me be judged accordingly. The rest is silence." ~ Dinobot
Jeff you shouldn't be sleepy; it's the morning! You should consider revising your diet and exercise. Unless you're not feeling well, in which case, get better!
Maybe Williams recognized the need for a catcher better than Pierzynski and was confused by this prospect’s surname
IGNORE ME
All trades executed by Kenny Williams should have an asterik next to them which says, "Caution- Kenny WIlliams is a fucktard."
Okay, maybe fucktard is too strong a description, but anyone with trades like Nick Swisher for Wilson Betemit or Ray Durham for Jon Adkins should be given some type of testing to see if he is a low-grade moron.
As I said, perhaps fucktard is too strong a description
But the man has made some head scratching trades that seem to outnumber the good ones

by 

















