Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

John Jaso Trade

Trying a thing here.

Poll
As a Mariners fan, how do you feel about the John Jaso trade?
Love it
328 votes
Like it
1266 votes
Neutral
464 votes
Don't like it
76 votes
Hate it
28 votes

2162 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 52 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I love it.

He should work great with Olivo in a platoon, and relievers are pretty damn easy to replace.

by Cascadian Man on Nov 27, 2011 7:40 PM PST reply actions  

I don't like it as a Rays fan

So I voted that I like it as a Mariners fan

by benderbrodriguez on Nov 27, 2011 7:56 PM PST reply actions  

I'm not a fan of mortgaging a piece of the future in Leuke for a small, flawed piece in the present in Jaso.

But I’m definitely a fan of getting Miguel Olivo on the bench as often as possible, and relief pitchers are pretty fungible.

by thehemogoblin on Nov 27, 2011 8:38 PM PST reply actions  

Since relief pitchers can be overpaid by arbitration, even in a best case scenario, Leuke was only a value player for 4 years.

As is Jaso if he works out, yeah? So wouldn’t they both be potential players for the future?

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on Nov 27, 2011 8:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Yup

If Lueke is going to end up being an ace closer—and that’s his best case scenario—he’s likely to be overvalued in arbitration because of the saves, and that’s going to get expensive by 2nd/3rd year of arb.

What I love about Jaso is that he’s not a one-year stop-gap. He’s similar to Chris Snyder, but has 3 more years of club control, a better fit for the park, should be relatively inexpensive, and is still young enough to have some upside. He’s not Brian McCann, but anyone hoping to acquire a McCann-type catcher without giving up anything worthwhile isn’t living in reality anyway.

by JLC on Nov 27, 2011 9:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Re: Mortgaging a piece of the future

The difference in age between Leuke and Jaso is one year.

by Ballard Erik on Nov 28, 2011 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Like it

The piece we sent away (Leuke) was in seemingly in danger of being dumped last year under the pressure of ownership. They managed to hold on to it and exchange it for much needed catching depth. Sounds good to me.

by ThundaPC on Nov 27, 2011 8:42 PM PST reply actions  

Don't particularly like it

Voted ’Don’t like it’ but it’s just barely on that side from ‘neutral’ because the chances of it mattering a whit aren’t much. Jaso’s hitting numbers look like he’ll fit right in with the Mariners, and sure, I’m sure he’s a great game-caller and defensive catcher, but goodness knows what this team’s #1 weakness is. It ain’t defense.

Being that I found myself able to separate Josh Lueke the man from Josh Lueke the baseball player (to my surprise, frankly), I am a bit sorry to see him go. Yes, I know relievers are ridiculously volatile and un-projectible to any degree of reliability, but were it not for the PR shitstorm trading for him in the first place caused I felt like he could’ve been the closer for the future (which seems to be the mantle placed upon Chance Ruffin?). As it is, maybe he’ll be aces for Tampa. And maybe he’ll be dogshit. I actually would have preferred for him to maybe be dogshit for the Mariners. Again, surprises me a little.

by Aly Edge on Nov 27, 2011 8:49 PM PST reply actions  

His defense isn't great, from what I'm hearing. Probably still better than Olivo.

His skill is that he gets on base a little. If he’s near his career average offensively (I wonder how many more wins we’d have over the last two years if everyone on the team played near their career averages), he’ll be an upgrade at the plate over Olivo.

by moyerLIVES on Nov 27, 2011 9:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Says volumes that he's instantly one of the best catchers in the M's system

Got some depth at a position that needed it badly. Cost them next to nothing, in terms of dealing from strength in general and who they got rid of specifically. Love this trade.

by Chris_FB on Nov 27, 2011 8:54 PM PST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

I like it,

I’m a bit bummed to hear Jaso’s mediocre-to-below-average defensive and runners-thrown-out numbers, though. It makes it easier to swallow the idea of adding little-to-no power in a lineup that badly needs it when you know he’s not a defensive liability.

But I like this a lot better than rolling the dice on Adam Moore as the backup catcher next year and he’s a player that makes sense on a lot of levels.

by _Hutch_ on Nov 27, 2011 11:57 PM PST reply actions  

I like it

I think Lueke has a pretty good amount of upside but Jaso is an upgrade at a need position with lots of control left and we’re pretty well off in the reliever department probably.

by OlSalty on Nov 28, 2011 1:35 AM PST reply actions  

I don't know yet.

I have to see how he handles Felix’s pitches in the dirt.

Fuck the Angels

by InSpokane on Nov 28, 2011 8:50 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

I'm disappointed that the team felt the need to rid itself of Josh Lueke.

Jaso’s certainly more valuable to us than Olivo is, so that part’s good, but trading Lueke away says bad things about the organization’s priorities.

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Nov 28, 2011 8:56 AM PST reply actions  

Not necessarily

If this was about PR damage control they would’ve traded him a while ago, when he was doing all that PR damage.

by OlSalty on Nov 28, 2011 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think that this was a good trade based purely on the baseball ability of the players involved

even though I didn’t care much about the Lueke story, since he was a model player after arriving in Seattle, having less potential for a PR headache and a more valuable player is always going to be OK with me.

by seattlebruin on Nov 28, 2011 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Lueke's stock has fallen a great deal in the past year

There are many more likely reasons he was traded besides that

by Poochie on Nov 28, 2011 10:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Tell my wife... Hello.

This is the most neutral I could possibly feel about a trade, I’m pretty sure.

by joof on Nov 28, 2011 9:27 AM PST reply actions  

This deal fills my heart with neutrality.

How come you can do all this other great shit, but you can't lie the fuck down and sleep?

by JAH on Nov 28, 2011 10:36 AM PST reply actions  

I like it, but I don't love it.

I can’t love any trade that’s such a small piece of the puzzle.

Jaso might be more than a 2 WAR player, but we’re getting into fantasy land to imagine the possibility. More likely, he’s a back up catcher in the long term. I will never be excited about a relief pitcher as a buy-and-hold stock.

Unfortunately, I think the big pieces of the puzzle are coming mid-season, when the M’s deal Felix for a gigantic haul. It will make me sad.

by philosofool on Nov 28, 2011 1:50 PM PST reply actions  

Yay vote number 2000!

Like it, for reasons that have already been mentioned above.

by Aussie Mariner on Nov 28, 2011 11:11 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY