An End of Season Light for 2012's Bullpen
It is time to finish up the series preview-based reviews of the team's units. Hit it, relievers! No, wait! Don't hit it. Hitting is bad for pitchers. Um, miss it? Bats I mean. Also, hitters. Don't hit bats or hitters. But don't miss your spots either. This is so confusing!
*pRAA = (league's tRA - pitcher's tRA) / 27 x pitcher's expected outs recorded
Here is last season's reliever post. 2010's graph looked like this:
Ah, that false hope as the 2010 team hovered around interesting before collapsing faster than the Greek economy. Here is this year's:

As noted in the previous posts, the 2010 year-end mark was left off the graph which would have dragged that team down below -35 runs in the bullpen. This past season's incarnation certainly fared better though that might have been only because of the arrested fall and subsequent recovery over the season's final six weeks. While this year's edition of the bullpen was, at ~every step, superior to last year's, the two were not very far apart in terrible in mid-August.
And then it turned around, gaining roughly ten runs in a month, which is a significant achievement for a bullpen. The encouraging sign is where those gains came from. Brandon League, Tom Wilhelmsen, Josh Lueke and Shawn Kelley were the main positive contributors down the stretch. The unit's 3.51 xFIP during September ranked 10th in all of baseball. That's obviously a mediocre sample with just 80-90 innings for most teams during that span. I'm not using September's numbers to declare that 2012 will feature a top ten bullpen. However, good numbers are better than bad numbers, no matter the sample size and a revamped Wilhelmsen, a Lueke that can reach the mid-90s and a healthy Kelley are good for our hopes.
13 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Anyone saying that the M's need an "experianced" reliever
Just hasn’t been paying attention during the Zduriencik years. Turns out that pretty much any decent reliever can close—Just ask J.J Putz, David Aardsma and Brandon League.
Because of this, I wouldn’t hesitate to deal Brandon League if the right offer came along or even if the M’s simply need the payroll wiggle-room. You put enough 95+mph fastballs in a room, and someone’s bound to come up gold, even if it’s just for the short term.
League and Leuke could get back a significant position player
…and there would still be enough bullpen depth to cover the M’s just fine. Especially if Pineda has a much higher innings / pitch count limit, and Felix and Jason are expected to get into the 7th and 8th on a regular basis.
by Chris_FB on Oct 26, 2011 7:42 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Wait Josh Leuke is a valuable trade asset?
by seattlebruin on Oct 26, 2011 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
That's not how it works.
Lueke has little MLB record. He’s essentially still a prospect and relief prospects are not valuable trade assets. However, they are still assets to the team
I love our bullpen
League, Wilhelmsen, Kelley, Ruffin, Lueke, soon to be Delebar, Snow, Cortes <.< should be fun.
And I think relievers as a trade asset are underrated. We saw what the Rangers and Cards paid for mid-season relievers. If there are any cheapish reliever FAs I would love to pick a few up. Sadly no one does reliever write ups and I don’t have time so I have no idea if they exist or not.
I expect a better bullpen next season
with or without League. We have some live arms already and Z will collect his usual pile of possibilities with minor league contracts and invites to spring training.
Looking forward to seeing Snow
and his “Verlander-territory” RPM.

by 


















