Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Talk amongst yourselves, or talk over there?

almost 2 years ago Claw_tiny JY 92 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Because he, like a lot of misinformed people, was going off Noriega's stats in Pulaski.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 5, 2010 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Our Top 5 is interesting.

I think most would agree that Pineda, Ackley, and Franklin are the Top 3 (with the first two being interchangeable) and then after that I see a lot of folks still putting Liddi in there or even Halman.

I feel like our system has made big improvements, but there really isn’t a fourth guy that you can feel somewhat confident in. And by that I mean a guy who looks like they have real potential to be a regular down the road. However, we do have Smoak and Saunders who very well could still be on our list. However, I could see a case for Luecke being in our Top 5, even though he’s a pure relief option. James Jones has also had a nice second half, as Sickel’s pointed out.

by Rudy4three on Aug 5, 2010 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know, I'm just talking about some of the comments below and some of the other lists

I’ve seen M’s fans put out around the net. I’m surprised Liddi gets so much love, but then when I think about it, after those three guys I mentioned above, there are probably cases to be made for about 10 others guys fitting into that #4 and #5 slot.

by Rudy4three on Aug 5, 2010 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's like last year when we thought the top three was obvious.

I doubt most people successfully nail it though.

After that it’s a big mess. I don’t know where I’d slot most guys. Raben, as I’ve said on multiple occasions now, can’t hit LHP for shit, and Poythress got home runs in a lot of cheap places, this past night excluded.

I’d put Chavez in the top ten I think. I’d probably put Liddi in there too, and Lueke. Robles, probably, and Paxton if/when he signs.

I probably shouldn’t even be thinking about this as my mind’s too muddled to even really remember who all we have at the moment.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 5, 2010 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I would put Chavez in there. The fact that he's taking walks lately makes me believe

that his monster offensive season isn’t simply a creation of High Desert. Still has a lot to prove going forward, but I don’t see him as just another Balentien. I think his BB/K numbers are a lot better than what Wlad put up at the same age in High A. And he’s put up better numbers than Wlad. But we’ll see what happens next year.

Raben’s strikeouts kinda bother me and he isn’t walking as frequently as I thought he would. He’s dropped down a bit in my opinion.

Poythress I don’t know what to make of yet.

by Rudy4three on Aug 5, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've been hoping to see some things from both Raben and Poythress too

And I can’t say I’ve been thrilled with either of them this year. They’ve seemingly done okay, but at the age and level they’ve been playing at they haven’t shown the plate discipline you’d like to see for a player that is going to make the majors as a bat-first kind of guy.

by nathaniel dawson on Aug 6, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kevin Goldstein strikes again.

Overrates the shit out of Halman. Rest of the prospect people pick up on it.
Overrates the shit out of Noriega. Rest of the prospect people pick up on it.

I can’t wait for the overrated toolbox for 2011’s lists.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 5, 2010 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except Noriega doesn't have great tools.

No one’s ever looked at him and seen anything better than average power at best.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 5, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Goldstein? He doesn't require actual analysis.

He picks ONE scout that he loves, goes with his opinion, and spreads it around the net as gospel. He’s the reason the “Dustin Ackley’s Defense at 2nd Base is TERRIBLE and he’ll never play there in the majors ever” is running amok.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 6, 2010 2:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

I liked him better when he was at BA, not that the expectations were high for doing daily stats.

There are a few people who lean to heavily on one or two scouts without really adjusting the information. It’s unfortunate. He’s probably the most recognizable one.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

BA I think is still the most reliable.

They cover a lot of bases and manage to get good information on a lot of things. The issue is that they lean a bit heavily on the organization’s front office when making top ten lists, from what I’ve heard, and that can skew things.

I wouldn’t say any of them are ideal, or the standards which all should strive to emulate.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can't remember which site it was now, but I'm sure you know it.

It just compiles all the lists you could think of to give you a decent idea or average on a prospects status.

I do like John Sickels though. I don’t agree with him on everything of course, but overall I think he knows his stuff.

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 6, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sickels is overextended.

I read his stuff when it comes out, but in his position he’s able to show a breadth of knowledge and not any real depth. Consequently, he’ll make a few mistakes here and there based on bad information and he’s not quite as good at picking sleepers.

For my purposes, it’s not particularly useful. Other are probably in a different position though.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm glad he's done so well after getting the shaft from ESPN.

Of course, ESPN hooked up with BA, who later abandoned them for FoxSports… anyway, I don’t dispute the fact that he works hard, I just view it as a solid, entry or 2000 level course. He’s still way better than a lot of the operations that try to make lists for everyone like Top Prospect Alert or what have you.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

More like 95% us and 5% everyone else.

For example I don’t usually know anything about NL prospects except maybe the top one or two names in any given system, and a lot of that is just culled from my own reading and not actually paying attention to them.

I have like 800+ games to write-up every season and the weekly wraps to do. That’s psychotic enough as is.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seems reasonable.

Perhaps what you should do is get with the 29 best minor league writers from the other teams and compile one website and once a year you guys argue a top 100 list.

I will take a 10% idea fee, I’m not greedy.

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 6, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've already been approached with an offer in the past.

They ended up going under and getting bought out by another group, though I suppose if I talked to the former owner he’d tell me it’s still his dream to get a network of minor league coverage going and wants me to be a part of that.

I’m not holding my breath.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Conor because hey, it's Conor.

But Callis is probably the most level-headed of the bunch. I like reading Eddy and Badler too, but for different reasons, Badler because he loves the international market.

There’s some value in following multiple authors, you just have to acknowledge and account for the particular biases they operate under.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, thanks.

I like you too. And guess what….I get to do the M’s chapter in the Prospect Handbook this year!

Stop The Wave!

by ConorGlassey on Aug 9, 2010 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, congratulations on that.

I was wondering for a while whether or not they’d let you do it or if they’d just assume that bias came into play too much.

Also everyone should go out and read Conor’s prospect bulletin for the Pulaski M’s.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 9, 2010 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a bit hyperbolic

Goldstein was high on Halman, but not as high as BA who had him as the M’s #1. He was high on Noriega, but so was Sickels. This isn’t to excuse the Noriega thing, which was just weird, but it’s not like he’s been singularly ‘bad’ when it comes to the M’s.

I think he’s got very good info at times. I really don’t get into internet prospect warzzz anymore, so I can’t comment on the ‘Ackley can’t field’ meme that you reference, but if he’s not completely sold on Ackley, well, that makes two of us. I guess I just like as many points of view as I can get, assuming that they’re not Pedro Calderon-level awful.

by marc w on Aug 8, 2010 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Goldstein had Halman as his #1 Mariners prospect and a 5 star rating.

Here.

He also had him 42nd on the top 100 list from that year.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 8, 2010 2:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Does Goldstein (or BP, for that matter) even have that kind of influence anymore?

A few years ago, maybe. But now whenever Goldstein goes gaga over some toolsy teenybopper, he’s usually met with “there goes Goldsteing acting all prospect pedo again” derision.

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Am I the only one surprised by how little respec' Robles gets?

I like that he’s small but can bring the heat.

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on Aug 6, 2010 9:04 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm more concerned with his command than his stature.

He takes 100 pitches to do what Pineda can do in 85.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Everyone can't be on of the top five arms still in the minors.

He’s young, he can still refine his delivery and harness his stuff. I’m just excited to have a lefty with an above average fastball in our minors. When was the last time we could say that?

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on Aug 6, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Justin Thomas?

I’m pretty sure he was above-average. Same with Paredes now. But if you’re talking strictly starters, that’s another matter.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pulling for him too

Love the lefties that can bring the heat. I loved it when we got him as part of the Washburn trade.

It was the Washburn trade, wasn’t it?

by nathaniel dawson on Aug 6, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes it was.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, you're not.

I still think he’s one of the sleepers in this system.

by marc w on Aug 8, 2010 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Are the grades for what the player did or for how he placed them?

If he is grading the players doesn’t Pineda deserve better than a B-?

by Sec 108 on Aug 6, 2010 9:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Grades refer to the player, Sickels does not grade himself

that would be remarkably self reflective for a prospect blogger. I don’t think any of them have that kind of self awareness.

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on Aug 6, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do. I have incredible self-awareness. If I were grading my self awareness I'd give myself an A+

fuck that I give my self a W+, because my self awareness is so off the charts it jumps from A and starts going through the letters all over again.

Someone brought beer to lab today.

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on Aug 6, 2010 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

John

I think he is pretty fair about going back and revisiting where he got it right or wrong. Always strikes me as very level-headed, decent person, wherever he registers on the self-aware scale. Not saying you think otherwise. Just observing that he does engage in some self-criticism. I always like when he goes over his, say, top 50 hitters or pitchers from 2003 or what not.

by wobatus on Aug 9, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who are the players which aren't in his top 20 that probably get bumped up after taking into account the 2010 performances?

Andrew Carraway
Carlos Peguero
Rich Poythress
Kyle Seager
Matt Tuiasosopo
Matt Mangini
Johan Limonta?

Anybody I’m missing?

by Edgar for Pres on Aug 6, 2010 12:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Limonta probably wouldn't make it because hey, he's old.

Beavan, Lueke and Lawson would probably be added because they’re new. Paredes or Varvaro could make it on depending on how you value relief prospects. I probably wouldn’t.

Tenbrink is probably a pretty big omission. I’d add Hensley but I think his elbow is fucked. Anthony Vasquez, I’d take over Carraway. Moran is another relief arm that might get on depending on how you value a guy relying on deception and low velocity. I’d consider putting Erasmo Ramirez in a top 20. Mieses is a guy I’ve heard some good things about, same with Anthony Fernandez.

There’s also international guys like Guillermo Pimentel and Ji-man Choi

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

He hasn't played there yet.

He’s been 2/3 at first, 1/3 at catcher, where he’s been not horrible (45% CS!)

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks. Yeah I just tried to come up with a list on the fly and knew I'd miss some guys.

I figured you’d knock Limonta off the list because he was old which makes sense. I guess a bigger question about him I have is why has he been in AA for 3 years in a row now? Over his 3 seasons in AA he has put up a line of .300/.373/.476 which looks pretty good to me. Is his defense not very good? Does he not hit for as much power as you’d like? Has he just been blocked the whole time by guys with higher upside? I feel like I’ve hardly heard anything about him bad or good.

by Edgar for Pres on Aug 6, 2010 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's been blocked mostly by better/more interesting prospects.

His defense isn’t bad though. He’s played center a couple of times, though I wouldn’t exactly peg him as an above-average corner OF.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd echo Jay's interest in Moran, Ramirez, Mieses, and Fernandez. Definitely Fernandez.

And definitely Pryor, too.

I can’t get too excited about Tenbrink right now, mostly because, well, High Desert, and he’s 23 years old. Unless Jay can swear on a stack of….well, whatever Jay swears on that he’s a great defensive thirdbaseman, and then I’ll think I love him.

There are some other guys that are flying under the radar that have been looking good this year.

Fray Martinez
Kevin Rivers
Tom Wilhelmsen. He could rise quickly if he continues to pitch well.
Henry Perez is still stuck in the Dominican Republic doing what he’s been doing for the past 4 years.

Julio Morban is still around and is only 18 years old. Injury problems this year, though.

Wanna take a real flyer? Brandol Perez, 16-year-old down in the Dominican.

by nathaniel dawson on Aug 6, 2010 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't throw in Pryor because I figured the draft made it implicit enough.

Tenbrink isn’t a good defensive third baseman. The tools are all there but the results are inconsistent. One play he’s Brooks Robinson and the next he’s Tui.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think for the betterment of everyone involved, Tui is no longer a prospect.

If the threshold for rookie status is 130 ab (which I think it is?) he is at exactly 130 ab. GOODBYE TUI THE PROSPECT!

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 6, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Am I a bad person for not fully embracing the Franklin hype?

I probably am but I can’t help but look at those splits and get the shivers. In my top 5, I’d have him right behind Liddi. Is that foolish?

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes it is.

Franklin’s splits aren’t exciting, but you’re also looking at that from the perspective of him being a switch-hitter, and his swing on the right side is nothing like his swing on the left.

There are plenty of players who give up switch-hitting and go back to just swinging from their dominant side and end up with better splits that way then they would have if they had kept at it. I’d cite Mike Wilson as one example of that, much as I hate talking about him. Franklin to me would be a guy who gives up switch-hitting in the next year or two and manages to hit left-on-left better than he would right-on-left.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

That is a fair point on the switch-hitting.

Now, back to Mike Wilson. When do you think the Mariners will call hi…

I’ll pre-emptively duck now.

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've already answered that question once today.

The only reason I did was because the guy was the pilot of the original Mike Wilson bandwagon way back in 2006 when he was trying to convince me and everyone else that he was way better than Balentien.

The good that came out of it is that I managed to develop a stock answer that I’m just going to copy and paste from here on out whenever it comes up. Before anyone asks for it…

I don’t know how the org views him, aside from they’ve put him on the 40-man before. It’s a unique situation because the M’s have been able slot in bullpen arms that are quad-A types for lack of better options, but their outfield is considered to be fairly set. It’s also hard to just say “oh, he’ll DH” because there’s still Smoak and Branyan to consider.

What I would say is that the M’s are looking at an offseason where a number of prospects are going to need to be added. Most of the international prospects we have save Triunfel need to be added. Liddi, Pineda, Robles, Peguero if he actually interests anyone, Johermyn Chavez, and probably Cleto, along with domestic acquisitions like Lueke, Lawson, Dunigan, Mangini, and Hill.

In order for Wilson to keep a spot they’d have to believe his short-term contribution outweighs their long-term contributions. I’d say that one likely scenario would be that he picks up some starts and has a small opportunity to prove himself before the M’s make their final decision on him. At this point, it’s been more or less established that he can hit and walk, but his ability to stay healthy (quad injuries) and age work against him to the point where I’d say he’s in the wrong org with all these other guys needing to be added. I think he’ll end up in the major leagues yet. With us? I’m not so confident.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ha, well that brings up an actual question I was going to ask.

What do you think the M’s are going to do with Peguero this offseason?

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that he's one of the guys that's likely to lose out.

He can’t hit left-handed pitching and since April he hasn’t even slugged .400 in any month.

People are going to ask me questions about him and he’s still intriguing from strictly a tools standpoint, but he’s not actually worth paying going out of your way to pay attention to at the moment.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I'm not mistaken, as long as Peguero spends the rest of the season in AA he's eligible for the minor league phase of the Rule 5 Draft.

So there’s probably a chance he’s striking out four times a game for some other organization next season.

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.

He’s eligible for the major league portion.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is kind of a complicated one.

Remember back the other day when we were talking about how Sweeney passed through waivers without anyone noticing? It’s like this…

There are reserve lists in the offseason for the triple-A and double-A levels. Players that are placed on these reserve lists are eligible for the major league portion of the Rule 5 draft. Those that are on the reserve lists for the levels below that are eligible for the minor league phase of the Rule 5 draft. But going back to around ‘01-’02 or so, the particular movements as to who has been on and off those lists has been mysterious. I also can’t exactly explain to you why they don’t overload the double and triple-A rosters with the Rule 5 eligible prospects just to be safe and do whatever with the guys that aren’t yet eligible, but I suppose there are rules about how the reserve lists operate that I’m not fully acquainted with because it’s not a huge thing.

I’m not 100% confident on it, but that’s the gist of it.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

And, if you were wondering "what's so special about '01-'02"...

Well, it’s actually more like 2004, but here’s another stupid minor league history question.

Back in the day the MLB was the major source for minor league transaction information and they would report everything, from reserve list movements to low-level summer league signings that no one would know about until May of the next year otherwise.

This cost a lot of money to operate, or something, and so what they did is they outsourced all minor league info, box scores, transactions, and everything to a third-party company. Said company was pretty bad at this, either because the teams weren’t cooperating or didn’t know how or because it’s a shitton of work and they got in over their heads.

After a couple of years of that, the MLB bailed on them and decided that the better course of action would be to get a standardized site for minor league baseball, supply template sites to every team, and maybe profit off the increased advertising space if they could. Most minor league transaction data theses days are reported by individual teams, which is good but results in a variance of quality from one to the next. The Rainiers and Diamond Jaxx are pretty great at keeping theirs updated, but by comparison, the Pulaski Mariners, who were shut down for a year due to lack of affiliation, have a pieced together office that’s a little less dilligent.

One of the cost cutting measures in this whole scheme was presumably that transactions that are minor like reserve lists and summer leaguer signings generally aren’t reported anymore.

[The more you know]

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I personally would think it a bit outside-of-the-box to think that Liddi is ahead of Franklin.

We know more about what Liddi is by now, and his ceiling is nothing compared to Franklin’s. I think Franklin is a top 5 SS prospect in the minors right now. Certainly want to see what he’ll do at higher levels before rushing to judgment on what he’ll do as a major leaguer, but in terms of ranking prospects, there are few better SS right now in the minors.

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 6, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not entirely outside of the box.

While Liddi doesn’t have the ceiling of Franklin, he is a bit closer to contributing and he has shown he can (somewhat) handle more advanced pitching.

I think he’s being somewhat underrated in general. There really doesn’t seem to be a consensus on his defense (as opposed to those that quickly claim he’s horrible) and he does seem to have some semblance of knowing how to hit the ball.

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

It depends on how you weight proximity compared to ceiling.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

On a 100 scale, my personal weights would be something like 65 proximity, 35 ceiling.

General attrition and flameout rates damper my enthusiasm for ceilings alone. I look no further than Triunfel for a good example of why I don’t put a great deal of stock in a player until he actually starts doing well against better competition.

Personal preferences obviously. I would never begrudge a person for ranking Franklin over Liddi.

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Triunfel was a guy that they were mostly ranking highly on build and age vs. level.

Franklin has performance on his side. It’s not a fitting comparison.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe I'm just remembering Goldstein's adulation

But wasn’t Triunfel considered a legitimate five-tooler at some point?

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sort of.

He stole a lot of bases at one point, but back when he signed there were people that were assuming he was a 3B long-term anyway due to lack of footspeed and defense that was heavy on the arm and light on the footwork.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, but as of now Nick Franklin appears to have a really special combination of power and speed at a premium position.

Liddi’s skills appear to just not be as good. When you talk about the top 10 performances in MWL as a teenager, Franklin is certainly in there.

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 6, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

How good are his chances of sticking at short?

I see a lot of talk about an eventual move to second, which still makes him awesome if his bat is legit. But is there potential he stays at SS?

by ThomasG on Aug 6, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes there is.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 6, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey TIF, what did you do to that Dewey Finn guy?

Or is he always that belligerent?

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 7, 2010 8:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Finn is a fine example of someone creating and then believing their own hype.

Nothing he says has any merit whatsoever but for some reason he styles himself as a prospect expert that doesn’t require anything resembling evidence to back up his claims. Instead, he becomes exactly the kind of vampire that I mentioned the Kevin Goldstein stuff above about. He feeds off of whatever expert he believes in says and then regurgitates it into a Skip Bayless style “HERES MY OPINION, FAGGOTS” troll. Worse, he and casejud and King Billy Royal all pretty much parrot each other, so they gang up on any contradicting opinion as if a mass number of fucking stupid will somehow make their opinions more valid.

I started in on it when Dewey Finn boldly proclaimed that Dustin Ackley was overrated and not worth the attention he gets. When pressed for more information, he parroted Kevin Goldstein’s appraisal of his defense, complained that Ackley’s overall minor league numbers show he’s not good (ignoring that Ackley has been awesome aside from a really bad April, and pressing him with that fact is usually met with a reply something akin to "well he should not have had to take a month and adjust to professional ball at all if he’s a “TOP PROSPECT”), and is now harping on his lack of power.

All three of them agree that Dustin Ackley doesn’t deserve a top 10 ranking (of all prospects in baseball, which is a fine argument to make). But depending on which chucklefuck you’re talking to, he’s either a 15-20, or “not even in the top 25”. You’ll also note they all have the same signature. It honestly wouldn’t surprise me if they were all the same dude. Sickels had to put a kabosh a month or so ago on some users making multiple names to purposely rec their posts. No evidence of that, just sayin’.

Anyway, you can see for yourself in that thread what kind of imbeciles that Sickels has allowed to infest his blog. One more reason I’m happy as hell for Lookout Landing and it’s policies.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 8, 2010 2:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry, Dewey Finn actually speculated thus:
Bottom line, the best case scenario for Dustin Ackley would be to develop into a Chris Coghlan type of player. From what I remember, Coghlan never came close to sniffing “Top Prospect” status (ie Top 25). However, it seems many of you believe Ackley is worthy of such attention. Like I’ve mentioned above, aside from his strong plate discipline, nothing stands out. No power (his SLG is lower than OBP!), bad defense, yet widely considered an elite level prospect. Crazy. Where do I think he belongs? Probably outside the Top 50, maybe in the 60s.

Yep. He actually said this.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 8, 2010 3:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

That seems to operate under several flawed assumptions.

The first, of course, is that a guy who has played a position for all of four months after not being on the middle infield since high school is not only terrible defensively, but will never show anything more than what he is showing at present even with practice.

Secondly, as a corollary to that, is that the scenario he presents, worst-case as it is, overlooks or discards the notion that Ackley, with his decent footspeed and good instincts, could also conceivably make a good defensive CF if he didn’t work out at second. But I’m guessing that same suggestion would be dismissed as either taking too much time or with the earlier “he’s bad now, why would he ever get better?” rhetoric.

A third point that I’d make is one that I guess Dave and I have both honed in on lately. Dave points to the precedents of Jeter/Roberts/Erstad and cites other examples with the claim that good OBP bats often hit for more power down the road. I’ve gone another rout and pointed out that Ackley didn’t start to hit for power until his third year in college, losing nothing from his average in the process, and proposed that he could be one of those wiry hitters who manages more power than one would immediately think given their build because the bat control is so damned good, and he’ll start turning on pitches when he’s good and ready. That’s probably a point we’ll have to keep pushing in order to keep expectations realistic.

Anyway, guys like that are part of why I stopped hanging around Sickels’ blog years ago. It’s weird to me because you have a large subset of people there who know enough to recognize certain names that most baseball fans wouldn’t even know, bu by and large they still tend to make crazy and uninformed decisions about them (i.e., Tyson Gillies is the number two prospect in the system)

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on Aug 8, 2010 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

TIF

Have seen you post many times at Sickel’s site and respect your opinions. Dewey does make some outrgareous claims (a la his Thole over Carlos Santana meme this winter, and havens is a poor man’’s Utley-which i actually agree with, if the man is very, very poor and haven’s actually makes it through a year without a hangnail). And i think he does do it at times to be outrageous, the bomb-throwing type claim, but he isn’t wishy-washy and it can stimulate discussion (ok, not always in a healthy way). But he doesn’t seem the “hey faggots, this is my opinion” type, unless you can point to some examples.

And KBR and Dewey did do a tag-team list of top prospects by position, but they don’t seem like the same guy, unless Dewey/KBR are going through an awful lot of trouble to have different personas. They don’t always agree on prospects, and KBR is usually an extremely respectful, thoughtful poster.

I happen to agree that Ackley likely doesn’t have a 20 homer ceiling, but it is awfully early to be making definitive pronouncements. And he certainly doesn’t need to hit 20 to be a fine second base prospect. I just happened to see that thread at minorleagueball and commented there, then stumbled on this convesation here (I was looking for ya’ll’s take on Nick Franklin, actually, who right now I prefer to Ackley, but obviously Ackley is much more advanced and from what I see scouts and analysts seem to still prefer him).

by wobatus on Aug 9, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dewey Finn reacted to "overhype" instead of facts.

That’s why he’s a fucking moron. Several fanposts before his declaration that Ackley was overrated and “hadn’t shown shit” were a bunch of random know-nothing blog denizens posting what they thought was the current mid-season prospect listings. A lot of them had Ackley in the top 5. This included one from Keith Law of ESPN, who was the only person amongst these that had any credibility whatsoever.

But Dewey took these fanposts as gospel and came to a realization that Ackley was overhyped and, thus, overrated. He has since come up with whatever bullshit he can think of to try to discredit Dustin Ackley. The thing is, what the hell does it matter? So some other people have rated Ackley high. That’s their opinion. It doesn’t warrant anybody going on a crusade to try to altruistically educate the other blog members. Dewey Finn has no fucking reason whatsoever do be doing what he’s doing.

But it’s getting him the attention he wants, and, worse, it appears to be working. Is that Dewey’s fault? Not really. The people he’s influencing should be smart enough to look past his crap and have their own opinions. As for me, I wouldn’t even be saying anything if the arguments were presented with logic and reasoning first and conclusion second. That’s not what happened here. He went conclusion first, and then started hunting for everything that would knock Ackley down a peg.

Now, this topic is done. This blog is Lookout Landing, not Sickels’ Blog, and nobody here wants to hear about some jackass being a jackass anyplace not here.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Aug 9, 2010 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough

I don’t mean to poison the LL well any more than I already have. Just didn’t think Dewey ever threw an insult quite like that one.

I am likely guilty of “flavor of the month” with Franklin over Ackley. There’s a lot to like about Franklin, but he could get the walk rate up a notch. There’s time for that. Ackley looks to be an OBA machine at the very least and has done it at a high level.

by wobatus on Aug 10, 2010 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY