Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Those Poor, Poor New York Yankees

Rosenthal, now:

#Yankees livid with #Mariners. Believed they had deal, then M's took it to #Rangers saying put Smoak in and Lee is yours... #MLB
...
#Rangers
jumped. Adams' ankle injury was excuse for M's to back out. "You just don't do business that way," one Yankee official said. #MLB

History:

Yankees sign David Wells
...
The team formally announced the signing of left-hander David Wells to a $7 million, two-year contract.
...
Diamondbacks owner Jerry Colangelo, who had a handshake agreement with Wells three weeks ago, called the pitcher's explanation for backing out "wishy-washy."

Business is business, and nothing's ever done until there's ink down on paper. Deal with it.

I'm just so dreadfully sorry that you have to live with Javier Vazquez as your #5 starter. Life isn't fair.

Comment 161 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

AL West high five.

Enemy of my enemies and what not…

Suck it, Yankee motherbitches. Suck it hard.

Great play, M’s, using them to draw out Smoak.

I think Michael Scott calls this a win-win-win-(win).

by Rangers100 on Jul 9, 2010 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why you hate the Yankees? I would think strengthening the Rangers is worse than

strengthening the Yankees from the Mariners perspective. The Yankees HASN’T been our rival since 2001. We have been so bad to care about the Yankees winning their 27th or 28th.

by brian_sun on Jul 9, 2010 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

This year doesn't matter anymore, competitively.

For 2011 and beyond we’ve weakened the Rangers, not strengthened them.

by Eyeball Kid on Jul 9, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last thing?

There was tranny porn in a thread the other day.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I vote this joke gets killed

So BrianL can move on.

Dissenting opinions are welcome, and should be encouraged, at Lookout Landing. -LL Style Guide

by MT Olson on Jul 9, 2010 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm done now.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Yankees are unhappy?

The Mariners had something to do with it?

I AM DELIGHTED.

by Joe Metro on Jul 9, 2010 3:01 PM PDT reply actions   5 recs

its not like NY won't be able to sign Lee in the offseason

world series grubbing bitches

Peace, Love and West Coast Hip Hop, Go Mariners!

by E2ESQUARE on Jul 9, 2010 3:03 PM PDT reply actions  

Brian Cashman isn't going to do business with Jack Z for a while.

To be honest, I would take the Yankees deal. Even if Adams turns out to be damaged good, Montero + McAlister > Smoak + the 3, and throwing in 2.5M + Mark Lowe. Not high on Lowe, but the 2.5M basically amounts to the value of a 1st round sandwich pick. Well, still happy about what we got for Lee. I like this better than Hicks / Ramos. Smoak fits our park better than Montero, and you have your 1B for the present and future, where as Montero will take time to get used to 1B. I am still pretty happy.

by brian_sun on Jul 9, 2010 3:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Smoak is good

His wOBAr is 350 and I hear that that’s great

by benderbrodriguez on Jul 9, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Amazing nobody is debating whether either is a fair deal for Lee.

We’re instead debating the finer points of which deal was better. I’m just amazed that anybody would offer their arguably #1 prospects for a few months of Lee. A few months ago I’d have called you nucking futs if you said this would happen.

Now, the gritty:

Smoak = Montero – Even if you think Montero is a better bat, no way he out duels Smoak in defense, base running, and the switch handedness is cool. Overall value, I think, puts them roughly equal.

Beavan = McAllister – Right now anyway. McAllister is not sexy. Beavan appears to have been messed with. I don’t think McAllister can improve much more than he is but Beavan probably can. Still, for now, they’re equal.

Adams = Lawson – Who cares about either.

Now the rest.

Lueke = Lowe – I know we love Mark Lowe and he’s been a good story, but with his back surgery and his elbow history how much more does he have? Lueke has legit stuff.

So the only bit that seems to be a stick in the craw is the 2.5 million. If cash is the only real difference in the deals, I’m not worried about it. Obviously New York doesn’t need us to throw in cash. Still, it IS a difference between the deals, even if the difference is, for all intents and purposes related to the playing field, irrelevant. Yes, it SHOULD net us a better haul, but it didn’t. I’m not going to cry my eyes out over it.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lueke > Lowe?

Lowe is broken right now and disc injuries are brutal, so you could say this.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could. But until Lowe demonstrates he's done, it's premature. Also, Lueke may not be as good as reported.

For now, they’re equal based on what I know now. The rest is arguing from ignorance.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough.

All things considered approximately equal.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's how I see it. The only unequivical point is the cash.

Which I care absolutely nothing about, even if it should be an important factor in the return.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

In the long run 2.5 mil isn't that much in MLB terms.

If it got the deal done then so be it.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

It IS still a factor to consider.

Typically when you send money you SHOULD get better returns. Not always great, but better. Since the deals are, in my mind, equal, the 2.5 million IS a factor that has to be considered.

Still, I don’t care about it, but I understand if people do.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think most people are happy for what Jack Z got for Lee.

I think people are just debating whether this is better than the Yankees deal. Personally, I didn’t think it was, but not that big of a difference. You compared to what Cleveland got when they traded CC Sabathia couple years ago on July 7. I think Jack Z did much better, as Justin Smoak > Matt Laporta. I think that’s the bench mark I would use to compare the value in what we got for Lee.

by brian_sun on Jul 9, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't like comparing unrelated trades.

Yeah, I know Sabathia was a big pitcher traded in the middle of a season and so’s Lee, but the people involved are different (sort of). We don’t know what kind of market was open for Sabathia aside from the deal that came through. In this case, it looked like a heated and competitive market for Cliff Lee, which is fascinating.

Yankee’s in, Yankee’s out, Rangers in, Yankee’s pissed. This has been a very interesting day of baseball.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lee

You guys got more for 1/2 year of lee than we did for 1 1/2.

Must not be here for baseball either. Because that isn't what we're playing.

by westbrook on Jul 9, 2010 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Knapp, Donald, Carrasco, and Marson.

Hmm… have to think about that one.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Whatever. I hope they choke to death on A-rod's rancid ejaculate.

A team that does whatever it can to take advantage of every other team can go fuck themselves.

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on Jul 9, 2010 3:11 PM PDT reply actions   5 recs

Rancid ejaculate will do that.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm tempted to put that in my signature.

Rancid ejaculate will to that.

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Jul 9, 2010 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Awesome little subthread here.

SBNation needs mobile rec-ing if only for this.

by Jon S. on Jul 9, 2010 3:37 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm no Yankees apologist, but isn't doing

“whatever it can to take advantage of every other team” exactly what every MLB team should try to do? Come to think of it, I wish the Mariners would do this more often.

by FlaskInSafeco on Jul 9, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Theres a twisted sick part of me that feels the BEST part of this deal

was not aquiring Smoak, but making the Yankees think they had Lee and then pulling him away at the last second. I hope Lee destroys the Yankees in the ALCS.

by scottg02 on Jul 9, 2010 3:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Having time to digest

I’m a bit disappointed, not because I think the Yankees’ package was better, but because when news broke of the Rangers getting involved, I thought we’d get more than Smoak plus Beavan, Lueke, and whatever the other kid’s name is.

I can deal with the cash (it’s not my money), but losing Lowe isn’t great.

The fact that Yankees don’t get Lee makes this a win for me.

by tait644 on Jul 9, 2010 3:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Possibly is a big word.

Having said that, I was pretty stoked when we won the West before the Rangers, and sad when the Rangers won the West for the first time. They can fuck themselves.

by LonelyintheBleachers on Jul 9, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

My feelings exactly.

You have the best record in baseball and you will probably win the WS anyway.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Yankees knew Cliff Lee can beat them twice in a 7 game series,

That’s pretty big. But Texas still has to win 2 other games. But Cliff Lee just drastically increase their chance in a 7 game series. Now, if it’s a 5 game series, Cliff Lee winning 2 games is even bigger. That’s why the yankees are very pissed.

by brian_sun on Jul 9, 2010 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

In the ALCS, the Rangers could potentially start Lee in games 1, 4, and 7.

That’s riding him pretty hard, but I don’t think Cliff F Lee would have it any other way.

by Jon S. on Jul 9, 2010 3:43 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

By you guys I mean the Rangers...

…seems like a good deal for the Ms.

by Jesse on Jul 9, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Honestly I don't think either deal was close to worth what they are getting.

We are just all hot and bothered because it look like the Yankees deal was better even though we don’t know all the details.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

HOLY SHIT YOU GUYS ITS MAGICMIKE23

This is why the yankees are great, but hated lol

Also the reason why rangers havent made the playoffs in a decade.

I find it hard to believe a montero, adams, mcallister offer couldnt be topped. Rangers have more than enough depth to pull it off.

by MagicMike23 on Jul 9, 2010 11:27 AM PDT reply actions

by Decatur on Jul 9, 2010 3:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Did he get banned here?

I don’t recall him being one to give up on posting voluntarily.

Dissenting opinions are welcome, and should be encouraged, at Lookout Landing. -LL Style Guide

by MT Olson on Jul 9, 2010 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sure hope so.

It’s been a long time since I’ve seen him around.

Karma police, arrest this man.

by wyte_lightning on Jul 9, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here's the tweet of the day. From Larry Stone, of course.
StoneLarry Inside sources say the Mariners are holding out for Pokey Reese about 2 hours ago via TweetDeck

by Decatur on Jul 9, 2010 3:29 PM PDT reply actions  

After Jack Z backed out of conversations, was their offer of Montero still on the table?

Or did Jack have to make something happen with Texas because the Yankees no longer wanted to negotiate? Couple of questions that I hope are answered in the coming days

by russak on Jul 9, 2010 3:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Sounds like Z really wanted Justin Smoak.

Interesting that he mentions about how you already know what GMs are going to offer in terms of prospects after the phone calls you have. And yet, Daniels turns around and offers Smoak instead today.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Z: "Every deal should stand alone".

“What happens a year ago or 6 months ago has no relationship to what happens in this deal.”

I love this man.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

So Smoak wasn't on the table before today?

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

A question was asked of Z whether if Smoak was available yesterday if the deal would have been done then.

Jack said “Yes”. So the implication is that Smoak wasn’t on the table until now.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow, he is looking kind of brilliant to me now.

Sounds like he wanted Smoak (however controversial that may be) and did what he had to to get him. I agree with Divish, wouldn’t want to play poker with him.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, I mean, if you're given the choice of Smoak or someone else's offer that isn't as good

It’s an easy decision to make. I don’t know if he REALLY wanted Smoak, I think he just REALLY wanted Smoak from the Rangers.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Could be.

Either way we got to see him pitch for a half of a season AND we got better stiff back. Confidence restored.

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

*stuff

According to my calculations, your problem doesn't exist.

by the other side on Jul 9, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Smoak fills a huge hole.

Montero would also fill that hole, but with questions that make it harder (I’m guessing) to manage the roster, as well as no guarantee he succeeds in the new spot. It wouldn’t be a shock if they wanted Smoak over Montero even if Montero is destined to be better. Now he can simply attack catcher separately.

Major league ready, cost controlled first baseman. That’s pretty great.

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on Jul 9, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree.

The other factors on Montero is that he doesn’t have a position. If he doesn’t stick at catcher long term, he has to learn first base or just become a DH, which okay whatever. But he’s also not major league ready. Smoak is going to help this team starting tomorrow. Montero not for another year or two.

I think we’re really grasping at straws, though, on this debate of Montero vs. Smoak. In my opinion, they’re both valuable as all fuck and for a long time. It’s about equal in terms of value both near and long term. Why quibble? It’s a good deal.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Montero also is characterized as not being naturally athletic.

I really didn’t like the sound of this, coupled with him not having much potential to help you defensively. Is he already slow, at 20, fit only to DH?

ignacio

by ignacio on Jul 9, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have to go off what I read and hear.

But it doesn’t look like he’ll stick at catcher, and his only other viable position is first base. He does not appear to have a lot of speed. DH, of course is ANYBODY’S option.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Z just got asked about Lee's comment about a long term deal

He smirked, then dodged the question, but defends Lee’s comments from the time he got traded to the Mariners to now.

Admits that they did talk to Lee about extension, but doesn’t go into details. Mentions Lee’s injury in Spring Training. Says it would have been difficult to get a deal done.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Lee basically admits that he was paying attention to the news on him being traded.

Kicks the shit out of the cliche’s we always hear from players who say “y’know, I don’t pay attention that kind of thing”. Liars.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 3:55 PM PDT reply actions  

For a really quick interview and without much prep time, Cliff answered questions well.

He basically said that it looked like he was a Yankee but he’s a Ranger now. He didn’t have any particular excitement one way or the other, he’s just happy to go to a team that wants him. He definitely tried to make sure that everybody knows that becoming a Yankee wasn’t a big deal to him, even if one of his old buddies (Sabathia) pitches for them.

God speed, Cliff. I’ll be adoring watching you kick the everloving crap out of the Yanks again in the post season.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 9, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lee doesn't know cliches

because Lee doesn’t read.

Must not be here for baseball either. Because that isn't what we're playing.

by westbrook on Jul 9, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

When we traded him to the organization that I hate more than any other in sports (thought we traded) I was just so happy to Montero that I let by-gones be by-gones.

The fact that we ended up getting one of my favorite players and pissed off the Yankees.. Just how the fuck do you make me so happy Jack?

by Kenneth Arthur on Jul 9, 2010 4:00 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Awwwwww

that’s so sad.

Must not be here for baseball either. Because that isn't what we're playing.

by westbrook on Jul 9, 2010 4:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Hey Yanks...

Shut up and go do a deal for Oswalt or Lilly or someone else and leave us alone. I personally would have loved if this deal happened in a couple more days, just so Cliff could have beat you one more time in an M’s uniform.

by Henry H on Jul 9, 2010 4:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Since when is leverage bad business?

This is just New York taking there LeBron frustrations out on us. Losers.

by NoStars on Jul 9, 2010 4:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Did everyone get a warning?

Cause I hadn’t even posted yet. Although I solemnly pledge to avoid being a twat.

by THolt on Jul 9, 2010 5:01 PM PDT reply actions  

I had no idea

Why the Yanks were in it in the first place really, their odds of making the playoffs with their current roster is already crazy good, and while Lee certainly help their chances in the playoffs somewhat, how much so seem to be vastly overrated. shit can always happen in the playoffs, While Jeff Weaver + Jeff Suppan can also dominate you.

Meanwhile, their core is aging and the last thing they really want to do is to trade away a guy that might be a legitimate piece of the next one.

by RollingWave on Jul 9, 2010 5:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
Everything I Know About Jesus Montero

Recent FanPosts

Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
OTDOD - Early February Edition
Agentejebaox3_small
A Statistical Analysis of Mariners' Fan Support
Small
Who will have a better season?
Claw_small
BA's Top 10 M's Prospects
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Munenori Kawasaki Predictions!!!
Small
The Longevity and Future Success of Felix Hernandez.
Small
The present vs future conundrum

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew