37-60, Chart

by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2010 11:31 PM PDT in Seattle Mariners Game Recaps

Biggest Contribution: Jack Wilson, +12.7%
Biggest Suckfest: Josh Wilson, -17.9%
Most Important AB: Josh Wilson strikeout, -17.3%
Most Important Pitch: Hall homer, -19.9%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): +5.6%
Total Contribution by Lineup: -55.6%
Total Contribution by Opposition: 0.0%
(What is this chart?)

Tweet Comment 25 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

So what does this mean for Wak?

by Mariner Melee on Jul 23, 2010 11:41 PM PDT reply actions

How would any of us have any idea?

Something. It means something.

by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2010 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions

I meant purely on the speculation side of things.

by Mariner Melee on Jul 23, 2010 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions

I get the sense that Jeff doesn't think there's much value in speculating about that.

by Jeff Nye on Jul 23, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions

How would you have any idea?

Something. He thinks something.

by DrunkAmerican on Jul 24, 2010 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions

Assuming Wak benched Figgins for the bad play at second

I think benching Figgins mid-game was the kind of snap decision Wak may come to regret. Given all the crappy plays M’s players have made recently, it just smacks of singling a guy out. First of all…he needs to hear Figgins’ side of the story. Then, if what he hears isn’t satisfactory, he may choose to give him a day off.

Chone may not like it but at least nobody ends up with Russell Branyan’s foot up their ass. Or, more importanly, with a lot of embarrassing questions from the media. I really think this doesn’t reflect well on the manager. But what Z thinks of it…who knows?

by short on Jul 23, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions

Baker says Z isn't happy.

by Mariner Melee on Jul 24, 2010 12:04 AM PDT up reply actions

Really?

I thought Jack Z would be overjoyed. I mean, rubbing his hands going “WHOO HOO! I’ve got a bunch of people we’ve invested a lot of money in that are 23 games under .500, hitting like they should be on the roster in Tacoma, showed the collective IQ slightly lower than a baseball this week, and now they are getting into fights! Man, it don’t git no better ’n this!”

by Henry H on Jul 24, 2010 1:47 AM PDT up reply actions

What would Figgins's side of the story be?

by Freneau on Jul 24, 2010 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions

Perhaps he did not see the ball.

This excuse would also help to justify his average plate appearance this season.

by Henry H on Jul 24, 2010 1:40 AM PDT up reply actions

There was a difference in what Figgins did (or didn't do)...

Figgins didn’t “hustle” after the ball, he just let it go by without attempting to retrieve it. Just stood there and watched. The baserunning mistakes were brain farts, but weren’t lazy, they just were not attentive. I think that’s the difference in Wak’s eyes. I love that Figgins got benched but wish Wak would’ve at least done the same to Lopez because his “error” was more egregious.

by basebliman on Jul 24, 2010 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions