Draft Thread, Round 1 + Compensation Round
The 2010 First Year Player Draft starts at 4pm. You can watch live at MLB.com or on MLB Network. Today the Mariners are picking #43.
(Jeff's note: tomorrow will feature rounds 2-30, while Wednesday will finish it off. Both tomorrow and Wednesday start at 9am PT.)
I'll be updating this post with Seattle's pick and the corresponding scouting report as it comes in, followed by some final thoughts when we're through.
So far the Mariners are rumored to be strongly considering a pair of prep bats for their first pick: sure-handed infielder Marcus Littlewood and toolsy centerfielder Joc Pederson. It looks like early rounds are very murky, however-- more than normal-- so there's really no telling who the Mariners or anyone else might end up with.
Pro Ball NW plug: If you're interested, check out my rundown of last year's draft as well as this roundup of Littlewood scouting reports and links. Also, I'll be live chatting over there leading up to our pick with the rest of the PBNW crew and other fans. Pulling double duty!
---------------------------
With the 43rd pick of the draft, the Seattle Mariners selected RHP Taijuan Walker out of Yucaipa (California) High School. Walker is a projection pick whose best features include a lanky and athletic 6'6/200 frame, a fluid arm action and a fastball that tops out in the low-to-mid 90s. His secondary pitches are very much a work in progress, but both his curveball and changeup have shown real promise at various points in his prep career. He also experiments with a slider when his curveball isn't working for him.
Walker is fairly new to baseball, at least full time, not opting to focus on the sport until this past year. He's raw and as such will have his growing pains, but if he can learn to refine and repeat his delivery while gaining control of his changeup and big curveball the Mariners could have a very good power starting pitcher on their hands.
It seems like a lot of fans had their eye on alternative arms like Peter Tago, who went a few picks later, and Stetson Allie, who was highly rated but has gone unselected, but Walker doesn't appear to be a bad pick at #43. Prep arms were all the rage day one with 13 going in all, and the Mariners wanted to get a piece of the action.
Scouting report roundup after the jump.
Walker was terrific in a stint for the Angels Elite scout team in the fall of 2009, but since then he has been more erratic. His outings in the early part of this season were rocky, probably due to the transition from basketball to baseball. In later starts, Walker would start strongly and then struggle as a game went on. When right, Walker fires a 91-93 mph fastball that can touch 95, and adds a slider and curve. His whippy three-quarters arm action can be free and easy on some occasions, restricted and stiff on others. Scouts agree that Walker, who hasn't committed to a college yet, is a long-range project as a pitcher, but his combination of sparkling athletic ability, raw stuff and imposing build may make Walker a gamble worth taking.
Walker's stock was down this spring when he went through a horrible run of 3-4 starts where his stuff was off and his results were terrible, including a well-attended eight-run beating that seemed to seal the lid on his prospect status coffin. To his credit, he recovered well and has been sitting up to 94 in every outing down the stretch with good sinking life on the pitch. He's got a big 12-to-6 curveball but doesn't command it. Walker's delivery includes a high leg kick and a long time over the rubber before he moves forward, and his arm action is fairly short for a guy his height. He's a basketball player with that kind of body -- tall, loose, athletic -- but is incredibly raw in almost every aspect as a baseball player. He's considered signable due to lack of a college commitment.
Taijuan Walker has a great right-handed frame and untapped natural arm speed and power. As far as projection pitchers go, Walker is an imagination’s delight. His frame is the first selling point. Long, loose, lean and fast, there’s clearly an abundance of physical projection. Translation: he touches 93 today, look for him to pitch at 94 tomorrow.
Beyond that, Walker is in the infancy stages of developing himself as a pitcher, but all the building blocks are there for him. These parts include the beginnings of a power curveball. There’s also one other aspect about Walker. You have to see it in a game, but the guy shows the ability to figure out how to make a pitch when he needs to. You wouldn’t put a grade on it and the gun won’t tell you. Nobody will text it to you. Better be watching.
More from Baseball Beginnings: Another scouting report (in which Kilma concludes that Walker is one of the three best prep arms in SoCal), Q&A (mostly about transitioning from basketball to baseball), yet another scouting report, video and more video.
MLB.com (includes video)
Strengths: Projectability, athleticism, arm strength and glimpses of good secondary stuff.
Weaknesses:He doesn't have a ton of experience on the mound. He's changed his delivery and arm action, leading to concerns about command and health.
214 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A bit ago, when things were going poorly...
I had a moment of hope thinking we could finish last this year and get Bryce Harper, but then quickly remembered that I was a whole season off.
It’s funny to hold a draft in the middle of the season.
This is going to be a lot less fun with only one pick on day one. Wish they went 3 rounds like last year.
It's hard for me to get excited when we don't have a top 20 pick period.
I’ve heard that next year has a pretty great draft class, good news for the direction the M’s are currently going, what’s your take?
Although we haven't had much luck with top 20 picks, so there is that.
"Because 100 luftballoons would be far too many"
This is true, however completely unrelated to my excitement level.
Although not having a first round pick saves me from the frustration of watching the M’s take Baron over 30 better players.
Mariners aside, it sure seems like a pretty blah draft this year.
Harper will go first, then Machado and Taillon, then a bunch of nothing special…
But several years down the road there will be studs playing in MLB,
that were taken in the 6th or 7th round.
"Because 100 luftballoons would be far too many"
Ok, you're on the clock.
Make the fucking pick.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:05 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
This comment applies to each pick.
I will not repeat it.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:05 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
They should forfeit if it takes too long.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, everyone knows.
We’ve had our one bitch about it. We’ll be quiet now.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:09 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It's because it makes your hands go numb so you can't feel things.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:07 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Don't let a piece of faux-leather come between you and the infield dirt.
If you can’t FEEL the grit, you ain’t gritty.
Seriously.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
My favorite part so far:
“They’re biting the bat.”
The Nationals are run by Ozzy Osborne.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
So do the Nats.
Dave Cameron likes the move.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:13 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
They just called Harper an outfielder.
Oh, Nationals…
The Holocaust was Rob Johnson's idea
by I Lick Squirrels on Jun 7, 2010 4:10 PM PDT reply actions
That's what I meant.
It doesn’t seem like a very good idea.
The Holocaust was Rob Johnson's idea
by I Lick Squirrels on Jun 7, 2010 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
And it makes sense.
If he’s really the bat they say he is, why not move him to RF immediately. No point in killing his legs with him being behind the plate.
"Because 100 luftballoons would be far too many"
I think the Nats are okay with that.
His bat is the most impressive thing about him. Not playing catcher and having a longer career is more important to both parties.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions
He has ridiculous power.
I wouldn’t keep at catcher.
by Scruffy Lefty on Jun 7, 2010 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Why not?
It would be much easier to find a competent bat in the outfield than at catcher, and Harper is reportedly pretty good behind the plate. As for the longevity factor, it shouldn’t matter much to the Nationals since they probably don’t have much hope of keeping him once he becomes a free agent. The only thing that really matters to the Nationals is the six years in which he is under team control and in the major leagues, and they’ll get the most value out of him by having him catch.
The Holocaust was Rob Johnson's idea
by I Lick Squirrels on Jun 7, 2010 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Now we get to hear about how the Nats haven't signed Harper yet for the next two months!
Even though everyone knows he won’t get signed until the very last minute like always!
Baseball!
News!
Fuck this I'm not sitting around on a nice day and watching this crap. I'll come back when it's over.
You're dead to me.
I'm muting it until the 43rd pick
My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed
by Griffin Cooper on Jun 7, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Bud Selig has the charisma of a 2x4.
When are we gonna get a new Commissioner?
When this one loses his pulse.
Karma police, arrest this man.
by wyte_lightning on Jun 7, 2010 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions
STR and INT are always the trendy stats to look at though.
Be a rebel.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:23 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 3 recs
I lean more towards DEX.
Because we’re rebels. Accurate, intelligent, introspective rebels. And damn proud of it my friend. - CapSea
A Work in Progress
I'd go with LCK
More special encounters that way, maybe we get some new stars or something.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Fine, I suppose we can judge him on his horrible league management and awful steroids debacle.
But only if you force us to.
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying.
by the other side on Jun 7, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Like the Wildcard, insane revenue increases, development of MLBAM?
I’m no Selig apologist, but he’s done some good for the sport along with his screw ups especially compared to pretty much every other league aside from the NFL juggernaut.
In all seriousness,
Yes, I agree he’s been the usher of a pretty great era in baseball. I guess what bugs me most about his ‘reign’ is that the NFL and NBA, by far, seem to promote their sports and run better PR machines than MLB.
I know it’s a really random and nitpicky thing to mention, but I think it matters. One small example would be the “response” that Selig made after the recent perfect game debacle. Whether you believe in replay in baseball or not, I think the other sports would’ve made an immediate comment and explained their position and be done with it. Baseball just seems to fumble all over themselves when it comes to making public comments and promoting their game.
I don't know how responsible he is for this
But MLB’s YouTube etc policy is horrible. Think about how much NBA/NFL/NHL highlights you can watch on YouTube. Think about that exposure.
This is very true.
You can’t really look back and decide if some one else would have done better. I guess we just have to take the good with the bad.
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying.
by the other side on Jun 7, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions
No, it's something I've known for a long time
He’s just making it worse right now, by announcing the player names at the draft. There are clearly many other worse things to ‘judge’ him on.
He should be smart enough to leave this task to someone else.
"Because 100 luftballoons would be far too many"
Tommy LaSorda, please.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions
I could go for this.
"Because 100 luftballoons would be far too many"
I'm surprised MLB isn't trying the draft in with a new movie,
like when the bases were supposed to have Spider-Man logos all over them.
The 2010 MLB Draft, brought to you by Cialis!
Bud Selig gets free stuff out of it.
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying.
by the other side on Jun 7, 2010 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes please!
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying.
by the other side on Jun 7, 2010 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Need somebody with big breasts
Bowden should be in charge of this stuff.
by Edgar for Pres on Jun 7, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions
I think MLB Network means
The 21 pitchers to pitch a perfect game.
Such gripping television.
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying.
I'm at work, I knew nothing about anyone but Harper, and the draft is on mute.
Dumb question – any surprises yet?
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:45 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
The Royals taking Colon is being lauded pretty badly.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Are you saying the Royals might have fucked something up?
Didn’t see that coming.
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying.
by the other side on Jun 7, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Unbelievably enough, this is the first big draft fuck up in a few years.
At least that’s how it looks right now. If you re-did the top 100 from the preseason, Moustakas, Hosmer, and Montgomery would each be a lot higher. Moustakas might be top 10.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions
And of course this happened 10 minutes ago, I can't call it a fuck up.
That’s what they said about Tony Sanchez last year at 4 and he looks pretty good.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe you're going for "derided" there.
by Eyebrows on Jun 7, 2010 4:52 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
As I read it again, it sounded horrible.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't really have enough information to say one way or another
But it sure seems like at least a mild reach.
Everybody talks about athleticism, but especially with pitchers, that doesn’t always translate to success.
If it’s a “signability pick”, then I’m angrier about it, because we eventually have to spend some money if we want to build a quality organization.
Not any huge ones, I don't think.
The Astros just ‘reached’ to take Delino DeShields, Jr, according to the commentators.
It's a pretty sizeable reach, I think.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I've been following this draft for a couple months and I didn't know Delino had a son.
So to me that makes it somewhat of a reach. But it doesn’t sound like the “Experts” hate it. Unfortunate for the ‘Stros, its just kind of a weak draft. Maybe they’ll get lucky and beat the Mariners Orioles for top pick next year.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Astros take Delino DeShields.
They just refuse to go young.
by MFAN on Jun 7, 2010 4:49 PM PDT reply actions 5 recs
This is terrible television.
The late rounds are so much better. Rapid fire into a conference call.
by JonBBT on Jun 7, 2010 5:02 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Truth.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately, the MLB draft is not interesting television just by nature.
Outside of a select small population of America, there’s very little here to keep an audiences attention.
by Kenneth Arthur on Jun 7, 2010 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Sale to the Rays!
RAYS!
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
So do you know who the Cubs took at 16?
Because nobody else seems to.
by drblacknwhite on Jun 7, 2010 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Nope!
I’ve scarcely been paying attention to the draft this year though, simply because of where we’re picking.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions
This is how we get attention for the MLB draft!
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Anyone currently still on the board who we want to drop to us?
I paid so little attention this year.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
Yes,
Castellanos, Dietrich, Allie…
But we’re fifteen picks out and I won’t care until we get to around three.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Castellanos wants a lot of money?
Sounds like he’s one of the better hitters in the draft. What I read of Allie is really raw, really high upside.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, one of the 3 will likely be left.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Now we're going to do eighteen picks in eighteen minutes!!!!!!
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Asher Wojciechowski!
Very interesting name.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Aw man.
The Jays picked him.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh man a guy named Taylor Lindsey just got drafted
worst name for a guy ever?
GETTING EXCITED
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Allie or Castellano
Please happen.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Of the two, we're probably pick Allie.
Simply because he’s Midwest.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Allie's there! Get 'em McNamara!
Would he immediately would be the 2nd best arm in the system? (behind Pineda?)
Who the fuck.
Gimme a minute.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
It could have been a great deal worse.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Here's what I got.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Pretty bad when the very first pick the team makes has everybody wondering who the fuck he is.
You're dead to me.
The last time I was this befuddled with the team's first pick was '06, with Morrow.
You’re not off to a good start, M’s.
From the sounds of it
Great fastball, nonexistent breaking ball, control issues…
Sounds ever-so-familiar.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Reminds me of last year's sandwich pick with Baron
by Edgar for Pres on Jun 7, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I actually trust our scouting department though so in this case I'm willing to assume that he is.
by Aaron Campeau on Jun 7, 2010 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't condescend.
We all trust the Mariners scouting department. They’re great.
That said, people, including Jack Zduriencik and Tony Blengino, make mistakes. No front office bats 1.000 on draft day. Most high-draft picks never even enjoy a successful Major League career. I’m not going to assume that just because we have a good front office, and this was our first pick of the draft, that this kid we picked is spectacular. The odds empirically state that he probably isn’t.
by katal on Jun 7, 2010 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The odds...
state that for pretty much every pick in the draft.
I would never be condescending to you, Eric.
Your opinion is valid and the pick does indeed seem a bit curious, but I don’t know nearly enough to pass judgment. I have a ton of faith in our scouting department and since this isn’t a money issue (which Baron may very well have been) I’m willing to trust them here. That’s all.
by Aaron Campeau on Jun 7, 2010 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks, sorry for coming across so defensive.
I’m sure our FO saw something intriguing in Walker. It’s just that whenever we pick someone who I didn’t hear much about before the draft, my suspicions immediately rise and I start thinking back to former out-of-left-field selections, from Michael Garciaparra to Josh Fields.
I even start thinking about Philippe Aumount, who everyone agreed was a top-talent, and who I wanted to draft.
So many things can go wrong with prep arms. They terrify me as top-picks.
I am honestly curious whether the org sees him as a pitcher or not
by Aaron Campeau on Jun 7, 2010 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I seriously doubt they put him on the infield.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Fields wasn't an out of left field pick.
Bavasi was panicking and they were talking about a reliever for days.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions
People Complained...
about reaching for Nick Franklin too. Jack knows how to scout. I’ll let you know on 6/7/2011 if this was a bad pick.
People complained about Franklin and Baron
so far I’d say he’s 50/50.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Baron is what he's supposed to be...
Nobody expected him to hit a lick at this point.
Umm,
a lick more than a .480 OPS, yes.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Not really...
He’s been a project from day one. He wasn’t even a very good HS hitter.
Besides, he was selected in large part because of sign ability. We can not take him if you want…but we probably don’t take Ackley.
About what?
The fact that Baron was a project?
Also, he was drafted with the expectation that his hitting would improve.
And it’s been absolutely horrendous. Jack Z and company would not have drafted him if they were expecting this. Not saying there isn’t time for him to turn it around, but he hasn’t gotten off to a good start, relative to expectations.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions
More like 4 months, but that's semantics.
For the record, Nick Franklin is also 4 months into his pro career. You can’t call Nick Franklin a good pick and use that as evidence that Jack Z is a good scout and say the jury is still out on Baron at the same time.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe I was a bit extreme saying the M's wouldn't have picked him if they expected this hitting.
I retract that statement. I expected a bit more improvement but I would imagine they have a whole different set of expectations and are looking at a lot more than just his offensive statistics.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions
huh?
I never used Franklin as any kind of evidence.
I just stated that people whined when he was picked and he’s turned out ok so far. There is also a lot of time for him to fail.
I’m simply saying that I’m not passing judgment at this point.
I think it's wrong for anyone to pass ultimate judgment this early on any pick.
I also don’t believe we should just trust that the FO is always going to make the right decision. Saying “this is a bad pick” doesn’t mean the guy is destined to fail, it means people believe there was better talent on the board.
We aren’t as informed as the front office and we aren’t scouts like they are, but when the majority scouts say better talent was on the board and that much of Walker’s appeal is his signability, I believe it’s right to have a critical stance on the pick.
That being said, I don’t hate the pick.
FUCK THE MARINERS!
by Fuckmikereilly on Jun 7, 2010 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions
This organization has a blind spot regarding all-glove no-hit catchers*
Yet you’d still rather have us believe that they see something that no other scout apparently saw that indicates they thought he’d develop into a decent hitter?
Our scouting department is good, yes, but so are a lot of others, and I don’t think anyone else takes Baron at 33 last year.
*or no-glove no-hit catchers in the case of Rob Johnson
Who knows?
Are you saying that the M’s truly scouted Baron and thought “wow this kid can rake?” If that’s the case I want the entire front office fired.
No one did.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I know...
but he was still a 3rd round (or so) talent. If everyone felt that his bat was hopeless, he wouldn’t have even been projected that high.
I don’t think that they saw him any differently than anyone else. They just had reasons for taking him when they did.
Talk entirely of basketball, picture of him wearing batting helmet, no friends yet posted on his selection.
Fantastic.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe this is a good sign, because Chris Tillman's MySpace in 2006 made him come across like a douche, too.
Walker is in good company.
I was going to say.
Butler made him look responsible and his arm blew out.
Quick, someone start scouting the douchiest baseball players on myspace!
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Meh, he doesn't really look like a douche at all
he looks like he’s 17 and aware he’s a talented athlete
I assumed it was one of those hippity-hop songs.
Dawg.
by msb on Jun 7, 2010 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions
My favorite part, under Interests:
Books – None
I think Tillman's said "reading is for losers" or something.
There may have been a LOL in there.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions
He lists his occupation as "basketball"
The Holocaust was Rob Johnson's idea
by I Lick Squirrels on Jun 7, 2010 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions
The first real love of my life went to Yucaipa HS
So, clearly, this pick is going to go down in flames.
The guy had good numbers
It’s High School, but he posted a 1.77 Era and a .190 BAA, He also hit well, which probably doesn’t matter at all. Its really hard to get info on these guys though.
I turned it on in time to hear eight "you know"s in the span of half a minute.
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors
by JY on Jun 7, 2010 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Not picked on day one:
Hit it, Fangraphs
"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by 
















