Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

M's Make Their 40-Man Move

No surprises here, although I'm sure it'll still send many of you into fits:

Mariners RHP Ricky Orta has been placed on waivers for the purpose of granting him his unconditional release

I figured they'd put Orta on the 60-day DL. Shannon Drayer said it wasn't going to be a 60-day DL move. The M's split the middle.

As many have already pointed out on Twitter, the likelihood is that, after Orta clears waivers - which he likely will, since he's a 25 year old AA reliever with a fresh Tommy John scar in his elbow - the team will re-sign him, so we're probably not losing anybody. And even if we do, it's Ricky Orta. It'd be like losing a pushpin behind the desk. Aw, man, I was gonna use that pushpin to hold some shit in place. Now I have to grab another pushpin. Guess I'd better open the drawer with all of the pushpins.

The thing that's getting people upset is that the move doesn't send Mike Sweeney away, but while anyone who wanted that has his heart in the right place, it wasn't going to happen. That'll be addressed separately. If it's ever addressed, which, oh man. I'm holding out hope for a versatile righty/switch-hitter in the Ryan Doumit mold, but whatever happens, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. The corresponding 40-man roster move was never going to involve the unceremonious ejection of Mike Sweeney.

Comment 49 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Lookout Landing

Mike Sweeney Retires

Mar 2011 by Jeff Sullivan - 10 comments

A Mike Sweeney Timeline

Oct 2010 by Jeff Sullivan - 55 comments

A Quick Thought On Momentum

Aug 2010 by Jeff Sullivan - 10 comments

Comments

Display:

The feeling seems to be mutual.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 3, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I want Alex Gordon

Yeah, it probably won’t happen. But it’s the Royals.

by Cantu Easley Winn on May 3, 2010 12:00 PM PDT reply actions  

If Sweeney ever goes

You’d preferably want a RH bat that can play LF, DH, and even a little 1B – given the handedness of Langerhans, Bradley, and Griffey.

by tait644 on May 3, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oops

*Kotchman

Not Bradley

by tait644 on May 3, 2010 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Versatility seems like a must, though, especially if they stick with the 12-man pitching staff

We want Bradley at DH every day, right? Unless you go high-profile, then you’re looking for a righty who can spell Langerhans against lefties, but also serve as a pinch-hitter/sub for Lopez or the catchers or whoever.

by Jeff Sullivan on May 3, 2010 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

We don't have versatility now.

We don’t have someone who can hit now.

If you can solve both, fantastic, but solve at least one of them.

by Matthew on May 3, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, as long as Bradley starts more games at DH than LF, I'll be content.

Unfortunately, I have a feeling that’s not going to be the case just yet.

Milton Bradley apologist

by sanford_and_son on May 3, 2010 12:07 PM PDT reply actions  

If it's in place of Griffey, fine.

But it’s probably at the expense of Langerhans in the lineup, so BOOOOOOOO.

FUCK THE ANGELS!

by Fuckmikereilly on May 3, 2010 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Langherhans vs. lefties isn't likely to be much more productive than Sweeney.

Though striking out is better than 6-4-3, so while he might not be more productive, he would likely be less detrimental.

by Matt Erickson on May 3, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

ZiPS

has Griffey putting up a .308 wOBA the rest of the way, Sweeney a .318, and Langerhans a .313. Basically a wash.

It would basically come down to Langerhans’ D vs. Bradley’s. Not to mention cutting down on the risk of Bradley getting hurt playing the OF and having to live with Griffey or Sweeney at DH.

by tait644 on May 3, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like to think that whatever gears have to turn to move Sweeney have started moving

things like this aren’t instant. Lacking internal solutions necessitates going to other teams, and many of the teams that might have something to exchange with us are not necessarily ready to do so. Unless we want Jacobs. Do we want Jacobs? Right.

It’s hard to imagine that the FO thinks it’s ok to make a run at the division with two bench spots taken up by the hitting version of a double play combo. Believe [in] Big [roster moves coming].

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on May 3, 2010 12:38 PM PDT reply actions  

No.
The reason I would suggest caution is he’s had good months in the past. In June of last year, he hit .324/.358/.706, nine home runs and a 24/5 K/BB in 102 at-bats. The next month he hit three home runs and struck out in nearly half his at-bats. Another reason to be cautious is about five hundred points of OPS split from left-handers to right-handers. Peguero had an incredible April, and came closer to putting everything together than we’ve ever seen from him, but the minor leagues are all about adjustment, and readjustment, and samples are made all the more wonky in the Southern League by the constant five-game sets, which make good or bad stretches more a product of competition than elsewhere.

From JY’s Minor League Wrap at USSM.

by Eyeball Kid on May 3, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wheeee.

It’s still weird to see myself quoted, but I like that word gets around.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 3, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sadly, I think Sweeney is here to stay for a while

I suspect that Sweeney dodged a bullet on Sunday by not playing. While he may be terrible at hitting the ball now, he seems to have superattuned survival skills, by the way.

After the bad losses and built up frustration it probably caused a “end of the rope, show some results today or you’re gone” type situation, but Sweeney managed to avoid playing (and not getting results like usual), and he didn’t get cut like Byrnes. Byrnes was probably gone anyway, and the Byrnes DFA probably relieved some of that stress to do something about this awful situation.

With some of the stress relieved I don’t expect a super-survivor like Sweeney to be cut so easily.
But as everybody is saying, the Byrnes (and Tui) move is really not enough to salvage the team’s chances.

Another tough thing is that Sweeney does probably have more left in the bat than Junior, but Junior can’t be cut, so it complicates the situation a little.

by Sam Regens on May 3, 2010 5:17 PM PDT reply actions  

Pushpins!

Ha-ha! Jeff!

I would rec my post if I could just because it reminded me to read your post like three times already. Excellent stuff…

by fortyniners on May 3, 2010 7:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY