Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

14-23, Chart

20100516_mariners_rays_0_70_lbig__medium

This team is not as bad as their record. This team is not as bad as their record. This team is not as bad as their record. If you want to give up on the season, go ahead. But don't bring your defeatism here. Not now. I just got to watch Cliff Lee dice up the Rays like it was a Double-A team. Take that away from today. Michael Saunders was a couple inches from catching Carl Crawford's triple. B.J. Upton's double was on a joke of a swing.

All three games in this series were winnable. The Mariners didn't convert all three into wins, but they hung in with the Rays. This team is not as bad as their record.

Biggest Contribution: Casey Kotchman +.058
Biggest Suckfest: Chone Figgins -.196

Comment 235 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

We've got great pitching and defense.

We’ve encountered some bad luck and we currently have an ineffective offense. The offense is going to get better.

by TrustBaseball on May 16, 2010 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

there is a difference between being defeatist...

… and coming to a rather defensible conclusion that this team is not and cannot consistently be competitive. Enough of the “bad luck” bullshit. We are a team that should be thinking about restocking talent pools and improving the skills of our core.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 2:59 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Explain how the "bad luck" stuff is bullshit, please.

Explain Casey Kotchman’s .188 BABIP, or Chone Figgins’ .250 BABIP, or Jose Lopez’s .238 BABIP, or his 2.2 HR/FB%, or the team’s .276 BABIP, among other things. Explain why these things are sustainable.

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

easy

When you lack power and hit a lot of groundballs, your babip is going to be low relative to the league average. Low babip by itself does not imply bad luck.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 3:49 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

That doesn't explain career norms

Casey Kotchman’s career BABIP: .271. Chone Figgins’ career BABIP: .338. Jose Lopez’s career BABIP: .283

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually I do understand.

I just think we’re very close to digging ourselves to big a hole to get out of. Not only that, but I don’t trust the manager to do what’s right in order for the team to win.

by Poochie on May 16, 2010 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Yup.

I don’t think this is a bad team, but what’s done is done. We’re almost a quarter of the way through the season, and 5.5 games is a solid gap. And it’s not like we’re only chasing one team.

I’m not giving up, but I’m not confident.

by Teej on May 16, 2010 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

So in otherwords

I can’t be optimistic until they make our easily fixable problems go away

by Poochie on May 16, 2010 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well

I have a hard time believing Griffey’s going to be getting ABs in late June if he’s still under the Mendoza line. At some point, if Griffey doesn’t take himself out of the lineup, someone in the organization is probably going to suggest a DL trip for acute suckitis if Griffey wants to do the farewell tour once rosters expand in September.

by eponymous_coward on May 16, 2010 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even if we were to replace

Griffey with a 1 WAR player going forward, how much better does it make us?

by Ballard Erik on May 16, 2010 6:07 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Well, one win at the very least.

Snark aside there’ll also be the added flexibility as absolutely any player that replaces Griffey will be more versatile. It would help if our manager showed any rudimentary understanding of how to use his bench though.

by Eyeball Kid on May 16, 2010 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, this.

Last year’s Mariners weren’t ever THIS far under .500, and while we were able to get within a couple of games of the lead by July, it took a month of playing very good baseball in June… and by the end of July we were toast.

We’re starting to run out of runway.

That being said, yes, this team isn’t this bad, unless you believe that Chone Figgins, Jose Lopez and Casey Kotchman have completely and irrevocably lost the ability to hit a baseball. I actually feel pretty good about the fact that Vargas has developed nicely, and Fister is doing well, though Hyphen losing ~5 mph on his fastball from the end of 2009 to now worries me, given his injury history.

by eponymous_coward on May 16, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah.

I wouldn’t even mind Sweeney being 25th guy so much, if Milton’s the everyday DH.

Also, I forgot Saunders, which I should have added. IF Vargas and Saunders develop into 2-3 WAR players (this is questionable, but hey), we’re a LONG LONG way towards solving problems this team has had for a while (the team’s got sufficient talent at the top of the pyramid with Felix/Ichiro, and plenty of replacement-level talent, but is missing players to fill out the middle).

by eponymous_coward on May 16, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

There's no reason the bad luck won't keep up -

our current luck has no bearing on future events, so there’s no guarantee that we’ll get luckier as the season progresses, as nice as it would be.

We’ve both sucked and been really unlucky, and that’s a horrible combination.

by seattlebruin on May 17, 2010 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure, there's not a guarantee. I'm not saying we're guaranteed of anything.

But it’s unlikely that our luck is going to continue being this bad

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 17, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Texas is looking pretty good

maybe not run away with the division good, but good. Guerrero is hitting very well, their starters look better than we thought… and what have we got? Bradley coming back from his meditation retreat? Bedard coming back from Labrum surgery? Those are our silver bullets. I understand about bad luck and regression, believe me I do. I just happen to think that this was a team with precious little margin for error, and just about all of that has been chewed up. We’ve played what is absolutely the easiest part of our schedule and come out of it looking like shit. Maybe the team will start playing better but until major roster changes are implemented there’s no way to think of the Mariners as an over .500 team.

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on May 17, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

You might think I disagree with you on this, but I don't at all

It’s your last point that’s the most important – the one about roster changes. If we don’t fix the obvious problems with this roster, I don’t think we’re going to contend. But with what Jack Zduriencik has already shown us over the last year and a half, I’m not ready to think he could be so dumb as to let this continue happening. I expect changes to happen over the next week or so. If I’m wrong, well, we’ll probably end up being a ~.500 team in a year that could have been so great.

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 17, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would think our second off day this week (today being the first)

Will be the day where changes happen. You have an off day in the middle of a homestand, with a long stretch of continuous play coming up fast – seems like perfect timing to me.

by seattlesundevil on May 17, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mariners could still realistically end May only 3 or 4 games out of first

Get Bradley back (and hopefully rehabilitated), get a bat from trades and the hopefully-inevitable regression to the mean in regards to luck and this team will be competing by All Star break.

Seriously, the luck has to change at some point.

Right?

by ManifestDestiny on May 16, 2010 1:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Good perspective Matthew.

There are definately positives to take away from this series…I just wish that winning it was one of them.

by Omerta on May 16, 2010 1:40 PM PDT reply actions  

I think there is a psychological component to these losses.

Last year, the team was all about winning the close games. This year we can’t do it. I think maybe the attitude of the team is a big difference. The “never say die” attitude wins more games that the “oh, fuck here we go again” attitude. Not statistically provable, but as a coach I can vouch for it.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 1:47 PM PDT reply actions  

The bullpen has really underperformed expectations.

Before the season, the bullpen looked like an embarrassment of riches. What happened?

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also they changed League's delivery so his splitter doesn't work nearly as well anymore.

Drayer says it was to help prevent possible future injuries. Has League had a history of injury problems or something? It seems to me, you shouldn’t screw with awesome and make it less awesome unless you have a dang good reason to do so.

by hiskeyd on May 16, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

One year

he came to the Jays’ spring training having lost 5-10 miles off his fastball. The official story was he’d screwed up his shoulder by surfing too much, which sounded terribly suspicious. He’s also changed his delivery/arm angle several times over the course of his major league career.

by abelard on May 16, 2010 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Statistically speaking, yes.

There is no statistical proof that attitude affects anything. But “getting down on yourself” isn’t an explanation for poor performance that was pulled out of thin air. Hundreds of years of hundreds of sports support that observation.

Also, physiologically speaking, emotions trigger physical responses. Negative emotions (like anticipating disappointment) can trigger physiological responses like lethargy and lack of focus. Neither of these responses are helpful in what should be an adrenaline-packed contest where every PA matters.

I admit that in statistics and economics, these explanations are useless.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is it really that much of a given?

Honestly wouldn’t a lot of that stuff be misidentified in variants of confirmation bias? Sports pysch is such a garbage realm because everything is tied to wins and losses and post-facto evaluations and explanations.

Supposedly losing teams also start to “press” which seems like it would be the opposite of lethargy and loss of focus. One day we hear about how guys need to stay loose, then the next we hear about how there needs to be a player’s only meeting where everyone screams at each other and calls each other names, and then the next day its about having fun out there.

by Freneau on May 16, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sport psych IS garbage. But there's nothing else that can account for the human side of sports.

No sports psychology explanation can ever be proven or disproven. As a scientist, I hate that. As a human and former athlete, I can’t discount it.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

luck? what are you talking about?

Breaks go both ways in any game. We don’t have the quality of talent to overcome the ones that go against us. Let’s accept this and move on to crafting the team we want to be in 2011.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 3:03 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

This team has been unsustainably unlucky so far this season, particularly offensively

It’s tough to overcome the bad breaks when you don’t get any good breaks. Also, really? You do realize that Milton Bradley, Jack Wilson, Mark Lowe, and Erik Bedard have all been out and are all fairly close to returning, right? You also know that we’re 5.5 GB and it’s May 16th in a weak division, right?

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

if you want to hang your hat on the bad luck theory,

…Then what do we make of Fister, Vargas, Ichiro and Guti? Also, you then have to acknowledge that others in the AL West have been unlucky and that they will revert to their expected level of performance. 80 wins is our “better case” scenario and that won’t be enough to win this division. We’d be fools to try if it means sacrificing moves that can position us better next year.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 3:56 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Fister's going to regress, and so is Vargas (though to a lesser degree).

Ichiro and Guti will too – but none of them to anywhere near the degree that Figgins, Kotchman, Lopez, or Bradley will. Plus, we were missing Cliff Lee for the first 3 weeks of the season, and Felix was hurt for a couple of starts. This team has had a lot of shitty things happen to it, on top of an abundance of shitty offensive luck – much moreso than any other team in the division.

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is simple enough.

Ichiro: He’s really, really ridiculously good looking. This isn’t the first time he’s posted a .390 BABIP. He has three other seasons in his career with a BABIP over .380. It happens.

Guti’s BABIP should regress, but we’ve seen a complete change in his approach at the plate this year. He has evolved as a hitter. He’s swinging at less pitches, but making contact more on pitches out of the zone. He’s hitting less groundballs and more flyballs and line drives. He likely won’t be posting a .380 wOBA for the whole season, but if he can maintain this approach, even as the luck fizzles, he could realistically maintain .350-ish.

Fister is posting an xFIP in the 4’s, so is Vargas. They’ll both regress. But good defense can (and does) significantly deflate ERA’s. Guess what: we have a good defense!

by harkening on May 16, 2010 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

so, in Guti's case, it is possilble for someone to get sustainably better ...

… but, in the case of Kotchman or Lopez, it is not possible for them to get consistently worse?

I’m not bailing off the ship, I’m just voting for managing this team in such a way that we optimize our chances for 2011 and beyond. Claiming bad luck, suggesting that we can finish the year at a .650 clip to win a bad division (just so we can get completely outclassed in a short first round playoff series) and chanting that this team is somehow better than its record reflects an inability to accept reality and to make different summertime plans.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is evidence to believe that Guti is improving himself in a sustainable way

What is there to suggest that Figgins, Kotchman, and Lopez have all suddenly become sustainably awful?

Also, your point about the playoffs is just wrong. The playoffs are a crapshoot – and if anything, we’d have the advantage (Felix-Lee-Bedard….?)

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

keep believin' my young friend.

.. as for me, I’ll be rooting for us to be sellers at the trade deadline.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

This kind of rooting is absolutely the worst.

I don’t know why you would root for our team to have a bad record. Ever.

by Kirk on May 16, 2010 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Strasburg?

But yeah, it’s unrealistic to believe the entire team will continue to bat the Mendoza line. Kotchman in particular seems unlucky.

Hard work never killed nobody, but I won't take my chances.

by JAH on May 16, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not rooting for us to have a bad record. I'm rooting for lemonade to come from the lemon of the season that we are having.

I’d hate to see us trade away pieces like Ackley, Triunfel and Fields in order to secure the services of a player who will have little to no impact on how this season is going to end up. You really can’t see the difference?

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 16, 2010 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is possible to not be either a "buyer" or "seller" in the traditional sense

Last year’s Mariners provides an example. Just because the team isn’t planning on trading Cliff Lee doesn’t mean that it is planning on trading Ackley.

Quitter's People United: Member 12

by Uh on May 16, 2010 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

PTBNL!

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 16, 2010 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Technically, yes.

In practice, I don’t think players like Ackley move as PTBNL.

by Jeff Nye on May 16, 2010 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jeremy Bonderman did!

I’m not saying it’s any less stupid to be talking about it.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 1:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Way to make me look bad with facts, Jay. :(

Does it happen that often though?

Especially since, if I’m reading the rules right, he’d have to remain a PTBNL for several months?

by Jeff Nye on May 17, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry Jeff. :(

Its one that sticks out in my mind because it almost never happens, but yes, he was a PTBNL for several months. It’s highly uncommon on the whole.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's probably why it didn't come to my mind, then.

In any case, it’s just a small factor in why the whole “trade Ackley” discussion is stupid, and I’d wager that 99% of the people who bring it up have no idea how the rules work.

by Jeff Nye on May 17, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

nevertheless, the point is valid.

… why mortgage future success in the hopes of landing a mediocre major league player who can be put on the roster today? Whether or not you think Fields sucks, or Ackley is untradeable, or X player is in X situation is irrelevant.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on May 18, 2010 7:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

We had to.

You can’t blow off scouts like that.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I hadn't thought of that

I guess there was some trust-building to be done.

De Gutibus non disputandum est

by Bearskin Rugburn on May 17, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's not terrible...

just injured (oblique) off and on and struggling to find his command at times.

He could end up being all right, but I wouldn’t spend a first-round pick on him. Doing so with a reliever is generally a terrible idea.

I’m more frustrated with the “call up French!” camp, or worse, the “call up Peguero!” one.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

It seems like he's had control and injury problems the entire time he's been a professional

that’s really frustrating when he was a guy who was thought to be more big-league ready than just about anyone else in that year’s draft.

Perhaps if he’s ready like we thought he would be, we get to keep Morrow or trade him for a different piece rather than another reliever like League.

I am also inherently biased against relief pitchers who can’t throw strikes =/

by seattlebruin on May 17, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mumba Rivera sucks.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

You have me mistaken for an optimist.

I bailed on the “In Z We Trust” bandwagon in December (after the Morrow trade) and have been calling for Wak’s head since late last season. I was willing to believe, given the divisional mediocrity, that we could compete with ~.500 ball, if not a little better. And the truth is we still can. The problem is that just to get back to .500, we need to play great baseball for a sustained amount of time. As to your specific questions re: Lopez and Kotchman…

I don’t know what to say about Loafie. He looks absolutely lost.againt right handed pitching. Against lefties, he has a .357/.367/.464 slash line for a .361 wOBA. That’s good to very good. Against righties, oh man: .178/.211/.229 for a .201 wOBA. So he’s obviously capable of seeing the ball and making solid contact still. This is why we can reasonably conclude in luck playing a part in it. He has a .400 BABIP lefties (versus .299 for his career) and .198 against righties (.277 career). He has never shown such a significant platoon split as he has this year. Meanwhile, his line drive and ground ball rates are up overall which should show an increase in average, yet it’s not coming. Even in his abysmal line against righties, his LD% is only down by ~1%, GB% is up and FB% is down. There is just something bizarre going on in his results.

Kotchman, meanwhile, had a slightly above average April and has absolutely tanked in May. I’m not sure how to read into it. His ground balls are way up this month (66.7% versus 52.7% career). He might be sustainably awful for the rest of his career, but then you have to account for April.

This team is better than its record, though. Do I see playoffs coming? No. But I don’t see us playing sub-.400 baseball for the rest of the season either.

by harkening on May 16, 2010 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I personally don't see Kotchman as our 1B of the future.

Sure, he had a good month. But his track record offensively is just not that impressive.

He has a lot of defensive value, but then he plays 1B, where defense isn’t as important as at other positions.

by Cantu Easley Winn on May 16, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Like Branyan, Z took a flyer on an undervalued free agent for a one year contract.

If he was legitimately long term, the future, he’s worth more than a one year signing. He’s not the future. We have him now, and he is contributing for better or worse to this season.

None of which has anything to do with Gekko Mojo’s questions about “sustainably worse” performance or my point above.

by harkening on May 16, 2010 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

"just so we can get completely outclassed in a short first round playoff series"

Playoff series do not always go to the team with the best regular season record. (Insert references to any number of “eh” to good-but-not-best teams who have hardware here.)

Look, the path for the M’s to get to the playoffs is ADMITTEDLY narrow, but if they get there, they almost certainly:

- have Saunders performing well in LF
- have Loafie, Figgins, Bradley and Kotchman performing closer to their historic norms of hitting
- aren’t playing 6-4-3 or Griffdawg at DH
- Bedard comes back and performs at his historic norms, which gives you a 1-2-3 of Felix-Lee-Bedard, which history tells us is very important come playoff time and rotations shorten.

I don’t think this is the most LIKELY scenario (given that the M’s haven’t given up on their ancient DHs yet and we still don’t know about Bedard and Bradley, and there’s undoubtedly going to be more bumps in the road), but I have yet to see a convincing argument why it’s an impossible one.

by eponymous_coward on May 17, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm talking about the fact that the results of one-run games are heavily influenced by chance

and rejecting the notion that last year’s team was psychologically capable of willing themselves to victory while this year’s team is not.

by Aaron Campeau on May 16, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Psychologically capable of them, no.

But as a tangentially related side I don’t believe they are truly toss ups. It takes away from the fact that one team is probably better than the other in general, and that team is more likely to score/prevent the runs necessary to win.

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on May 16, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of course. Mine is more of a separate point.

I don’t really like the idea of referring to 1 run games as a tossup, since in reality the better team should be more likely to come out ahead. There is, however, no psychological “winning attitude.” At best one could argue there is a psychological losing attitude (teams have looked visibly defeated during games before) but even that is arguable since each individual player would need to stop trying, and that never happens.

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on May 16, 2010 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only problem with luck

Is it isn’t a rule that good luck will come after a string of bad luck. However it could, so yes please.

by Ballard Erik on May 16, 2010 6:10 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I, too, still believe this team can begin winning, and that this record is far worse than what it should be.

That being said, moves need to be made soon. A fairly obvious improvement will be getting MB back.

The problem is, I’m willing to be patient with Kotchman, Figgins, and Lopez, especially given their stellar defense. But collectively being patient with all 3 when they’re hitting like this is giving us no chance of winning ballgames.

FUCK THE MARINERS!

by Fuckmikereilly on May 16, 2010 1:47 PM PDT reply actions  

When MB gets back, he needs to start HITTING.

If he continues performing like he is right now, the team will not be any better. A wOBA of .300 won’t cut it at any position Milton can play. I hope he’s hitting the cages as often as the therapist’s office.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

No it won't.

One potential starter in LF (Saunders) had a .368 wOBA before the game. One DH option (Sweeney) is posting a .351 wOBA. Milton CAN be better than both of them with the bat, but he’s not right now.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm evaluating to-date performance, not talent. I'm not projecting anything either.

I’m using the largest possible sample size for evaluating 2010 to-date performance in the majors. If you think I’m trying to project anything or infer anything about true talent level with these numbers, you’re reading it wrong.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 3:45 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm just saying Sweeney has hit better than Bradley so far.

From that fact, I have concluded that when Bradley returns we need to get him some PAs without sacrificing too much of Sweeney’s playing time (assuming Sweeney is still hitting well). We’ll be able to see if/when Bradley starts hitting better than Sweeney, and when that happens we should make the switch. Annointing Bradley the full-time DH before he starts hitting well is a mistake that could cost us runs, and therefore wins.

As for sample size, we went over this in this thread. I can’t link to the exact part of the conversation, but I showed that the last time Bradley was better than Sweeney was 08.

That being said, I want Bradley to start hitting so he can take the DH role (also covered in that thread). I think he’s immensely talented and a better option for the future. But bleeding runs and wins in the meantime is not something we can afford to do.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 7:39 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

You think you showed that, but you didn't.

Your argument is missing 98% of the rest of the puzzle.

by Aaron Campeau on May 16, 2010 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

The Mariners have allowed the fourth-fewest runs in the AL.

That’s with some really shit starting pitching performances.

by Aaron Campeau on May 16, 2010 1:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Hate to say it

But I’m almost at the point where I would give Olsen or French a start instead of RRS

by ManifestDestiny on May 16, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not unconditional, but I like the guy.

It’s just that… man… I don’t think he’s going to keep this up and then he does. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is he still experimenting with his changeup?

it seems like his control has been pretty good this year

by seattlebruin on May 17, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

He might be.

But the weird thing is that I thought it was helping him get some groundballs in spring training and now he’s more extreme on the flyball end of things.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 17, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, and he's generally had very good control.

Some of what he’s doing is clearly lucky, but he’s trying to find the Doug Fister path to success – throw strikes, keep hitters off-balance (even if you don’t have the pure stuff to miss a lot of bats), somehow profit.

The GB thing in spring training looks like a fluke. Everyone on the team had insane GB rates in spring training, but that hasn’t lasted.

by marc w on May 17, 2010 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I vote French

Olson has never impressed me. In my humble opinion, he sucks and can eat poo.

by Jon S. on May 16, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn't change Bedard's timeline since it's retroactive.

What Shannon said anyway.

Everything is Rob Johnson's fault.

by the other side on May 16, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here.

Link.

Everything is Rob Johnson's fault.

by the other side on May 16, 2010 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

.
Update…just informed that the Mariners ended up not placing Bedard on the 60 day dl as we were originally told. With Bradley on the restricted list the roster was at 39 so the move was not necessary.

by Aaron Campeau on May 16, 2010 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Twitter is amazing and annoying all at the same time.

On the one hand constant updates on the teams moves is great, on the other hand it’s easy to get sucked into constantly monitoring for updates.

by Kermit. on May 16, 2010 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

To me, the most interesting story line so far has been the Twilight Zone run environment created by the combination Mariners run prevention and offense.

Tons of games end of not only close but low scoring as a result of both of these effects. Boy, it would be really dandy to see what we could accomplish with a real DH, some better luck, and Jose Lopez pulling his dinosaur head out of his dinosaur ass.

by abender20 on May 16, 2010 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Am I crazy

or does it seem like we ALWAYS score just enough to NOT win. I mean why can’t we win a 4-2 game and then lose 1-5 instead of games like 1-2, and 4-5.

by universalguru on May 16, 2010 1:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Okay, I've embraced hopelessness, but I'm not wedded to her because she's a strumpet whore.

So I’d like a reason to hope. But before I can do that, somebody please explain to me what the fuck is going on with Chone Figgins, and should I hope for huge improvement? Don’t tell me to go the stats, please, as much respect as I have for them I don’t understand a lot of the peripherals enough to know what to look for.

Tell me he’s not a hopeless sack of crap, with reference to aging patterns and comparable players and impressive shit that makes me realize that this is the smartest fanbase of any sports franchise on the planet. I want to believe.

by esoteric on May 16, 2010 2:01 PM PDT reply actions  

Unlucky. Really low batting average on balls in play. That will rise.

He’s near the top of the league in walks so his approach is ok. I’m optimistic on him.

by marinerdan on May 16, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

How bout them Nats!?

It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray

by Faux on May 17, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

We all thought this team would be really, really annoying and boy were we right!

Kotchman, Figgins and Lopez can’t possibly continue to hit so terribly.
Bradley will hopefully come back and hit something like Milton Bradley. If he does so in the DH slot that will solve one glaring problem. *Assuming the organization accepts the undeniable reality that Griffey is soooo fucking done.

Our pitching and defense have been great.
We’ve had so much shit luck and under performance and we’re only 5 games back!
I don’t think Tejas is going to run away from anyone.
We are lucky enough to be in the Special Olympics division.

These are a few good reasons not sink into defeatism and despair.
I’m incredibly frustrated at this point but I’m still hopeful and even a bit optimistic.

Griffey!

by Big Jared on May 16, 2010 2:09 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm with you Matt.

The M’s can overcome this. The offense can only get better.

That's my grammar

by ChaseB on May 16, 2010 2:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Always the optimist

Look what happens when Jeff and Graham are both away! We need them to break us down, and tell us it’s not okay. That way, when it finally is okay, it feels so much better.

by dkulich on May 16, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Matthew*

Thanks Professor, i’m glad you have my back.

That's my grammar

by ChaseB on May 16, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Too bad we couldnt have had last year’s good luck with this year’s weak division.

by ARock on May 16, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

This surprised me

Our playoff odds actually went up from 5.4% on thursday to 8.0% as of right now.

rest of our division from thursday to today:
Texas: 64.9 → 54.3
Oakland: 27.7 → 21.8
LA: 6.0 → 17.5

Yeah we’ve been very unlucky, but god our division is terrible. Which is kind of lucky.

by Karma Police on May 16, 2010 3:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Yep, 5.5 back is bad but not the end of the world

Especially when the team(s) you’re chasing aren’t that good.

Try not to take me too seriously

by calim on May 16, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Despite the good play this year, this season is really hard to endure.

But i’ll keep watching. A ‘95-like comeback is never out of the question, especially in May. Our fortunes have to change eventually. I’ve never seen a team with this much bad luck on a daily basis.

by FisteeFisterer on May 16, 2010 3:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Why can't we just lose bad?

 It’s so much easier to take than having 3 of the last 4 losses be games we probably should have won.

by SethGrandpa on May 16, 2010 3:46 PM PDT reply actions  

It's a steep drop from infinity.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 16, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

We have been terribly unlucky, that's for sure

But even if Figgins, Lopez, and Kotchman start getting the results they should, and Griffey/Sweeney go away for a league average hitter, we’re probably still not better than Texas. And they have a 5.5 game head start with 125 to play. Of course the season is by no means over but we’ve gotten to that point where we’re going to need to rely on luck pretty quick here to justify not shopping Lee at the deadline and replenishing the farm. And I hate getting to that point, because it seems like every year we’re pinning our hopes on a bunch of breaks going our way and not actual good, contending baseball, which this year was supposed to be.

Fuck you, Scrappy.

by OlSalty on May 16, 2010 4:04 PM PDT reply actions  

I appreciate the cogent, sober analysis in this thread

But I’m still despondent. And the Madres got swept by L.A. Fuck you baseball, you merciless whore.

by lemonverbena on May 16, 2010 4:50 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

It's cogent

But I’m not sure if it’s sober.

by Cantu Easley Winn on May 16, 2010 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I understand that we've had bad luck. I get that we'll eventually see some positive regression.

That said, as talented as this team is, this is still a bummer. While it’s still quite possible that this team will climb back into contention, and thank God the AL West is as bad as it is, I’m going to need to see something great in order to get any hope back. Playing .500 ball against bad teams and competing well but still losing the series against great clubs isn’t doing it.

by katal on May 16, 2010 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Well said Katal

This sums up my own feelings perfectly. I hate the idea that I’m being stubbornly pessimistic, but it’s going to take more than some good starting pitching performances to make me optimistic again.

by johnbai on May 16, 2010 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

To start with this team was borderline to contend. We were hoping it could happen if we got some breaks that fell our way but now the opposite has happened and its happened so fast I haven’t really been able to process what has happened.

by Edgar for Pres on May 17, 2010 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

The hole is getting pretty deep, but we're not out of it yet, since nobody's running away with the division.

I just hope Kotchman, Figgins, and Lopez, do not only start hitting when we’re out of it and there’s no pressure. I would not attribute that solely to “luck” (as is popular) but something else.

But not just talking offense, on a whole, it’s not fair to single out those guys because they are playing good defense. Some really bonehead moves/plays/calls and the bullpen have cost us plenty wins.

by Sam Regens on May 16, 2010 6:46 PM PDT reply actions  

And about "luck"

I know it’s really popular to bring out the BABIP numbers and saying it’s not his fault someone’s sucking at hitting, it’s just “bad luck”.

But is that really a full analysis, the whole picture? It seems to me that disregarding caught foul balls (which are a small event) when these BABIP “excuses” are brought out, the main argument that some people seem to be making is basically just that Player A ‘s strikeout rate hasn’t increased and therefore he’s having bad luck.

Are Kotchman, Figgins, and Lopez ALL really just the victim of bad luck (well hit balls going directly to fielders) or are some of them making weak contact (even if they are not striking out more)?
That would be their own damn fault and not just bad luck.

by Sam Regens on May 16, 2010 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have you been watching the games? Lopez and Kotchman especially have made a ton of line drive outs

Plus, just look at LD rates. Lopez is above his career average, and so is Kotchman. As for Figgins, just read this post.

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

A very good portion of it is bad luck - although I'm not sure how that translates to "we're fucked".

It would be worse if it wasn’t bad luck – bad luck turns around. When your players all suddenly become sustainably bad, that’s when you’re really fucked.

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 16, 2010 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Another interesting point about this

I bet if there was a stat that kept track of the types of foul balls a player hits, you could successfully pinpoint some young breakout candidates. For example, if a young player consistently hits foul balls right around the foul pole, it would be a good bet that they’ll hit a few more home runs in the future. I don’t know if there is a way to keep track of that right now, though.

I’m digressing again though.

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on May 16, 2010 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember Jeff mentioning this before.

But it doesn’t look like it’s kept track of anywhere at the moment.

by Mariner John on May 16, 2010 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

It actually seems like he has been to me

I can recall a good amount of deep/semi-deep line drives to left that have been caught, and his LD rate backs that up

My Mariners blog SodoMojo, My Twitter Feed

by Griffin Cooper on May 17, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

What's weird with Lopez is that his peripherals always seem to completely disagree with how he looks to the eye

I think he’s hitting a decent number of liners this year, but he’s turned his warning track/homer popups into grounders to third or short

by seattlebruin on May 17, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure 14-23 is still 14-23 whether it "shoud" be or not

At some point, it is what it is. Cliff Lee will probably having a losing record and a sub-3 ERA in his time as a Mariner. Call me when this team is on pace to score 500 runs over the course of the season.

by Aly Edge on May 16, 2010 7:31 PM PDT reply actions  

At least we aren't in the AL East!

In Baltimore you can’t even look forward to next year because division re-alignment is much further away than that.

by Snowman1025 on May 16, 2010 8:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Exactly right. We are in a rare season when our division is incredibly not real good.

This doesn’t happen every year, but it gives us a chance this year at 14-23 in the middle of May to still see that the season isn’t over yet. We are only 5 1/2 back, and our team is not as bad as the record indicates. We’ve had some bad luck in close games. We can still win the division if things go our way. Baltimore has nothing to look forward to at this point.

by TrustBaseball on May 16, 2010 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Should we consider moving Figgins to leadoff?

I know he is not hitting worth a lick, but he is still drawing walks and can only regress back to the mean.

by Tyler is a G on May 17, 2010 1:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Hopefully, doing so would tip the scales of our endless amounts of 1-run games in our favor.

Also, batting in front of a singles master like Ichiro would give Figgins plenty of opportunities to go first to third as he is know for. A walk from Figgins in the #2 slot while Ichiro is on doesn’t provide this one extra base.

by Tyler is a G on May 17, 2010 4:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, but a walk from Figgins with Ichiro on moves Ichiro into scoring position.

Because we’re rebels. Accurate, intelligent, introspective rebels. And damn proud of it my friend. - CapSea
Preserved In All His Greatness - R.I.P. The Reignman 1989 to 1997

by JLProck on May 17, 2010 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Post game Drayer relayed a conversation with Wak discussing moving Figgins to 9th in the order.

She listed some of the points raised in the conversation, reducing his plate appearances, 2nd leadoff, taking some pressure off him. Not offending anyone and not messing with Ichiro.

by Kermit. on May 17, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

While I don't have an issue with the thought process behind this, the next obvious and problematic question is who do put in the 2 hole?

We’re looking at a situation where, right now, Figgins, SS, C, DH, Choloaf, and Kotch to an extent are not hitting, so that leaves you 3 guys to toy with offensively. Ichiro isn’t going anywhere, and Guti is fine in the 3/4. Saunders isn’t likely as good as he’s been, but I wouldn’t quabble with him getting a few games at 2 while hoping that shifting Figgins to 9th magically fixes him in order to return him to the top. There just aren’t a lot of ways to get creative when you pencil in three guaranteed offensive black holes and have two more that should be hitting better but have looked clueless. Kotchman, whatever. More line drives please.

by abender20 on May 17, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I'm going to give him a month or two

but Casey Kotchman is beginning to look like one of this team’s major problems. He is looking like the same player he has been for years now. Lots of groundballs which leads to no power and since he is not very fast, a low BABIP. His BABIP is going to regress some but his lifetime BABIP is .272.

I was intrigued at first when we have him but at a certain point we need to look at him and realize he might be a replacement level 1B. Its not like we had a backup plan for 1B this year. We were basically hoping that Casey Kotchman had a semi-breakout season if he got consistent playing time. I’m sure Kotchman won’t be this bad all year but I’m more afraid that he is going to turn out to be a below average 1B that we got sucked into believing in.

by Edgar for Pres on May 17, 2010 10:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Basically...

If Kotchman doesn’t work out, he’s a 1-1.5 WAR 1B- not exactly replacement level. More like Mike Carp or Eric Hinske, “can play some ball but not very good” level.

We gave up Bill Hall for him. We let him walk in 2011, play Carp or sign a FA. Not a big loss in my book- sometimes you’re going to hit paydirt on these speculative plays (Branyan), sometimes you won’t (Kotchman so far).

by eponymous_coward on May 17, 2010 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I messed up the WAR calculation in my head. Forgot to add in the playing time

Lets call him +10 defense but then the 1B adjustment takes that away. Then you have to ask how good is his offense. If you use his career then he’s a below average hitter. So yeah, that’s probably 1-1.5 WAR.

I guess I still feel like 1B is a place we probably missed an opportunity to improve our team by a win or so. Kotchman is cheap so getting him wasn’t bad.

by Edgar for Pres on May 17, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY