Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

And That's Why It's Important To Not Overreact

A lot of people are looking for reasons to get pissed off at Junior right now. I get it. But if that's the angle you're going to take, you should probably try to limit it to performance-based reasons, because, for one thing, it's not like there isn't enough there, and for another, we don't really know much about anything else. Drayer chimes in with a new take on the most famous nap in Seattle history:

Don Wakamatsu has joked about Junior sleeping in the clubhouse in the past. He has also then turned serious and said that he has a sleep issue. This is nothing new. I have asked Junior about this and he said that yes, this is true. It has been a problem for years. As a result, he naps. It is not uncommon to see him asleep on a training table before a game. Ichiro even commented on this in my interview with him this winter.

You should read the whole thing, and you should pay particular attention to the end. Falling asleep in the clubhouse looks bad. It looks really bad, and this is a lousy time for Junior to be getting negative attention. But it's something he's always done, and it's never been much of an issue. Nor should it have been. The truth of the matter is that Major League baseball players don't spend all of their time on the top step cheering for their teammates. They do their own things, and it isn't fair for any of us on the outside to question their commitment, because we don't know. We don't know if a guy in the clubhouse is avoiding the game or getting himself prepared, just like we don't know if a guy in the dugout is paying close attention or looking at chicks.

In his career as a pinch-hitter, Griffey has posted an .882 OPS.

Comment 219 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I guess I figure that even if it's a regular occurence, I fundamentally disagree with it, sleeping problem or not.

I’d let it slide a bit if he was hitting, but I still wouldn’t like it. Even if everyone is saying it’s not a big deal…I just don’t like it. I’d have been upset about hearing it last year. I’m not asking players to stand on the top step cheering…but they should at least be available to their teammates whether it be in the clubhouse, dugout, etc.

I know, it’s probably stupid of me to think this way…it just seems like the wrong way to go about being a teammate.

by BrettJMiller on May 10, 2010 2:27 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Uh, no duh.

Never said he did. Simply said that he’s been napping his whole career. If that got him to the Hall of Fame, so be it. The fact he’s a bad hitter now is, uh, obvious. Taking a nap has no effect.

by Pete_ on May 10, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, implied that napping helped him hit the home runs you and I both know got him to the Hall of Fame.

If taking gave him the necessary rest he needed to produce at a Hall of Fame level, then yeah, his career is built in part because of it. He’s been taking pre-game and off-day naps for years. You think he should have been forced to stay awake? How well would he have performed on no sleep?

by Pete_ on May 10, 2010 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nobody has been talking about pre-game and off-day naps.

Your argument seems to essentially be that in-game napping helped him produce at a HoF level, and that he would not have performed at that level without in-game napping. Is that your argument?

by Chris Hafner on May 10, 2010 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

.

That’s arguably what Shannon Drayer is arguing.

by Double06 on May 10, 2010 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's the implication of what she's saying, for sure.

What I’m gleaning from her post is that he’s always had this issue, and that he’s been doing it all along. And she sites Piniella through Ichiro. 1994-present.

by Pete_ on May 10, 2010 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

She said that he has done it, not that it has contributed to his success.

She’s not saying that it helped him, hurt him, or made no difference.

I have little difficulty believing Griffey napped during games from time to time in the 1990s, but I do have difficulty believing that it helped him perform at a higher level. I mean, I’m sure there was lots of other stuff Griffey did in the 1990s that didn’t contribute to his success, like driving a GMC Syclone or wearing a little mustache. Neither of those things caused his success.

by Chris Hafner on May 10, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

By the way, who says he's been napping regularly his whole career?

I don’t see anyone on the record with Drayer. “Many a player” telling her about anecdotal occurrences of him napping and then hitting pinch hit homers just isn’t credible in my book. I’m not saying she’s lying, but what I’m saying is that this is hardly convincing evidence that this is just business as normal.

by Jeff Nusser on May 10, 2010 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's what Drayer said.
The fact of the matter is that aside from his home in Florida the clubhouse is the most comfortable place for Junior to be. He and others have told me that it is one of the only places he can sleep. What they saw Saturday was nothing they haven’t seen before. The stories are legendary and they span his career. Many a player have told me of Junior waking up from a catnap, grabbing his bat, heading straight to the plate and hitting a homerun. Lou Piniella has told stories of this.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would he have needed those naps if he took care of his body?

More than two decades of swilling soda is not wise for a professional athlete. When Griffey was younger there was a clubhouse attendant whose son became rather friendly with our crew out in right field. He mentioned numerous times how veteran players were equal parts appalled and amazed that Griffey was as good as he was while treating his body like shit.

In part I felt sorry for Griffey watching his body fall apart on him while he was in Cincinnati, but I was not one bit surprised. The man could have been the best player ever but instead he wasted his talents by being a lazy fuck.

by Sec 108 on May 10, 2010 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cute, but not an apt metaphor.

Did Griffey harm his performance and longevity by failing to properly condition his body in his youth? Most likely. Would taking care of his body properly allow him to sleep better? I doubt it for a variety of reasons, such as the neurological/psychological demands of sleep that aren’t expressly somatic, or the fact that he’s been doing it since years with Lou, during his peak.

Sleeping is not just for your muscles and tendons.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uh oh.

Apparently I have been doing it wrong.

by Ballard Erik on May 10, 2010 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know they offer medical help for sleep disorders.

I would bet even money Griffey was never treated for one.

by Sec 108 on May 10, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who says it's a disorder necessarily?

It kind of reads like “he’s only truly comfortable” in these two places. It doesn’t say anything about him truly lacking or being unable to sleep elsewhere.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

G.R.I.F.F.E.Y.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Having had treatment for a sleeping disorder...

it depends on the specific disorder, and then there’s an issue of whether treatment actually takes (which it sometimes doesn’t).

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also, being tested isn't the most comfortable things in the world.

If he has trouble sleeping anywhere but home, testing him would be quite difficult seeing how they have to hook you up to various wires and make you sleep in a strange bed.

"Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly, the ill deeds along with the good and let me be judged accordingly. The rest is silence." ~ Dinobot

by beastwarking on May 10, 2010 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've always questioned that myself.

How are they supposed to know how you sleep when nothing about sleeping during the test is normal? When my step-dad had one, they even told him not to drink coffee or soda that day. Soo…. how do they get an acccurate reason for your sleep issues?

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

But if chugging a gallon of coffee right before bed is causing you to have problems sleeping,

how will they find that if they don’t allow you to do that before they test you?

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's a pretty stupid question

Stop drinking coffee and night and then see if you sleep better. No test required for that.

Mariners/D Broncos/BSU Broncos fan in Seattle
The first rule of Lookout Landing is...

by appleshampoo on May 10, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

But many people won't make that connection on their own.

I just realized about a year ago that I can’t drink pop after about 7:30 or I’ll be up all night. Before that I could slam 20 Mountain Dews and still sleep like a baby.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's true, but...

if your doctor doesn’t say, “hey doofus, lay off the late night caffeine” before sending you in for sleep tests, then your doctor has a serious mental deficiency. People might not make that connection, but your doctor definitely should.

by jwiscarson on May 11, 2010 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know if I would call it wasting talent

but if he was basically the Josh Hamilton of junkfood imagine what he could have done with some semblance of a healthy diet and habits.

by Ballard Erik on May 10, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's really not though

it’s built on his prodigious offense, which was last seen in about 1998.

by pdb on May 10, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

No kidding.

But if he was napping 1989 to 1998, then it stands to reason that this part of his routine either contributed physically or mentally to his success.

by Pete_ on May 10, 2010 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

There's absolutely no way to prove that the napping helped him physically or mentally.

I know there are studies that show this, but you can’t build an argument that he would have had a worse career if he didn’t nap.

by seattle_since_81 on May 10, 2010 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

... nap *during* games.

1. I don’t think anybody would begrudge the guy napping during his own time.
2. I’m not sure why napping during games would make him better, unless he achieves some kind of inhuman focus that is only possible within the first ten minutes of waking.

by Chris Hafner on May 10, 2010 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Your point being? I mean, in regards to the napping.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

It doesn't mean it's a hindrance, either.

Griffey naps; this is normal. He napped when he was great, he naps now that he’s bad, and he’ll probably nap after he retires. Do we need to take any more than that from LaRue and Drayer?

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Again, you're suggesting that it's a negative thing, a hindrance.

We have no reason to think this is bad or good. Merely that he does it. What if—for a pure thought experiment—napping does indeed help Griffey’s performance? He’s bad now not because of the naps, but because he’s old and broken down? What does “getting away with it” mean in this context? What if napping is actually helping him pots a wOBA over .250 instead of being completely useless?

There are far too many assumptions going into everyone’s analysis. Now that we know this has long been part of Griffey’s habit, we need to scale it back.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm not saying the napping has any effect on his performance, just that it comes across as unprofessional.

And back in the day he had enough talent that no-one cared.

Also a .250 wOBA from your supposed DH is completely useless.

by Eyeball Kid on May 10, 2010 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let us say, hypothetically, that Griffey has a legitimate sleeping disorder.

Brandon Morrow has diabetes. I don’t know if he uses a pump or monitors his insulin levels and gets injections or whatever during the game, but I’m sure it’s treated. Ryan Rowland-Smith (and Brandon League) has (have) bad eyesight. They wear corrective lenses on the field. A player with asthma may or may not utilize an inhaler—probably not, since albuterol is a technically steroid.

My point is to say that if Griffey is treating in some form or another a legitimate medical condition, it’s no different than these other scenarios. But no one thinks Hyphen is unprofessional because he’s wearing specs. It’s a stigma because it’s sleeping. But that only holds divorced from the disorder.

Does Griffey suck? Yes. Does Griffey need to retire? Yes. Do we have any reason to think any of this relates to sleeping? Given his career, the regularity, the longevity and all other factors, I’m going with no.

I’m open to the idea I could be wrong, I just don’t see any reason to condemn Junior for this after Drayer’s post.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

However it works, and however he's "always done it",

I still think it’s unprofessional. I don’t care if you’re sleeping, playing cards, paying bills or what… When the game is going you should be ready to play.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're being irrational about it.

Nothing in the past suggests Junior sleeping has been prohibitive to his playing capability. If we trust that “many players” have told Shannon of him stepping to the plate after a catnap to hit a dinger, and Piniella telling the same, then he is ready to play.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying it hindered or helped him.

I’m saying that either way I still think it’s unprofessional. If I wear filthy clothes to work, I can still do my job just as well, but it’s still not the professional way to do it.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

People have asked below:

“would this story get published if we were winning?”

Would this story have ever appeared without the slump?

by harkening on May 10, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

yes

winning or not, if the team needed Junior to do the only thing he is capable of and instead he was in the clubhouse napping, it would be a story. If he were contributing to the team winning, it wouldn’t be a story. He’s not, therefore it’s a major story and a major indictment of his future. Slump or no slump, he can’t do his job if he’s sleeping in the clubhouse. There’s never been a point in his career where he could do his job while napping in the clubhouse. By rule, if you’re napping, you can’t play the field… and he’s played the field up until the last two years where he’s been very ineffective. So, at no point did these naps help him… and I question they ever existed until now when we’re trying to save his legacy from getting some taint on it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on May 10, 2010 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would agree with this - we have no way of knowing what impact this would have on Griffey's performance, if any.

I think the more balanced criticism of Griffey is that if he’s not contributing at the plate, the only conceivable defense of his presence on the team is that he’s adding value with leadership and chemistry. This would at least seem to cast some doubt on his contributions in that area.

But really, all of this is empty argument anyway – whether naps have helped or hurt Griffey’s career doesn’t really matter that much. What matters is what is likely to happen as a result of this story, if fans turn on Griffey, or if this causes management disgust with Griffey. I thought the most interesting bit of LaRue’s post was that some sort of split between the Mariners and Griffey was imminent. I’d like to hear more about why LaRue thinks that’s coming, whether that’s something he’s hearing or something he’s assuming.

by Chris Hafner on May 10, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Naps aren't giving him bat speed, that's for sure.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it would have been a problem last year because he still wasn't very good last year.

I think the point of Drayer’s post was that the sleeping is not new. The not hitting is.

by moyerLIVES on May 10, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's funny that you posted this at almost the exact same moment that Larry Stone put up a post in which he is over-reacting.

Although Stone has been covering the team long enough that it seems like he should know about this napping thing if it was as common as Drayer is saying.

by moyerLIVES on May 10, 2010 2:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Does it strike anyone else as weird that LaRue would make a comment so strong about Griffey's future

when he plays on a notoriously tight-lipped team?

Charter Member: Dave Sims Sweet Hat Club

by Two Rs and Two Ls on May 10, 2010 2:31 PM PDT reply actions  

That was LaRue and not Baker?

I admit I don’t read either of them that much, but Baker seemed to fit the shit-stirrer role more.

Charter Member: Dave Sims Sweet Hat Club

by Two Rs and Two Ls on May 10, 2010 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

"If you win 20 in the Show you can let the fungus grow back on your shower shoes and the press'll think you're colorful. Until you win twenty in the Show, however, it means you're a slob."

If Griffey was hitting like he was in 1994 and the team was winning like it was 2001 everyone would be making a joke out of this. But Griffey is done and nearly everyone, the team, the media and most of the fans are looking for a reason to send Griffey on his way.

by mark sobba on May 10, 2010 2:34 PM PDT reply actions  

It's a bit of a reach, but I get where he's going with it.

When you’re good, you can be weird or do strange stuff (like nap mid-game). When you suck those things become an issue.

Kind of like if you have an ugly batting stance but it works, no big deal. But you better not be weird and bad.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

The napping thing is a non-issue to me.

I was hoping all of the hullabaloo was over the fact that with Bradley/Bedard set to return, Langerhans/Saunders presumably continuing to play well and the DH situation bein untenable…that Z and company were ready to call it a day on Griffey.

by Omerta on May 10, 2010 2:40 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm still hoping this is all an elaborate hoax in order to sour people on Griffey enough

that they can just release him for…must…not…call…it….napgate…thing and take an intense 48 hr PR hit instead of releasing him for “no reason” and hearing about it the rest of the season.

by pdb on May 10, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the important thing about this story isn't whether it's significant that Griffey was napping.

The important thing about it is that it’s a reason to end the Mariners/Griffey relationship that even the casual fan can understand and get passionate about. Up until now it’s been the sabremetric crowd that has been most loudly arguing that Griffey is done and that his presence is hurting the team. This is the hook that the broader fan community can seize on.

I think the rational approach to Griffey being done is far more compelling, but it’ll be interesting to see if the Mariners are now able to make the right move prompted by (at least publicly) the wrong reason.

by Chris Hafner on May 10, 2010 2:44 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Don't care about his napping...

as long as it gets management to make a right move on the field and 25-man roster though, I’m happy.

by Kenny Knows Sports on May 10, 2010 3:00 PM PDT reply actions  

I think this whole episode is just further proof that chemistry comes with winning, not vice versa.

If the Mariners were in first place, does this story even get published? Does LaRue even find out? No. While these players might respect Griffey, there still has to be some frustration in the clubhouse for them to even share this story.

by Ballard Erik on May 10, 2010 3:04 PM PDT reply actions  

=(

...and now I'm here

by CapSea on May 10, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I took one this afternoon and bypassed this shitstorm.

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 10, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh.... GOD

I was actually chatting with a Mets fan today…

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 10, 2010 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is anyone else

More upset that he supposedly could not be found by the manager for a potential pinch-hit during the game? The fact that he was napping is secondary to the fact that he was not available.

by m_b on May 10, 2010 4:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Players are back in the clubhouse all the time.

He wasn’t hard to find. And Drayer’s post suggests that he is available despite the napping. Wak just didn’t use him.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think this says more about the mood of the team than anything else

If they were winning and things were otherwise hunky-dory, Griff’s unnamed young teammates would be less inclined to throw his old ass under the bus.

by lemonverbena on May 10, 2010 4:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I'd be interested to hear from Jay or Edgar about this.

They’d know what he did back in his heyday.

"Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated."

by Thingray on May 10, 2010 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dereliction of duty

I don’t care if he’s napping before the game. It was the ninth inning. The team was mired in a 7 game losing streak. The score was tied, and we all knew Johnson was going to strike out. Griffey was asleep. He was unable to perform because he was literally asleep. THere’s absolutely no excuse.

by mikethomas22 on May 10, 2010 5:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Your concerns have been addressed, and they are overstated.

He has slept during games in the past only to be awakened for his AB. Wake him up if you want him in there. It’s apparently normal.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

And exactly how many times...

…did Jr pinch hit between 1989 and 1998?

Not exactly a regular occurrence.

Best hidden narcolepsy problem ever!

by Dave Paisley on May 10, 2010 7:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Catnapped and played?

Really, she makes a bunch of vague assertions, none of it backed up by anything concrete. Even if it is/was true, the implication is still that he was READY TO PLAY WHEN NEEDED.

Not so much anymore, apparently.

I can’t believe so many people are falling for the BS.

by Dave Paisley on May 10, 2010 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't exactly call LaRue's piece well sourced.

He gives two unnamed sources, and none of it takes context into account.

by harkening on May 10, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that Drayer is probably trying to counter the anti-Griffey sentiment, which is fine.

But she doesn’t give us any reason to believe this isn’t a problem.

“It happens all the time” isn’t an excuse, especially in the context of Griffey’s performance this season to date.

by Jeff Nye on May 10, 2010 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I basically like Drayer

…but she is to investigative journalism what Mike Sweeney is to baseball these days.

Fluffy bunny stories? She’s all over it.

by Dave Paisley on May 10, 2010 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

That doesn't really seem fair

There’s a difference between what she does and Bob Finnigan.

by Jeff Sullivan on May 10, 2010 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sweeney is old and not very good at baseball.

How do you compare that to shannon?

Everything is Rob Johnson's fault.

by the other side on May 11, 2010 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for deeming my concerns addressed.

I appreciate the dismissal. Seriously though, who was supposed to wake him up. A coach? A player? Hey buddy, go wake up Junior, we want him to do his job. No, you have to be awake for the game.

by mikethomas22 on May 10, 2010 8:03 PM PDT reply actions  

Don't worry

You don’t have to bite on the line they’re feeding you.

by Dave Paisley on May 10, 2010 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Please us the reply button

Otherwise things rapidly become very confused

by Graham MacAree on May 10, 2010 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you Shannon!

And thank you Jeff, for keeping an even keel and nonreactionary perspective as usual, even after the LaRue hatchet job came out (and even though I think you are probably not particularly a Griffey fan).

by Sam Regens on May 10, 2010 8:52 PM PDT reply actions  

The worst part of the hatchet job was this...

“Junior is the best player I’ve ever seen or will see. He’s an example of what pro athletes can and should be – clean-living, devoted to family, good in the community.”

Stick it to him, LaRue!

by RustyJohn on May 10, 2010 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Damn, looks like I picked the wrong day to not be near a computer or radio...

but I am so going to use this as an excuse to sleep at work tomorrow. “I feel most comfortable at my desk. I actually don’t get much sleep at home and, because I’m 30 pounds over weight, my throat fat constricts my airway, waking me up. But if I sleep sitting up, Elephant Man style, I’m good. Sure, there are 16 other hours during the day when I could sleep, but just wake me up whenever you need anything. I do this all the time. Close the office door on your way out. Thanks.”

by RustyJohn on May 10, 2010 10:55 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

There you have it.

Chemistry!

"Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett Mariners Minors

by JY on May 11, 2010 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I feel the team was far too haughty in their approach to this season.

They just assumed that the good feelings would carry over from last year. Well, that was rather stupid. As anyone who has been married for any length of time can tell you, passion fades. It must be replaced with hard work, commitment and an honest desire to see the best in life for the other person. This team relied too much on chemistry and not enough on talent and the proper use of talent.

by Sec 108 on May 11, 2010 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

In a weird way it reminds me a lot of 2002

After 2001, the M’s didn’t figure they needed to reload at all – the team won 116 games, what could possibly be wrong? They didn’t stop to consider the number of guys on that team that had career years, and the number of guys on the wrong side of 30. They just assumed, like this year, that things would continue just as they did.

by pdb on May 11, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mike Sweeney chimes in:

1) “We don’t think there are two players who said that (about Griffey sleeping),” Sweeney told FOXSports.com. “I challenged everyone in that room — if they said that to stand up and fight me. No one stood up.” qed

2) I said, if either of you broke this vase, stand up so I can give you a spanking. Nobody stood up. Therefore, the vase is not actually broken. qed

3) Mike Sweeney is a huge idiot. qed

by dlukas on May 11, 2010 3:05 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY