Awesome Tool, and Beltre in Fenway
So thanks to The Book Blog I recently discovered this neat site that lets you superimpose BIP data from one player/pitcher/park onto another. Just for fun I superimposed all of Beltre's SAFECO balls in play onto Fenway to check out the results, which, unless the data is wrong, is somewhat surprising:
According to this chart, Belre would have had approxmately 5 doubles and 1 flyout turn into home runs in Fenway last year, which is much less than what I expected. Now obviously this doesn't take into consideration weather, how a batter changes, his approach, how the Green Monster effects balls, etc., etc. But I still found it interesting.
P.S. - The same analysis on Washburn says that about 10 of his doubles and 5 of his flyouts at SAFECO would've been home runs in Fenway. Nice!
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As for J-Rod...
yeah… add that to the runs that Guti, Ichi, Endy and Langerhans saved and you could see how he racked up that 7.3 ERA in Detroit real quick
Not to mention
Beltre was playing with a bad something, usually his shoulder, most of the games he did play in
As you suspect, the main thing about Safeco isn't the dimensions but the cold wet air blowing in from LF
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Mar 3, 2010 5:35 PM PST reply actions
Wet air is less dense than dry air
(Really, it is) . Wet air would be an advantage to balls leaving the park, all things being equal. But that’s a minor factor compared to other things (like temperature and wind). The real problem with humidity is that it softens the balls (and to a lesser extent the bats) and thus makes them rebound with less elasticity. Which is why putting the balls in the humidor at Coors is effective.
But cold air is definitely denser, and if it’s blowing in….
Apart from the effects on elasticity, humidity effects are trivial
For all practical purposes in this context, air density is a function of temperature and elevation.
by Steve Nelson on Mar 4, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions
Yes, exactly
People always talk about fly balls in Seattle being hindered by the “cold, wet air” but in fact it’s just the cold air that matters. The wet part is irrelevant (and to the trivial extent it isn’t, it’s actually helpful).
Actually, it's not very wet here during the baseball season
Very early on, in April and May we are, but there are other places that are at that time as well. When we get into mid-June, we’re farily dry for the rest of the season. So the cooler temperatures, relatively dry air and our proximity to sea level all combine to make our air dense (although I doubt that the humidity plays much of a factor compared to the other two).
by nathaniel dawson on Mar 3, 2010 9:57 PM PST up reply actions
But to be fair
Where is it wetter than Seattle during those summer months? It may be reasonably dry here, but compared to most other parks it’s still as wet, if not wetter.
Rooting for lovable losers since 1984.
by seattlecougar on Mar 4, 2010 12:37 AM PST up reply actions
I would think most Major League cities are wetter than Seattle during those months
We’re certainly not as dry as Arizona, and probably not Southern California as well. Denver might be drier than us, maybe Arlington too. Other than those places, my guess is that we’re drier here than elsewhere. The Gulf Coast is tremendously humid during summer, and most of the Midwest as well. Eastern seaboard cities also are pretty humid then.
I may well be wrong, as I don’t know how to check something like this, but I’d be willing to bet we’re on the dry side compared to the average Major League city.
by nathaniel dawson on Mar 4, 2010 1:54 AM PST up reply actions
Anything at altitude (like Denver) would be significantly drier.
But all the east coast teams, and Houston, would be wetter in the summer.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
But warmer hit has a lot to do with it as well.
Racer X. You have to love those amarillo hops.
p.s. fuck you angels
Actually
July and August here are drier than almost anywhere in the nation, including places like Phoenix!
Gameday doesn't use land location, rather where the ball was eventually fielded.
So this makes inference as to exactly how many extra doubles would be home runs and stuff like that difficult.
This data does not take into account the height of the ball does it?
So a lot of those balls that look like they would be beyond the wall would really bounce off it and back onto the field. Jose Lopez would be a doubles machine in Fenway, but I don’t think it would increase his home runs that much.
I wonder if Lopez hit any baseballs high enough to clear that thing
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 3, 2010 11:35 PM PST up reply actions
He hit a dinger in Fenway last year.
by I Lick Squirrels on Mar 3, 2010 11:38 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Lame
but we’ve been guessing for a while that Lopez might be a monster in certain other parks (US Cellular, Fenway, Great American)
You should look at one of Beltre's healthy seasons
Beltre just didn’t hit many to left in 2009, even factoring in his limited playing time.
This actually elevates his Safeco wOBA
from .284 (I calculated myself from The Book’s article on wOBA, not Fangraphs scale) to .308. That’s .024 runs per at bat. Over the course of a season, that’s 8.28 runs. That’s almost a whole win.
That’s a significant improvement. Beltre is going to beast in Fenway, if he’s not playing hurt at all.
I thought maybe Awesome Tool was a nickname for John Lackey.
angels fan in seattle
by Eyebrows on Mar 3, 2010 10:46 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I still can't go two days without watching this again
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 3, 2010 11:34 PM PST up reply actions
A video made by Fitzy.
I used to kind of enjoy watching what he had to say, until he started going on about how underrated the Red Sox are.

by 












