LL Podcast Survey
Out of curiosity:
72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Podcasts have been awesome so far
it’s nice to hear more of a freeform interaction between you and Matthew which obviously is much more difficult to do through a text medium
In the event that you don't like them and aren't afraid to own up to it
What do you think would make them better?
You anticipated my response nicely
And I’ll say it again for emphasis: I hope the podcasts continue. And I’d just as soon see them continue to go wherever you guys find the conversation leading you.
I like them, and I know it can be hard...
but you should have guest stars every once in a while!
Right now I'm dreaming of Carl Crawford. Maybe next year...(or this year at the trade deadline)...
This is in the works
We just haven’t yet gotten around to figuring out the best way to add and record a third person.
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 15, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm glad you wrote this, because I felt pretty bad saying I disliked them.
The non-baseball talk hasn’t done much for me. That said, I’m sure the reason there’s (relatively) so little talk about baseball is because February and March are two of the most boring months of the year for the sport. It makes sense that you and Matthew would drift to other topics. I’m sure the podcasts’ baseball-talk quota will skyrocket once April hits.
I'd agree
I find the podcasts interesting, but light on baseball content. But, that might just be a matter of the time of year. I would recommend interspersing the baseball and non-baseball content a bit more?
I think a podcast with quality Mariners analysis is lacking in the world (I currently listen to Brock and Salk podcasts).
I know how hard this sort of thing is to do, and you guys are pretty entertaining, but I listen to a lot of podcasts that are entertaining. I guess I was really excited about the LL podcast because it would be about the Mariners first, entertaining second.
by Snuffleupagus on Mar 15, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't think I'm the only one.
But I would dread these if it was a hour of just straight baseball talk.
by Scruffy Lefty on Mar 15, 2010 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Absolutely agreed
I like knowing that if there is big baseball news, I can expect the LL Podcast to cover it, and if not, I can expect entertainment rather than beating of a dead horse.
by Robert Lintott on Mar 15, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions
intersperse
I think that’s why I would suggest interspersing it (and my agree with sentiments about shortening it). So that instead of 15 mins non-baseball and then 45 minutes of baseball, there would be 5 minutes non – 10 minutes baseball – 2 minutes non – etc.
The sports podcasts I listen to have a lot of non-topic conversation (as do the radio shows). But they intersperse it well, part of that is driven by producers and advertising, I’m sure ("you won’t believe what this homeless guy we ran into said to us, but before we get to that we’re going to discuss Lopez at 3b. . . "), but I think it works well for a reason.
by Snuffleupagus on Mar 15, 2010 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Shorter
10 minutes would be a good maximum- I don’t have the time or energy to listen to anything for thirty minutes
Determined, Jonesing Commentor
I actually enjoy the length of them.
If you keep them space out to once a week or longer.
by Scruffy Lefty on Mar 15, 2010 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Same here!
It entertained me on my whole drive up to Bellingham!
2009 Safeco Field Record: 6-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 10-4
I much prefer the hour+ length actually
Gives me something to listen to while I walk around the city.
by Robert Lintott on Mar 15, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions
I do like them
But the audio quality still makes it tough at times. I really can’t listen to them in my car (which is old and loud) because of the lack of clarity in the voices. The problem there is that I listen to most of my podcasts while driving.
I wish I had some advice for you on how to clean up the garble in the voices. Your meta (frequency, bitrate) looks OK to me …
Matthew came up with an idea that, in the early going, seems to have a lot of promise
The latest podcast sounded the best, I believe.
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 15, 2010 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm the only lame-o
who has voted don’t like at this point. For clarification, I just haven’t liked them quite as much as I anticipated. I really like hearing what you guys have to say, but I’m less interested in hockey and Winter Olympic experiences than some. Plus I’m just contrary.
That's mainly been because the Olympics were a big story and there was nothing going on with the Mariners
Now that it’s baseball time again, we probably won’t have much of a window to talk about anything else.
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 15, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I confess
I didn’t listen to the last one because it looked like hockey was so prominent. I might have ended up finding it endlessly fascinating. I mean, I might never have guessed that a post on pitching faces would be the funniest thing I read all month. And then it happened!
Actually we talked about the Mariners for 45 minutes!
by Jeff Sullivan on Mar 15, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I was fooled by proportions of visual space
Heading back to give ’er a listen I see that I was fooled by the proportion of typed space in the recap:
This week’s topics incude:
More Olympic Hockey and coverage on each of the Mariner infield spots.
That closing half of the sentence points to five dramatic and overlapping storylines—-about the same amount of raw material that has produced 30 years of Days of Our Lives.
Wanted to say that I love that the first half of the podcasts have usually been about hockey.
I realize that this will probably change once baseball season starts, but I have to give you guys credit for me having the most interest in hockey that I’ve had since maybe 2001 or 2002.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 6-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 10-4
I like the hockey talk and hope it continues at least a bit
I know there probably won’t be much time for it come opening day, but I hope you sneak in a few minutes of hockey stuff when possible (the Canucks/Sens will hopefully both make decent playoff runs so there will be lots to say). I’m Canadian and we get force fed hockey, hockey, hockey pretty much 24/7/365, but you guys have a fresh point of view that I enjoy.
by shuswapslugger on Mar 15, 2010 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I haven't listened to the newest one,
but I’ve liked the rest.
Right now I'm dreaming of Carl Crawford. Maybe next year...(or this year at the trade deadline)...
The podcasts have forced me out of lurking
And made me finally sign up.
So yeah, you could say I like them.
Go! Huskies!
Same here!
Oh my God it’s like we’re kindred spirits!
I’m making you a compilation cd and a bracelet, right now!
I would reciprocate
But I’m not very creative and I find my own music tastes embarrassing. Settle for a jolly hello?
Go! Huskies!
They make me laugh out loud in the grocery store.
And I don’t give a shit about hockey but I can still enjoy most of it.
My feeling is that writing output has gone down since the podcasts started.
Granted, nothing interesting has happened to write about, so whatever.
by Graham MacAree on Mar 15, 2010 12:44 PM PDT reply actions
I thought the one I listened to was entertaining, but honestly, podcasts just aren't for me.
I prefer reading, and the amount of written content on LL is enough to keep me busy. If I ever used my MP3 player or if these were on the radio when I was driving or something, then my opinion would probably be different. But when I’m in front of a computer, I don’t want to listen to an hour of anything.
This is about where I'm at
Most of the time I spend online is at work, where I am unable to listen to a podcast but have no problem making time to read
I want to poop at your house - Thingray
by tootthekazoo on Mar 15, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm the opposite.
I’d rather listen to something so I can keep working. But I don’t want it to take away from the written content.
by Scruffy Lefty on Mar 15, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions
This is pretty much how I feel
I use an iPod but downloading podcasts to it just isn’t on my radar. I like the backstory stuff on how you prepare articles and that kind of thing that we don’t necessarily see in written form. Matthew has good “radio voice” and Jeff is a bit of a fast-talker, but we knew that. Couldn’t get through the last one (lost me right around Giraffe-Bear-Man) but I think that’s just because the season needs to hurry up and fucking START ALREADY
by lemonverbena on Mar 15, 2010 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions
I wasn't interested at first partly because I cannot listen at work.
I just do not have much time to waste at home. That being said I have listened to two of them and enjoyed them a lot.
I can listen at work, and maybe that's the only bad thing.
I can’t seem to focus on work when I’m listening to a podcast, especially ones about baseball. I guess since you guys started doing these my productivity has taken a hit when new ones are available. So, in other words if I get fired it’s all your fault.
by shuswapslugger on Mar 15, 2010 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions
I have only listened to one podcast.
I wasn’t interested in the beginning, but I liked the one I listened to. You guys interact well together. I don’t think you should limit yourself to baseball talk, but you might want to stick to baseball in the beginning and then warn the listeners you are moving into territory outside baseball.
I enjoy the non-baseball talk because you guys outline most everything about baseball here on the site already. I wouldn’t mind hearing more reviews on things you enjoy personally doing (e.g. which movies you watched recently and why you liked/disliked them). You can basically get your ideas from the OT threads. I quit participating in them for a period of time because they became addictive. I am only now dipping my feet back in them. However, I might be using the OT threads to curb my excitement for the upcoming season.
They are very entertaining
And will only get better once we have more baseball-relevant news.
by niceguysfinishlast on Mar 15, 2010 12:53 PM PDT reply actions
I haven't listened to one of your podcasts yet
but then I’m a pretty regular reader of LL so I don’t feel like I’d be getting anything from the podcast I don’t already get from LL. As the season gets started and it becomes more baseball-centric I might listen to one though.
I'm looking for the option:
“I was interested in them, and I like them, but talk less about Hockey”
I've enjoyed them
I like that you guys do talk about things other than baseball because it allows the readers/listeners to get to know you more than just through reading the articles. I think it is a great way for you guys to introduce yourselves to newer LLers that haven’t been able to meet you in real life at a meet up or LL event. It’s hard to convey certain emotions through writing that can be conveyed through speaking. I think that it has helped me understand some of the articles a little better. This is one reason why I have enjoyed participating in the OTs because then you get to know the other people that are part of the community. It’s kind of nice to put a personality behind the written words from an author. Obviously the non-baseball talk will slowly get less and less as the season approaches.
by seattle_since_81 on Mar 15, 2010 1:06 PM PDT reply actions
I've been enjoying them.
I don’t really care what you talk about it. You guys do it in an entertaining fashion so ramble, rant, and talk on.
Ehh
I only listened to the last one, and I guess it boils down to the fact that nothing that you guys said on the analysis side was that interesting, meaning I could pretty much infer what you were going to say about all of the positions based on previous articles and the prevailing opinions of the LL authors in general based on reading here for years. So in that sense it’s not worth it to me to spend the time to listen to it. Sorry if that comes off harsh…there are clearly a lot of interested people so I would say keep doing it. I’ll give it another go-round once the season starts for sure.
Mariners/D Broncos/BSU Broncos fan in Seattle
I fall on the secret option of "Interested from the beginning, and have not listened"
I’ve downloaded all of them, but haven’t been able to block aside any time to listen
I want to poop at your house - Thingray
That's a bimodal distribution if I've ever seen one
I listened to part of the first one, got bored, and never messed with it again- I have trouble listening to anything for more than about 5 minutes- I either space out or see a bunch of kittens making noise on youtube that I absolutely have to watch
Determined, Jonesing Commentor
by Corco on Mar 15, 2010 1:45 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
listener from day 1
I’m from Vancouver, so all the hockey talk and such has been great. It was quite the 2 weeks, so it deserves the attention. But I cant wait for the season to start. I guess my only complaint would be the sound quality. But if you’re using Skype (or similar) there isn’t much that can be done about it. I’m guessing you dont have access to a sound booth…
by crushingyourhead on Mar 15, 2010 1:57 PM PDT reply actions
This is OT, but I had a question about obtaining hockey tickets in Vancouver.
Anyway that you can e-mail me so we can discuss there? My e-mail address is on my profile.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 6-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 10-4
There's no option for "I was interested in the beginning, but haven't listened to them".
Just haven’t had the time.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Mar 15, 2010 2:21 PM PDT reply actions
I listen every week and enjoy it mainly because of your sense of humor.
I thought it would just be a rehash of what you guys say in writing but you guys digress enough that’s it’s not completely that. If I were listening to this looking for purely a Mariners podcast then I would be mildly disappointed. But like the blog itself, you don’t always talk about the same thing. That you manage to cram in an hour of interesting at this time of year is amazing. But then again I like hockey.
I like them, but I'll also echo the sentiment that I don't care about the non baseball stuff(though the Olympic stuff was interesting)
I generally just skip over the stuff I don’t want to listen too, so it’s not that big of a deal. They’ve gotten alot better since you guys have improved the audio quality.
FUCK ERIC BYRNES FUCK ERIC BYRNES!
I was really disappointed to learn that there wasn't a "NL Team of the Week"
I agree with SB above that you’d probably stink if you tried to be funny, but I’m sure there’s enough to laugh at extemporaneously that it’d work.
Only fair to explain why I voted for the final option.
Still on dialup.
Wow
I’m really, really sorry. Isn’t the internet as a whole borderline unusable for you?
Mariners/D Broncos/BSU Broncos fan in Seattle
by appleshampoo on Mar 15, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions
At least, because I can remember all of us giving you shit about it even back then.
FUCK ERIC BYRNES FUCK ERIC BYRNES!
I wasn't real psyched about this but eventually listened to one...
Fortunately, it was apparently the first one in which you spoke about baseball all the way through (with a small tangent about trains). I have to say, I’ll probably never listen to the older ones and may stop listening altogether if I get bombarded by too much stuff that is not of interest.

by 










