The Luckiest Pitchers of 2009
Prompted from this comment by katal,
I like how the moderators don't write any posts for nearly 48 hoursAnd so subsequently, between this and Fogel’s take on Rob Johnson, the quality of FanPosts skyrockets in order to fill the void.
as well the chapter on luck in Tom Tango's The Book, I figured I would share this bit of writing. Granted, I'm both eager to share my work and to get some feedback on my writing, so don't bash my head in too much for failing to understand how the ins and outs of luck work. But if I'm horribly, horribly wrong, I apparently wasted my Sunday afternoon.
Every year, several pitchers across the league get extremely lucky and end up being signed to contracts worth far more than they deserve. I figured I would find out who the luckiest of the lucky was in 2009.
Listed below are the starting pitchers with the lowest BABIPs of 2009.
| Jarrod Washburn | Randy Wolf | Ross Ohlendorf | Matt Cain | J.A. Happ | |
| BABIP | .257 | .257 | .265 | .268 | .270 |
None of you should be surprised to see Jarrod Washburn’s name on that list. That man benefited massively from the likes of Ichiro, Franklin Gutierrez, and Endy Chavez patrolling the Mariners outfield, robbing opposing batters of home runs, line drives, and gappers alike. But even then, Washburn was very, very lucky. Wolf ran up a 3.23 ERA in 214.1 innings, which actually wasn’t so far off from a 3.86 tRA and 3.96 FIP. Ohlendorf’s luck changed dramatically from what it was in 2008 (his BABIP dropped over .115 points), and a 5.55 K/9 doesn’t say much for his true talent level. Matt Cain, who pitched quite well in 2009, was unarguably pretty lucky, as he ended up with an ERA a full run below his FIP. For reference, his teammate Tim Lincecum’s FIP was just about level with his ERA. And then there’s J. A. Happ. We’ll get to him later.
Now, here are the starting pitchers with the lowest HR/FB ratios in 2009.
| Clayton Kershaw | Zack Greinke | Chris Carpenter | Tim Lincecum | Carlos Zambrano | |
| HR/FB | 4.1% | 4.5% | 4.6% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
This list shows that even really good pitchers can get lucky. Or, one could extrapolate, that really good pitchers tend not to give up very many home runs. Although one could argue that better pitchers induce weaker contact which leads to more weak fly ball outs instead of hard-hit home runs, for the most part, running a HR/FB ratio around 4-5 is very flukey, no matter what ballpark you’re playing in. For reference, the league average percentage of fly balls allowed that turn into home runs was around 11.
Zack Greinke may have gotten off easily in the HR/FB department, but for the most part, he pitched to his true talent level in 2009. Opponents hit .313 on balls in play against him, a far cry from the .274 mark run up by Clayton Kershaw. However, Kershaw’s 3.29 tRA indicates that perhaps he wasn’t that lucky.
And last but certainly not least are the starters who stranded the most base-runners of 2009.
| J.A. Happ | Matt Cain | AdamWainwright | Chris Carpenter | Jair Jurrjens | |
| LOB% | 85.2 | 81.6 | 80.4 | 79.5 | 79.4 |
Notice that Matt Cain, Chris Carpenter, and J. A. Happ are all listed on two of these charts. For some illogical reason, this amuses me.
And now we can talk about J.A. Happ. Happ was lucky to a Washburn-esque degree in 2009. He stranded a ridiculous amount of baserunners and allowed a relatively tiny number of homers (considering he pitches in the miniscule, hitter-friendly Citizen’s Bank Park). His K-BB ratio was only 2-1, his BABIP was way lower than the Major League average, and was only worth 1.8 WAR in165+ innings. And yet he ended up with a shiny 12-4 record and 2.93 ERA. Fortunately for Phillies fans, Happ has a ton of potential, and there’s a very real possibility he puts up similar numbers for years to come. But at that point luck may not have anything to do with it.
Congratulations to all the aforementioned pitchers for not ending up like Ricky Nolasco.
15 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good work
Clearly Washburn was very lucky to have had such a great outfield behind him. Yet you point out that there was still luck even beyond that. It’s an interesting point which goes to something I’ve wondered about for a little while- how to isolate the respective impact of ballpark/defense and just plain dumb BABIP luck. In an admittedly brief search I didn’t any material directly on point.
Washburn does have a lifetime BABIP of 0.280
As a trend all of the “lucky” BABIP guys give up lots of fly balls (which more often go for outs than groundballs) and played in front of decent defenses. I’m not sure if that’s really luck however there is a little in there somewhere. If you had to force me, looking back at Washburn’s season last year a BABIP of .275 probably wouldn’t have been out of the ordinary.
by Edgar for Pres on Feb 8, 2010 8:40 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, I agree
BABIP is definitely a skill, it’s just really hard to identify given all of the other factors involved. However, when you got a guy like Washburn who’s posted a .280 BABIP in 12 seasons and 1863.2 innings, you can probably safely call it a legitimate skill. Pizza Cutter has r = .50 at 1500 BIP. Washburn’s had roughly 3600 BIP by my calculations, so using Tango’s formula, described here, you get an estimate of .288 as his true BABIP skill.
by vivaelpujols on Feb 8, 2010 11:09 PM PST up reply actions
On the other hand
Washburn’s three awesome BABIP seasons – 2002, 2003, and 2009 – came in front of really good defensive outfielders. The 2002 Angel OFs were +26, 3rd in the league. The 2003 Angel OFs were +47, 1st in the league. And then there were last year’s Mariners. As a flyballer, Washburn will have a slightly lower BABIP than the average pitcher, but his numbers are inflated by guys like Darin Erstad and Franklin Gutierrez.
by Jeff Sullivan on Feb 9, 2010 12:04 PM PST up reply actions
You might have a point there
Rally has Washburn receiving 40 runs of help from his defense in his career using Total Zone:
http://www.baseballprojection.com/war/w/washj001.htm
Do you know how that would translate into BABIP?
by vivaelpujols on Feb 9, 2010 12:07 PM PST up reply actions
I'll do this the sloppy way
Taking the run value of a play made to be…0.8?, we get 40 runs = 50 hits = BABIP inflation from .275 to .284 (using B-R numbers).
by Jeff Sullivan on Feb 9, 2010 12:13 PM PST up reply actions
Basically I have to take every opportunity to point out how awesome Darin Erstad was since I bashed him so bad at the time
by Jeff Sullivan on Feb 9, 2010 12:14 PM PST up reply actions
And also because Ackley is going to be Erstad 2.0
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Feb 9, 2010 12:30 PM PST up reply actions
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Don’t ever apologize in advance for writing this stuff. It’s good. Keep it up.
by pdb on Feb 8, 2010 9:11 PM PST reply actions 6 recs
These last few posts are why LL doesn't have a "21 and Over" rule.
Very cool.
...and now I'm here
This is a good post
I think it should also be said that all stats contain some proportion of luck and skill. Even K and BB rates have a lot of luck just because of the batter and the umpire – factors which are completely out of the pitchers control. BABIP, strand rate and HR/FB contain a higher proportion of luck to skill than other stats; however, there is nothing really special about them.
This is a neat article, Taylor
but I think it would have been even better if you had looked at who was the luckiest in relation to their career averages – we know that some pitchers are likely to run BABIPs higher than others, so calling a pitcher lucky simply based on his rate stats ignores the another important factor, which is how he had performed throughout his career.
It's intresting on luck...
I’ve been spending some time recently again trying to dissect the “problem” of MLB’s Beat The Streak, researching both batters I want to choose and pitchers whom I want to choose “against.”
One of the methods I have tried is to look for pitchers who have limited balls NOT in play (i.e. strikeouts, walks, hit batsmen).
Interestingly, Mark Buehrle is on that list. Mark Buehrle threw a perfect game. He’s the fourth lowest ball-not-in-play percentage of the pitchers I’m looking at (I think I made it a number of innings… the lowest Total Batters Faced of anyone on my list is Todd Wellemeyer with 561). Joel Pineiro is #2. Washburn is #15. Cliff Lee is #35.
Batted .393/.614/.464 for 2009 Diablos, #5 in OBP for PSSBL Rocky Division.
by Two Rs and Two Ls on Feb 9, 2010 1:38 AM PST reply actions

by .Taylor on 











