Shawn Kelley's 2009 Injury and Effects
A little background to get us in the mood. You might want to turn the lights down a little. Pour some wine, it's okay, I'll wait. Now then, Shawn Kelley was selected in the 13th round of the 2007 draft out of George Sherrill's alum Austin Peay State University. It's unusual for someone to make it up to the Majors in just a year and a half, much less for somebody talented enough to do so being lost all the way until the 13th round. After getting his feet wet in 2007, Kelley started out 2008 in High-A and moved quickly to Double-A West Tennessee where he still pitched just 42.2 innings. Nevertheless, last season Kelley found himself on the Mariners' roster from the get-go. Kelley is currently the only member of Seattle's 2007 draft class to have played in the Majors, though 7th round selection Nick Hill could join him this coming season.
Shawn Kelley appeared in ten games for the Mariners before going down with his catastrophic rib injury. In those ten games, Kelley tossed 11.2 innings, struck out 11 and walked just 1. In a bullpen that couldn't find the strike zone with a compass, GPS unit, flashing neon signs or even a YOU ARE HERE map, it was a welcome relief have Kelley come in out of the pen to throw strikes. That he could actually throw those strikes past batters was even more welcome. This wasn't just a cute looking puppy sitting across the street; we managed to coax it over and pet it too! It was a small sample, but Kelley was coming out of nowhere and establishing himself as a potential dissenter to The Ministry.
And then the injury happened and we wouldn't see Kelley for two months while our bullpen went to tatters. Kelley came back just before the All-Star Break on July 3rd, but for the next month the magic was gone. Over Kelley's first 11 games back, he threw a similar 11 innings, but faced eight more batters, had four fewer strikeouts, walked five and allowed three home runs. 17 hits fell in as well, making him look even worse.
Relievers have small samples - not just for a season, but also game to game. That makes it difficult to point to any particular game and say "Here is where he turned it around," but starting around his appearance on August 7th and continuing for the remainder of the season, Shawn Kelley was back. He finished strong. Immensely strong, even though it was hidden a bit now by how awful he had been in July. How quickly the mind anchors itself to that new first impression. From August 7th to the end of the season, Kelley appeared in 20 games, faced 93 batters, struck out 23, and walked just three. The same 17 hits dropped in on him but in almost twice as many hitters faced and over twice as many innings pitched (23.1 to 11).
What changed? The obvious answer is that Kelley came back too quickly from injury and it took more time for him to heal. I would be more inclined to believe that if he had sucked then went back on the disabled list to fully recover and came back pitching like his April self. Kelley didn't take any extra time off after coming back to the roster however and I am skeptical that he simply couldn't find his Staples-brand easy button for a month and eventually discovered it hiding in Jarrod Washburn's old locker.
![]() |
This is the incorrect way. |
So I went looking deeper. Kelley is essentially a two-pitch guy. He has a fastball and a slider and might possibly have a changeup but he throws it so rarely as to be meaningless for this purpose. I went through and compiled the following scary looking chart. Don't worry, I explain it directly below and most of it is meaningless, which I will also get to.
Pre: (Through May 5th)
109 FB, 93.2mph, 31°, 3.8", 209, 2311
51 SL, 83.1mph, -12°, 9.2", 91, 801
Comeback: (July 3rd through August 4th)
126 FB, 92.8mph, 30°, 3.8", 208, 2240
46 SL, 83.1mph, -12°, 9.1", 92, 826
End: (August 4th onwards)
259 FB, 93.5mph, 29°, 3.7", 207, 2275
110 SL, 84.2mph, -12°, 8.6", 101, 827
Each line contains:
the number of times the pitch was thrown
the type of the pitch [fastball (FB) or slider (SL)]
Average speed
Average break angle [0° is down, 90° is toward RHB, -90° toward LHB]
Average break length
Average spin direction
Average spin rate
I looked at all of this to see if anything jumped out. There doesn't seem to be anything in the actual pitch movements or frequencies. The closest anomaly is a 1mph jump in average slider speed, something hardly noteworthy in general and even less so over such small samples. His fastball and slider both maintained similar breaks and spins. Kelley's pitches themselves did not fluctuate in any noticeable way*, but his results on those pitches certainly did. Take a look at another chart:
*I also mapped out his locations, but over such small samples it is difficult to notice anything but the largest shifts, none of which were present
Pre: (Through May 5th)
109 FB, 30% / 25.5%
51 SL, 35% / 31.8%
Comeback: (July 3rd through August 4th)
126 FB, 35% / 18.8%
46 SL, 41% / 34.4%
End: (August 4th onwards)
259 FB, 30% / 26.5%
110 SL, 28% / 35.8%
The two percentages following the pitch identification is the percentage of pitches called for a ball and the percentage of pitches either called a strike or swung on and missed. Shawn Kelley came back from two months off and was unable to throw strikes as consistently as he had been able to before. Given his professional experience up to that point - just 78 innings in the minors and 11 innings in the majors - some rust is hardly a surprise.
Based on everything that I looked at, and my complete inaccessibility to ask him or Rick Adair directly, my best guess is just that: some rust following the time off to heal. The great news is that Kelley finished stronger than he began the season, and if he manages to maintain rates close to those he posted from August 4th on, he is going to be a highly valuable piece to the Mariner bullpen. Over 70% strikes and with some missed bats thrown in as well? Perfect.
35 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Watching that injury live was a bit scary because of how it happened.
Nice analysis Matthew. Glad to see that his stuff was as good at the end of the year as it was in the beginning.
That would be a very reactionary thing for the FO to do
So I’d go with not really
by Graham MacAree on Jan 26, 2010 9:31 AM PST up reply actions
except...
Jack Z specifically mentioned Kelley and White when explaining the Morrow trade.
I recall seeing it in articles by Ryan and Geoff, and something similar in Shannon’s blog (although she didn’t mention Kelley, I don’t think).
There's a difference between the baseball ops motivation and the PR explanation
by Graham MacAree on Jan 26, 2010 10:30 AM PST up reply actions
if true...
you would be assuming that they really wanted to get rid of Morrow. Which they would never admit publicly, so not sure how you would know that?
What they did admit publicly was that they wanted to get League, and they wanted to bolster the bullpen because of White and Kelley.
Do we have a good reason to doubt them?
The reason they made the trade is because they think that League is likely to be better than Morrow
It’s got very little to do with Kelley or White (perhaps a little peripherally, due to bullpen chaining) and everything to do with the respective assessments of the actual players in the trade.
The Mariners know how easy it is to build a bullpen.
by Graham MacAree on Jan 26, 2010 11:07 AM PST up reply actions
I viewed it as
The M’s deciding it was unlikely Morrow would be a starter (his diabetes creating a lot of uncertainty in addition to the “baseball” reasons) and even if he was, it wouldn’t be one in 2010 when the team needed a #3 behind Lee and Felix at the top of the rotation. On the other hand, League had the “best pitch in baseball” and the Jays were clearly building for some year after 2010, meaning they didn’t have much use for an ace reliever but could take a chance on a potential future starter. It was a good match of organizational needs, each side trading something they didn’t value as much as the other did (even if neither side is going to be that brutally honest about it in their respective press conferences).
In other words, as Graham said, it had nothing to do with the rest of bullpen; Jack might mention some of the other guys just like he mentioned Figgins when introducing Kotchman, but there’s no reason to read anything into that.
Or due to Morrow
It was pretty obvious the new FO wasn’t too high on him.
my blog: foul weather fans - seattle sports coverage
by AtomicGarden on Jan 26, 2010 9:41 AM PST up reply actions
And League has got 'closer' written all over him
by Graham MacAree on Jan 26, 2010 9:43 AM PST up reply actions
I'd be shopping Aardsma pretty hard next offseason
Assuming he does a decent job closing this year
by Graham MacAree on Jan 26, 2010 9:51 AM PST up reply actions
Exactly
Putz trade 2.0
It would be awesome if the M’s got a rep as “closer U” and got a kind of assembly line going, turning good setup guys into “proven” closers and then flipping them for value. You’d think the rest of the league would catch on, but you’d think they wouldn’t give jobs to Dayton Moore and Omar Minaya either…
by wandergeist on Jan 27, 2010 10:00 AM PST up reply actions
I hope it's not Sharpie.
That takes a long time to fade.
angels fan in seattle
by Eyebrows on Jan 26, 2010 9:50 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
How many will we have in the bullpen?
I see it as seven right now…
1. David Aardsma
2. Mark Lowe
3. Brandon League
4 Others: Shawn Kelley, Luke French, Jason Vargas, Garrett Olson. (I left Doug Fister off this list because I have him at SP #5 currently, but feel free to swap out any of the previous Lefties if you wish).
Does anyone think we’ll be more likely to have eight in the pen? What are considered normal numbers for a pen? Any insights on this from the more experienced LL crew?
Others who could make a case with a strong spring: Ryan Feierabend, Sean White, Kanekoa Texeira, Yusmeiro Petit, either KC prospect (Derrick Saito, Dan Cortes).
Long shots: David Pauley, Mike Koplov, Chad Cordero
Gritty... that's the term I think of when I see Jack Wilson play. Gritty
by A Steamy Day in Cleveland on Jan 26, 2010 9:49 AM PST reply actions
No way we ever have an eight man pitching staff
That leaves only three position players on the bench, and one of them is Ken Griffey and another is the second catcher. Eight is too many. We may only carry six, but that seems less likely.
Call it Aardsma, Lowe, League, Kelley, [LHP], [dogfight]
by Graham MacAree on Jan 26, 2010 9:52 AM PST up reply actions
Thanks Graham
Gritty... that's the term I think of when I see Jack Wilson play. Gritty
by A Steamy Day in Cleveland on Jan 26, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions
So if its seven in the pen...
Then I count four on the bench.
5 Starters
7 Pen
12 Arms
9 starters (including DH)
4 bench
13 Bats
12+13 = 25 Starting Opening Day roster.
Of those four bench spots, you’ve said Ken Griffey is one, the backup catcher is another. I see two spots open. (Jack Hannahan and another?)
I really apologize to those reading this and think I’m a 4th Grader (I’m not) I just need these things put in very simple terms. (still a newbie here) Your patience is appreciated.
Gritty... that's the term I think of when I see Jack Wilson play. Gritty
by A Steamy Day in Cleveland on Jan 26, 2010 10:10 AM PST up reply actions
Backup Outfielder
Yep. You forgot the yet to be acquired/identified backup outfielder
Arms:
5 SP
7 RP
Bats:
C: Johnson
1b: Kotchman
2b: Lopez
3b: Figgins
SS: Wilson
RF: Ichiro!
CF: Guti
LF: Saunders
DH: Bradley
Bench:
Infielder: Hanahan
Outfielder: To be acquired
Pinch Hitter/ Designated Tickler: Griffey Jr
Backup Catcher: Bard
by doublemazaa on Jan 26, 2010 10:29 AM PST up reply actions
Don't forget about Nick Hill
Hill, I believe, has a good chance of getting a BP spot.
Also, the configuration of the starting rotation will have a lot to say about how many arms are carried in the bullpen. If Zduriencik picks up a high upside reclamation project then look for the BP to carry seven arms. If he grabs a guy with a record of durability then the chances are pretty good, IMHO, that we start the year with a six man BP and carry an extra bat on the bench.
Lonnie
Met the dude
Last ST I got an opportunity to chat with Shawn. The kid is very personable, humble, and yet very confident in what he can do. That he was able to succeed as quickly as he did does not surprise me.
Lonnie
Fancy seeing you here.
Stick around why don’t you.
Thank you Matthew for this great analysis! This is a relief.
Kelley’s second first impression stayed with me pretty strong, and not doing any analysis I worried that he was “broken” for good.
For someone spoiled by Rhodes-Nelson, it seemed (impressions again, but hey) the bullpen’s middle relief dropped quite a few games. Which may be why our genious management spent to get League, by the way. If Kelley’s back this is further good news.

by 
















