...those same players also doused Adenhart’s jersey with beer on the field and in the clubhouse, a debatable choice given that the driver of the car that it the vehicle in which Adenhart and three friends were riding allegedly was drunk at the time of the accident.
over 2 years ago
Matthew
15 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I don't find it offensive, though I'm sure many people will.
But I still find it…weird? I don’t know, I cannot come up with a good adjective. I understand it’s not like they went 100% out of their way to celebrate his memory in a directly connected way to which his death was facilitated, but… I don’t know, weird/funny/odd/interesting/something
We were just talking about this in the offtop
and I’m not at all offended by it, I just think it was a poor choice of celebration mode. Moment of silence? Sure. Bring his family to the game and make them the center of attention? Absolutely. Pour the liquid responsible for the impairment of the guy that killed him on his picture and jersey? Strange.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
Probably just one of those things
where they were caught up in the moment and didn’t put two and two together.
That's what I imagine as well.
After all, athletes are dumb. Still though…
I'm not offended
It was a gesture of celebration, a celebration the team has every right to have. I’m sure that had Adenhart been there, he would have participated in kind. It might have been slightly shortsighted, given the circumstances, but I can’t possibly imagine they meant any harm.
"Let this big fucker come in and walk the world here." - Dave Niehaus on JJ Putz
Did the Angels stop selling alcoholic beverages after his death?
Adenhart was killed by a drunk driver, not by someone who was sprayed with champagne.
This is not the first time this has happened.
After the Yankees clinched, A-Rod threw salted peanuts at Cory Lidle’s jersey. No one said boo.
...and now I'm here
by CapSea on Sep 30, 2009 5:14 AM PDT reply actions 12 recs
That's OK - I didn't need that sip of coffee. Or my keyboard...
This signature space for rent.
by PositivePaul on Sep 30, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions
I think, and I'm a bit embarassed to say this,
but yesterday on PTI Kornheiser kind of summed up how I felt in that they celebrated with the jersey just as they would have celebrated had he been there, so I have a hard time finding much of a problem with it. They were treating it as if he had actually been there with the team.
But I agree Matthew I can’t really find a good adjective to describe it, but I don’t know that the adjective would be negative if I did find it.
I actually tend to agree with this.
I don’t fault them for it, but I can also see the humor in it.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 30, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions
I think the word I would go with is "ironic,"
which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, just notable.
but like you said, it’s just as much of a tribute to him that they thought to celebrate with his jersey as if he were actually there. Would we have said anything at all if they had non-alcoholic champagne in their celebration?
by seattlebruin on Sep 30, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions
My first reaction was revulsion
It was an instantaneous reminder of the circumstances of his death. Bad, bad visual.











