Some More Washburn
Graham's Note: I'm going to be joining Jeff in out-of-town-land this afternoon, but before I leave I wanted to throw a tiny little post up to tide everyone over (for a little while at least). After all, who doesn't like looking at Jarrod Washburn's numbers?
So we've spent a reasonable amount of our August gloating that someone took the Jarrod Washburn bait and even gave us a shiny prospect in return. After all, we said, the Tigers should have expected this. Washburn has been a bad pitcher, and four months of superficially great numbers shouldn't have given their front office amnesia. But now things are getting silly: Washburn was taken out of his last start in the first inning, having given up four runs in one inning to the Royals (caveat: his knee was swelling up). Not even Carlos Silva managed such a feat this year. So just what's going on with Washburn? Is he pitching the same as with us, but getting unlucky? Is his defence screwing him over?

Table 1: Comparison between Jarrod Washburn's advanced statistics in Seattle and Detroit (2009 only).
Nope. Not the defence. Washburn's gotten worse by a lot in every meaningful category. Strikeouts are down by almost a third. Walks are up by a factor of 1.25. His home runs per ball in air rate has more than tripled. His runs allowed and innings pitched for each of his starts have spiked/been in freefall:

Figure 1: R/9, R, IP for each of Washburn's starts in 2009.
This isn't regression. It's not even close. Those numbers are utterly, utterly abysmal. For those of us expecting Washburn to go back to being normal Washburn in Detroit, we were almost as wrong as the folks thinking he was going to be good. One might have expected him to give up five or so runs per nine and be his usual back of the rotation self. Instead, he's put up a tRA over eight with the Tigers. Damaged goods? His knee has been a problem all year, but it's starting to get worse, which might have something to do with it - I doubt, however, that that's the whole story or he wouldn't have lasted as long as he did in Seattle, where he reportedly was in so much pain that he couldn't walk between starts. I'm at a loss. Washburn just shouldn't have been this bad, and while the situation is beyond hilarious, it's a bit baffling.
0 recs |
22 comments
|
Comments
Morosi reporting he may be done for the year (knee problem).
by waldo rojas on Sep 17, 2009 1:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
So which trade has turned out worst for our trading partners?
JJ Putz for the Mets or Jarrod Washburn for the Tigers?
FUCK THE ANGELS! FUCK THE ANGELS! FUCK THE ANGELS!
by Goose on Sep 17, 2009 1:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Although it wasn’t such a bad idea for them to trade Guti having Sizemore playing injured most of the season with no good backup plan was uh…
by Graham on Sep 17, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think they'll be okay with Valbuena in the long term
Though the next person to complain about trading him away needs to realize that he’s the big piece that got us Guti.
by CMC_Stags on Sep 17, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps it's some weird Karmic
Workaround for us given our own bad luck in the Bedard Trade?
by gybmsfn on Sep 17, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed,
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Sep 17, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
BB% went from 6.21 to 8.29, and you say:
Walks are up 125%
What? I see a 33% increase there, not a 125% increase. What am I missing?
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
by Llewdor on Sep 17, 2009 2:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Graham or Washburn?
Your thesis statement is unclear, but the heart speaks volumes.
by HitKing69 on Sep 17, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's because he doesn't have Rob Johnson helping him.
Must be. Maybe Detroit will trade us another good player for Johnson.
by b_rider on Sep 17, 2009 3:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












