Who Feels Like Believing?
To be fair, I didn't get to watch the game today. It's entirely possible that Doug Fister's results were all voodoo and black magic, and that he wasn't nearly as good as someone in my position would be led to believe. But when you come home to a performance like this against a team like New York...
7 IP, 65% strikes, 10% swinging strikes, 0 walks, 4 strikeouts, 1 homer
...and you see that the Yankees slotted in six left-handed bats, you've no choice but to be impressed. That's a hell of a lineup that Fister was facing, and he managed to do something few other starting pitchers have been able to do all season long.
What does it mean? I don't know that it means much of anything. It's important to remember that Fister posted one of the lowest swinging strike rates in AAA this year, and that his repertoire isn't the least bit overwhelming. However, the difference between Fister and someone like, say, Chris Jakubauskas is that at no point was Jak able to do what Fister's done so far as a starter, which is throw strikes and miss some bats. Just look at this list of players who've swung and missed at least once against Fister so far:
Nick Swisher
Paul Konerko (2)
Jerry Hairston Jr.
Jim Thome (2)
Alexei Ramirez
Derek Jeter (3)
Alex Rodriguez
Johnny Damon (4)
Jermaine Dye
Carlos Quentin
That's nothing but quality and Jerry Hairston Jr. in there, and you have to give Fister his due. Out of nowhere, he's come up and really impressed, throwing four pitches for strikes and showcasing what in the early going has been a remarkably effective changeup.
| pfx_x | pfx_z | |
| Fastball | -7.8 | 10.0 |
| Changeup | -8.1 | 4.0 |
Change:
| Result | # |
| Strike | 34 |
| Ball | 18 |
| StS | 8 |
| GB | 8 |
| FB | 4 |
| LD | 0 |
Good swinging strikes, good location, and weak contact against a pitch that looks a lot like his fastball coming out of his hand. I didn't know a whole lot about Fister prior to his promotion, but he's wasted little time in making a name for himself. An actual name. A name that isn't a vulgar novelty name.
Doug Fister may very well go on to find that his Major League career peaked this afternoon. It is impossible to ignore the fact that he has a rather pedestrian repertoire that didn't miss a lot of bats in AAA, and by no means do I think we should start penciling his name into the 2010 Mariner rotation. On the other hand, though, he did have a 7.2 K/BB in Tacoma before getting the call, and given this organization's history of guys getting called up and going on to struggle, Fister's two starts have been a breath of fresh air. Who am I to tell you not to get excited? Fister's been terrific, and when you've got a guy this easy to root for, there's no sense in holding yourself back. I'll be pulling for Fister up until he washes out, be that in ten days or ten years.
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
Is it possible Fister could go on to be Slowey-ish?
by Kenny Knows Sports on Aug 16, 2009 7:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Slowey's command is impeccable. Few pitchers in baseball can put the ball where they want like he can.
Slowey’s a legit above-average MLB pitcher. I doubt Fister will ever be that. But, obviously, he doesn’t have to reach that level to be valuable.
by Teej on Aug 16, 2009 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Fister might benefit from excellent defense behind him, more so than most pitchers.
I can’t account for the swinging strikes. I’m guessing those will go away soon.
What're ya gonna do with those pies, boys?
by rickpo on Aug 16, 2009 7:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It really is strange
Fister’s SwS% is better here than it was in AAA. That…never happens. The key will be whether or not he’s able to sustain his ability to throw strikes. If he does, he’ll have a chance. If he doesn’t, then USSM’s “Tall Jakubauskas” tag will be right on.
by Jeff on Aug 16, 2009 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there any way to know if he started AAA with a flurry of strikeouts?
Maybe he has something quirky in his delivery that loses its effectiveness the more batters see it.
What're ya gonna do with those pies, boys?
by rickpo on Aug 16, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Monthly splits
April: 34.6% K% (8.1 innings)
May: 17.7%
June: 16.9%
July: 15.5%
August: 14.3% (9.2 innings)
There’s a slight trend in there, but it’s in no way conclusive, and plus he began the year in the bullpen where everyone strikes out more guys.
by Jeff on Aug 16, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you how quick swinging strikes "stabilize"?
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Aug 16, 2009 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha. Headline on the M's website reads "Fist of Fury".
by Kermit. on Aug 16, 2009 7:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yanks come short from Fister.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 6-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 10-4
by Fin on Aug 16, 2009 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My dream of a Fister jersey is looking better and better.
Seriously though, how can you not love it when guys like this succeed?
Fear the NPE
by thewyrm on Aug 16, 2009 8:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
On swinging strikes
I’m going off at a slight tangent, perhaps, but swinging strikes are obviously a subset of all swings (strikes, fouls and BIPs).
I’m by no means suggesting that the total swings is also proportionately higher than expectation, but might there be an abnormal increase in these – batters who’re backing themselves and therefore swinging more often, and as a by-product end up missing more often too?
A batter’s select swings end up meeting their target on x% of occasions.
A batter’s ignorant swings end up meeting their target on y% of occasions, where y% is far smaller than x% and produces the higher addition of swinging strikes…
by MarkE on Aug 17, 2009 4:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Batters have actually swung less often against Fister than the league average
by Jeff on Aug 17, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice
I promise not to read too much into it, SSS and all…
Am I missing something obvious here, though? Is ‘swing rate’ called something really simple and listed anywhere and I’ve overlooked it? Is it even useful?
by MarkE on Aug 17, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's listed on Fangraphs under Swing%
I don’t know much about its utility for pitchers. I don’t look at it very often.
by Jeff on Aug 17, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fab, ta!
I don’t spend nearly enough time understanding Plate Discipline.
I know it’s only 57 TBF, but if I’m reading right then he’s hitting the zone more often than league average and simultaneously missing bats with those pitches more often than league average.
Bodes well.
by MarkE on Aug 18, 2009 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













