On Brandon Morrow As A Starter
At this point, over parts of two seasons, we have a sample size of 50.2 innings and 924 pitches for Morrow working out of the rotation. Here's how he's done:
94.7mph average fastball
60.6% strikes
11.5% swinging strikes
35% groundballs
44% fly balls
21% line drives
His tRA and FIP aren't anything special, but that's largely due to his having allowed nine home runs; if you apply a little regression, then, given his ball in play profile, we would've expected him to allow six homers instead, which would bring his FIP as a starter down to about 4.50 (not adjusted for park). That's right around the league average.
Lost in all of the talk over whether or not Morrow should go back to AAA is the fact that, right now, he looks to be something like an average to slightly below-average starter, making him a Major League #3 or #4. It'd be great if he could spot his fastball or throw consistent offspeed stuff or keep the ball on the ground, but the ability to miss bats makes up for an awful lot, and, so far, Morrow has missed bats like a crazy person.
Put simply, a double-digit swinging strike rate for a starter is terrific. If you go over to StatCorner and play around with the leaderboards, you'll find that it's really hard to suck when at least one out of every ten of your pitches generates a whiff. As evidenced by guys like Edinson Volquez and AJ Burnett, you don't even have to throw that many strikes. Getting a batter to swing and miss is the greatest single indicator that a pitcher is doing something right, and Morrow has done that as well as pretty much anyone.
Brandon Morrow is greatly flawed. That much is undeniable. He doesn't have anything resembling good command, and his secondary stuff - particularly his change - need a lot more work. But where a big part of me wants to see him go to Tacoma to work some things out, he could prove to be a valuable asset to this team down the stretch, starting tomorrow. People have been so concerned about Morrow's future that his present value has kind of flown under the radar, and despite all of his shortcomings and inconsistencies, he still looks like he can help the team win now. And that's important. Everything goes out the window if we get steamrolled by the Rangers, but as long as Bedard stays on the mound and Morrow's shoulder doesn't act up, I like the look of this rotation. It's the sort of rotation that a team could ride a long long way.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is the weirdest career path ever.
The Rise of a Superstar:Justin Upton-.425 wOBA, 21 years old.
And yet it's kinda sorta working?
Thank heavens Morrow has a gift for an arm. The only thing that can stop him from having a career as at least a league-average pitcher is injury.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 9, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Any word on whether Morrow is feeling the same scary, can't-lift-his-arm fatigue in his pitching arm after his starts like he did last year? If off-day fatigue is getting less intense, that would be an encouraging sign.
I am surprised that literally none of the beat reporters have investigated this in detail since he returned as a starter.
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Jul 9, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
A sort of related unscientific bit of research
Using Baseball-Reference’s Play Index, I identified 44 starters aged 25 or below who, between 2000 – 2006, posted a season with a BB/9 of 4 or higher. 19 of them went on to improve their control over the rest of their careers, while the other 25 either stayed about the same or flamed out.
I like those odds!
If he can be league-average with one really good pitch he has no control over, I imagine he’d be a beast if he could locate it.
If Brandon Morrow were to gain better command
I think he would look an awful lot like 2009 Edwin Jackson. Similar velocities, similar repertoires, and similar ball in play tendencies.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 9, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Was there anything interesting in the K/9 of the successful/unsuccessful group?
Or just a random assortment of the control-challenged in both buckets?
Just eyeballing it
the strikeout guys had a lot more success. Falling into the “improved” bucket are names like Erik Bedard, CC Sabathia, and Brandon Webb.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 9, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions
They sure are increasing his pitch count quickly this time
I guess that means his arm is doing better this time or they probably wouldn’t be taking it so fast.
As Dave said in the Nick Hill thread (about Varvaro)...
Call me when he gets his BB/9 under 6 (okay, well, it is technically right now but you get the point…)
This signature space for rent.
I was on the Tacoma bandwagon pretty much every start, until that Boston game.
Something about his performence in that game got me excited. I could be off, but he seemed to throw alot of balls right by some pretty good hitters. He battled out of trouble at times and even when he surrenderd the late homerun to make it 4-3 I believe, he came back and mowed down the next two hitters.
I don’t know. Something about that start made me a believer that he could really help us in the second half. Maybe it was just the fact he went six innings.

by 


















