Ortiz & Manny
Here you go, baby birds. Go to town.
180 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is the extent of what is written at ESPN:
Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003, lawyers with knowledge of the results told The New York Times.
The two were key members of the Boston Red Sox World Series teams in 2004 and 2007.
Hmm… very nicely detailed, ESPN. Go apeshit about A-Rod and Manny having tested positive, but when Ortiz is involved, keep things minimal.
Do people really still care?
Everyone was on steroids, we get it. I think at this point most of the outrage is media-generated for a story.
angels fan in seattle
It's not that I have any kind of outrage anymore, but yes, I want to know who tested positive.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions
I just want the whole list released at once so people can explode with rage once, be done with it, and move on
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
Pretty much where I'm at.
The union has every right to be pissed, and that list should have been destroyed, but I’d rather see an avalanche of names than this one-name-a-month bullshit.
It's the MLBPA's fault the list wasn't destroyed in the first place
They were keeping it to fight the fact that the players made the list in the first place to see if they could get below the 5% (or whatever) threshold and avoid serious testing.
I want to see the whole list released because it's bullshit that only the good players whose names are on an anonymous list have gotten out
by seattlebruin on Jul 30, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions
A story about Jay Payton being on steroids
doesn’t get a lot of media attention.
Bunch of bs, agreed.
And as if those two were the only ones on roids. What, they were hoarding them from Johnny Damon?
We need to start realizing it was happening in every clubhouse in one way or another.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Just what I said.
As has been previously said, we only get the stories about the “stars” but to assume they’re the only ones would be ludicrous.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I think this has already been realized.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 30, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd like that too, seriously though, how is this all working?
Are they doing this on purpose? Are people sneaking into the bosses office where the steroid list is held and they only have a couple of seconds to check it before they get caught? The fact that one or two names are released at a time every few months just sounds like absolute BS.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
....
There’s still a bunch of stupid fans who think their favorite player hasn’t done steroids. People still think Frank White and Jim Thome haven’t taken them.
Fr...Frank White?
Noooooo! He was pretty durable, I suppose.
Frank White is one of the top 5 players in the game and he has been ever since he came into the league.
I remember the day Frank White tossed a 13-inning perfect game and hit the winning grand slam over the Los Angeles Raptors.
Hey look, it’s raining donuts.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Again I ask, without snark or malice
why do you still care? I am genuinely curious.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
I can't even begin to feign anything resembling interest in this, much less outrage/disgust/whatever
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
It doesn't surprise me at all
And Ortiz is supposed to be one of the poster children for the clean guys
.
“If I test positive by using any kind of banned substance, I’m going to disrespect my family, the game, the fans and everybody,” Ortiz said. “And I don’t want to be put in that situation. So what I will do, I won’t use it. I’m pretty sure everybody is on the same page.”
He and Juan Gonzalez have the same speechwriter
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
Ugh, why would you say that?
You just make yourself look like a jackass when they find out.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Jul 30, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, that could really blow up in your face.

angels fan in seattle
by Eyebrows on Jul 30, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
All this will do is cause "dirty" players in the future to use even more sanctimonious and dramatic language
Guess what: it’s easy for steroid users to choose words. Convincing words.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 30, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
The one time in their lives that most athletes are articulate is when they're denying something
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
by pdb on Jul 30, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Says him.
Ortiz said that he believes players are clean because testing is quite invasive, and if they test positive now, they should be thrown out of the game for the rest of the year. He said that players and whole teams should be tested “three or four times a year, that’s it” which he thinks would give a good reading on who is or who isn’t on steroids.
“I think you clean up the game by the testing. I test you, you test positive, you’re going to be out. Period,” Ortiz said. “If I test positive using any kind of banned substance I’m going to disrespect the game, my family, my fans and everybody. And I don’t want to face the situation so I won’t use it. I’m sure everybody is on the same page.”
angels fan in seattle
When one of Pujols/Griffey/Ichiro tests positive it might surprise me ever so slightly
but otherwise, yawn
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
Pujols would not surprise me in the least.
The other two would.
by Matthew on Jul 30, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think anybody's infallible
he’s just been held up as the latest Poster Boy For Playing The Game The Right Way for some reason.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
He has monstrously quick recoveries from injuries.
That is why he would not surprise me.
06 and last year also
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Jul 30, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Wasn't he on the cover of SI this year and the headline was emphatic in saying "I don't use steroids" or something to that affect?
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Here's the cover
it says “Don’t Be Afraid To Believe In Me”, which is nice and uplifting. And vague.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
They made him look pretty slim in that picture, actually.
Photoshop steroid conspiracy!
by Teej on Jul 30, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah I was just thinking how small is arms look.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions
I have this distinct feeling Teej was joking
by seattlebruin on Jul 30, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Especially compared to his appearance on the cover of Muscle & Fitness.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
Ortiz was just as emphatic as Pujols. I don't believe Pujols' denials..
And there was a CNN/SI story some years back, linking Pujols’ former trainer with steroids.
Ehhh
Whatever Pujols is doing, and I’m sure he’s doing something I doubt it’s as old school and detectable as anabolic steroids. Maybe he’s into some new shit, but whatever it is it probably isn’t scheduled yet.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions
I would
His performance has been consistent as hell every year, and he can’t be doing steroids now right?
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Jul 30, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Never assume that a player can't be using steroids
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
He has a higher power factor than Chipper Jones
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Jul 30, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions
He only needed to do it at one point in his career.
Then maintain what he gained the rest of his career.
...and now I'm here
You have to keep using to maintain because you have to keep working out at that high of a level.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 30, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I really don't think this is true.
But at the moment I can only find anecdotal evidence, and I don’t really care to keep looking.
...and now I'm here
Agree with this completely. Now that A-Rod, Manny, and Ortiz are busted, Pujols should be next.
But the media is building him up as MLB’s golden boy. Jeez how blind can you get?
when it's laced with HGH it is
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
by pdb on Jul 30, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think Frank Thomas, Edgar, maybe Buhner would surprise me too.
And I half agree with your point up there. I do care, but I don’t care about the speculating. Release the lists, do the testing, and let everyone know so it can be done with.
...and now I'm here
I think if he played in a different market and his last 3 or 4 seasons were say a few years later (like if he retired in 2007) there would be speculation around Edgar.
But we all know that he put up big numbers past age 35 because he’s just a God. Or even THE God.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions
I am shocked. shocked! that major league baseball players would use performance enhancing drugs!
Seriously though, I don’t care at this point. However, I really do hope that in five years time we’re not going to be seeing headlines like, “Popular Player X Tested Positive for Steroids in 2009”
The Gladiator!
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
by pdb on Jul 30, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
TAKE AWAY THEIR RINGS!!!!
CLEARLY THEY WERE THE ONLY TEAM ON STEROIDS AND IT GAVE THEM A SIGNIFICANT ADVANTAGE!!!
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 30, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I bet that Papelboner was chemically enhanced, too
by seattlebruin on Jul 30, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Seriously
After that dance we must assume he was high on something.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 30, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions
I can't bring myself to say anything but "whatever"
a lot of people did steroids. Oh well.
BUT IT'S A NATIONAL OUTRAGE AND WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN AND THE SANCTITY OF SPORT AND LIFE AND
oh my god I can’t even fake it.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
Dustin Pedroia getting caught with roids would be the greatest thing ever.
Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?
Someone needs to leak a Cal Ripken Jr. story
by Graham MacAree on Jul 30, 2009 10:03 AM PDT reply actions
Really?
The guy who managed to play in every game for years and years would surprise you to find out took drugs noted for their recovery effects?
I AM THE LUCKIEST MAN ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH
thanks, Mr. Conte!
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
by pdb on Jul 30, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
OMG ARE YOU SAYING RIPKEN WAS ON STEROIDS THAT'S AMAZING
YOU READ IT HERE FIRST – IRON MAN WAS ON THE JUICE
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
The day it is found out that Ripken was on roids is the day that this whole shit begins to die down for good.
they were the secret ingredient in his candy bar
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
You people seem to have a deficient understanding of human nature and the nature of crowds.
It’s really rather stunning, your naivete.
The day it is found out that Ripken was on roids is the day the fans come together and metaphorically burn baseball to the ground. That’s the day we go to Olympic-style testing regimes and lifetime bans for positives. If you think otherwise, you’re crazy.
I don't know how to stop.
I for one know people very well and also disagree with your statement.
People are way too fucking lazy to get up in arms about this.
Is this really necessary?
You people seem to have a deficient understanding of human nature and the nature of crowds.
It’s really rather stunning, your naivete.
That’s a pretty insulting statement that is based on a pretty massive assumption on your part that I don’t find to be the least bit fair.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 30, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
No it's not
Since the media is driving the whole thing (and if you don’t think so, you have a rather deficient understanding of the situation and are displaying some quite extraordinarily stunning naivete), if a golden boy of theirs gets caught they’ll shut the hell up and nobody would care anymore.
by Graham MacAree on Jul 30, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I honestly don't think this is true. Look at the way the Boston press is rounding on Ortiz right now.
I think the media would behave even more furiously if Ripken were confirmed as a user: the ultimate ‘betrayal’, if you will. Note my assessment of how the media in general would react stands independently of my views on how they should act or how I feel about the whole PED issue. I think we can both agree that self-righteousness is one thing that is never in short supply with the media…and I think it would whip up to toxic levels after someone like Ripken were fingered.
I don't know how to stop.
You couldn't possibly be more wrong.
The sport hasn’t suffered in the least from this whole scandal. Fans don’t care. Fans love to pretend that they care, but people voice their opinions with money, and the game’s doing fine.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 30, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I must disagree most vehemently, sir
The gentlemen is the very font of all knowledge regarding human nature and therefore his tone seemed more than appropriate.
by Graham MacAree on Jul 30, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions
At least one person understands me here.
Seriously though, apologies for the tone. It was uncalled for, and maybe it says something that I didn’t even realize it was a problem until it was pointed out to me.
I recognize that I’m in a minority on LL on this matter.
I don't know how to stop.
I think it's they remake the movie fever pitch.
Racer X. You have to love those amarillo hops.
p.s. fuck you angels
p.p.s. geoff baker is an idiot
I like in Oakland
Racer X. You have to love those amarillo hops.
p.s. fuck you angels
p.p.s. geoff baker is an idiot
fuck me. I need to shut up this morning.
Racer X. You have to love those amarillo hops.
p.s. fuck you angels
p.p.s. geoff baker is an idiot
You dip shit I think you mean
It’s time they remake that awful movie.
Racer X. You have to love those amarillo hops.
p.s. fuck you angels
p.p.s. geoff baker is an idiot
They already remade it into an awful movie from a perfectly charming original
I don’t need to see it again in a different form.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
I think the real loser in all this steroid mess is Griffey
and all the other idiots that that didn’t use them.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 10:05 AM PDT reply actions
IM SO ANGRY IM IM STUTUTUTTERING
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions
Well yeah it'd be like competitive swimmers who don't wear the fancy new swimsuits
because they’re too pure. There’s technology out there, everybody is using it to their advantage, and not doing it doesn’t win you extra points. On the plus side, you get the moral highground. O the minus side, no one knows who you are because you can’t keep up with the big boys.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
The swimsuits have the added bonus of not shrinking your balls or giving you manboobs.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 30, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions
That has yet to be determined
but my instincts tell me those suits don’t leave your manhood entirely intact
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions
My manhood is fine.
I wear a high tech suit at some meets.
beggingmusicians.blogspot.com.
My music blog.
by Kirk on Aug 3, 2009 12:44 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
God, I'm gonna be pissed when Pujols' name gets leaked
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
I ask this without a trace of snark or sarcasm
why?
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
I just don't like steroids
I don’t mind the cheating, but something about injecting yourself with weird shit disgusts me.
Also, it’s pretty cool to be a Cardinals fan because whenever someone says their team is better or whatever, you can just say “we have Pujols”. If he did steroids, you can’t really say that anymore because his performance “wasn’t clean” or whatever.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Jul 30, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions
Not really
everyone else is on them. At this point taking them is just leveling the playing field.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions
One player whose name I hope never shows up in connection with roids
is Randy Johnson’s. I want to believe he was just naturally awesome.
The rest of these guys are cocks though.
[DELETED ZOMG NO POLITICS]
Earlier this year during his "slump" didn't Ortiz get "randomly" tested 3 times.
And I believe 3 is the maximum number of tests they can do in a year. Oh hey and he’s coming out of his slump now.
Fuck the Angels!
It's a pretty good idea.
F*** Billy Beane... actually, I kinda like Holliday
by vivaelpujols on Jul 30, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I think its funny myself.
You’ve already stated that you don’t care one way or the other about steroids.
Fuck the Angels!
I really don't think that's how steroids work.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions
But it IS how half-baked conspiracy theories work so there's that
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
Steroids don't work like that
it’s not like a video game powerup. It takes time for them to take effect.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Time and a ton of weight lifting.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 30, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions
It's the technical term for when your vein pops up after you tie off your arm
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
OMG ARE YOU SAYING SWEENEY'S ON STEROIDS THIS IS HUGE
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
His hugs are unnaturally powerful
I previously posted as "Man From Nantucket"
I would care more perhaps if it wasn't the Yankees that they beat in 03 to make the World Series.
Because the Yankees are clearly the cleanest team in baseball.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 10:29 AM PDT reply actions
I'm with the rest of you.
This gets a big ole meh from me.
FUCK THE ANGELS! FUCK THE ANGELS! FUCK THE ANGELS!
The biggest effect this has for me is to improve my opinion of Bonds.
It makes 73 homers seem more legit if “everyone” was doing PEDs.
But not the 762.
How many HRs would Bonds have hit if his body broke down like a normal human being’s? How many would Griffey have hit if he fully recovered from his injuries in 4-6 weeks as opposed to 4-6 months?
Well, fuck the Red Sox and fuck Ortiz.
However I just don’t care, I’ll still be watching baseball and following the M’s 24/7.
Well, most of the ones I know have been shitting all over Arod because he's on the list
and putting Ortiz up on a pedestal.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 30, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Football player tests positive: Little article on page 5 that is forgotten by the next day
Baseball player tests positive: Massive headline. The end of the world in fact.
Anybody even remember Terry Bradshaw admitting to using steroids to “speed healing”? There were no apoplectic calls to remove him from the hall of fame. It was barely even a story.
Imagine if say, Joe Morgan admitted to juicing back in the 70’s. OMG!!!!!!!!
This is my gripe with the whole thing. Otherwise I just don’t care. I wish they’d just release the whole list and be done with it..
It is a nice barb to throw at irritating Red Sox fans. I guess there’s that.
"If I'm in a slump, I ask myself for advice." -Ichiro
The difference is baseball's obsession with records.
(Which I couldn’t give less of a shit about, so steroids have never really bothered me.)
And not only an obsession with records, but an overall obsession with numbers.
I think it has more to do with the fact that in football, there are only 16 games and it feels like every one of them matters. So winning is the most important thing.
Winning is also important in baseball but over 162 games, you’re bound to lose 60 of them even if you’re the best team in the league. So we have other things to focus on, i.e. a players statistics.
Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa were heroes in 1998 even though neither of them made the World Series. In fact, more people could tell you who hit over 60 homers that year than who actually won the World Series and against whom they did it.
In football you’re only as good as the next yard you gain. I think in baseball if you hit two homers and lose you still feel like you had a good day, there’s still 161 other games. In football if you rush for 150 yards and lose, you don’t feel good about it. You should’ve rushed for 180 yards. Or you should’ve made that extra tackle.
So statistics in baseball become more important than in football. Tom Brady was more revered in his first Super Bowl season with decent numbers than he was two season ago with record numbers and a Super Bowl loss.
Still, this doesn’t answer the question completely as to why we don’t care about steroids in football, except when you look at the fact that we can’t measure a players contribution to a win through statistics in football. Because it is such a team sport, we can’t quantify Shawne Merriman’s affect on winning or losing. However, in baseball it’s much easier to see that player A put up 45 home runs and if player A was using steroids we assume he would not have hit as many home runs and therefore if we assume he loses power, average, speed, and health, that the team he was on would not have won as many games. Especially if player A was Manny Ramirez and he had a buddy named David Ortiz that was player B.
It’s also because nobody in this world has an obsession with anything as much as ESPN has an obsession with the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees. Not even the chick that stabbed Selena.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 30, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I think football players shooting somebody,
getting shot themselves by other people, and shooting themselves accidentally, is the best stat in all of football.
Mike Napoli speaks softly and carries a big stick.
Records obsessives. They survived the hurdle of 162 games seasons, the great meltdown of adding a third division
Hopefully they’ll survive the steroids era, despite the lamenting and dusting of heads with ashes.
I think he already wrote one after Manny was suspended.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 30, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm waiting the racist angle, of why white athletes reap greater benefits
Through social connections/economics/blah blah blah. There has to be a story in there someplace, it really does have to be my fault and I should feel guilty for being complicit by not demanding change.
Give Jemele some time
I’m sure she’s working on it.
by seattlebruin on Jul 30, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
NYY fans still have the same indignation for Clemens and Petitte.
There are a couple people at my work that still believe Clemens and think he’ll be vindicated in the end. My response: So will OJ.
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
Nice article. It had to be said.
Can’t stand the Yankees either, though.
(And the farking Angels also).

by 












