51-44, Chart
Biggest Contribution: Jarrod Washburn, +46.2%
Biggest Suckfest: Russell Branyan, -11.8%
Most Important AB: Sweeney double, +10.0%
Most Important Pitch: Granderson triple, -16.2%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): +66.0%
Total Contribution by Lineup: -19.8%
Total Contribution by Opposition: +3.8%
(What is this chart?)
325 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Please note that this is not a thread in which to discuss Mark Buehrle
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 1:17 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Also, 21 outs, only 3 Ks for Washburn.
So he had 18 outs in the field against only 2 hits? Is that correct?
Sounds sustainable to me.
GB/FB/LD of 4-11-4 on the day
Wonderful!
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions
In the new Yankee Stadium
That would be a 3 HR day…
This is not the first time.
Washburn doesn’t get run support, doesn’t strike out any batters, and still shows all the shiny stats that get him noticed.
What is the statistical probability that somebody with a 4.5ish tRA who gets one of the lowest run support figures in the league not only finishes with a winning record, but does so with a top-15 ERA?
Strange things can happen over just 30 starts.
by AnotherAaron on Jul 23, 2009 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I couldn't believe it when it flashed up that the DA has only conceded one HR all year.
It seems that every ball in play is a fly ball or pop out. Long may this continue, and then come the off-season, get him traded to a dumb organisation for some prospects.
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
Yes I know that he sucks now
But the talent is still there.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Have you noticed that we actually traded him for other players?
Lots of them? Several of them very useful? One of them is the second most valuable CF in the AL?
Yes
It was a good deal, I’m just saying I don’t want to let DA go.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Like whom?
Of course in that case. Find a stupid team and trade him if they give us value.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Which is what I was saying 10 comments ago!
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Jul 23, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Looping threads is only funny when it's ironic and intentional
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions
More like Fag Day amirite
I will smash your face into a jelly.
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Jul 23, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hey it's almost like EM had this exact idea already!
get him traded to a dumb organisation for some prospects.
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Right...
Although Putz sucking might have more to do with every single Met under-performing this year basically.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Or the fact that he has been bad for almost two years
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I was about to say this
2007 tRA – 2.91 SwS% – 12.6
2008 tRA – 4.61 SwS% – 11.0
2009 tRA – 5.11 SwS% – 8.2
I’m still new to this but those numbers don’t look good to me.
Fuck Anaheim.
Can you guys imagine how amazing Wash would be pitching in the NL?
If he can do this in the AL, he has to be up there with Dan Haren for best pitcher in the league.
Hey if it was rapid enough he could theoretically see his mistake in time to not make it
Einstein for Dummies is a helluva book
I think he would need a good outfield behind him, regardless of what league he is in.
For example, Raul might screw him over in Philly.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 5-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 9-4
But, he's the third best in fielding!
For Left Fielders…
…
In the national league.
by Robert Lintott on Jul 23, 2009 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions
He's actually still got a positive UZR this season somehow
he’s going earn all $33M of that contract in one fell swoop
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions
His UZR/150 though is -0.4 though according to Fangraphs
But yeah, you’re definitely right.
Though he is 37th in MLB in UZR/150, 31 in UZR, and 39 in RngR. So by a very basic, non-position adjusted measure, he should not be a starting OF in the majors (assuming 30 teams and 3 starting OF/team).
by Robert Lintott on Jul 23, 2009 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions
The Phillies OF defense is really good
it will help Washburn look a lot better
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn't realize that seattlebruin's comment was sarcasm.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 5-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 9-4
Though with Werth and Victorino, they're actually not awful outside of Raul
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I wonder if the Philly SBNation blog has caught on to his crappy defense yet.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 5-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 9-4
I made a comment about once over there.
They called me a “bitter” M’s fan.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Jul 23, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions
All two of the posters there?
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
So, how much of this improvement is defense
and how much of this is Washburn pitching better?
Crap
Can’t wait until the Cardinals sell the farm for him.
Well this seems like the right person to make this comment to
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Hey, I'm a cards fan too
Oh well, better than the rumored Wallace-for-Holliday deal; at least I’ll still get to root for them
I would prefer Wallace + somethings good for Halladay
but Wallace for Holliday looks ok to because he has no position and you get draft picks.
How would that work if the A’s finish in the bottom half?
Washburn for a sexy shortstop, please.
by I Lick Squirrels on Jul 23, 2009 1:32 PM PDT reply actions
Booti
I will smash your face into a jelly.
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Jul 23, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Wash's OBA is down .70
To .275 from .345, that’s your difference right there.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
A lot of luck
The knack our pitchers have for getting out of jams this season is amazing.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Maybe it's the cowboy hats in that wedding photo somebody posted
but I doubt it. I think he’s wearing a pop country t-shirt under the uniform.
Doesn't mean I think he's ugly!
Beauty is directly proportional to fielding, pitching, and batting skills far as I’m concerned.
Chicks dig the long ball.
You forgot throwing arm and baserunning.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 5-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 9-4
Only 5 out in the AL West
And 4.5 in the Wild Card, yay!
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Serious question
How do you think the media would react if Washburn were traded for something that helps us right now, and would that reaction change Zdurencik’s standing with the FO? I’m thinking that trading Washburn wouldn’t be worth it if it creates a shitstorm that could get Z fired if the team stumbles on field in the next year and a half.
I think the ownership is going to give Z more rope than that
The media would hate it, but I think Howard/Lincoln have realized they’re not that smart when it comes to baseball decisions.
by appleshampoo on Jul 23, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions
One would pray that Howard/Lincoln and Chuck/Armstrong knew better, but it's hard to know.
by abender20 on Jul 23, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 7 recs
I don't think there would be a problem apart from dumb fans.
The media are bitches and Z has tremendous good will right now.
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Jul 23, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions
I have no idea his standing because I don't work the FO
I’m legitimately curious, and it should be considered
Did you see what they did to DePodesta in LA?
I think it’s definitely a concern. If the right deal comes up, you take it of course, but this has to be in Z’s mind.
I just wish we knew how much rope Armstrong/Lincoln are willing to give him. Probably plenty, but the trade-Washburn-then-suck scenario would use up quite a bit.
Yes, I read your comment up there!
It is thought provoking.
I think it depends on what you get. At this point, trading him to cut salary and/or get a B- prospect may not be worth it. More than that and I think he’d have enough cover even if everything blew up.
A lot of that had to do with the media in LA hating him.
The media in Seattle seems to like Zduriencik a lot.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't disagree, but Baker and Stone are probably the most visible M's writers
and both of them seem to acknowledge that he knows what he is doing and have said that they are okay with moving Washburn/Bedard even if they aren’t exactly in favor of it.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions
To expand on that
Yes, it would take a confluence of several bad things for the media to just jump on GMZ – the move would have to backfire and the M’s would have to fall out of the race quickly, and probably some players would have to grumble about what the move did to morale. But all of that is possible…
At this point, you're almost better off holding on to him just because of this
unless someone really stupidly just blows you away with an offer
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I think it is likely that someone will make such an offer.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe in order to not piss off the idiots, but that shouldn't be a concern.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand what you mean but I have faith in Zduriencik to manage risk and make informed decisions.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Bedard may have value beyond this season.
Washburn does not.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
And Bedard's value is not even near it's peak
while Washburn’s is higher than any peak we could have ever imagined.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions
He has been healthy before.
It’s not out of the question he could put up another 2007 if we sign him to a one year deal.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Hopefully they get over it
If the player is good (which he should be, if we’re trading Wash away), then they’ll soon forget. Kind of like with Putz.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions
This is what it would take to trade Washburn
there is no reason to unless we’re getting an awesome return.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't blame them
he’s very candid and honest with them and seems to make their jobs a lot easier. It helps that he’s gotten good results all season, too
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Exactly. I actually love his interviews these days.
He’s refreshingly candid and aware of his own shortcomings (more so than many sportswriters/fans).
I would just look to 2006-2008 to prove that his success isn't sustainable.
2009 Safeco Field Record: 5-0 ; Overall Safeco Field Record: 9-4
All depends on the return
I think even the FO was planning a rebuilding year under Z. And I think they’re still committed to letting him see how he could rebuild the team given free reign. If he nets something of value going forward, I don’t think they’ll be upset, especially after things like the Putz deal.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Second Serious Question
Which helps more
Bedard regularly giving us 4+ inning starts?
or bedard working out of the bullpen?
Yup, and plenty of people hated the trade.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn't really like the trade either
then I saw Franklin Gutierrez play center field and all was instantly forgiven
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions
I think the (major) media would handle it fine
However, it is very obviously not a move that Z could afford to make if he weren’t getting much in return. Unless the M’s drop out of this, selling Washburn would almost certainly have to be accompanied by another move that adds to the roster.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions
I can't believe they'd fire him after one 'mistake' (their invevitable words, not mine)
While letting Bavasi go on and on like he did.
Besides, if the return for Wash works out well then they’ll forget about him soon enough and maybe realise that RRS is doing pretty the same thing.
Fuck Anaheim.
The problem may be that Armstrong/Lincoln
took no end of shit for giving Bavasi as long as they gave him. They may not be willing to do that again.
But Z has already made many more good moves
and has turned the team around in less than a year. They’re not going to ignore that because of Bavasi’s failures.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Have you ever heard sports talk radio?
He got the team into contention and then he pulled the plug because he doesn’t care about winning. He thinks this is all about looking smart and not about winning championships! He just wants HIS guys out there, and doesn’t care about chemistry or what’s good for the organization!
Some people are going to think that, sure.
The only sports talk radio I listen to is Brock and Salk, but I’d say an equal number of their callers on the issue have said they would be okay with moving Washburn or Bedard because they feel like Zduriencik knows what he is doing.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions
People are fickle!
I think the odds of a trade like this really hurting his standing are like 1/10 or 1/20, but, y’know, they’re not 1/1000000.
If you can make the team better you have to take those odds.
And I should point out that I am not in favor of moving Washburn because you can.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
And to bring up another point
let’s say Zduriencik decides not to move Wasburn, he regresses and the M’s fall out of it. The biggest gripe you hear from casual fans is that the Mariners have a history of being indecisive at the trade deadline. If they are close to where they are in the race a week from now and the above scenario occurs, those same revisionist morons are likely to pile on him for continuing what they see as a trend of fence-sitting.
When things don’t work out as well as they think they should, uninformed fans bitch and they usually blame the people at the top. I’d say the odds are just as good that keeping Washburn backfires as trading him, so the best thing to do is weigh the risks and proceed as though what the fan base thinks is irrelevant in this particular situation.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
A great point, ac
I just think casual fans believe in Washburn and would deflect blame for the collapse away from him. Whereas if they collapsed just after a trade, people would point to the trade as the causal factor. That’s crap, of course, but I think we underestimate how popular Washburn’s become.
I know he is popular, but like I said, you've got to take risk into account and roll the dice sometimes.
I’m not saying that I will be disappointed if he isn’t moved, I just trust Zduriencik to make the correct decision re: public perception.
by Aaron Campeau on Jul 23, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Sports talk radio is the lowest form of fandom
Regardless of how little the FO knows, I think they’ll take their cue from the media and the fans. And most of them have faith in Z at the point. It could evaporate a bit if Wash is traded and we tank, but it’s not going to be the tipping point or anything. And I have faith that if he’s trading Wash, he’s at least trying to make us better in the future.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions
There is a touching belief in all the callers today that the M's are destined for post-season play this year.
You don't trade pitching in the middle of a pennet race, you need a big bat , and to send a message to the rest of the division, you need Matt Holliday"
Oh, a caller already proposed that.
it was later referenced by a caller who thought while it would be good to have three Cy Young candidates in the rotation ….
The Mariners don't have the players necessary to get Roy Halladay.
And even if he is the best pitcher on the planet, I’m grateful for it. We can’t mortgage the farm on another “ace” for a year and a half before he signs a $150 million dollar contract with the Red Sox.
by Kenny Knows Sports on Jul 23, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
They actually might have the players
but I don’t think we’d enjoy the cost
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions
They could probably get him for Aumont, Morrow, Clement, Halman, and Saunders.
Of course if that happened, I would probably fly into a violent rage and burn down Safeco.
by I Lick Squirrels on Jul 23, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
They could probably get him straight up for one player on the ML team
by seattlebruin on Jul 23, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions
From Rany on the Royals
The highlight of my weekend – hell, it might be the highlight of my career – came on Friday night, when unbeknownst to the Royals (or me), the participant in the between-innings "Match Game" promotion was a devoted reader of this blog. After winning the promotion, our good reader was given the microphone and asked to say a few words. He said only two: "Rany Rules!" The microphone was snatched away by the announcer at that point, but judging from the audience’s reaction, the damage was already done.
Jesus, I feel so sorry for Royals fans.
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Jul 23, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Goddammit
keep front page posts on topic or you will be castrated
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 23, 2009 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Anyone who heard it will know what I'm talking about, I would think
He was on for a good 5 minutes
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed
Really wow I shall go back in time in order to try and figure out who you mean
by Graham MacAree on Jul 23, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Everyone has the ability to travel through time
by Graham MacAree on Jul 23, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions
And here I've been moving forward through time like a lazy bastard all these years
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
And I clearly meant that I do indeed possess astonishing superpowers
by Graham MacAree on Jul 23, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
And here I was thinking you were too dense to understand me rather than being too juvenile to figure out why you got this response
by Graham MacAree on Jul 23, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Neither
I understand why I got the response, but was it that ridiculous to think that there would be other people listening to 710 at the time I posted it? I didn’t know any better ways to describe the guy, so I was just make an observation.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed
Continuing this exchange enriches the site
and is highly likely to end well for you
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 23, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Am I just supposed to not respond? If so just tell me and I'll note it, but that seemed like something I needed to at least respond to
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed
In the future, if something happens on the radio that relates to the topic at hand, recount the story.
Otherwise, it’s akin to walking into a meeting at work and saying “I just saw a person in the elevator.” then walking out.
Try the offtopic next time.
Also try to tell us what the meth head said that might have been strange.
In other words please don't post comments like that because they are of extremely limited value
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
A heart of gold, while valuable to others,
would seem to not be a very good quality to strive for personally. I mean, I know gold is one of the more pliable elements, but I do not think it would make a good compression simply from electrical shocks.
Washburn on the trade rumors
“If I’m traded, it means something bad happened in the next 10 days. That’s the last thing I want to happen. I love winning, and we’re winning here. We have maybe the best group of guys I’ve ever been a part of, and that’s saying a lot. That ‘02 team in Anaheim (that won the World Series), we were a great team. Everybody loved each other. We had fun. We did whatever it took to win. That’s the exact same feel I have with this ballclub. I’m very happy to be a part of it, and yeah, I want to continue to be a part of it.”
The Rise of a Superstar:Justin Upton-.398wOBA, 21 years old.
The Wash interviews, I half expected him to say something like:
“I’ve been overachieving and the team has good pitching depth. If they can trade me for a useful replacement, that would be lovely.”
Shutup Jarrod. Just shutup. I'm starting to actually respect and like you.
I hope something happens the next 10 days or whatever. Either gettting us within 2-3 games of first or dropping us 7-8 back. This 4-5 game stuff is making it difficult to decide what to do with guys like Washburn.
I still say deal him if the prospect or prospects are right, but I like this group of guys we got in the clubhouse right now, and I have to admit, I’d feel bad if this group starts getting broken up, although it’s probably best in the long term
His interviews have been quite honest recently
I enjoyed the part where he calls bullshit on players who say they don’t pay attention to trade rumors.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Has he said
“I’m much happier now throwing to Rob Johnson with an incredible outfield defense to bail me out instead of throwing to Kenji and having Raul watch fly balls drop for doubles?”
He's admitted sometimes that he's been lucky.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions
It's easy to admit you are lucky when you have $40,000,000 in the bank.
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Jul 23, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions
So if Washburn keeps up his current pace for 75 or so more innings this year
He will have accumulated enough WAR during the past 4 years to actually earn his contract. Who would have thought.
by Manzanillos Cup on Jul 23, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions
Where's the process/results pic?
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 23, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Yatzee

De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 23, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Although I'm pretty sure fangraphs uses FIP for pitcher value stuff
which is quite a bit kinder to Washburn than tRA.
by Manzanillos Cup on Jul 23, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Actually, I don't know if this is true or not.
Looks like Fangraphs uses an RA version of FIP. Also, I don’t know which metric makes him look better over the years, but this year his FIP is well above average and he’s just below average in tRA.
by Manzanillos Cup on Jul 23, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Why would the Phillies want Washburn?
Come on, have some common sense. Why would the Phillies want an extreme flyball pitcher like Washburn pitching in their little bandbox? 9 flyouts to start the game? His ERA would double to Jamie Moyer level if he pitches in Phillies.
The Phillies aren't the smartest organization in baseball and Washburn is a veteran with playoff experience and a shiny ERA.
Plus he probably would be an upgrade for them.
Happ is pitching great, we know about Cole Hamels, and he's awesome,
They just signed Pedro, and Moyer is going to stay in the rotation because of his contract and local ties. I am sorry, but Washburn isn’t a upgrade to the Phillies.
Only 2 or 3 of the Phillies starters are league average or better. Pedro is too much of a wild card right now he can be great or suck.
You got slurved!
Hehehe Mark Reynolds is so awesome.
I don't think anyone here is saying Washburn is going to Philadelphia.
Nobody cares where Washburn goes, as long as he returns something of interest. Philly just so happens to be doing their homework on Washburn, hence the talk around here.
Phillies might not be the smartest organization in baseball,
but the are the defending WS champ and have one of the best farm systems in baseball. I would love the Mariners to be in their shoes.
Is Jarrod Washburn's 1.06 WHIP sustainable?
He’s leading the whole AL in WHIP now. How the heck is that possible? He’s only given up 31 extra base hits in 126 IP. That’s pretty awesome for a flyball pitcher.
This is how.

WHIP is a stat the relies on defense. It’s not a very good way to analyze a pitcher. Plus a flyball pitcher will have a lower WHIP in general.
angels fan in seattle
by Eyebrows on Jul 23, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
I have not read a single commment.
Nor have I watched the game. I am probably LLLJing a bit, but I just got drunk with my dad and hoped to see 51-44 upon my refresh of LL. I am happy and satisfied. Go M’s! :)
We won and I had a great day. Hooray for the M’s! :D
Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.
I think all of his strikes should be called Ke ke ke ke's now because that's the sound dolphins make
He actually registered a swinging strike on it today!
Maybe more than one…haven’t checked.
by appleshampoo on Jul 23, 2009 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions
By Miguel Cabrera no less!
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jul 23, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
We should send Washburn some Captain Morgan
He’s our captain and we’re all on his ship. Sorry Felix, you’re too young to be a Captain!
I am pleased by the fact that we are 7 games over .500!
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
Wahsburn should be annointed a knight in Felix's court and granted an exension on his super fucking-I'll-fuck-you-and-make-it-hurt-powers.
Illegible
He throws balls full of semen and hate.
He might have eaten toxic spillage from the Sound that has made him angry. You won’t like him when he’s angry.
Illegible
FUCKING LISTEN TO ME FOR ONCE IN YOUR FUCKING LIVES
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/22/958774/a-friendly-notice
DID I FUCKING STUTTER
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions
There there
There there there there there
by Dewey N on Jul 23, 2009 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I know you're upset, and I'm not trying to start anything, but I'm curious.
I’ve always kind of wondered how is the result of an Angels game, and hence our standing in the division, not “on-topic” when discussing our game result of the day? Is it just discussing specific plays that irks you? Because if, say, Nathan had gotten the final out and I’d simply posted “Sweet Angels lose. Only 4.5 back!” that would’ve surely been on-topic.
by SethGrandpa on Jul 23, 2009 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Posting about a result is fine
Posting about something happening during the game is not because it encourages further game thread-style conversation.
Also I’M FUCKING MAD
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Can we post them in the game thread? Since it's....a game thread?
The Rise of a Superstar:Justin Upton-.398wOBA, 21 years old.
Yeah all this stuff belongs in the game threads
That’s why they’re there.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions
If Joe Nathan cannot complete a fucking 2 run save against them, I don't see how the fuck they're ever going to fucking lose
Fuck
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed
They've won back-to-back with 5% or less chance to win the game.
But it feels like about 15 in a row.
by SethGrandpa on Jul 23, 2009 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand not wanting constant updates, after yesterday
I think simply stating the outcome and maybe a brief summary of frustrations about how the Angels never lose would be more appropriate? Or maybe it should just all go in the game threads. Up to Jeff.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't even understand how we are closer to that
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes that was a thing that happened.
angels fan in seattle
by Eyebrows on Jul 23, 2009 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know the Angels are flawed and getting incredibly lucky...
But I’m really starting to think we have a better shot at the wild card. I mean Boston is clearly not great (unless they swing something for Halladay) and the Rangers are due to fade. The Rays scare me, but I think we might just have a shot.
by SethGrandpa on Jul 23, 2009 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions
The Red Sox are bound to make moves
and they’re fucking good as is. Our top of the rotation and our defense is the only thing that comes close to them.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I know I'm contradicting almost all evidence I always use to seperate smart fans from dumb fans, but...
I dunno. I just don’t get a feeling with Boston that they’re as good as all indicators say they should be. I thought the entire year (ok…excluding games 3-5 of the series with the Yanks) that Boston would win it the last two times they did, but I don’t get the same vibe.
by SethGrandpa on Jul 23, 2009 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions
In my gut I feel better about beating Boston than the Angels
but that’s just because recently Boston has been sliding and the Angels have been…whatever.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Their offense is only above-average and their defense is bad
but the pitching staff is phenomenal from top to bottom. Our only WC hope is that the AL East beats up on itself.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jul 23, 2009 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions
You hear that, Rays?
Go make a trade. Just keep Scott Kazmir away from the Angels.
angels fan in seattle
Also simple math
We are chasing two teams in the division. We are chasing three teams in the WC. There are no teams realistically chasing us in the division. There are a couple Central teams in the WC.
I'm beginning to think it's an Angels in the Outfield scenario
Fucking Christopher Lloyd.
by Fuckmikereilly on Jul 23, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Worst mainstream propaganda film of all-time.
I’m working on a piece that proves such.
by SethGrandpa on Jul 23, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Pro-Angels.
Who clearly are a team that has made a pact with Satan. When I said mainstream was meaning that it was maliciously marketed as a family movie, when it was really more “Triumph of the Will” than “Lion King.”
by SethGrandpa on Jul 23, 2009 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Angels=performance enhancers.
Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.
by BrettJMiller on Jul 24, 2009 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 












