Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Steve Phillips Challenge: The halfway point


Before the season, nine intrepid LL'ers went on a mission to call the records of all 30 teams in MLB. The picks can be found in this post. I have put all the predictions into a spreadsheet, converted them to win percentages, and compared them to the standings at the all-star break.

Functionally, what I did was take a predicted win percentage, and multiply it by the number of games that the team in question has played, rounding down all games (So by your percentage, Cleveland won 46.9 games? I'm only counting it as 46). I then took the absolute value of the difference between each commenter's predicted wins and the actual wins at the break. For example, I predicted the Dodgers would only have 46 wins at the break. Instead, they have 56, giving me a score of 10 for that team. I added those scores together for all teams; low score wins.

The Standings:

Benne (116 off)
Two Rs And Two Ls (123 off)
sironz (124 off)
vivaelpujols (126 off)
cwel87 (128 off)
Jack Moore (129 off)
JI / Poochie (129 off)
hcoguy (132 off)
Trenchtown (135 off)

As a group, we were shitty at picking Cleveland (an average of 12 off), but good at picking all the teams in the AL East (no team an average of more than 3 off), and great at picking Minnesota, the White Sox, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, and Houston (all an average of just 1 off).

1 recs  |  Comment 33 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I have it all in down as well

The original Vegaswatch used squared mean error as the standings determination and I can post that if you want (not that it treats my predictions any better.) Admittedly, I thought this was going to be much easier then it so far has been, fucking TIgers

Don't believe the lies Bill!!!! look at the sparkly ERA!!! Sparkly, Sparkly!!! - McCovey Chronicles

by Trenchtown on Jul 13, 2009 11:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

My spreadsheet looks

a little something like this.

I’m hoping that works.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 13, 2009 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually get a blank page when I click on that

I’m using firefox so I don’t know if that matters

Don't believe the lies Bill!!!! look at the sparkly ERA!!! Sparkly, Sparkly!!! - McCovey Chronicles

by Trenchtown on Jul 13, 2009 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny you say that

I am searching frantically through espn looking to see if he actually made a real prediction or not to right down, funny I never did that to start the season

Don't believe the lies Bill!!!! look at the sparkly ERA!!! Sparkly, Sparkly!!! - McCovey Chronicles

by Trenchtown on Jul 13, 2009 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm. I'll try to look into that tomorrow.

Google documents. I don’t know.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 14, 2009 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong thing to reply to.

Woops.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 14, 2009 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, bad news and possibly good news

Bad news is I can’t find Steve Phillips’ predictions. Possibly good news is that I found the original vegas watch article, followed their links, and could not find the 2008 Steve Phillips predictions, but saw how they might have been on that page at one point. This means that it is possible that they have the Phillips predictions recorded somewhere and will post them at the end of the year like they did this past time. If not, between articles and prediction we should be able to piece together as pseudo-Phillips prediction. This is not ideal but better then nothing. However, I am confident that Vegaswatch has the information recorded somewhere

Don't believe the lies Bill!!!! look at the sparkly ERA!!! Sparkly, Sparkly!!! - McCovey Chronicles

by Trenchtown on Jul 14, 2009 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I did the math right...

…it looks like predicting .500 would make the sum of the absolute errors 139 right now. (This is without rounding anything and saying that a .500 prediction has a half-game error for a 45-44 team.) ~12% of that 139-game total is from Washington. I knew they were bad, but that’s nearly 2003 Tigers bad.

So it looks like everyone is doing slightly better than the null hypothesis that all teams are equally good.

by ubelmann on Jul 13, 2009 11:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

And if you use the other obvious null hypothesis, that teams should be as good as they were in 2008, I get the absolute error (without rounding any of the partial games) to be about 144 games. I would expect that if you made a regression using the ‘07 and ’08 data you could probably come up with a formula to beat the “everyone is a .500 team” hypothesis, but I’m not sure by how much it would win.

by ubelmann on Jul 14, 2009 12:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I do a regression between 2007 and 2008

(I know, not much data to go on, but I am lazy in compiling records by team.) Then I get the following regression equation:

2008WPct = 0.10*(2007WPct) + 0.45

Which is equivalent to this form, which I think is a nicer way to look at the regression:

2008WPct = 0.10*(2007WPct-.500) + .500

The r is pretty low on that fit, unfortunately, just 0.09. If you figure the same coefficients should hold for ’08 and ’09, the absolute error in the prediction to this point is ~133 games, which hardly seems worth the effort for the 6-game improvement over the “every team is .500” hypothesis. Going back to use more pairs of years to get better regression coefficients might help, but probably not more than another 6 games (total) or so, I would guess.

by ubelmann on Jul 14, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It could happen.

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Jul 15, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple rainouts against insignificant teams and you've got it.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 15, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh Cleveland.

I recall rating the Brewers high but can’t remember.

Thanks for following through on this. My friends and I do something similar every year with the division predictions but don’t go all out like this.

by hcoguy on Jul 14, 2009 12:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Holy crap, I'm in first place? Sweet.

Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?

by Benne on Jul 14, 2009 9:29 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Heh, we pretty much all whiffed badly on the Indians and D-Backs.

Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?

by Benne on Jul 14, 2009 9:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Strangely, we were terrible at the Nationals.

They have 26 wins so far. The lowest guess anyone gave so far was 30 wins (Sironz, who guessed the record as 55-107). Nobody else picked them to lose 100 games this season, though a couple of us picked them to lose 99.

The next two teams to get blown so often were Arizona and the Dodgers; we were an average of 9 games off of each of them.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 14, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I was wrong to assume that the Nats' "rock bottom" was last year.

Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?

by Benne on Jul 14, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I went and got the PECOTA projections.

PECOTA scores 74 so far. Interestingly, that system was off the most on Washington and Cleveland, just like we were as a group.

On average, we BEAT PECOTA on:
Boston, White Sox, Kansas City, Seattle, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Houston.

PECOTA was ON THE MONEY (off less than 1/2 of a game) on:
Toronto, Minnesota, and Milwaukee.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 15, 2009 2:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You mean the Pecota Projections updated July 12th?

yeah thats real fair. Just looking at the original projections of Pecota posted February 19th, they only have two division posted (I let my subscription lapse this winter) for free and were off 60 alone for those two divisions and I doubt they were off only 14 games in the four other divisions combined (not a chance) is the only way they would be at 74. When were those projections you used posted?

Don't believe the lies Bill!!!! look at the sparkly ERA!!! Sparkly, Sparkly!!! - McCovey Chronicles

by Trenchtown on Jul 15, 2009 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if the projections themselves have been updated

but the page that they were on had been. Linky.

From looking around other sites, it looks like you’re right, they did update the projections. Well that makes this worthwhile.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- P&P&Z

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 16, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Chone/Decatur projection

using the Two R’s method is 136 off, or in other words, dead last

Don't believe the lies Bill!!!! look at the sparkly ERA!!! Sparkly, Sparkly!!! - McCovey Chronicles

by Trenchtown on Jul 15, 2009 10:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Max_small
FootbaLL IV (Nov 21st)
Small
The Sabermetrics of Cats

Recent FanPosts

Small
WAR gains major exposure
Laughing_man_elmex_small
AFL Championship game thread
Smell-the-glove_small
OFFTOP 11/19 - The Hand of Fraud
Small
Tony Blengino interview on 710 AM ESPN Seattle's Hot Stove League
Ichirocameron_small
OTFPOTD 11/16: Recipes Edition
Small
Lookout Landing as a communtiy
Small
Royals determined to unload Callaspo...
Ichiro_small
Ackley and Triunfel on MLB TV right now

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

1_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff