Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Options

Don't want to give up on the season? That's understandable. The M's are only six back of a very vulnerable Rangers team in the first week of June, and PECOTA gives them a 15% chance of making the playoffs. Competing in 2009 is far from a lost cause, and quitting now would only send a bitter message to both a clubhouse and a fanbase anxious to make a run.

Don't want to do anything that improves the team a little now while jeopardizing a part of the future? Also understandable. Just because the M's have a prayer doesn't in any way mean they're not a longshot, and you never want to sacrifice something down the road for a chance to chase rainbows. Since taking over control, the front office has espoused a big-picture approach to team-building, and you don't want to try too hard to turn a season into something it was never intended to be.

This can be a difficult situation to navigate. The M's, as currently built, clearly need to address some weaknesses if they want to hang in the race, but addressing weaknesses frequently requires one to sacrifice resources that could help down the road. Fortunately, in our case, there are options whereby the M's can get better now without doing anything to harm the next several years. Some of these options are shown below.

1) Cut Mike Sweeney and call up Chris Shelton. With Sweeney having a wOBA of .282 over 92 plate appearances and Shelton standing at .395 in Tacoma, the Mariners have the opportunity to reverse the decision they made back in Spring. It was assumed before that the M's chose the way they did because when faced with a ~tie in offense they erred on the side of likeability, but with Sweeney not producing, there's no longer much reason to believe the two are offensive approximates of one another. Shelton looks like the superior hitter, and that's all he'd need to be were he to take Sweeney's place. It might come as a bummer in the clubhouse, but nothing raises morale quite like better play on the field.

2) Unload Endy Chavez and hand Michael Saunders the keys to left field. I like Endy. He's been exactly what we thought he'd be, and believe it or not, he's actually provided the fourth-best wOBA on the team while playing solid defense in left. He's an excellent role player who isn't too terribly miscast as a regular on an otherwise solid team. But this whole Endy/Wlad platoon thing hasn't exactly lit up the scoreboard, and with Saunders tearing it up in AAA, the team may wish to make a change. In that event, Endy would become expendable with another lefty taking over. If you let Saunders start, keep Wlad around as the backup OF, and trade Endy to a contender, everyone comes away happy, and Safeco gets to set its sights on a guy who should be an outfield regular for the next several years. Saunders might not hit immediately, but given the .663 OPS the M's have gotten out of left field so far, I don't know if anyone would notice.

3) Unload Jose Lopez and plug in Mike Fontenot. Dave's already written this one up, so there's not much left for me to say, but landing the left-handed Fontenot and slotting him in at second would represent an improvement across the board, from defense to discipline to batting order handedness. While the deal may not be available as a simple one-for-one, it's something the M's could and should work to make happen, because though Fontenot's no star, he's better than Lopez and under control through 2013.

4) Unload Jose Lopez and plug in Kelly Johnson. This one's similar to the whole Fontenot thing. For whatever reason, the Braves seem to have soured a bit on Johnson, and he's definitely available. And as a young, productive left-handed 2B under control through 2011, he's the kind of player the Mariners badly need. Once again, the Braves may not be willing to go straight up, but it wouldn't take a whole lot on top of Lopez to make it happen - perhaps even just Endy Chavez - and it would bring the M's a valuable player. Johnson's no whiz in the field, but as a guy who can walk and take the ball out to right field, he'd be a great fit.

5) Play Ronny Cedeno at shortstop more. I don't think this one needs much explaining.

So there are a few options. Unfortunately the whole Griffey handicap prevents us from doing too much at DH, but then I'm not so sure that Clement or Carp would out-produce him anyway, so for the time being it's not that big of an issue. The other things, though - those are ways that the Mariners could make themselves better now without doing anything to damage the long-term picture. And to me, that makes them really appealing. No, I don't want to give up on 2009. No, I don't want to sacrifice future value to get better now. Luckily, it's not one or the other.

0 recs  |  Comment 87 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

When you say Johnson's no whiz in the field

do you mean he’s just sort of average, or actively bad? Because the last thing the M’s need is another actively bad defensive infielder, it would seem.

Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.

by pdb on Jun 3, 2009 3:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

that works.

Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.

by pdb on Jun 3, 2009 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on UZR he looks to be about the same as Lopez.

Is that fair? I’d obviously prefer Johnson by a ton, but I’m just trying to get a feel for it.

by acblue on Jun 3, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say that's fair

but having watched Lopez a whole bunch, I feel like he’s getting worse in a hurry.

by Jeff on Jun 3, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't disagree and for what it's worth Johnson appears to be trending upward.

Given the superiority of his bat, handedness and plate approach I’d be happy even with a minor defensive downgrade.

by acblue on Jun 3, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This seems so obvious and it's really frustrating that the team has done absolutely nothing along these lines.

I think the division is still winnable and it’s the option I’d prefer they pursue with the restraints you bring up, but if they want to start selling then I understand that too. But this horrible purgatory of boring mediocrity is driving me batshit insane.

by acblue on Jun 3, 2009 3:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Fontenot is pretty damn good

He’s been worth a little over 4 WAR in about a full seasons worth of at bats. And he’s cost controlled for a few more years, it might be pretty tough to get him.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Jun 3, 2009 3:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

good point

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Jun 3, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have Aaron Miles.

So they’re set!

---
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com
http://www.rightfieldbleachers.com

by Jack Moore on Jun 3, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the ideas constructed here.

What about Lopez being moved to 1B, release Sweeney (maybe offer a coaching gig for the rest of the season to keep him in the clubhouse), and then go after Fontenot?

by Wilder. on Jun 3, 2009 3:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well whoops.

Branyan is full-time 1B.

by Wilder. on Jun 3, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Scratch the idea.

Unloading Lopez is about the only thing we could do if we somehow acquired Fontenot.

by Wilder. on Jun 3, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to agree

these moves seem so obvious that the only reason they haven’t happened is because their is more going on in reality than we know about.

Paris Hilton, Burberry plaid, reality TV, mullets, Zima, Dubya, and the Sonics being sold to Oklahoma City. - Yahoo Answer results for "7 Signs of the Apocalypse"

by bluemax on Jun 3, 2009 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of the options you present
  1. seems good, but Cedeno would make it a lot easier if he could hit again.
    #2-#4 are not unilateral moves… they require a trading partner… and I can see Jack being loathe to dump Lopez when his trade value is at its bottom. Why not wait until he’s mashing again (you know he’ll heat up again this summer) and then try to trade him for something good.
  2. seems like a very marginal improvement in a very part-time position. Shelton may be performing better (even adjusting for level of competition,) but he’s not having to deal with being a seldom-used bench guy. Does Sweeney even have a large enough sample size to conclude anything about his performance. All I can conclude is that he’s on amphetamines based on how wide his eyes are when he comes up to bat… and how often he’s wiping his eyes/nose.

by johnbai on Jun 3, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

stupid autoformatting fucked that up royally

by johnbai on Jun 3, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't speculating on who you could get for Lopez

just sayin’ his trade value has to be low right now because of his slow start. I expect that he’ll heat up at some point and put up some eye-raising numbers again… at which point getting someone like Fontenot or Johnson might be possible.

by johnbai on Jun 3, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Similarly

We probably don’t want to trade Beltre just yet because his perceived value couldn’t really be much lower. If we trade him after he gets hot… maybe we get an additional lower level prospect thrown in… or the better of two almost interchangeable parts.

If we want Jack Z to maximize the future… I’m okay with him waiting to pull the trigger on trades for Lopez/Beltre until they are worth more. No matter how much I hate their poorly-discipline/right-handed asses.

by johnbai on Jun 3, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really think you're overstating the tendency of GMs to ignore past performance.

Beltre is a known quantity. So is Lopez to a certain extent and if anything most people are likely to expect his value to increase.

by acblue on Jun 3, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless the poor performance is a result of a masked injury

there could be justifiable reasons for a GM to be gunshy.

by johnbai on Jun 3, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if a frog had wings he wouldn't bumb his ass when he hopped.

He could always start playing worse. Then where does that leave us?

Fear the NPE

by thewyrm on Jun 3, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"at which point getting someone like Fontenot or Johnson might be possible."

We don’t baselessly speculate on trade possibilities, John.

by Matthew on Jun 3, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotcha

So we’re the ones holding back on proposed straight up trades. Huh. Maybe Jack figures the league difference is signficant?

by johnbai on Jun 3, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sweeney prorates to something like 300 PAs over a full season

And Sweeney’s progressively sucked more and more since the end of 2005. I think nearly 3.5 years is a sufficient sample size to conclude that despite all the spring training “I’m healthier than I’ve been in years” bullshit, he’s still 35 years old and done.

by eponymous_coward on Jun 3, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just wish they would make a move already

If you’re not giving up on this season yet: Great, that’s just fine. But there are still obvious moves you can make to make the team better in the organization already. Why not make them now? Or like two weeks ago for that matter?

The inaction one way or another is what’s bothering me the most.

by OlSalty on Jun 3, 2009 4:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I would DL Sweeney if they are so cocerned about clubhouse crap.

I totally agree in regards to Shelton.

Saunders in and Chavez out. Yea I guess that could be done, although Im not convinced he’ll be more valuable then Endy this season. However, it would get him major league experience for next season. However, if you are promoting a Saunders/Wlad platoon, does that not hurt Saunders development vs left handers?

If you believe Saunders future is only a platoon guy vs righties, then sure bring him up now. But if you want him in an everyday role, I may prefer leaving him in AAA so he can play everyday and get a good amount of ABs vs southpaws.

In regards to Fontenot and Johnson. I just do not see how we are obtaining them. Why would they trade either for Lopez?

by Rudy4three on Jun 3, 2009 4:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't want to platoon Saunders with Wlad

I’d make Saunders the regular and just have Wlad as the reserve.

by Jeff on Jun 3, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, as for your last question

The Braves are sour on Johnson and the Cubs aren’t that high on Fontenot because he’s 29 and some people think he may not be an everyday player. Meanwhile, Lopez is a 25 year old former top prospect who’s proven he can play everyday, and who seems like the perfect change-of-scenery target.

by Jeff on Jun 3, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So why are we trading Lopez then? Just for handedness?

You make a point that he’s a young former top prospect, who has proven he can play everyday. Why are we dealing him for a player who “may not be an everyday player”?

by Rudy4three on Jun 3, 2009 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This explains why my Fanpost disappeared

I actually put thought and effort into it but I had a coworker come by before I finished it :(

Paris Hilton, Burberry plaid, reality TV, mullets, Zima, Dubya, and the Sonics being sold to Oklahoma City. - Yahoo Answer results for "7 Signs of the Apocalypse"

by bluemax on Jun 3, 2009 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's the lesson here, kids?

That’s right. Never put any thought into anything again.

Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.

by pdb on Jun 3, 2009 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

MLBTR says the White Sox are promoting Beckham

and DFAing Betemit.

The Bedard for Beckham fantasies probably won’t come true, but is Betemit anywhere near as good as he was supposed to be?

by Rollo Tomasi on Jun 3, 2009 8:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Or just DFA Denny Stark, and then bring up your favorite of any of the aforementioned. No trades needed.

Really, what use is he? Batista is the innings-eater-slash-designated-white-flag-of-surrender already. Stark’s not exactly a specialist, or particularly good.

If Don learns proper bullpen management, and Morrow and Jakubauskas don’t implode, you can make do with one less bullpen arm in order to bring in more potential offense.

And then if things go south with the bullpen due to a couple bad starts or bad outings overall, you can probably shove Sweeney onto the DL (bad back, case of the willies, whatever), and bring up another reliever.

by Spoomeister on Jun 3, 2009 10:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Max_small
FootbaLL IV (Nov 21st)
Small
The Sabermetrics of Cats

Recent FanPosts

Smell-the-glove_small
OFFTOP 11/19 - The Hand of Fraud
Small
Tony Blengino interview on 710 AM ESPN Seattle's Hot Stove League
Ichirocameron_small
OTFPOTD 11/16: Recipes Edition
Small
Lookout Landing as a communtiy
Small
Royals determined to unload Callaspo...
Ichiro_small
Ackley and Triunfel on MLB TV right now
Small
Xbox LLive, Pt 3
Clemente_small
OT on a friday morning 11/6

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

1_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff