Regression Goes Both Ways
It's a fact that, overall, hitters are more productive with men in scoring position than they are with no one on base. The numbers bear that out. In the American League this year, the OPS difference is +.026. Last year it was +.045. The year before it was +.038. In run-scoring situations, batters walk a lot more and also hit for a higher average than they do with the bases empty.
It is with that in mind that I present to you the following two splits:
Mariner batters, bases empty: .265/.311/.403, .299 BABIP
Mariner batters, RISP:.234/.323/.366, .250 BABIP
Mariner pitchers, bases empty: .247/.313/.379, .285 BABIP
Mariner pitchers, RISP: .224/.329/.315, .259 BABIP
At the plate, the Mariners have been unsustainably bad with runners in scoring position. The main culprit? A laughably poor .250 batting average on balls in play. The average BABIP shoots up by five or six points with RISP. The Mariners' has dropped by 49. That's going to change over the rest of the season, and the offense is going to appear more productive as a result. (For the record, Ichiro/Branyan/Griffey/Gutierrez account for 39% of plate appearances with nobody on and 35% of plate appearances with RISP.)
On the mound, meanwhile, the Mariners have been unsustainably good with runners in scoring position. Here, there are two factors at play - an improved BABIP and a crazy home run rate. Not only has the BABIP dropped by 26 points, but their rate of home runs allowed has gone from once every 40 plate appearances with the bases empty to once every 81 with RISP. Compare that to the league average split of 1-in-32 and 1-in-44. That's not going to continue.
Through 75 games, the Mariners have had both good and bad fortune with runners in scoring position, making their offense seem worse and their pitching seem better than they really are. Get ready for things to even out. Those of you who're fans of low-scoring games - I hope you've enjoyed yourselves, because while this team will never be accused of lighting up the scoreboard, you can count on more runs scoring in the second half than we've seen in the first.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In fact, we led the league in avg w/RISP after April.
May really sucked.
I remember plating something close to 70% of runners over the first couple of days of the season.
Awaiting the day I catch a Russell Branyan foul ball. I will make love to it.
Preserved In All His Greatness - R.I.P. The Reignman 1989 to 1997
I think June has been the bigger problem
.328 team wOBA, but only 3.9 runs per game.
by Jeff Sullivan on Jun 29, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions
So my question is, which regression outweighs the other?
If you regress our offense and our pitching is our run differential positive?
I'd be interested to see a breakdown by different players.
It would be fun to see if every player has been equally lucky/unlucky, or if there are some in particular who we should expect to see progress/regress. Or would that be too small of a sample size?
by I Lick Squirrels on Jun 29, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions
Huh there was something in the body of that comment at one point
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 29, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Shouldn't have gone all anorexic on us then.
A little bit can be okay, but you need to stop when it becomes a problem.
by Matthew on Jun 29, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's not about body image
it’s about being in control
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 29, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions
This entry could also be titled....
Beware the Washburn/Vargas/Olson/entire bullpen explosion
or
Offense: Don’t Worry We Do Not Suck As Much As You Think
It could also have been titled
Here you go greg briley. Here’s the keys to the blog, why don’t you drive for a while?
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 29, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I dont think that would have made much sense.
Given the content.

by 










