Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

35-34, Chart

Above .500 with a run differential of -20. This is starting to feel a little familiar. 

They say that good teams make their own luck. I don't buy that for a second. Luck, by its very definition, cannot be caused. The thing about luck, though, is that while it can happen to anyone, some teams are able to take more advantage of it than others, and if the short-handed Mariners use things like Clark's error tonight and Hundley's error a few days ago in order to stay afloat, then so be it. You can't make yourself look better by causing good luck, but there's nothing wrong with taking advantage of a little good luck while you wait to get better.

We won. We won with that lineup.

6_21_medium

Biggest Contribution: Yuniesky Betancourt, +15.9%
Biggest Suckfest: Chris Woodward, -22.6%
Most Important AB: Clark error, +34.4%
Most Important Pitch: Reynolds homer, -47.3%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): +13.6%
Total Contribution by Lineup: -21.3%
Total Contribution by Opposition: +57.7%
(What is this chart?)

Comment 67 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Two things

1) Eight swings and no misses for Mark Reynolds against Felix? For shame.

2) Also this

by Jeff Sullivan on Jun 21, 2009 11:34 PM PDT reply actions   4 recs

Michael Phelps should be taking notes.

"You're so beautiful. You could be a part-time model, but you'd probably still have to keep your normal job."

by nickmo on Jun 22, 2009 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

On my scorecard for the game,

I put “(moustache)” after Zavada’s name. I should have just put him down as Moustache.

by appleshampoo on Jun 22, 2009 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mark Reynolds is having one of the weirdest seasons ever.

The Rise of a Superstar:Justin Upton-.425 wOBA, 21 years old.

by Goose on Jun 22, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Felix data

62% strikes, 10.7% swinging strikes

71 fastballs, 9 sliders, 20 changeups, 9 curves, 3 pitches missed by PITCHf/x

6 swinging strikes on the change, 4 on the slider, 1 on the fastball, 1 on the curve

9 grounders, 6 flies, 5 line drives

by Jeff Sullivan on Jun 21, 2009 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm trying to wrap my head around the use of swinging strikes to evaluate individual starts.

Would it be productive or even possible to create a “weighted swinging strike percentage” (call it “wSSP” or whatever) that factored in the environment (contract rate-related park factors) and the contact percentage of the team the pitcher faces (team contact % ranges from ~75.3% to ~84.6%, and the D-Backs have the second lowest contact rate in the majors at 77.7%) or, probably more accurately, the combined season (or 3 year, maybe) contact % of each hitter in the lineup? It seems like a pitcher should get a good deal more credit for having, say, 10% swinging strikes against the Mets, who have a contact % of 84.6%, than having a 10% swinging strike rate against the Rangers, who have a 75.3% contact % and have Chris Davis regularly in the lineup.

by Decatur on Jun 22, 2009 12:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

You have a point but over a season opposition averages out (unless you pitch in ALE)

and on a per start basis the difference between a 75 and 85% contact rate will be about one StrSw, so if Felix gets ten on a day he wasn’t that sharp it’s still good news. Also, once you start looking that closely at opposition you may as well start looking at lineup handedness and success against pitch types and so on. Diminishing returns.

By the way, if league avg contact rate is ~80%, how is league avg StrSw rate ~8? I think I’m missing something obvious again.

"Even the stupidest of men, by some instinct of nature, is convinced on his own that with more observations his risk of failure is diminished."
-Jacques Bernoulli Ars conjectandi 1713

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Different denominators

Contact rate = (fouls+BIP)/swings
StrSw = swinging strikes/pitches

by Graham MacAree on Jun 22, 2009 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

12.0% swinging strike rate so far this year.

He’s ~equaled his value from all of last year. Dear god I hope Z resigns him.

by Zwakamatsu on Jun 22, 2009 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Are those your numbers or Gamedays?

cause they mischaracterize about 1/4 Felix changeups, from what I’ve noticed.

"Even the stupidest of men, by some instinct of nature, is convinced on his own that with more observations his risk of failure is diminished."
-Jacques Bernoulli Ars conjectandi 1713

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 7:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

And each time we pull out a lucky victory, it's gotta help our chances that much more

considering how bad the division is. If we get “lucky” ~10 more times than we’re “unlucky,” that’s gonna swing a division that’s so bad and so close. So hooray!

by calim on Jun 22, 2009 12:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Why is the division 'so bad.' What constitutes a 'bad division'?

We have three teams in our divison over .500. The Central (with one more team) only has one. The two worst records in the AL belong to Central teams. Three teams in our divison have a winning record against the AL East opponents. What is ‘bad’?

by greg briley on Jun 22, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

True, true. Run differential being a sign of dominance. Don't even get into VORP with the Mariners (or anything else that evaluates talent/lack thereof)...

I guess my only point being that while the division is subpar, it certainly isn’t Journey-cover-band-playing-at-your-favorite-bar-bad…. just karaoke-at-your-cousin’s-wedding-reception-bad. I mean, what did you expect? Any other wedding reception with karaoke is just as bad. That’s my point.

by greg briley on Jun 22, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

The whole three teams over .500 thing

is very likely to change by season’s end, when the effects of run differential will be more amplified/stabilized. I hate power rankings but if you were to rank the ML teams in order of likely # wins at season’s end I don’t think the ALW cracks the top ten and I guess average place would be something like 18-20.

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, but it is still early in the season (most teams playing about 70 games)

so it is certain these numbers will change (even in the aggregate) as well. In the end though, at least one AL West team will emerge from this mess and crack the top ten. After all, look how many times that said team will face the Athletics.

by greg briley on Jun 22, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dude I am 4-0 at Safeco now!

I think that damn Felix jersey is a good luck charm.

by Fin on Jun 22, 2009 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

2-0 for me and my wife this year.

Both Felix games, though.

Awaiting the day I catch a Russell Branyan foul ball. I will make love to it.
Preserved In All His Greatness - R.I.P. The Reignman 1989 to 1997

by JLProck on Jun 22, 2009 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

3-0

With 2 Vargas starts and a Jakabauskas!

I never really liked the old tagline.

CougCenter

by Craig Powers on Jun 22, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anybody, Anytime right Tony?

Anybody can lose the game, at anytime.

The Rise of a Superstar:Justin Upton-.425 wOBA, 21 years old.

by Goose on Jun 22, 2009 1:13 AM PDT reply actions  

When this season ends and the Mariners are in the playoffs, and the DBacks win the Bryce Harper sweepstakes,

I’m going to proclaim this the best series of all time.

The Rise of a Superstar:Justin Upton-.425 wOBA, 21 years old.

by Goose on Jun 22, 2009 1:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Yow

I didn’t see that coming. But hey, the Yanks just lost two to the Natinals so there’s that.

"Even the stupidest of men, by some instinct of nature, is convinced on his own that with more observations his risk of failure is diminished."
-Jacques Bernoulli Ars conjectandi 1713

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

That was before people knew that Bedard is a health risk

"Even the stupidest of men, by some instinct of nature, is convinced on his own that with more observations his risk of failure is diminished."
-Jacques Bernoulli Ars conjectandi 1713

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Our clubhouse attitude differential is crazy high though

"Even the stupidest of men, by some instinct of nature, is convinced on his own that with more observations his risk of failure is diminished."
-Jacques Bernoulli Ars conjectandi 1713

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yatzee!

"Even the stupidest of men, by some instinct of nature, is convinced on his own that with more observations his risk of failure is diminished."
-Jacques Bernoulli Ars conjectandi 1713

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 22, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
Everything I Know About Jesus Montero

Recent FanPosts

Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
OTDOD - Early February Edition
Agentejebaox3_small
A Statistical Analysis of Mariners' Fan Support
Small
Who will have a better season?
Claw_small
BA's Top 10 M's Prospects
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Munenori Kawasaki Predictions!!!
Small
The Longevity and Future Success of Felix Hernandez.
Small
The present vs future conundrum

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew