Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Playoffs? You're talking about playoffs?


Since we're back sniffing .500 again, the playoffs discussions have come back into play.  I thought I'd revisit our playoff chances and see where we sit as of right now.

Through 59 games, we are at 29-30, sitting just below .500 and 4.5 games back of the Rangers.  Additionally, we are only one game back of the Angels, who are sitting at 29-28.  The question becomes do we have a shot at the playoffs, and what will it take to get there.  Obviously nobody is running away with this division and it is as week as we thought it would be.  Let's dig in.

First, I want to examine the other teams to see what their flaws are and if they will keep up the pace they are at, get better, or get worse.

Texas:

Texas has started off the first 58 games at 33-25, a record that was not expected by most.  The general consensus is that they will fall off come summertime.  Their weakness is still in their pitching staff.

Pitching:

Thus far, the Texas rotation is sitting at a TRA of 6.00 and a TRA* of 5.64.  Their bullpen has a TRA of  5.83, with a TRA+ 5.34.  In other words, they are who we thought they were.  Their pitching should in no way carry them through the season.

Hitting:

The strength of the Texas lineup.  As a team, their wOBA is sitting at .351.  They may not outpitch teams, but they are built to score runs.  Nearly all of their regulars are at or above a wOBA of .300.  The hitting part of their game probably won't go away.

Summary:

With a shakey pitching staff, the Rangers are going to have to hit the crap out of the ball to win games.  Relying on hitting, in my opinion, is a dangerous way to go about things.  At any time, their hitting could go cold, leaving them on shaky ground. They are 4-6 in their last 10 and have showed signs of cooling.

Anaheim:

The Angels started the season missing most of their full rotations to injuries, leaving a slow start to be expected.  The rotation is back now, but not performing as well as they were expected to be.  Santana has lost velocity, as noted by Jeff, Lackey hasn't ben a standout by any means, and Escobar found himself demoted to the bullpen.  Add in the injury to Vlad, and his lack of performance, and they've done quite well for themselves up until now.

Pitching:

The Angels pitching was predicted to be their strong point coming in.  It was assumed that when they were healthy they would be the team to beat.  The Angels pitching staff is healthy, but has not showed signs of being where everyone thought they would be.  As a rotation, they have a TRA of 4.52 and TRA* of 4.83.  Santana has had a dropoff, as mentioned, and Lackey isn't quite back to form from what I've seen.  Weaver, on the other hand, has been lights out with a TRA of 3.21, comparable to where Felix is.  In the pen, they have a TRA* of 5.01 and pRAA of -4.9.  They appear to miss having K-Rod as their closer, with Fuentes having a TRA that is almost two points higher than him.   Shields also hasn't been performing well in the setup role.  All in all, their pitching has been shakey as well.

Hitting:

Their hitting has been about average with a wOBA of .333.  Vlad has been out with an injury, but had seemed to regress quite a bit before that.  Torii Hunter is their bright spot with a wOBA of .409.

 

Mariners:

For what we are on paper, this start has been better that what could've been expected.  After getting off to a hot start, we cooled off very quickly, but have been picking it up recently.  The holes in the team, as has been noted, lie in the bullpen and with our hitting.  Our bullpen treads on shakey ground and our hitting, at many times, is non-existant.

Pitchers:

This seems to be our strength.  Our rotation has a TRA of 4.51.  Felix, when good, is killing it with a TRA of 3.17, with Bedard at 4.02.  We've been able to plug in Vargas and Olsen and putter along quite well in the last month.  The emergence of new Washburn has also been helpful.  Overall our rotation has been a strong point at many times.  The bullpen, on the other hand, is still cause for concern.  The pen's TRA is at 5.21.  Just from watching the pen, we all probably feel that they may not be as good as advertised.  It is shakey at times, downright scary at others, and yet surprising good sometimes as well.  All in all, I would call the pen inconsistent.

Hitting:

Not our strong point.  The lineup fails to produce, outside of Ichiro and Branyan, most of the time.  Branyan ihas been dead sexy with a wOBA of .435.  The team, as a whole, have a wOBA of .313, or well below average.  Our lineup is flat ugly on paper and is just about the same on the field.  While it looks bad now, it should be expected to improve by heading closer to what is projected soon.

Summary:

The team relies on pitching and continues to be frustrating at the plate.  The rotation can go out and allow 3 or less runs, yet still lose due to the lack of production from the lineup.  We are also prone to late game blowups by the bullpen, as we've all seen.  The fact that the team has played so many one run games, and won many of them, leads me to believe we've been quite lucky up until now and if we keep playing the way we are, our luck will run out.

 

Where do we go from here?

From the looks of it, we're still in this thing and should continue to be in this thing through the rest of the season.  Texas is all bat and not so much pitching.  We are the opposite.  The Angels are hanging around without major standouts in either.  With the rotation woes of the Angels and Rangers, we should be able to make it close.


I would not, however, like to see us become big buyers at the trading deadline.  Instead, I think we can solve some of our lineup troubles in house.  Saunders is kicking down the door of the big club and making a case to take one of the OF spots.  Moore may very well be seasoned enough to be the solution at catcher in the summer after a bit more seasoning.  Our middle infield, well we're just kind of stuck with that right now unless we can unload one or both onto a sucker team.  There really isn't any prospects for it from what I see in house.  Clement is kind of stuck due to the fact that we have a LH 1B, that is sexy, and a LH DH that probably won't be bench anytime soon.

The other issue I see is Erik Bedard.  If you think he will be a type A free agent or that he will resign here, then I have no problem keeping him around.  Derek at USSM, does not think he will be.  If neither of these are true, I really would like to unload him to get something out of it.  I guess it all depends on where we are standing around the trade deadline and whether he will be able to pitch himself into type A territory.

So, there's my take on it.  I didn't have time to go too far in depth but from what I see, we should be in the race, especially with our weak division.  What we should do if we are still in the race come two months from now remains to be seen.

2 recs  |  Comment 24 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Uh.
by cougfan on Jun 12, 2009 4:04 PM PDT Comment 0 comments
Through 59 games, we are at 29-30, sitting just below .500

Are we witnessing a time displacement experiment?

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jun 12, 2009 4:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dave made a point on the radio earlier today that Texas pitching hasn't been lucky so much as they've been backed up by much better defense than in years past

Which is kind of bad news for us, since that means they’re not going to regress as much as we thought they would.

by OlSalty on Jun 12, 2009 4:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That about sums it up.

That defense is mighty impressive. Just by watching the games, you can tell it’s making a world of difference. The pitching staff should be buying the defense steak dinners every off day they have.

by ThundaPC on Jun 12, 2009 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we need to keep Bedard, unless Z gets an offer he can't refuse.

Felix and Bedard would be the 1-2 punch we would need in the playoffs. Also, and correct me if I’m wrong, wouldn’t we get prospect(s) if we couldn’t re-sign Bedard after this season?

by Sinking Away on Jun 14, 2009 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is true.

Getting rid of Jones and Tillman was unforgivable. I would kill to have Jones in an M’s uniform for the next few years. On the other hand, we lost him and now have Bedard. I’m not giving away any prospects to keep him. He’s already here.

by Sinking Away on Jun 14, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We would be giving away a mid-late 30s draft pick. Not 'prospects'

We would get much much more back from Bedard than he’d give us as a type B

by Graham on Jun 14, 2009 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I apologize, I guess I don't understand. We get nothing if we can't re-sign him?

In which case, yes we should try to get whatever we can by trading him, I don’t want to see his sore ass on the payroll next year. I thought that we got a prospect or prospects (depending on whether he was a type A or B free agent) from whatever team signed him next year. I thought that was a little goofy, but isn’t that what happened with Raul?

by Sinking Away on Jun 14, 2009 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Draft picks. Not prospects.

Bedard is more than likely a type B free agent, which would translate to, like I said, a mid-late 30s pick in the 2010 draft. Ibanez was a type A, which got us the #27 and #33 picks.

The package we’d get back for Bedard is far far far better than we’d even get for type A compensation.

by Graham on Jun 14, 2009 8:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Graham, thank you for that explanation. I didn't understand how that works.

I’m hopeful that it’s better to get it wrong here and learn than to suffer the ridicule of co-workers in front of the water cooler on Monday morning. Trade away.

by Sinking Away on Jun 14, 2009 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he walks as a type B free agent that's a monumental mistake in my view

We’ll essentially get nothing for him, and it looks like that’s what he’ll be because he’s not going to get enough innings.

by OlSalty on Jun 14, 2009 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the offers we get

I might be okay with it even then if the price is right. I guess if we’ve taken the division lead closer to the deadline that would change things but personally I don’t see us getting back into realistic contention anyways even with Bedard unless some changes are made real soon.

by OlSalty on Jun 15, 2009 4:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm all for unloading Yuni, who is a serious hole in the middle infield.

I know we only have Cedeno to fill in but Yuni is a total liability. Neither one can bat for crap, but I believe dumping Yuni would be a positive for a team that has seen him benched a couple of times, changed nothing, and is back in the starting line-up. I know I’m teetering on talking about “chemistry”, but I’m really not.

by Sinking Away on Jun 14, 2009 8:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I get what you're saying

It would be awful to see a player, who is so bad and seems unwilling to change, start everyday simply because the M’s have nobody else. It definitely wouldn’t offer any motivation to current players, and it would be a drag on team moral.

St. Louis relievers... defying win expectancy since 2008
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com/

by vivaelpujols on Jun 14, 2009 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't going to go that far, because it gets into the "team chemistry" stuff, but yeah, lose Yuni.

He can’t be taught, he can can’t be re-trained, and his attitude can’t be good for anyone to emmulate.

by Sinking Away on Jun 15, 2009 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is "team chemistry" really that taboo?

I mean, obviously, most guys overstate it, but I gotta think it has some effect.

St. Louis relievers... defying win expectancy since 2008
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com/

by vivaelpujols on Jun 15, 2009 2:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Max_small
The Turkey Bowl (Nov 27)
Small
The Sabermetrics of Cats

Recent FanPosts

Small
11/23: Weekly? Rumor Open Thread
Small
WAR gains major exposure
Laughing_man_elmex_small
AFL Championship game thread
Smell-the-glove_small
OFFTOP 11/19 - The Hand of Fraud
Small
Tony Blengino interview on 710 AM ESPN Seattle's Hot Stove League
Ichirocameron_small
OTFPOTD 11/16: Recipes Edition
Small
Lookout Landing as a communtiy
Small
Royals determined to unload Callaspo...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

1_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff