"In retrospect, absolutely. Jones and Tillman were the difficult names to move. But had Bedard operated with the intensity and competitiveness we'd expected, we might now have a different opinion. I didn't give enough weight to the fact that he'd never been on a club that had any expectations of winning. We had expectations. Bedard was a key to those expectations and he did not react well to that."
6 months ago
Bad Horse
23 comments
0 recs |
Comments
God what a jackass
Jones+Tillman was WAY to much to give up for him, even if he had performed at Cy Young level last year. It’s his fucking fault for thinking this team was really good going into 08. Also, wasn’t Bedard injured most of last year? How does that reflect him lacking intensity or competitiveness.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 22, 2009 2:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Orioles/A's fan, but I like the M's.
First, let me emphasize that I come with good intentions, with the understanding that the Bedard trade might not be the favorite subject here, just as pretty much every personnel move the O’s made before the last few years are unpleasant memories for Orioles fans.
I’m not one of those fans who hopes that every player who gets traded away suddenly starts sucking. Ideally, the Bedard trade could have been good for both teams. The Orioles were in the tenth year of their eternal rebuilding project and needed prospects, while the M’s might have been one ace away from becoming a contender. The trade would have made perfect sense for the Orioles even if Bedard won the Cy Young award while leading the M’s to the World Series. In fact, I would have been happy for him and the M’s.
I remember seeing the Erik Bedard greeting cards here earlier, so I know you guys understand how Bedard is often misunderstood. Just because he’s quiet and doesn’t really enjoy the “fame” aspects of being a baseball player doesn’t mean he doesn’t care. People accused him of being a poor teammate in Baltimore, too, even though he was one of the few reasons anyone had to watch an O’s game.
In any case, I understand Bedard played through injury much of last year, and is healthier and pitching much better this year. I’m glad for him and for the Mariners, and rather irritated (putting it mildly) that Bavasi thinks that it was Bedard’s attitude that somehow prevented him from winning 40 more games and the AL West for the M’s.
I know I’m preaching to the choir here, but had to get that off my chest.
by Bad Horse on May 22, 2009 3:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I love Erik Bedard and have every sympathy for his injury-riddled 2008
but I still think that the M’s gave up waaaaaay too much for him.
Nice Guys Finish Third - My semantics are a waste of time.
by pdb on May 22, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
… that the M’s gave up too much for Bedard. But as I think you and I agree, it’s not because of his alleged bad attitude. In other words, Bavasi made a bad trade. Even if Bedard had been healthy it still would have been a bad trade. Bavasi appears to be making excuses for himself.
by Bad Horse on May 22, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone with any sense could see that the M's were a .500 true talent team in 2007 and needed everything to go right in 2008 to get to the playoffs.
Bavasi had little sense, unfortunately.
by Decatur on May 22, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On a related note, Bavasi just lost his last redeeming quality.
His take on Bedard erases the “[explative] Dave Samson” moment.
by Decatur on May 22, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow Bill.
Just wow.
If you are really within inches of serious WS contention, then maybe this is a good ‘win now’ trade………..but the ‘08 M’s were several FEET from WS contention. Even if Bedard put up season comparable to Pedro’s 1999, we still wouldn’t have been close.
He had such a lack of intensity and competitiveness that he pitched half a season truly hurt. He was damned if he did damned if he didn’t. Your new team gave up a mother load for you and you don’t pitch because you’re hurt. Or, you try and gut it out at far less than 100% and you don’t pitch nearly well enough to justify your trade price.
I’ve come to rather like Erik and I hope we can keep him.
Oh, and Fuck you Bill.
"I do not buy numbers defensively. At all," Amaro said. "I look at fielding percentage. But that other business? I don’t buy it a lick."
by Big Jared on May 23, 2009 2:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Even if we'd been contending it was a bad trade.
Don’t forget, we gave up more for Bedard than the Mets gave up for Johan. Think about that. Johan was trading for a four man package where Carlos Gomez was the center piece. Not one player at Tillman’s level, much less one at Adam’s level. If we were going to blow our entire farm system, we could’ve done it for a better, healthier player who was under contract longer. Everything about this trade was a mistake.
by DAMellen on May 24, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice.
Well, if the result of that trade didn’t convince him he’s an idiot, nothing will. I guess he’ll go to his grave believing that drive, intensity, and chemistry have more impact on winning ballgames than health and skill. What a monster.
by DAMellen on May 24, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was a crappy trade when he made it
and everyone else knew it.
St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008
by vivaelpujols on May 25, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jones hit #10 today
but his average dropped to .359.
by Paytheline on May 24, 2009 5:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's Bedard's fault!
What a load of bullshit. I like you, Bill. You seem like a nice guy. But don’t blame your mind-boggling ineptitude on a player you so horribly misjudged. 95% of people who have brains knew this was a terrible trade at the fucking time. We don’t need hindsight. The fact that it looks stupid now doesn’t change the fact that it looked stupid at the time. FUCK.
by Teej on May 24, 2009 9:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bedard was supposed to be a 40 win player!
Too bad he was a pussy and manage to be the 40 win player he should have been.
Jose Lopez roxxorz my boxxorz.
51!
by joof on May 24, 2009 10:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope Adam Jones turns into a Hall of Famer
Just so that everyone remembers how incompetant Bavasi was
by Scrupio on May 25, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Fuck you!
Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you!
by Mariner Melee on May 26, 2009 10:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm just now seeing this.
Yea. Let this be a constant reminder as to why Bill Bavasi will never be a baseball GM ever again.
by ThundaPC on May 28, 2009 1:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I always thought Bavasi's strength was his character
He always seemed like a stand up guy who would stick up for the players and try to give them a fair shake. Then this.
From a certain point of view I understand him trying to back peddle and defend what is, in effect, a career ending blunder, but I really expected more from him. Sad.
by Smegmalicious on May 29, 2009 2:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That final statement was so retarded I don't know what to say
I will never forgive Bill Bavasi for being a failure and ruining the Mariners. He helped make me a cynical person by showing me at a young age that the GOB system trumps good sense.
Tillman + 2 good prospects was reasonable but trading Adam Jones was an obviously foolhardy move. He was still so young yet so advanced. He had torn up the minors and was ready to learn at the ML level.
It’s amazing to me that an enterprise that generates as much capital as the Seattle Mariners can be as ineptly run as it is. Surely ownership care enough about their investment to recognize that people like Bavasi are clowns. So much for the free market smiting inferior products.
:(
by spittle8 on May 30, 2009 12:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs













