Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Griffey brings back old mojo

If you saw 39 year old Ken Griffey Jr running from 1st to home in the 8th inning just to get a insurance run and you thought it was a highlight from 10 years ago but then you noticed he was joking with Adrian beltre and you realized it happened tonight against the Tigers you probably wernt alone. Already you can see the difference between these M's and the under achievers that were fighting each other last season. These mariners are playing the gane the way its supposed to be played. It is a game and you have fun playing games,  You respect your teamates and you dont give up and at the end of the day if you do all those things your gonna win more then lose. The reason i think this team is winning again is that last year a mariner probably would have stopped at 3rd with a 2 run lead. Ken Griffey Jr broght something to Seattle besides leadership he brought back mojo in the dugout and with mojo the Mariners can win.

Comment 254 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Imagine if we didn't sign Griffey!

I just don’t see us winning ANY games without his charm. Last year the players treated it more like a JOB than a GAME. That’s why they did poorly. Honestly, we should have kept last year’s roster and just replaced 1 guy with Griffey. CAN YOU IMAGINE?

by ermac on Apr 17, 2009 11:28 PM PDT reply actions  

A winning attitude

Let me clarify before more people misinturpet my post i am not saying it is only because of griffey. I am saying that Ken Griffey Jr was a great addition to the club and to see him hustle around those bases was awsome and he brings up the morale of his teamates. He may not have the stats of ten years ago but he still plays the game like he did ten years ago and if all the mariners follow suit they will win

by mariner1978 on Apr 17, 2009 11:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Why should I take you seriously when you can't even be bothered to spell properly?

If you want to be heard try having at least a modicum of respect for your readers.

by Graham MacAree on Apr 17, 2009 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Oof.

But yes, I thought something similar.

To the original poster: we really, really take proper spelling, punctuation and grammar seriously around here. It’s not optional.

Patriotism, Pepper, Professionalism

by esoteric on Apr 18, 2009 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Break it down!
If you saw 39 year old Ken Griffey Jr running from 1st to home in the 8th inning just to get a insurance run and you thought it was a highlight from 10 years ago but then you noticed he was joking with Adrian Beltre and you realized it happened tonight against the Tigers you probably weren’t alone.

Paraphrased “If you watched the game tonight, you weren’t alone.” Well, given that this is a Mariners fan site with reasonably high traffic, yes, it’s a reasonable assumption that you aren’t the only one watching the game.

Already you can see the difference between these M’s and the under achievers that were fighting each other last season. These Mariners are playing the game the way its supposed to be played.

Please define “how it’s supposed to be played.” Does that mean we want our bullpen to walk the whole fucking world like they have been?
It is a game and you have fun playing games,

Except MLB is a game and a job, and you take your work seriously. You know, if you don’t want to get fired.
You respect your teammates and you don’t give up and at the end of the day if you do all those things you’re gonna win more then lose.

This is what we call a “run-on sentence”
The reason I think this team is winning again is that last year a Mariner probably would have stopped at 3rd with a 2 run lead.

Winning by two would have been just as good as winning by three. Do you miss Willie? Also, what does this mean?!
Ken Griffey Jr brought something to Seattle besides leadership he brought back mojo in the dugout and with mojo the Mariners can win.

Final Thoughts:

  • Spell better. I’ve taken the liberty of fixing yours
  • NO MORE RUN-ONS GOD
  • Please be more coherent
  • The three above are not merely requests
  • This team isn’t better because Ken Griffey still tries hard. This team is better because they don’t suck like last year.

by seattlebruin on Apr 18, 2009 2:36 AM PDT reply actions  

I second everything SB wrote, but don't let all this scare you away, Mariner1978

Just take a look at the LL Style Guide that pdb wrote (this, and many other valuable resources, are in the “References” section on the LL home page’s left side). Usually, it’s best to lurk for a while and then start commenting (here’s the guidelines for that) for a while before you start putting up FanPosts. My first few comments on USSM (where I commented before joining LL) were either deleted or ripped to shreds, so don’t worry. Just take it slow and get a feel for this place.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 2:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly. There's a whole load of difference between making one or two

accidental typos and a barely legible post filled chock full of them, with clearly no attempt at using proper grammar and spelling. This fanpost is the latter. Nobody on LL gives people grief for the former.

by redwolf75 on Apr 18, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well done.

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 19, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually it's made it about a million times better

If you don’t enforce the rules it gets out of control, as evidenced by a few other Mariners blogs which are terrible.

by OlSalty on Apr 18, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

For example, those illiterate fucks over on USSM.

Troglodytes can barely string a sentence together!

Patriotism, Pepper, Professionalism

by esoteric on Apr 18, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really don't want to start a new subthread but this needs to be said.

I am not J/M/G but I imagine that they’re moderators on LL to write about baseball. To have a community that self polices itself allows them to focus on just that. Every time we have a intervention like this we are adding responsibilities to their job that they didn’t necessarily sign up for. It’s not just because I get "favored" treatment here but I don’t give a shit about how well or fair they are at moderating because I am not here for their moderating skills, I am here for to listen to them talk about baseball because few people do it better.
If having the community self moderate itself allows them to focus more on the baseball content then I am more than ok with taking the possible downsides that come with it. It’s easy for us to complain about how they run this site but we comparatively but we put in 20% percent of the effort that they do. We post but at the same time we expect them to write content, moderate, be a fan and post at a higher level than the rest of us all in the same period of time.

Jeff, Matthew and Graham all lead very busy lives outside of LL and yet they still manage to put in a 40 hours a week here that they may not really have time for. Every time somebody complains about how shitty the LL community has gotten, they should think about how they are affecting the mods experience because those are really the only inviduals that should count here. Without them there is no LL.

One last thing, It’s complete bullshit when people say that LL isn’t very welcoming to newcomers. We aren’t welcoming to newcomers when it is clear that they are not going to have a positive contribution in their stay here which is very apparent rather quickly. But just this week, my roommate was nervous about going to opening day with J/M/G because he has roughly just 100 comments. By the end of the day, he couldn’t stop saying how he never had more fun with people at a game and that the mods could not have been more welcoming or friendly towards him. People don’t just get preferential treatment on LL because they know the right people, they get their status by contributing more than the majority here.

In conclusion people here need to stop freaking out about every injustice at LL because if they don’t stop it, one day there will be no LL to freak out about.*

*This may not be very coherent but that’s because you guys pick shitty, drug influenced times to blow up at.

by Robert on Apr 19, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions   5 recs

Where did I say there was any injustice done?

I didn’t. I’ve fallen in love with Lookout Landing, and that love manifests itself through the care and thought I put into imagining what kind of community it should be. That’s what the point of the LL QC thread was, even though I hadn’t joined when you guys did that, and that was probably the most enlightening FanPost I’ve ever read.

And you’re the one freaking out Robert, not me or SeattleBruin. I never once suggested that the LL community should stop self policing (Corco did, but I think him and J/M/G had good discussion and worked all that out). I never once suggested that we should loosen commenting standards or go easy on people who violate them. My entire beef was, essentially, that no one played good cop and reiterated the commenting guidelines for the guy and gave him a word of encouragement. The bad cops who rip guys like Mariner1978 apart (like SeattleBruin did) are absolutely indispensable – and the majority of people who respond to someone like Mariner1978 should wail on him.

And yes, of course J/M/G are a blast to go to a game with – the problem is that the internet cannot convey that because, without tone, voice, facial expressions, or body language to guide us, there’s an emotional wall thrown up between all of us on LL (although meeting face to face alleviates this a great deal, but first time posters don’t have that opportunity).

I’m not trying to pick a fight or put you down, because you’re obviously one the greatest LL commenters and you’ve put more into this site than all but a few people (and I enjoy reading what you have to say), but try to put yourself in a new LL member’s shoes more often. That experience has, understandably, faded for you, but it’s still a recent memory for me, which is probably why I take such a special interest in it now that I feel comfortable here.

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think your missing the point.

the point is that LL is not here to please people.I highly doubt that Jeff would lower the site’s standards because he wants more traffic. If anything I bet that the powers that be don’t want the site to get too popular.

I think a lot of people here want to have it both ways and my feeling is that LL can’t be what it is at it’s best and still let blatantly stupid posters have a bunch of leeway. Why should LL waste it’s bandwidth giving some idiot an audience when this person refuses to adhere to the most basic of site rules, and then puts no content in their diary? I feel seattlebruin’s response was not only entirely appropriate but that he also held back from being as brutal on this person as he could have been. Furthermore I think the response to this person has been incredibly restrained compared to what it would have been six months ago (i. e. overrun with a bunch of obnoxious gifs, and everyone doing their worst Graham impression). The site’s not for everybody, particularly those who don’t have a thick skin.

by JI on Apr 19, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe I'm being misunderstood.

I praised SB’s post to high heaven – I thought it helped Mariner1978 more than anything else could have. All I think is necessary is one kindly link to reiterate the comment thread rules before we being flaming away. And I agree, the response to this guy was remarkably restrained. I had no problem with “meanness” in anything that was said. I think any facepalms or gif attacks or whatever are golden as long as you do that one thing before you begin.

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

The funny things once enough people post a link to whatever guide

even that will be seen as a form of meanness after a while because someone will eventually go overboard. You given them when you sign up, and failing that, their’s the site’s entire body of work at their disposal.

by JI on Apr 19, 2009 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, the linking becomes a type of meanness as well

But it’s because the post is usually “Ugh, read this.” I’m all for self policing but as Decatur said, nobody really steps up to play good cop. During a recent gamethread where we had zero mods on hand, I was mentioning to offenders that they should make an effort to capitalize because if they don’t then people will get fed up and start treating them like shit.

As we found out last night, the commenting guidelines aren’t made very clear to people when they first sign up, and don’t even require any acknowledgment on the part of the new user. And I think it’s more likely that they are missing it completely as opposed to openly ignoring it. It seems most new users restrict themselves to gamethreads because they are here for the same reason as all the rest of us, which is to enjoy the Mariners games with passionate Mariners fans. But if a new user is in there seeing all the ridiculous, all-caps-lock grammar and spelling errors common to a game thread, I imagine it can be confusing when somebody goes out of their way to point out that they didn’t capitalize or use a period.

I agree very much with Robert about self-policing, especially after having a night to give it more thought. J/M/G put a lot into this site just with content and anything more than that is asking them to put in even more time, and not the fun kind. But given that all of us only have the public forum with which to condemn the out-of-line, it does no good to spawn large subthreads with everybody jumping at this person and nobody to play “good cop.” May be time for another QC thread where we all brainstorm a bit (assuming that this thread hasn’t become the new QC).

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Also:
you’re gonna win more then lose.

means that you will first win more (as has happened thus far in the season) then lose later. Thanks for cursing the team.

by Vatinius on Apr 18, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

actually, i agree

there are a few things griffey brings –
1) more people and enthusiastic fans → helps the team’s morale
2) he’s got a pretty decent obp (.412 as of today)
3) he’s always smiling and affecting people in a good way
4) ichiro doesn’t have all the pressure on him to be the leader any more

i know for those in love with statistics the human factor is hard to admit.
being a good team mate and making those around you better adds to the team – even in baseball.
the human factor exists and griffey is definitely a very good influence.

plus you’ve got to admit playing with a living legend like griffey has a lot of the younger players excited – the article on jaukabauskas talked about how he loved having his locker 10 feet away from griffey’s locker.

"In baseball, even the best hitters fail seven of ten times, and of those seven failures there are different reasons why. Some are personal failures, others are losses to the pitcher. You just get beat. In those personal failures, I felt I could have done better." Source: Baseball Digest (November 2002 Issue)

by switch11 on Apr 18, 2009 12:31 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I'm just speaking for myself here, but I think it might be preferable to let the mods deal with somewhat minor violations such as this.

I don’t agree with what the poster said at all, but he clearly put time and effort into his comments. I love LL’s standards but they are different than most other places and unless someone has been asked repeatedly, it seems a little petty to jump on someone early on.

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think this is a perfect example of the reason

a lot of people run away from the site instantly, when they should at least at first maybe just be shown the way. Rec’d and seconded.

by Zwakamatsu on Apr 18, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wasn't trying to scare anyone away

just noting a commonality with a slight edge of snootiness. I’ll try to cut back on the latter.

I'm more like I am now than I've ever been.

by ralphie81 on Apr 18, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

A few things:

I’m not “in love with statistics,” I simply recognize that statistical analysis, when done correctly, can tell us a lot of tremendously valuable things about what it takes to build a successful team, what a player’s contributions are worth in terms of win-loss record and payroll, etc.

There seems to be this belief amongst those who are dismissive or not entirely sold on statistical analysis that those of us who are tend to be blinded by the numbers to the exclusion of all else. This is probably true to a certain extent, but this line of thinking ignores a pretty important fact; at some point, someone really really smart and really really good at what they do has made an attempt to quantify pretty much everything that could possibly contribute to success on the field.

In some cases (and defensive analysis is an excellent example of this) it has proven difficult to nail down a definitive answer but is apparent that it has a tremendous impact on the game. In other cases (and it probably wouldn’t be unfair to say most other cases) there just wasn’t much to it.

I think it’s great that Griffey has (as of yet) taken to his role, that the clubhouse seems to be a much happier place and that he has produced quite well so far. But to automatically assume that Griffey’s presence has lead to improved chemistry and therefore better performance is confirmation bias in the extreme. It’s much more likely that a hot start has led to less tension in the clubhouse, not vice versa.

I’m not saying that clubhouse leadership isn’t a good thing, and I’m less dismissive of the possibility that it can have a real (but still small) affect on a team’s performance under the right circumstances. And I know for a fact that this team has been a lot more fun to watch so far this year than they have been in a long time. But there are so many other factors that could have contributed to this. WHy chalk all (or even more than a little) f that up to Griffey?

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a simple answer: because everyone wants to

It’s a lovely story about a hometown hero rediscovering his roots and igniting a fire that is dormant in the innermost recesses of a team’s, a city’s, and a sport’s soul.

These kinds of stories that transcend sport are something you just try to accept. It’s rather blatantly obvious that we’re head and shoulders above where we were last year with what the public perceives as essentially the same team. Of course, they couldn’t be more wrong because this defense has made and will continue to make this team go.

But, is the media going to find this a fascinating story and easy plug:

Mets obtain JJ Putz, Sean Green and Jeremy Reed.

Indians obtain Joe Smith and Luis Valbuena.

Mariners obtain Franklin Gutierrez, Jason Vargas, Endy Chavez, Aaron Heilman Ronny Cedeno, Garrett Olsen, Mike Carp, Ezequiel Carrara and Maikel Cleto.

Or the Griffey one?

I love being as well-informed as I am about player’s impacts on winning, what they could do differently to influence winning, and what statistics are out there created for predictive purposes. But do I really think everyone’s going to feel this way? Absolutely not.

It was said in the game thread last night: this winning’s going to bring about numerous fans who weren’t around LL or statistics-based analysis previously. Most of them are going to believe Griffey is the one significant difference because that’s what the media is force-feeding, and that’s okay. I can only hope they poke around on this site, check out USSMariner, and realize what they’re being fed is a small amount of truth, and a large amount of malarkey.

by cwel87 on Apr 18, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I have a problem with people thinking Griffey is the reason this team is better

because I have a problem with ignorance, over-simplicity and ungrounded sentimentality. I’m fine with people thinking these things until they’re shown evidence that they’re incorrect, but once they choose to ignore said evidence I lose my patience.

I’m sure part of this is because I don’t feel as much of a sentimental attachment to Griffey as other people do. Still, I’d like to think that if Mike Cameron were to come back and make a similar contribution two or three years down the road I would be able to keep the analytical and emotional sides of my fandom separate.

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ignorance is something I have a serious problem with

But I’m not going to expect people who are new additions to an intelligent site like this to automatically think the way we do. It’s a process, because the rest of internet, and in many ways society, is dumbed down to absurd and insulting proportions. But, I think the people owe it to themselves to go through that process. And I think we owe it to them to let them feel their way through said process.

Is it going to annoy the living hell out of us in the meantime? Most likely. But if we get to continue the cycle of changing the way people think, from total naivety to actually using their brains and figuring out why this does that and how each affects the other, it’s going to do a lot more good in the long run for all parties involved.

by cwel87 on Apr 18, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm all for helping people through the process

but if people refuse to accept empirical data as evidence I’m not going to be especially forgiving.

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're certainly right - having Griffey around being a positive influence can't hurt

it’s just not likely to make the team any better at winning baseball games.

by seattlebruin on Apr 18, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm a little disappointed with LL here.

I read the LL QC a few weeks ago, and the biggest theme that struck me was how Lookout Landing needed to be more welcoming to new posters. Look, Mariner1978 wrote a terrible, Duckyou-esque trainwreck of a FanPost, and he deserved to get flamed for it. But this was pretty clearly one of his first visits to LL, and no one linked to the commenting guidelines or even gave him the slightest hint of kindness. Only Graham and esoteric even gave him a hint about what he was doing wrong. I seriously doubt this guy will ever want to visit Lookout Landing again, and that’s Lookout Landing’s loss. A kind word and a request for him to lurk for a few months might, for all we know, turn him into a terrific commenter and contributer. First impressions count, especially on the internet because there’s no capacity for facial expression or tone here. We all get excited watching Griffey go from first to home – this guy just felt the need to share his enthusiasm somewhere. Of course, he might turn out to be a complete imbecile, but if he is he’ll leave LL soon enough. If you guys are serious about your resolutions to make Lookout Landing a more welcoming place (especially now that you’re a part of the Yahoo sports network), you aren’t demonstrating it.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 1:35 PM PDT reply actions   8 recs

It seemed like most people were just disagreeing with his argument

I agree that there’s no reason to harp on a new poster about their grammar, let the mods do that. But there’s nothing wrong with disagreeing with someone when they make an argument that isn’t well-supported. Just because someone makes a response that is concise and direct doesn’t mean they’re being mean, it means they’re trying to make as strong of an argument as possible.

by OlSalty on Apr 18, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

LL social therapy. It's worked exceptionally well for a few months.

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 19, 2009 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

(I mean this sincerely. The guys have been awesome about working with the more "socially challenged" commenters.)

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 19, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree.

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 19, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good on you then

I still think the LL QC thread couldn’t have hurt his case

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, yeah. That's why I disagreed with JI's post.

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 20, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

This was about 5000% nicer than similar instances in the past.

Bottom line is this. If you put your opinions out there, you are opening yourself up to criticism. This sort of lazy writing is disrespectful to the people reading it, and the opinions are incorrect. If the response to this post bothered you you are entirely too sensitive. You’ve been around for about two months. You haven’t seen the kinds of things that happened at the beginning of last year, or during the off-season before Griffey signed.

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Decatur is right, AC

we (myself in particular) jumped on the post even though it was the guys first post. We probably should have politely told him that he was incorrect and to use better grammar, and then jumped on it if he did it again.

If we want to increase LL membership, we’re going to need to be a bit more understanding with first and second time posters – in hindsight, I shouldn’t have posted my critique above.

If we give everyone a chance to prove themselves before we mercilessly flame away, we’ll be a better blog for it, in my opinion. We’ve got a strong rookie commentor class already (setting the grounds for the 2009 LLemmies!) , and it would be nice if we could pick up a few more regulars as well.

by seattlebruin on Apr 18, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure I agree with any of this, honestly.

Could we be nicer? Sure. But at the same time people need to realize that we’re not just joking around here. This is an intellectual and analytical community, and if you make statements they’re going to be challenged. If people don’t like that, tough shit.

As for the grammar/spelling/capitalization thing, as I said above I’d prefer the mods take care of that exclusively (at least initially) but when you write something without capitalizing, putting enough thought into it so that it’s readable and spelling correctly, it’s obvious that you don’t have a lot of respect for the people you (ostensibly) want to read your post. I’m generally pretty patient, but this sort of stuff is a larger symptom of the dumbing-down of our society and I don’t have a lot of tolerance for it.

And lastly, I’m all for increasing the size of the community, but not at the expense of this place turning into HH or Minor League Ball or something. If people get alienated but it serves to preserve the standards that make this place better than the rest of the internet, so be it.

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not to sound like a dick

but how often do you think hit-and-run FanPosters with writing of this quality are going to turn into solid contributors?

by Aaron Campeau on Apr 18, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not often, but they will occasionally.

Especially since the commenting standards are so pitiful on most other sports sites that many thoughtful people become terribly substandard in their writing habits. Big Jared said: “Lookout Landing helped me find grammar salvation!” I doubt his first posts were as much of a trainwreck as Mariner1987’s, but still.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

LL helped my grammar posting as well

Also, if I had made a fanpost when I first joined this site, I’m sure it would have been something incredibly stupid or ignorant. The only reason I ever signed up was because I thought looking at the WE charts each day was cool. I slowly started understanding all the statistical analysis and now, although I don’t make many fanposts, most of my comments are fairly coherent and constructive.

When I started posting, I was just as stupid as this guy, I thought Ryan Franklin was a good pitcher (3.72 ERA!) Only after reading for awhile did I catch on. If we chase people like this away, how will they ever make the transition into being a more knowledgeable baseball fan. If you guys had E-slit my throat for everything I said, I’d have left here quickly too.

As Decatur said, maybe he is a complete idiot and incompetent poster, but if that’s true, we’ll find out soon enough, and he’ll be chased off once we recognize he has no potential.

Nobody is calling for Truinfel’s head because he’s not major league ready, we understand he has to develop first. (not quite apples to apples, but still…)

Formerly Mariners124M... Username was sorta bland, so I'm changin it up

by BQueezy on Apr 18, 2009 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm in complete agreement with everything here.

I just want people who do all that pointed to the comment and FanPost guidelines before we rightfully jump on them. I think there’s a lot more agreement than disagreement among us.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, your critique was brilliant.

You definitely should’ve posted it. That, honestly, is the most helpful thing that Mariner1987 could’ve gotten – even more than the FanPost and comment guidelines. Instead of random snark, it broke down, with cold, merciless logic, all the fallacies in his post. That’s valuable and useful for him.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except

The criticism was poorly executed. Honestly, Seattle Bruin did not do a good job of breaking Mariner1978 down.

In his first pulled quote, SB completely missed the point of Mariner1978’s opening. SB’s paraphrase did not represent the intent of the writer, so his mocking of the paraphrase just makes SB look silly. Obviously he wasn’t saying “If you watched the game, you weren’t alone.” (Here was the correct time to razz him for run-on sentences however. The later swipe at his run-on sentence wasn’t terribly appropriate.)

In the second block quote, Bruin mocks the writer for failing to define “how the game is supposed to be played.” But the writer clearly does… ironically enough in the very next line that SB quotes… “It’s meant to be played like a game.” A simple enough idea to comprehend: By hustling and scoring, Griffey displayed the passion and heart of someone that really likes to play this game. Mariner1978 likes watching this and thinks the team will benefit if everyone follows Griff’s example. You may not agree, but this is hardly a retarded assertation. Nor did Mariner1978 make some egregious error in not better defining his terms. It was pretty clear what he meant, even if he isn’t the best writer in the world.

And later, SB says that “winning by 2 would have been just as good as winning by 3.” I don’t understand where SB is coming from at all on this criticism. When you have a chance to take a 3 run lead, that is ALWAYS better than taking a 2 run lead. SB then finishes his complaint with “What does this mean?!” It means that scoring more runs is good, and hustling like Griffey lead to another run… so woohoo Griffey. Duh.

Then in the final thoughts, SB says spell better, be more coherent, and quit with the run-ons. Then goes on to say, “These are not merely requests” as if he’s going to either ban Mariner1978 or beat the shit out of him. And since he doesn’t have the power to follow through with either threat, he just sounds like a bastard trying to intimidate someone.

I don’t mean to be overly harsh toward SeattleBruin either. But I see a lot of these kinds of “policing” posts, and think they’re uniformly stupid. They also seem to spark huge controversies that would never come up if people would just ignore the post, or flag it so that M/G/J can respond appropriately.

by johnbai on Apr 19, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think those are valid points,

And I’m sure SB does too, which is why he later expressed reservations about posting that. I guess I saw SB’s breakdown through such rosey-tinted glasses because he at least attempted to walk Mariner1978 through his logical fallacies, which I think required a detailed breakdown to do. I guess I was trying a little too hard to make my point. After reading what Matthew’s excellent, “I’ve learned something today” entry at the bottom of this FanPost’s comments, I think we’ve all found the right equilibrium about all this.

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's true, I'm still pretty new.

And I haven’t seen the depths to which bad FanPosts and comments can drag LL. I’ve deservedly been flamed here before, like when I was talking about the Driveline Mechanics stuff while in Graham’s house, and I’m the better for it. But nothing in the response bothered me except that people didn’t point this guy towards the FanPost and commenting guidelines. The tiny print on the side bars is the last part of the page a new visitor will explose. I think it’s perfectly acceptable to flame the guy (and my Lord, every clause in this FanPost was a disaster!), but we need to say “Um, welcome! Take a look at these guidelines!” Then flame away – like pdb did in the first comment on the classic “Pike Street stench lingers all the way to Oregon” thread.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can't blame him for not sticking around though

He did make a comment early on and it had proper punctuation and grammar (for the most part). But with Graham saying what he did, why should the guy stick around and deal with that?

Like if I walk into a bar I’d never been before and sit at the bar and order a beer. When I make my order, though, I mumble and speak like I was in a gang. Upon hearing this, the bartender says, “Why would you even talk like that? If you’re not going to show enough respect to talk like a normal person then you can just get out of here.” And then after that a bunch of the bar’s regulars start saying the same to me. I wouldn’t stay and put up with that, I’d get out and find a different bar. While I’m on my way out, somebody mentions that posted on the far back wall of the bar is a little sign that says “No mumbling or ghetto slang allowed” and that I should have read that before I bothered saying a word.

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 18, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sigh.

I’m not trying to be combative at all, but Toots has a point.

You say the site has the expectations listed, but preferred members get away with it every day. It’s probably confusing to some people.

Again, not trying to cause controversy – just saying the lines aren’t equal.

Let’s say a bar calls someone on being an ass (I freely recognize the warnings I’ve gotten here) – a decent person would listen to what was said to them and comply (Which I have always done). Anyone who doesn’t do this deserves to be booted. No “bar” wanting money (or donations) would kick someone out if they recognized their flaw and changed. Whether the “bar” lists it’s exceptions or not, no one is flawless, and why in the hell am I even writing this, because I’m the guy that has so many friends here while the mods dislike me. Oh hell, do your thing.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 18, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what your point is but it's worth mentioning that "preferred members" are preferred for a reason

and it’s not because we like them as people. It’s because they earned their status. Everybody isn’t the same, nor should they be.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 18, 2009 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know it's tough to mod a site like this -

On my own site I’ve got SABRMatt thinking he’s the goddamned face of the site, trashing people’s opinions left and right. What do I do? I’m not going to willy-nilly ban the guy – for whatever reason, some people like his analysis – but I try to be fair and not set a double standard with our MVPs. Hell, I made a comment that JFromSeattle opposed. I recognized that this dude is so valuable to my site, I had to check myself. I’m not saying I’m valuable to LL – probably not. But I’ve made a great amount of good friends here, and it seems like it’s turned into a fraternity wherein outsiders are treated like shit.

Sorry.

Ban me if you like, but I loved when I could read good baseball insight without the classicism.

I enjoy this site. I like Jeff’s insight on the Ms. But if the “you’re okay if you’re in our small group of friends” atmosphere continues, I implore you to either cancel all memberships outside of yourselves, or look within and follow the guidelines you’ve set forth with even your favorite posters.

If I do get banned (and I hope not)

I love hanging out and/or talking to :

Sec108
Kermit
Toots
Royalcurve
Acblue
pdb
Seattlebruin
johnbai
thewyrm
FnX
msb
And many others. I’m not trying to be a bitch. Point is, I get along with a good amount of regulars here. Why not try to give others a pass and let them do their thing, too? Perhaps they get a private warning instead of a public flogging?

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 18, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You've got us all wrong

The atmosphere isn’t “you’re okay if you’re in our small group of friends.” It’s “you’re okay if you’re not annoying and if you contribute something of value to the community.” If people don’t meet our standards, then we don’t have any interest in letting them do their thing. Not here.

We don’t try to please everybody because we’re not going to please everybody.

It would also help if people would stop being so damn sensitive. Now I’d like to never discuss this subject ever again.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 18, 2009 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jesus Christ. Deal. We have a deal.

My skin is thick, but I disagree that you don’t play favorites, and that’s on you. It’s okay, but in my silly mind reckless.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 18, 2009 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do play favorites

I admitted it just right up there. The favorites have earned their treatment.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 18, 2009 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry to those of you who aren't mods or dating them -

I like this site, but it feels totally biased at the moment. All I ask is that it gets back to good Mariners analysis and less bitching and preening about new posters.

Sorry to hit a nerve.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 18, 2009 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Graham is completely harmless in person. It's really cute

Seriously though, it might seem like certain people catch a lot of shit, but we give a lot more slack than you think we do, except for those certain situations where it’s clear that someone doesn’t intend to become a valuable user. If we punished or got rid of everybody who annoyed us at some point then there wouldn’t be any activity on LL because the mods would’ve banned themselves after banning everyone else. There are several people I don’t like that much on here. You might notice that they’re still posting.

I don’t know why you expect this community to be so pleasant all the time. You can’t be friends with everybody.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 18, 2009 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sigh again.

The funny thing is I like Graham in person, and I’d love for him to tell me why he dislikes me. WE ALL SHARE FRIENDS. Jesus.

You guys have fun ripping me apart – :(
Good lord.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 18, 2009 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wait what?

This subthread was about me making a tonne of typos and Jeff calling me an idiot.

The rest of this is going into an email response.

by Graham MacAree on Apr 19, 2009 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

All I have to say on this is that

moderating should be done by moderators, and not anybody else, except in particularly egregious cases. That’s the most surefire way to prevent dogpiling while still being effective.

When moderators and only moderators moderate, you can pick your battles, rather then having someone get harped on every time they open their mouth.

Folks are more likely to respect firm and selective (but consistent) enforcement then just being tackled by random people for things that may or may not be bad.

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

I agree that this is the best way to do this

And I thought that this was covered back in the QC thread, but it was never really enforced. There seems to be a sense of entitlement that certain people have around here that they must feel allows them to act as a mo. I just don’t feel that this accomplishes anything but a sense of being dogpiled on. I know it’s a lot of work on the behalf of the big 3 here, but that’s the cost of being in charge of a place like this

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 1:18 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

This is an impossible reality

Is nobody else supposed to respond to questionable posts? What if we’re not around? The community should be able to prevent itself from unnecessary dogpiling.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 19, 2009 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree. I think we're almost there, in any case.

Just a little more self-awareness and all will be well.

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 1:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think things are very bad these days

I actually think the community has been solid since the start of the season.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 19, 2009 1:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's definitely gotten better

And self-policing is certainly good to an extent, but I think that after an initial warning, all else should be handled behind closed doors, and by mods where possible. It’s not necessary to have anything more than one person request, politely, that somebody shape up.

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 1:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree about behind closed doors

I’d rather make an example of the first offence I come across rather than have to issue 100 warnings to different people.

by Graham MacAree on Apr 19, 2009 1:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's what I'm saying though

I guess my wording misled you, but I meant that the initial warning, whether from a respected regular or a mod, be done in direct reply to the offending comment. But wasting space in a thread flogging a person for not following rules just doesn’t seem to accomplish much. Again, though, just my two cents. It’s all up to you guys

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 2:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's why I said egregious cases

In situations where it’s sort of borderline, there’s a nice button that says “flag” and anybody can feel free to bring up their complaints as necessary. Those that think a subthread is going down a bad road should simply not respond.

If somebody is blatantly being an idiot, then yeah, it’s totally reasonable for other members to intervene.

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 1:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

What happens when you get flagged?

Does it page the moderators or something?

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 2:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Actually, flag this post right here.

I’m curious about what happens, as I don’t believe I’ve ever been flagged.

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 2:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Only mods can see flags

which makes it a nice way to communicate to them, should you so choose

by seattlebruin on Apr 19, 2009 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

There was a certain thread in recent memory

where pdb did a fantastic job as a fill-in mod. LL needs people like him to pick up the slack when the mods aren’t around. I don’t resent people who try to enforce G/M/J’s rules – in fact, I respect them for that.

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 19, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oops. Meant to respond to Corco.

"The dark secret of LL is that it only exists so I can one day moderate Graham" ---Robert

by .Taylor on Apr 19, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

pdb is the exception to every rule

That shouldn’t need to be stated

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm still pretty much a replacement poster,

Or at least one who hasn’t been around long enough to become a regular. And I’ve never felt unfairly treated by Jeff or Graham, and I think any sins they’ve committed are shared by the whole community (the only one that comes to mind is the whole welcoming environment). But I agree with Graham that it’s gotten much better since the LLQC, at least from my limited ramblings in the archive.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does it?

I just created a new screen-name (I’m Decatur, in case you haven’t figured it out) with a new email, and I didn’t see any guidelines pop up. Do you mean in the columns? I’m only exploring this because I have no recollection of what SBNation did when I first posted a comment.

by Neo-Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

When you agree to join the site you have to get through a rules popup

It currently says:

No politics, no religion, no chatspeak (lol, ur, brb, and so forth), no +1’s, no unwarranted hostility. Please capitalize and use comprehensible grammar. Read this and this before posting. Follow the rules and you should be fine.

Or at least it should

by Graham MacAree on Apr 18, 2009 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I had nothing pop up whatsoever.

I just posted like it was my regular old Decatur account.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ahh, I see.

I honestly blew right by that when I registered Neo-Decatur. If it’s possible, I’d recommend a warning pop up that blocks new LL members from posting any comment until they check the box next to it. (Like the “no politics” and “no TWSS” warnings I’ve gotten).

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's really the reason very few people ever got banned?

So if the Terms of Service were to magically disappear, you couldn’t ban anyone anymore?

Really?

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is it just me, or has boxing people gone way down?

I’m not sure if that was always something done as a joke to us regulars or if it was used on anybody, but maybe instituting a penalty box type of thing for people that ignore a warning from one of the 3 of you. Instead of everybody jumping their shit for something, just give them a quick boxing and a warning. If they want to hang around, they’ll learn real quick to shape up

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure you do give warnings

I just think that maybe a boxing might accomplish a bit more with the repeat offenders. I’ve noticed that a large part of complaints with new people is that they aren’t capitalizing. However, these new people participate almost exclusively in gamethreads, which are littered with caps lock cussing and emotion. I wonder if this may be confusing to some people, getting chastised for capitalization while others appear, to the uninitiated, to be completely ignoring the rule.

But, as you have said, boxing requires remembering that somebody was boxed, which is certainly a big pain in the ass

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe worth running a trial experiment at some point

Obviously y’all are in charge and it’s ultimately your decision, but I do think this could help. This place is probably intimidating as hell to new people. I got in far enough back that it wasn’t too hard to step right in and learn as you go, but it’s a vastly different beast nowadays and to expect somebody to be perfect right away is just unfair to them. New people are going to be showing up everyday, whether you like it or not. They can either be shunned away or taught how to fit in, but it almost seems like both are going on at once and I can understand how it would throw people off

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

I totally agree

All I can do is laugh when there’s dozens of

OMEOIGEL GKFUDCDKFKDS GRIF1FEY NO!!!!

and then somebody says

“ken griffey junior is good”

only to have someone say
“Please capitalize proper nouns”

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm kinda surprised that people have been trying to enforce in the GTs

But I haven’t been in them much what with being at most of the games this week.

by Graham MacAree on Apr 19, 2009 1:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

May be worth speaking to Matthew about

He was hitting it on all accounts through most of the threads this week, and got to a point where he really started coming across as pretty damn mean about it. I remember a couple points where somebody was capitalizing everything just fine but then missed an “i” and Matthew jumped right to it.

I would think that the Gamethreads would have no spelling or grammar rules if only because everybody is trying to post as soon as something happens and will not even proof read what they’re doing.

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 19, 2009 1:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just figured he was having a bad week.

Because yeah he was going through and barking at people to capitalize at least a dozen times through a couple of different game threads.

You can't hide from the omnipresent eye.

by Goose on Apr 19, 2009 1:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

I thought he was just trying to be strict about it because the season had just started

Which means there’s usually a lot more new people around, especially with the whole Yahoo thing, so he wanted to nip it in the bud before it got out of hand.

by OlSalty on Apr 19, 2009 2:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

What disturbed me about the whole thing was that many weren't necessarily new users

A lot weren’t “regulars” per se, but were people who have posted here on several occasions without any problems.

Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org

by Corco on Apr 19, 2009 2:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wrong.

Every single person that I asked to capitalize had a history of not capitalizing. The very first thing that I do when I see and uncapitalized i or player names not capitalized for instance is check the user’s comment history to see if it’s a pattern or not. If it’s not, I let it slide. If it is, I ask them to start capitalizing it because otherwise it is patently clear that they’re not going to just suddenly start on their own.

We take moderating seriously. It’s not just an excuse to exercise power and stroke our egos and I’d like people here to stop assuming that’s the case.

Furthermore, pretty much the only thing I harped on was that; blatant capitalization issues that were shown to be a history from the user. I let grammar slide, I let LLLJ slide.

by Matthew on Apr 19, 2009 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

They should be, save for extreme violations

Unfortunately I can’t keep a watchful eye over every thread to see what’s going on.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 19, 2009 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I want to apologize for opening this can of worms last night.

While I stand behind my comments, I could have taken them private with the mods much earlier.
I had a nice conversation with Graham last night, further reinforcing why I stick around. I like this site a good amount, and that’s why I voiced my concern.
Anyway, this has been an interesting discussion.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 19, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah if it is just a little blurb on the page when you're first signing up

I could see how it is being missed. I find it hard to believe that this many people would be ignoring a simple set of requests. It’s more plausible that it is being overlooked

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 18, 2009 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was about to write a needy question about the concerns I raised...

But having that pop up warning get raised whenever someone joins LL mitigates most of my concerns about jumping on people who aren’t aware of the commenting and posting guidelines. I still think you should have the courtesy to reiterate the posting/commenting guidelines before rightfully flaming away and piling on a poster like Mariner1978. But if the pop up guidelines are working properly, I will lose most (but not all) of my sympathy for new LL members who write disastrous posts.

by Decatur on Apr 18, 2009 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Given Graham and Decatur's exchange from down below,

I guess that my analogy was a bit off. I suppose that you could replace the little sign being in the back and move the little sign up to the front in a semi-obscure spot. You should see it if you knew to look for it, but most people will look right past it because they just want to come get a beer and mingle at the best bar in town

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 18, 2009 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Boy that was hard to read.

We’re so spoiled here.

I’ve bought into the notion that Griffey, amongst many other factors, has contributed to our overall success, but I’m not sure we could think of a less quantifiable term than “mojo” to describe said contribution.

by Omerta on Apr 18, 2009 6:18 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Griffey's .410 OBP might have something to do with it

and the fact that he’s actually hit the ball reasonably well when he’s made contact

by seattlebruin on Apr 18, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but he's also really selfish.

2 RBIs and 2 HRs? Wow, way to only hit yourself in Griffey.

Jose Lopez roxxorz my boxxorz.
54!

by joof on Apr 19, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is an outstanding response Omerta

This is what feels like an acceptable level of self-policing to me.

by johnbai on Apr 19, 2009 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks friend

although I must admit my intention was more of a general comment concerning the fanpost’s content than new poster education. :D

by Omerta on Apr 19, 2009 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

This seems an appropriate place as any

to post this.

When we had the LL QC I was of the opinion at the time (along with others, it appeared) that giving out additional mod powers to regulars would be a bad idea because some of those regulars don’t command the respect of the entire community as G/M/J do.

Well, I’ve flipped on that position, in part due to this thread, in part by seeing how other blogs on SBN have handled increase in traffic.

Take AN for example, they have almost a dozen people with the ability to contribute front page material (and theoretically act as mods). We have a large and growing community here…it is probably time to up the amount of moderators to lighten the burden on the three we have. This doesn’t have to be a public coronation or anything, but I think we have to view, at this point, the small few who would be alienated by a certain poster becoming a mod (or by not being named a mod themselves) as acceptable “casualties,” so to speak.

Either that, or we cease having these Jack Handy deep thought sessions whenever the community chips in to police our stellar guidlines. You can’t have it both ways.

by Omerta on Apr 19, 2009 9:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Probably will happen sooner than later.

Until then, a summation of responses to this whole thread:

-LL is not Playtime Bob’s Sing Song Hour. People need to be respectful to other people, but that in no way means that people need to tolerate ignorance or unsubstantiated opinions. To people putting forth opinions, be prepared to back them up or they are going to get flamed to a crisp. To people criticizing, attack ideas, don’t attack people.

-Continuing above, people need to develop a way thicker skin. Some people are going to be very blunt in their rebuttals of your opinions/ideas. That is not the same as being mean. Stop crying.

-I, for one, like the concept of self-moderation from the community. However, there’s never a need to dogpile on someone. If an issue comes up, do your best to instruct the user on what he or she did wrong, but if someone else has already done so, leave it be. If the user repeatedly ignores these self-policing attempts, flag and/or e-mail the mods.

-It has come to our knowledge that the guidelines for the site are not as prominet for new users as we had been led to believe. Because of that, when self-policing, do try to be courteous (at least the first time) and point people toward here.

-Are we mods completely satisfied with the way things are? No, not 100%. But it’s probably 90-95% (adherence to the above points would probably get us close to 100%), so if you’re hoping for some radical change in how the site is run, it’s not happening.

by Matthew on Apr 19, 2009 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions   5 recs

See how I'm totally not pointing out how Matthew mangled the word "prominent" here

because doing that would be pointless nitpicking and might make Matthew feel bad about himself.

by johnbai on Apr 19, 2009 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Typos are fine

Not giving a fuck about spelling and grammar aren’t. I don’t see how this is hard.

by Graham MacAree on Apr 19, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was just giving Matty a little hazing... not trying to make a point.

Don’t read too much into my ee cummings and bell hooks joke either!

by johnbai on Apr 19, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm a dick.

And thanks for the email response, Jeff.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 19, 2009 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think this sums everything we've learned perfectly.

I think a version of this should become a standard LL reference.

by Decatur on Apr 19, 2009 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very well said

I’m glad that this thread somehow ended up spawning this whole discussion, because it ended up leading to what you just posted here. Decatur is right on with saying that some version of this should become an LL reference.

I want to poop at your house - Thingray

by tootthekazoo on Apr 20, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

I suppose most folks will read this thread and consider it a bit of onanism...

…but I thought it to be pretty productive.

Patriotism, Pepper, Professionalism

by esoteric on Apr 19, 2009 9:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Me too.

I get a little (okay a lot) LLLJ at times, and I’m going to try to nip that in the bud. Point is, I like this place, and want to see it thrive.

Illegible

by kevin_ess on Apr 19, 2009 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
Everything I Know About Jesus Montero

Recent FanPosts

Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
OTDOD - Early February Edition
Agentejebaox3_small
A Statistical Analysis of Mariners' Fan Support
Small
Who will have a better season?
Claw_small
BA's Top 10 M's Prospects
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Munenori Kawasaki Predictions!!!
Small
The Longevity and Future Success of Felix Hernandez.
Small
The present vs future conundrum

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew