More on Adam Dunn
On May of 2008, we published an article here looking at whether Adam Dunn might be a good investment for the Mariners during the 2008 offseason. Yeah, remember those days? It was the first of May and we were already looking forward to the offeseason. Anyways, the negatives on Dunn boiled down to these two views:
1. His skills were old player skills and thus prone to rapid aging, making a long term contract bad news.
2. His defense is horrible.
Jeff equated Dunn's defense to:
have you ever tossed the ball around with a friend on the beach? Have you ever missed the ball and had to go get it in the ocean? You sprint after it with all your energy, but you're limited by both the wet sand and the foot or three of water, so while you never really lose sight of the ball, and while it's not in danger of drifting away, it still takes forever to get there.
Now, little to be known at the time, but the market completely crashed in the offseason and Dunn, despite our fears of getting between a 5Y/$75M and 6Y/$90M contract, ended up at two years and just $20 million. That short of contract effectively eliminated concerns about his decline phase. He was just 29 this year so a contract running his age 29 and 30 seasons seems like pure gold. It's like getting the first two years of the Richie Sexson contract. That would be awesome. Well done, Nationals.
On the second point however... Keep in mind that this is not an isolated incident. Adam Dunn's defense has been atrociously bad for years and the fact that it's horrible is as unanimously agreed-upon as you'll find a defensive statement in baseball. His UZRs the four years prior to 2009; -19, -15, -19, -28. That's bad. But you know what they say, if you're ugly, just find an uglier person to be your friend and you'll look more attractive in comparison. So Adam Dunn went out and had 2009, a season in which he rotated through 1B (67 games), LF (62 games) and RF(22 games). Combined from the three, Adam Dunn tallied a -36.4 UZR.
-36.4.
Adam Dunn was the 20th best hitter in baseball this year according to StatCorner's park-adjusted wOBA. FanGraphs equals pretty closely on his hitting value. He had a career year in batting average and nearly one in OBP and OPS as well. Because of his defense and position, he netted 1.1 WAR. Endy Chavez played 54 games in the outfield, had a sub-.700 OPS and managed 0.9 WAR.
-36.4 UZR. Unfathomable.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think both
If this website cannot create a good pun-themed award involving the names Hawpe and Dunn, then I’ll resign my post.
The DunnHawpe treadless tire award?
Sorta sounds like Dunlop, work with me here.
by OlSalty on Oct 26, 2009 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was thinking more along the lines of
The “Bad Hawpe” Award, but witty and with Dunn worked in.
Dunn Took A Bad Hawpe Award?
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Oct 27, 2009 4:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Jesus, it looks like you're trying to write in dialects
The most abhorrent of all literary devices.
by Robert Lintott on Oct 27, 2009 5:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Hay thar! I Dunn laik yer tone, boy.
Thas’ mah heritage yer talkin’ ’bout.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Oct 27, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions
And we got Langerhans for nothing from them
Who while playing in only 38 games, was worth half a win.
I almost think I could play a corner outfield position for a major league team this April and put up a better UZR number than that.
FUCK THE ANGELS! FUCK THE ANGELS! FUCK THE ANGELS!
The Nats won't be too bad off with Dunn at 1B
If the Nats play Dunn at 1B next season it won’t be the end of the world. Dunn is a career ‘-16.0’ UZR/150 first baseman and put up a ‘-18.7’ UZR/150 this season after moving to the position full time following the Nick Johnson trade at the end of July. Given his reasonable salary next year he should be worth his contract if he can keep his defense in the ‘-16 to -20’ range and keep his wOBA in the .380 to .390 range.
I just don’t think the Nats can afford to trade Dunn. I lurk on the Nats’ SB blog some and most of the people there sound like they’d take it as a sign of a salary dump. They’d need to get something pretty shiny in return.
And, yes, I am too stupid to figure out how to make a minus sign without quotes. Help?
The awesome thing is that Dunn would be a 3-4 WAR player as a DH
Why the fuck did the Nationals sign him?
Big Bat!
I was at Shea for the Felix-Slam!
Personal M's record: 5-4.
by EnglishMariner on Oct 27, 2009 4:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Would he?
Remove the defense, subtract runs for position, replacement level, carry the four… uh…
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Oct 27, 2009 4:19 AM PDT up reply actions
He definitely needs to be a DH
I dont think he’d be 3-4 WAR after positional adjustments for DHing, but its a heck of a lot better than what he is doing in the outfield with -36 UZR
A lot closer to 3, depending on playing time
by Jeff Sullivan on Oct 27, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, you're right
He’s been about 35 park adjusted lwts the past 3 years. The DH penalty is -17.5, so with some regression, you get him a little over 3 WAR. I think he’ll get a nice payday after next year.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 27, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Dunn and Hawpe
I sure wouldnt mind having either of those guys DH’ing for the M’s though and neither of their respective teams have much need for either of them…
by eastcoastmariner on Oct 27, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions
Adam Dunn gave me my greatest baseball game to date, so he'll always have a soft spot in my heart.
I was at GABP for his two-out walk-off grand slam against the Indians in 2006… what an insane game.

by 











