Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Griffey Post

Let's do this.

Ken Griffey Jr. is a good player.

  • Demonstrably untrue. According to Fangraphs' data, since 2002, Griffey has averaged 0.75 WAR per season, and since 2006 has been a replacement-level player. Whatever pluses he's had at the plate have been completely and utterly undone by his ineptitude in the field. Ken Griffey Jr., as of the present day, is an absolutely awful all-around Major League baseball player.

Ken Griffey Jr. is a good hitter.

  • Now you're doing a little better, but still, not really. Using Fangraphs again, you're looking at an average of +10 runs/season since 2002 and +6 runs/season since 2006. He's been all right, but he turned 39 in November, and is coming off arguably the worst offensive season of his 20 year career. Griffey, at this point, could be somewhere around average, and maybe even a little better, yet no matter how you slice it, he's no star, and he's not particularly close.

Ken Griffey Jr. would be best put to use as part of a platoon.

  • Almost certainly yes. While the guy could hit southpaws at his peak, over the past five years (in hitter-friendly environments) he's hit .291/.380/.536 against righties and .227/.304/.428 against lefties. With his abilities eroding, it's gotten to the point at which, when facing a lefty, Griffey turns into a pretty easy out. There's no reason for anyone to promise him a full-time role.

Ken Griffey Jr.'s 2008 season was destroyed by a knee injury.

  • It's possible, of course - there's no way for us to prove anything either way - but it's worth pointing out that Griffey hit just .248/.342/.416 in April, before he got hurt, and .249/.356/.427 the rest of the way with a comparable home run rate. There's no evidence that the bad knee was responsible for his bad season aside from the agent claiming it was, and what else would an agent say? Besides, injuries aren't much of an excuse anyway, since injuries are an unavoidable part of the picture once a player gets to be Griffey's age. Even if a bad knee was to blame for his weak numbers last year, you can't just look around that, because the fact of the matter is that his body is far more likely to break down than most anybody else's. He's not exactly the most durable guy in the world. Injuries have to be considered, not ignored.

Ken Griffey Jr. would be rejuvenated by a return to Seattle.

  • Griffey hit .260/.347/.405 after getting traded from a shitty team to a playoff contender. To claim that a return to Seattle would cause him to elevate his game would imply a whole lot of unfalsifiable things, not the least of which being that Seattle is somehow more worthy of his top performance than Cincinnati or Chicago. Coming back to a bunch of standing ovations would probably make Griffey feel good, but there's a lot more to hitting a baseball than being in your happy place. I'm not buying it.

Ken Griffey Jr. would be a big draw.

  • Griffey brought nearly 140,000 people out to Safeco for a three-game series in 2007. Humans tend to suck when it comes to getting over lost love, and I don't think there's any questioning the assertion that signing Griffey would cause a jump in attendance. Probably not so much in the middle months, but for the first and last few weeks of the season, you'd probably see the stadium pretty full. Just because Griffey didn't mean that much to me as a kid isn't to say that he didn't mean the world to most of the city, and you better believe they'd want to come out and support their old hero. Griffey, if nothing else, would stir a little enthusiasm among the parts of the fan base who haven't been impressed by Zduriencik's franchise navigation.

Nostalgia is good.

  • I guess this one pretty much depends on what you think it means to be a fan. Some people want to win, and other people just want to feel happy and entertained, no matter the reasons why. Neither one is better than the other. The former group would presumably be less than enthused by a Griffey acquisition. The latter group, meanwhile, would wet its collective trousers.

Ken Griffey Jr. would be cheap to bring in.

  • With the vastly superior Burrell signing for $16m/2yr and the even more vastly superior Bradley for $30m/3yr, I can't imagine that Griffey's going to get much of anything. At the end of the day he'd probably be willing to settle for a few million dollars to ride off into the sunset, money that we have available to spend. Probably the most difficult thing would be trying to figure out how to deal with him in the event that he totally sucks, since the Mariners wouldn't exactly be able to bench Ken Griffey Jr. 

Ken Griffey Jr. would take up playing time that would otherwise go to a young player who could be part of the future.

  • This much is true - if he DH'd, he'd take some time away from Jeff Clement, and if for some unholy reason he were to play LF, he'd take some time away from Wlad Balentien. But with the Mariners in the market for a bat, it seems like one of these things is going to happen anyway, so the issue isn't unique to Griffey. Griffey, Abreu, Dunn, somebody else, it doesn't matter who - if the Mariners bring in another bat, he's going to take playing time away from somebody else. It's on them to deal with the consequences.

We might as well just sign Griffey since we're not going to go anywhere this year.

  • The Mariners, as currently constructed, are pretty close to being a .500 true talent ballclub, with upside at an awful lot of positions. The A's, Angels, and Rangers are all decent to good teams, but not one of them stands out as being very strong, and the opportunity exists for the M's to contend, especially if they add another multiwin bat. Bringing in Griffey neither improves the team nor grants development time to players who may help in the future. When that's the case for a team in our position, you're dealing with a move that isn't worth making.

-----

I'm out of ideas so, Overall

  • I understand why so many people want to see Griffey retire in a Mariner uniform. I really do. When I watch the Ottawa Senators, I can't even imagine how awful it would feel to see Daniel Alfredsson retire anywhere else, and while Alfredsson never stabbed his city in the back by demanding a trade, handcuffing the organization, and talking about death threats, the impact he's had on Ottawa is comparable to the impact Griffey had on Seattle, and that means something. To a lot of people, Griffey should retire a Mariner because he has to retire a Mariner, and there's no other choice. It's just the way the story's written.

    But at the same time, I just can't get on board, because what this team needs is to look forward, not backward. This team should be focused on putting a successful product on the field, because that's more important for the franchise than short-term entertainment value, and Griffey just doesn't represent any part of the bigger picture. He certainly can't help us down the road, and even in 2009, he wouldn't represent an asset. At his age, with his track record, you're talking about an absolute max of maybe 1.5 WAR, with all kinds of room for collapse. Marcel projects him to be a 0.2 WAR DH, and PECOTA projected something in the neighborhood of 0.8 WAR for 2009 before he even had his lousy 2008. Statistically, the odds just aren't good that Griffey would be able to help us. Even if you were to platoon him very carefully and moderate his exposure against tough opponents, you're talking about an incredibly limited impact, and a performance that you could approximate, if not exceed by bringing in a AAAA lefty slugger (or simply sticking with Clement). It's just not worth it.

    There is no convincing statistical case to be made that Ken Griffey Jr. would be of significant service to a 2009 Mariners squad that's closer to contention than many ever thought possible. As such, all of these sorts of arguments are coming from other places - sentimental places - and while I respect what those people are going for, this organization can't get caught up in that kind of stuff. It's not about collecting old heroes. It's about building a winner and bringing us new ones. As painful as it may be for some people to swallow, it would be in everyone's best interests for Seattle to remember Griffey not for what he is, but for what he was. Short of a late-summer acquisition by a Mariner team going nowhere, this is a retirement story that I feel is better left untold.

4 recs  |  Comment 94 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

yes yes yes a thousand times yes

because what this team needs is to look forward, not backward

The minute that starts happening I will know that the Zduriencik revolution has been completed. And I cannot WAIT for that day. Nostalgia is a waste of time.

Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.

by pdb on Jan 6, 2009 9:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Know what would make people stop pining for Griffey?

Winning.
And doing so with a successful DH or LFer, so there’s no place for ol’ Grif.
I have confidence Z can take care of this.

by katal on Jan 6, 2009 10:01 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm...
Nostalgia is good.

    * I guess this one pretty much depends on what you think it means to be a fan. Some people want to win, and other people just want to feel happy and entertained, no matter the reasons why. Neither one is better than the other. The former group would presumably be less than enthused by a Griffey acquisition. The latter group, meanwhile, would wet its collective trousers.

Actually, I think I have one foot completely in both camps. My intense fandom of baseball completely coincides with Griffey’s pro career w/the M’s (actually maybe a little bit before then — 1986). While he was only about my 3rd favorite player during those days (Buhner, RJ…) he still meant a metric f-ton to me. I’ll admit to being in tears seeing him last year finally coming back to Seattle.

I do agree that he won’t help this team, and could possibly do more harm than good.

Still:

Griffey at the Kingdome

The parallels to the Kingdome, too, are there. I absolutely had some of my best sports memories ever there — being Mascot of the Week (and getting to meet Pete Gross in the press box, tour the locker room, have my photo on the big screen, and greeting Dr. Dan Dornink, Largent and Zorn on the sidelines during the pre-game), seeing the Sonics and the M’s there too. I bawled when it was imploded, and still to this day can’t watch that footage without shedding a tear. Still, I’d been to Safeco. I knew how incredibly good it was to have the new stadium. I knew the future would be good for baseball in Seattle, and that had they not moved out of the Kingdome, then new memories at Safeco would not be able to be created. Likewise — moving past Griffey gives us a better future, both immediately and long-term.

Nostalgia plays a HUGE part of my fandom, though. Count me on the list of people who’d like to see a post-waiver deadline acquisition for Cibney Bello or some such irrelevant minor leaguer in August if and when the M’s are waaaaaay out of it. Give him a victory lap at the end of the year. I fully expect him to be DL’d anyway, so…

This signature space for rent.

by PositivePaul on Jan 6, 2009 10:41 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I'm very nostalgic about the Ms from the 80s and 90s

and that is exactly why I don’t want them to sign Griffey. The first time he was here, he was the best player in the game for a decade. He had the sweetest swing I’ve ever seen, he was amazing in center field and he made unbelievable catches almost every day.

But now he’s a shell of his former glory. I would rather not see him come back and struggle out one last mediocre year in a Mariner uniform.

by Vatinius on Jan 6, 2009 10:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

We got Griffey’s awesome years, and we never had to watch him suck. I treasure that. When I think of Griffey in a Mariners uniform, I think of the good version. I think of the SI cover with YANKEE KILLER in block letters. I think of the Kingdome fans going insane every time he came to the plate. The last thing I want to think about is a 39-year-old lug struggling to hang on to his former glory. (That’s not a knock on his character; it’s only natural to want to prove you can still play, even if you’re wrong.)

If Griffey comes back to don the uniform, it won’t kill the awesome memories or anything, but I think it will taint — to some degree — the way I think of a player I once considered a borderline god.

by Teej on Jan 7, 2009 8:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Amen, brotha, amen.

And what if further injury or regression issues cause him to “retire” like Richie Sexson? Are people in this city really going to want to remember him that way? Granted, I don’t have the same history with him as a Mariner that a lot of other fans do, but I would think that would just plain suck to have to witness. I know it might be a huge “what if”, but the possibility is there…

by section331 on Jan 6, 2009 11:03 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Numbers aside

I can’t stand the thought of a gimp Griffey being my last memory of him in a Mariner uniform.

by BrianL on Jan 6, 2009 11:06 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

I’m going to bookmark this and link it every time I see someone suggest bringing Ken Griffey Jr. back to Seattle. Which won’t be often because I don’t read the comments from Baker’s blog or from other various morons, but it never hurts to be prepared.

I really wish the Reds never had played us so we didn’t have the opportunity to hear Griffey get emotional and voice his desire to finish his career with the M’s.

Anyway, let’s try and focus on falling in love with the “new” Griffey instead of getting nostalgic about the old one. I really wish Felix Hernandez would get even half the love Griffey receives.

by JLC on Jan 6, 2009 11:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Oh he will.

I am already infatuated with Felix. Now he just has to bring home to goods.

by Fin on Jan 7, 2009 12:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty much, yeah.

Griffey was my favorite player in the 90’s (ok, second to RJ) but I don’t really want to see him come back. He’ll suck, it’ll be stupid, and I don’t want to remember him like that.

by AtomicGarden on Jan 6, 2009 11:40 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of nostalgia...

Sorry if this is going way off topic, and I thought about posting this as a fanpost — but I think this might just be retarded.

How about a one year deal for Omar Vizquel? I’m serious. He had a down year, and he’s really old, but his BABIP was .250 (although his 2007 BABIP numbers were down as well). His LD% and other batted ball stats are similar to the last few years. Obviously we’re not looking for an offensive contribution, but with his still better-than-betancourt defense, he COULD be a 1.5-2.0 win player, unless I’m being way too optimistic. The last three seasons, he was -0.3, 2.3, and 3.6. Betancourt, on the other hand, has had WAR values of 0.0, 1.1, and 1.5 for the last three seasons. Maybe I’m not considering the injury probability for Vizquel, but his UZR is way better than Betancourt, and it’s not close.

Would he be an upgrade, as a one year stop gap (although we won’t have anyone ready to go in 2010, either)? Is it even worth it? Are there better options still out there? I’d love to unload Yuni, especially if we could get some value for him.

I also don’t know the extent of Vizquel’s injuries, or if adding a .600 OPS to our lineup overrides any defensive advantages he has. Someone educate me.

by AtomicGarden on Jan 6, 2009 11:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If we were going after a shortstop, I'd rather sign Cabrera

but with this kind of buyer’s market, I think the smart thing to do might just be hanging on to Yuni and hoping he can reclaim some of his lost value.

by Jeff on Jan 6, 2009 11:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we lose the pick we got from Philly

Not sure what the rule is about unsigned draft pick compensation. I guess if the Mariners decide not to sign Fields then the White Sox get that pick. But then I don’t know what happens if the White Sox are unable to sign THAT pick (since if we are unable to sign the compensation pick, then we lose the pick entirely).

That gives the Mariners a lot of control over the situation, though. We could theoretically sign O-Cab, and if by June (or whenever the deadline for signing Fields is) the 21st pick doesn’t look very good (might be difficult to sign, don’t want to take a lesser talent, “safe” pick) then we can just agree to terms with Fields.

by JLC on Jan 7, 2009 12:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, no

I’m not sure about the comp pick for not signing Fields, if we don’t, but you only lose your own picks for signing guys — the ones you get for other teams signing your guys aren’t in play.

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 7, 2009 8:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We would lose the second rounder

and if it is a one year deal and cabrera does well we could turn one draft pick this year into two or at least a higher pick next year

by Flamefox111 on Jan 7, 2009 8:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Link and quote

courtesy of my old friends at SoSH:

“Once a team has acquired a draft pick by losing a Type A free agent, it cannot lose said pick by signing other Type A free agents; the only picks a team may lose are the ones which it had before the free agency period began.”

http://sonsofsamhorn.net/wiki/index.php/MLB_Rules_and_Procedures

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 7, 2009 8:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, that's even better for the M's.

If the White Sox are granted the 21st pick for O-Cab signing with us, we can just sign Fields and give the Sox a second rounder. If the White Sox aren’t granted that 21st pick (since, technically, we didn’t have that pick when the free agency period began) then they get our second rounder regardless.

by JLC on Jan 7, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They wouldn't be

To repeat, “the only picks a team may lose are the ones which it had before the free agency period began.” The compensation pick for not signing Fields would not be a pick which we had before the FA period began (we don’t formally have it yet, in fact) and thus is not in play here. If we sign a Type A FA, yes, we’ll give up our second-round pick, period.

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 7, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

While I recognized that possibility in my second sentence

That doesn’t seem right. Despite Fields being quite a unique case in that the deadline to sign him is extended, in effect that makes our pick protected.

Theoretically, teams could use their first round pick on a senior in order to protect their pick of equal value in next year’s draft, if they feel that the talent is weak or if they simply desire to keep their options open.

One thing that threw me is that draft and follows were prevalent in previous years, and only recently was the deadline to Aug. 15th set. Before the ‘08 draft, teams had up until a week before next year’s draft to sign their draft picks.

That could easily lead to teams taking advantage of the compensation rules. But then I realized that the compensation for not signing a 1st rounder was different back then, too (sandwich pick instead of a pick of equal value, which is how we drafted Jones).

by JLC on Jan 7, 2009 8:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why shouldn't it seem right?

The principle is clear: everyone starts out with a set number of picks. You lose picks from that pool — and that pool only — if you sign free agents, and you get other ones if you need to be compensated for something; compensatory picks aren’t subject to be taken.

Now, is this system fair? As lots of people have pointed out, no, it isn’t (I think the NFL’s is better). But what it is is simple to execute, which seems to be what matters most to MLB.

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 8, 2009 5:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Also, the "week before the next draft" thing

only applied to draftees who didn’t go to four-year schools; for them, you had until they took their first class. It was only when kids decided to go to JCs that you had draft-and-follows.

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 8, 2009 5:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand all of the above reasoning...

…And yet some desires in sports are irrational. Despite knowing that he might not be very good…at all, I would love to see it. Nostalgia doesn’t mean anything in terms of wins and losses, but as stated that is not the point of nostalgia. Frankly, I think anyone who dismisses nostalgia for Griffey out of hand is ignoring their own inclinations regarding whatever it is that “takes them back.”

Yes, we are closer to being competitive than we were a year ago, but we’re still relying upon an awful lot to go right in order to be division contenders (Yuni returning to some semblance of form, Lopez maintaining or increasing his value, Clement beginning to hit, Wlad beginning to hit, Kenji rebounding, Guiterrez hitting with regular playing time, Miguel Batista returning to form in the bullpen, the top of the pen sorting itself out, Felix breaking out, Silva having some sort of rebound, and Morrow’s performance are all question marks).

From a “winning” perspective, would I rather have Abreu or Dunn for those DH ABs, yes…yes I would. If that’s not happening for whatever reason though, then I see no reason why we can’t let Griffey ride off into the sunset here.

Frankly, after all we’ve seen happen, I’d be surprised if we did sign him…but all I ask is that if we do end up signing Jr., that people remember what that means to (dare I say) the majority of the fanbase, and save their vitriol for if/when he actually starts stinking at the plate. After all, that one signing can’t undo all of the great things that M’s ownership and Dr. Z have done this off-season.

It certainly wouldn’t represent a philosophical swing back toward everything we used to despise about how the Mariners ran business, the reasoning for his signing have already been spelled out…it’s a special circumstance and I highly doubt we’d see another signing like that again while Dr. Z’s in charge.

by Omerta on Jan 7, 2009 1:01 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I understand that people have their own reasons for wanting Griffey back, and that's fine.

About this, though:

all I ask is that if we do end up signing Jr., that people remember what that means to (dare I say) the majority of the fanbase, and save their vitriol for if/when he actually starts stinking at the plate. After all, that one signing can’t undo all of the great things that M’s ownership and Dr. Z have done this off-season.

I’m against the Mariners signing Griffey because I think it’s a bad move for a lot of different reasons. If it happens I have every right to be critical of it and I’m sure I will. Even if he comes in and puts together a solid season and ends up being an asset, I would consider any process that leads to his being signed a bad one, and I’ve had more than enough of those.

While I don’t think it will undo all the great things that have happened this off-season, it will be the first thing Zduriencik has done that would make me question his judgment, and I rather enjoy having total faith that the new regime will make good decisions. It wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world, but it wouldn’t be smart and I want the team to do smart things. And while you’re correct that a lot of things have to go right for this team to contend next year, they shouldn’t be doing anything that hurts their chances of doing so, and signing Griffey would do just that.

With that said, if he ends up a Mariner in 2009, I’m not going to hold it against anyone that’s happy about it as long as they’re willing to admit that they’re happy about it for sentimental reasons. We’re all fans, but we all have different priorities and different ways of looking at things. Baseball is a game and it’s about having fun and if having Griffey on the team would make 2009 more fun for someone, it’s tough to argue that they shouldn’t want it. I just have every right to not want it and not be happy if it ends up happening.

by acblue on Jan 7, 2009 1:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm really excited about Zduriencik, and it's based on the programs he's been associated with.

I’ve been reading up a bit on where he’s been, and some of the people he’s bringing into his staff. I know a lot of people in the LL and USSM community are stoked on his sabremetric department. Not to take away from that or diminish it’s importance, but I’m really excited about the potential improvements in player development. He and his people have strong ties to the Braves /Twins/Dodgers organizations. Dan Evans didn’t have much of a shot as GM of the Dodgers, but he really revamped their minor league system and Zduriencik was a part of that effort.

Until this team’s minor league system is consistently producing players that can impact a team at the major league level, not just for the M’s but for their value as trade assets, I don’t think it’s going to be firing on all eight cylinders. That’s going to take a lot of time and it just makes me sick to think public opinion could go against Zduriencik before he has a chance to reap the rewards of the system he implements.

The longevity of a GM in my opinion, is strongly tied to asses in the seats. Nothing does that better than the postseason. In the short term, if Griffey does something to boost the ticket sales in a measurable fashion then I’m for it. For me the crux of the whole issue is Jeff’s comments on ticket sales. Even if it’s a total PR move, but I really want Zduriencik to have a shot to build a healthy program here and survive to reap the rewards. I’m not expecting any quick turnarounds, if it takes him five years and he’s got a healthy process then I’ll be buying season tickets. The best baseball in town has been the opposing team for so long it just makes me tired all over.

 If Griffey pulled a Vidro, then maybe they could dump him on the DL. He’s been plagued by so many injuries I don’t see how anybody could question or complain if he was pulled from the lineup and that was the excuse and everybody saves face. I really don’t expect to see Griffey back, but if Z. signs him and it quiets the drums then great.

Formerly dpseadvr.

by Kermit. on Jan 7, 2009 2:52 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I suppose it's not really fair for me to ask people to temper their emotions concerning this issue.

I agree with the majority of what you said there, and while I don’t believe Griffey offers our best chance (or even a good chance) at winning, I simply can’t ignore the irrational part of me which would love to see him in a M’s uniform.

But I can say that, as a fan. Now, if I were running the ballclub, I would be able to detach myself from that emotion, do the right thing in terms of the product on the field and move on…because that would be my first priority. That being said, we know what our front office has been about in the past, and if Griffey were to sign here, I wouldn’t judge Z so much as acknowledge that it was likely facilitated by HowChuck, as I would imagine Griffey’s perceived importance to Seattle doesn’t mean anything to Zoidberg one way or another.

by Omerta on Jan 7, 2009 3:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Repercussions.
Probably the most difficult thing would be trying to figure out how to deal with him in the event that he totally sucks, since the Mariners wouldn’t exactly be able to bench Ken Griffey Jr.

This would be my biggest fear on bringing in Griffey. Bringing him in would basically lead to roster inflexibility due to the fact Griffey becomes a sacred cow as soon as he puts on a Mariner uniform.

Scenario: Wakamatsu wants to win an upcoming home series but the opposition just happen to be sending out three lefty starters. Wakamatsu wants to maximize his team’s win potential by Griffey on the bench ready to pinch hit at least 2 out of the 3 games if not all 3. Oh, but fans aren’t happy because they paid to see Ken Griffey Jr. in the lineup. Front Office feels the pressure and starts pushing for Griffey to be in the lineup by any means necessary.

I understand what Griffey means to Seattle but no siree-bob do I want him signed. In addition, the only way this ends up being a “last harrah” or “victory lap” for him would be if he sucks. If he is miraculously able to hit 20-25 homeruns what stops him from wanting to play some more!? Remember, he’s out there to prove that he can still play. If he wants to play another year but Z decides against signing him do fans get pissed that they let him walk again? And heaven forbid if Armstrong/Lincoln decide to step in and sign him to a multi-year contract. Now our confidence is shaken in the ability of the FO to let Jack have free-reign over the team.

Signing Ken Griffey Jr. seems like it opens up a world of trouble. It’s like a free agent landmine bigger than both Jarrod Washburn and Carlos Silva put together, not necessarily in terms of roster construction but in terms of potential repercussions.

by ThundaPC on Jan 7, 2009 1:23 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

The FO would do no such thing

if Zduriencik is the kind of guy who gets complaints that he doesn’t care enough about being touchy-feely, that he’s too much about winning and not enough about organizational loyalty — which, apparently, he is — there’s no reason to worry about that.

by The Ancient Mariner on Jan 7, 2009 8:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ken Griffery Jr. is boring

It would awesomely nostalgic if he was robbing people of home runs in Center and hitting homers in bunches and whatnot, but not that he’s an old man, what’s there to want?

by spittle8 on Jan 7, 2009 2:58 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, still don't care.
I’m not going to hold it against anyone that’s happy about it as long as they’re willing to admit that they’re happy about it for sentimental reasons

Yep. That’s what it is. Oh well. I’ve tried to dislike him, but I can’t. I’ve checked his boxscore every day since he left and I’d be just as happy to see him suck it up in person. And to be honest, that doesn’t upset me in the slightest – being happy watching a guy who sucks is probably a good thing for me, because whenever (if) he does anything positive, I’ll be elated.

...and now I'm here

by Librocrat on Jan 7, 2009 3:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

If Griffey wants to retire a Mariner fine.

If we’re out of contention come September then he can convince whatever team he is on to release him so he can sign a one month contract with the Mariners. Let him DH for a few weeks, then in game 162 let him play center.

Everybody is happy.

by Goose on Jan 7, 2009 7:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

For one pitch...

…just like Edgar in 2004 on Edgar Martinez Day. He played 3B for one pitch in the 9th inning.

This signature space for rent.

by PositivePaul on Jan 7, 2009 8:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Fun fact:

Edgar, 2004-.263/.342/.385, .317 wOBA, .01 WAR
Griffey, 2008-.249/.353/.424, .335 wOBA, -.01 WAR

by acblue on Jan 7, 2009 9:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

If you only saw it once, then I would question your fanhood.

by Jo-Jo on Jan 8, 2009 10:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I've seen an embarrassingly small number of Mariners games in person.

Something like 10. And three or four of those were in San Diego.

by Teej on Jan 10, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nostalgia is overrated.

I remember watching Junior play. I remember his grace in the field and that sweet sweet swing, and of course I remember the dogpile. I wasn’t aware of the controversy surrounding his leaving until recently—I simply loved watching him.

But why, why, why, would I like to see him put on that beloved 24 and take the field now? I consider myself a hopeless romantic and that is going too far even for me. I want to keep the memories of when he was at the top of the game rather than be saddened by what I see now.

by NOLAmarinergirl on Jan 7, 2009 8:30 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sometimes I think it's easier to be a stupid fan

Because if I was, it would be easy to think that bringing back Griffey was a good idea both from a nostalgia perspective but also from a baseball one. As it is, I’m left with the part of me that still has a poster of Griffey on my wall, and the part of me that knows he’s not useful anymore.

But I’ll also be honest, he’s the single largest reason I’m a baseball fan (and a Mariners fan today). Sure, I probably would have become a Mariners fan after moving to Seattle at age 5 anyhow, but it’s a whole lot easier to forget your former team (the Red Sox – maybe I should have stayed in Boston) when there’s this guy running around the outfield seemingly catching everything and hitting home runs into the upper deck.

Watching Edgar struggle through 2004 was painful, as I’m sure it was for anyone who’d been following the team for any length of time. And I’ll admit, a part of me wanted them to sit him down, to give someone else some playing time. However, we all know that was a team going nowhere, and considering what Edgar meant to this franchise, they did right by him, and by us, by letting him finish out the year.

Griffey, obviously, has a more tumultuous past with the team, but he’s still the single largest reason the Seattle Mariners even still exist. For a period of time there in the 90s, he made our team the coolest one around: when I was in college in New York, numerous friends told me stories of asking for Griffey jerseys from their parents, or always using the Mariners in a video game, largely because of him.

A part of me is always going to love Junior: he’s still the best player I’ve ever had the chance to see play regularly, and until some team here wins a championship that 95 team will remain my favorite sports memory. I can understand how for anyone for whom that’s not true finds this all relentlessly boring and frustrating, but in the end even for us sports is about more than just rationality: otherwise, I’d have cut bait on the Mariners a long time ago.

So bring him back in August or September if nothing is happening. Maybe he’ll hit a few home runs, we can give him a standing ovation in the final game, and then we can all move on.

I'd rather know a little about a lot than a lot about a little

by Sportszilla on Jan 7, 2009 9:54 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

.

"If my uniform doesn't get dirty, I haven't done anything in the baseball game."
-Rickey

by Big Jared on Jan 7, 2009 12:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is why I ♥ Buhner
“I am being selfish, obviously, but I would love to see him come back. His bat speed isn’t what it used to be, nor is his foot speed, but I still think Junior could help the ballclub.”

Very diplomatic. Griffey MIGHT me able to help the ballclub if he stays healthy and is used properly. Of course, he could hurt the ball club more, too.

This signature space for rent.

by PositivePaul on Jan 7, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta love him.

Man do I love midgets.

by Thingray on Jan 7, 2009 5:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope Tom Tango's analysis goes something like this

Re: Griffey

Dear Tony,

Griffey is done.

-Tango

by JLC on Jan 7, 2009 5:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

George Kenneth Griffey Jr. would help the Seattle Mariner's.

The Mariner’s prodigal son returns!
  
Ken Griffey Jr. becomes the Mariner’s new gate greeter!
Before every home game, dressed in a vantage era uniform, Griffey will welcome fans, shake hands and take pictures with you and your children.
At the end of every game Griffey will stand at the home plate gate, reciting the ancient tales of The M’s Miracle Year of 19 hundred and 95.
Sign him to a million dollars a year for the rest of his natural life. Then we could bury him in center field.

Everyone would love it.

Seriously, signing him to play LF/DH would be just as ridiculous, insulting and fan friendly as making him an official greeter. At least, as a greeter, Griffey would never get booed or injured as he would if he started every game.

by mark sobba on Jan 7, 2009 6:31 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

No!

I want that to be Rizzs’ job. Think how happy he’d be to meet a whole of new buddies.

by msb on Jan 8, 2009 9:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Max_small
FootbaLL IV (Nov 21st)
Small
The Sabermetrics of Cats

Recent FanPosts

Smell-the-glove_small
OFFTOP 11/19 - The Hand of Fraud
Small
Tony Blengino interview on 710 AM ESPN Seattle's Hot Stove League
Ichirocameron_small
OTFPOTD 11/16: Recipes Edition
Small
Lookout Landing as a communtiy
Small
Royals determined to unload Callaspo...
Ichiro_small
Ackley and Triunfel on MLB TV right now
Small
Xbox LLive, Pt 3
Clemente_small
OT on a friday morning 11/6

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

1_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff