A Typo, an Uninformed Assumption, or Hope?
From Pravda:
Unless something really strange happens, like he gets traded for the third time in about a month, left-hander Garrett Olson will arrive in Arizona in a couple of weeks and compete for one of the 11 spots on the Mariners' Opening Day pitching staff.
Seem benign? Let's isolate the good part and add extra emphasis
compete for one of the 11 spots on the Mariners' Opening Day pitching staff.
I've long been saying that with a bullpen's fungible nature and value that there's little reason to hold seven of them up on the big league squad when that roster spot could go to a useful additional bench role like a dedicated lefty masher, or allow you to use a platoon at an extra position.
It gives you a five-man bench. It typically takes four spots (catcher, middle inf, corner inf, outfield) just to have replacement at each position, leaving you to force those backups to also cover such roles as pinch runner, LOOGY pinch hitter, ROOGY pinch hitter, etc. That typically means that you have to sacrifice on some of those categories in the name of flexibility. An extra man on the bench means you can specialize a little bit more and as Econ 101 will teach you, specialization will reap you benefits.
The only thing that gets in the way of this is Minor League options and we do have quite a bit of mediocrity on the roster right now that does not have options. That inhibits the creation of a perfectly fluid shuttle between Triple-A and the big leagues, but it is still workable as it stands now. Furthermore, I would expect some of that mess to be cleared away by the end of Spring Training. If Zduriencik and Wakamatsu are committed to trying and sticking with an 11-man staff this year, that would be just one more feather in their cap.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
This could mean we might not have to hear end of bullpen pitcher say,
“My control is off because I have not had a lot of work lately.”
That would be wonderful.
by Sec 108 on Jan 29, 2009 4:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
With Heilman, it seemed pretty reasonable...
…for them to whittle their way down to 12 pitchers without dropping anyone significant to waivers, so now that Heilman is gone and Olson has options, it seems plausible that they could go with an 11-man ‘pen. I don’t think Olson has a reasonable chance of making the cut, though, unless a couple of guys get hurt.
by ubelmann on Jan 29, 2009 5:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He could have a freaking beastly ST.
BOOYA! You got Slurved!
by Slurvey on Jan 29, 2009 5:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still skeptical
Unless he’s showing a new pitch or something, the Mariners ought to know how good he is right now. I’m not a big fan of using spring training for tryouts, given all of the data we already have on these guys, but obviously opinions differ on this matter.
by ubelmann on Jan 29, 2009 6:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We're not manufacturing pins, here.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
by Llewdor on Jan 29, 2009 5:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Earlier today Zoidberg was on XM,
called Heilman a great reliever pickup for the Cubs (so much for the starter thing), and said that Olsen is going to get “every opportunity to succeed”. That sounds to me like he stays with the big club for the first few cuts at least.
It's hard to convince people to let you eat them if you're an asshole. - Thingray
by Faux on Jan 29, 2009 5:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Extra catcher, perhaps
Man, I would love for them to decide on an 11-man staff.
I was just thinking about this the other day. Having a 5-man bench would make them more able to carry Johjima, Clement, and Burke (or whatever 3rd catcher) in case they want to use Clement/Johjima at DH a lot and still have a backup catcher. The bench could be Clement, Burke, Shelton, Cedeno, outfielder.
Alternatively, Z/Wakamatsu might also be daring enough to just go ahead with 2 catchers and still let the other one DH— you’re only hurt by that decision if the catcher gets hurt (or if you wish you could pinch-run for one of them).
I love the forward thinking and willingness to try new stuff they constantly show.
by edgar is good on Jan 29, 2009 5:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If a catcher gets injured having to forefit the DH for 5 innings or whatever isn't the end of the world
I see no reason to carry a third catcher exclusively for unlikely 16 inning games or injury
Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org
by I'm NOT Corco on Jan 29, 2009 5:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah an extra RP would be more valuable than a 3rd catcher
by Edgar for Pres on Jan 29, 2009 5:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say a legitimate bench bat that can't necessarily catch is better than both
Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Wyomingroutes.org & Washingtonhighways.org
by I'm NOT Corco on Jan 29, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was seriously thinking about posting this
it’s perfect though. Talk about efficiency of the new front office!
by seattlebruin on Jan 29, 2009 7:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The last time I recall a game where a team had to forfeit the DH early on...
…this happened. (I’m definitely in the “it’s not a big risk” camp.)
by ubelmann on Jan 29, 2009 6:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, if you lose the DH, big deal, you just use the rest of your bench to PH every time the pitcher's spot comes up
what are the bench guys gonna say, “I’m too tired from not playing every day, why do I get to go bat now?”
by seattlebruin on Jan 29, 2009 6:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I love how both closers pitched in that game.
Gotta love manager philosophy.
---
Juuuust a bit outside!!
http://www.rightfieldbleachers.com
by Jack Moore on Jan 29, 2009 7:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was the second game of a double-header
And the first game was also pretty much a blowout, with one starter going 3 1/3 innings and the other going 5 innings. (Of course, there are other days when this happens where Ozzie Guillen and Ron Gardenhire have no excuse, but this one was mostly excusable.)
by ubelmann on Jan 29, 2009 8:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I kinda want to see 2 catchers get hurt in a game
just like I want to see 3 QBs get hurt in an NFL game. Sure I’m a horrible person but hey, thats fun to watch.
by Edgar for Pres on Jan 29, 2009 10:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Happened to the Redskins on MNF back in 1989
All three of their active QBs got hurt in the game, and they had to play return man Brian Mitchell at QB, since he played the position as an option QB in college. Obviously, they didn’t throw the ball that much.
by Gomez on Feb 2, 2009 6:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah happens every once in a while
i think I’ve see a punter and kicker get hurt in a game so somebody else had to kick extra points or punt. I forget though. Might not have been in the pros.
by Edgar for Pres on Feb 3, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 













