Series Preview: Seattle Mariners @ Anaheim Angels
Seattle: 57-87
Angels: 88-57
GAMES
Game 1: BRANDON MORROW!!!! vs Jered Weaver
Game 2: Ryan Rowland-Smith* vs Joe Saunders*
Game 3: Ryan Feierabend* vs Jon Garland
Game 4: Felix Hernandez vs Ervin Santana
For the third straight year, Jered Weaver's tRA has regressed toward the league average and his tRA+ now rests at just 104. While his ability to throw strikes continues to improve marginally, his number of missed bats took a dive last year but has managed a slight rebound this season. However, the amount of called strikes that he's managed has fallen each year and the line drives allowed have sky rocketed up to over 20% as his groundball rate falls back to 2005 levels.
Joe Saunders has come back from a terrible 2007 year to post a reasonably solid 2008 campaign though his missed bat rate has fallen to just 6.5% and he only throws strikes 62% of the time. The problem with thinking this might be sustainable is that Saunders is posting just slightly above average tRAs in his good years, and those are largely the result of very low line drive rates, on the order of around 16% while in his two other years they've been above 23%. It's a wide variance and something tRA* would regress heavily and likely put Saunders at below average.
We called Jon Garland terrible at the beginning of the season and he's only managed to be worse this season, having his tRA rise a few points while overall offense fell in the league. Even though he's upped his groundballs to the highest mark of his recent career.
What the hell happened with Ervin Santana? I still don't know. He went from a 5.69 tRA in 2007 to a 3.40 tRA this year. He's throwing strikes at a good rate and suddenly started missing tons of bats. Guh.
Likely Starters:
C Jeff Mathis/Mike Napoli
1 Mark Teixeira^
2 Sean Rodriguez
3 Chone Figgins^/Robb Quinlan
S Brandon Wood
L Juan Rivera
C Torii Hunter
R Vladimir Guerrero
D Gary Matthews Jr.^/Garret Anderson*
With a clinch of the division, we might see the Angels mix in some other players. The Angels playing Brandon Wood at shortstop is rather hilarious.
According to BaseRuns, the Angels are the 7th best team. In the American League.
CONTEXT
Our manager, approved by our temporary General Manager, penned a lineup that had Raul Ibanez playing left field, Wladimir Balentien playing center field and Jeremy Reed playing the fiddle while he sits on the bench.
If you replaced Feierabend with Erik Bedard, this would be represent four consecutive games that I would look forward to watching with high hopes of seeing good pitching. That's astounding. Not that Feierabend is terribly awful or boring, but he just kind of doesn't belong with the other three.
Combined, the four starters in this series for our side make about $1.3 million this year. That is:
-less than twice what we voluntarily paid to Miguel Cairo.
-about three times what the Mariners paid Horacio Ramirez to not pitch for them this season.
-less than three times what the Mariners paid Jose Guillen to kill an option that never would have been exercised.
THIS SERIES BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Hercules Double IPA
Great Divide Brewing Company. Denver, CO
A creamy, lightly citrusy, somewhat malty strong IPA from one of the better brewers in the country (best known for the Yeti Imperial Stout).
83 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re Santana
I’m pretty sure his FB comes in a couple miles an hour faster this year than last. Which is a huge and difficult to explain improvement.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 12:14 PM PDT reply actions
Just checked it out on Fangraphs and yes,
his FB averaged 93 and change his first couple of years in the bigs, fell to 92 in 07, and is somehow at 94.4 now that he’s almost 27.
Also, he’s abandoned his curve in favor of the slider.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
His curve was never all that good
but his slider is devastating when he locates it. His strike% is all the way up to 65.7 from last year’s disastrous 61.4. It’s almost as if something clicked on in his head.
If I had to guess, game prep would be a possibility. Jeff always warns us that one-year splits don’t mean that much, but Santana has a track record of pitching much better at night than he does in day games (still a SSS, ~35 starts total), going from ERAs of (yes, I know, but B-R doesn’t list FIP or xFIP in the splits) 8.01, 4.30 and 6.80 in 05, 06, 07 to 3.66, 4.27, 5.31 at night to 4.65/2.92 this year.
by seattlebruin on Sep 11, 2008 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Career
Day: 5.52
Night: 3.95
Day: 4.48
Night: 4.19
Insignificant.
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Uh
The first was ERA and the second was FIP. I’m amazing!
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't see how game prep would give him so much extra gas.
And I’d look to his increased velo much sooner than game-time splits.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Uh...Santana's not even 26 yet.
Nevermind 27. As for the huge change, he and Joe Saunders spent alot of time working on armslots this winter, and he’s more or less abandoned his curveball for the slider.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
My bad, he's almost 26
I read his birthday as 1/12 instead of 12/12… In any case, he’s at an age where velocities start to drop, not rise by 2.2 mph. That, I think is unheard of, unless he goes from a two seamer to a four.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I take it that Brandon Morrow's rise from a 94.8 to a 96.2
is equally impossible?
~Till the Halo burns out...
Add Bedard's salary and that entire 5-man rotation is less than just Washurn, Batista, or Silva
Would probably be one of the best runs/$ rotations in the league
Oakland As?
They don’t have Felix/Bedard, but Feier and RRS both have terrible tRAs and Morrow is kind of an unknown at this point.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Sure, but it's about dollars/runs right?
and theirs is cheaper.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Feier/RRS tRAs aren't that bad
esp. Hyphen. I don’t know that I’d project Greg Smith/Dana Eveland/??? for fewer expected runs than RRS/Feierabend/Morrow.
I’m pretty sure I know which of those I’d take, and guess what? They both cost the same!
I’m terrified the M’s will screw this up somehow coughgarlandcough.
RRS rotation tRA is pretty awful
but it’s a small sample, and I’m more inclined to trust his stuff than his results so far.
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Whatever; I'm with you. I like what I've seen.
And damn it, we’ve earned the right to cling to bright spots, even if they’re not supported by tons and tons of evidence.
Matthew,
Why are you linking the players to THT still? Shouldn’t you be pimping StatCorner?
I live in georegia but i dont see rusia no where not even sound but they says theres tanks should i be worrie-Yahoo Answers
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Sep 11, 2008 12:24 PM PDT reply actions
Make this happen
StatCorner is sexier than FanGraphs already and way sexier than B-R could ever be
by seattlebruin on Sep 11, 2008 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Which do you want me working on?
A) Minor league data
B) Leaderboards
C) Other essential stuff
D) Building a tool that takes players names and adds StatCorner links to them that pretty much only myself would use for these posts of which there’s about 5 left to do in the season.
Please tell me you did this on purpose.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions
B+D.
We’ll tell you when you’re older.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
According to the standings
The Angels are the best team in the American League.
Choose your stat.
http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.
You would honestly rather lead the league in base runs than.... win the league?
Really?
Give me the pythag-fluke pennant every time.
It isn't about either/or
It’s a simple statement of fact that the Angels’ record is vastly misleading.
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions
by "like that" I kinda meant with a pennant.
There’s misled, and then there’s misled.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
The Mariners' first WS victory is going to be shamefully undeserved
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions
And I will celebrate accordingly
by moping in the corner and decrying the injustice of it all.
Or maybe I’ll just go on a five-day bender. Either way works.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
I won't care but I just know that my first championship will not spare me from mocking and derision
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I just hope that it comes in the next 10-15 years
so that we don’t have to put up with inanities like the Curse of the Whatever. the longer a team goes without winning the more the media mythologize it, and I really could do without that.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
It has to be some sort of legendary player or some animal
so I’m going with the Curse Of The Geoduck, just because.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
Mythologies are only for teams on the Eastern seaboard.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I tend to think it's our run differential that's misleading, but you could
probably say I’m biased. _
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
Your W/L is 88-57 and your 3rd order W/L is 76-69
I guess you could split the middle and call it good.
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions
You understand why this doesn't mean very much, right?
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 11, 2008 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Um, as I recall, you don't get rings for run differential
So I’d say the stats don’t mean very much.
http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.
by Carl Johnson on Sep 11, 2008 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Actually that depends on what you're talking about -
for instance, if you’re talking about player talent, stats count for a lot more than rings. Scott Spiezio, for example, has some rings, while Ken Griffey Jr. Barry Bonds and Alex Rodriguez have none. Spiezio is not a better player though, as you (and I think even he) must admit.
That brings us to the point being made here. No one is saying that the Angels aren’t in first place, or that they’re going to the playoffs. What’s being said is that they’re not the best team in the league, and that they’re playing over their true talent level. If they win the world series, good on them, and good for you, but the best team will not have won. Baseball is like that.
by Bearskin Rugburn on Sep 11, 2008 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm pretty sure his point was a fairly simple one: they ARE going to the playoffs, and that's what matters.
I don’t like it any more than you do, but I’d rather Ryan Feierabend win game 7 for me than have Felix post a great tRA on a bad team.
Actually, it's entirely likely the best team WILL have won.
Remember, a good portion of that run differential was acquired while Mark Texiera was not on the team. Also, injuries to such players as John Lackey, Mike Napoli and Howie Kendrick keep that differential from being as good as it might have been. When healthy, the Angels have as much claim to ’the best team in baseball" as anyone in the majors.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
So?
It’s still true. And here’s another truth: the Angels are the only team in the AL not dependent upon their home park for their record.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
You said:
When healthy, the Angels have as much claim to ’the best team in baseball" as anyone in the majors.
That’s subjective; it’s not “true,” it’s opinion.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Since 'best team' is a subjective term already,
I hardly see how my being subjective makes a difference. 0_o
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
This is going to turn into a semantics argument really fast.
Which is silly, because there are fair points to made made on both sides. I understand what you’re saying, but I don’t think you can discredit the numbers out of hand. I don’t really see how a case can be made that the Angels are the best true-talent-level team in the AL, or that they’re as good as their record would indicate.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions
The only way I can think of to put it is this:
A team with John Lackey, Mark Teixeira, Juan Rivera, Mike Napoli and Howie Kendrick is going to perform a lot differently than one with Dustin Moseley, Casey Kotchman, Gary Matthews Jr, Jeff Mathis and Sean Rodriguez.
On top of that, the fact that the Angels are the ONLY AL team with a record above .500 on the road tells me there is something the Angels are able to do that other teams flatly have not this year. If you were to take the Angels road record and make it under .500, (35-36) like Tampa’s and Boston’s records are, you come out with a record much like what Pythagoras says we’re supposed to have. What does that mean? Maybe nothing, it could just be a random statistical oddity, but I don’t think so. I think it says the Angels are the most balanced, most stable team in baseball, and I think, given the first set of players above, it makes them the best.
Also, I have to point out that you’re in highly subjective territory yourself with that ‘true talent level’ stuff.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
I can't agree.
If half the season is a small sample, then we have no idea what teams like Boston and LAA, who went through significant roster changes in July, are capable of. I don’t think that’s the case.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
True-talent-level is subjective, yes, but it's typically a judgment made based on much more predictive numbers than W/L records.
Also, Boston and Tampa have had a ton of injuries as well. I’m not saying the Angels aren’t a good team, and I don’t think they’re the 7th best team in the AL. I just can’t possibly see how they’re better than the Red Sox.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions
It's definitely a hard case to make, though I'm still hopeful the Twins
and/or White Sox can pull out the wild card and we won’t have to worry about it. ;)
(In that respect, the Red Sox probably have the toughest schedule remaining of any of the 5 probable playoff teams. )
Defensively, I think we’re better than the Sox, atleast with the A team out there. We also have a better back end to the bullpen and the rotations are really about even. They obviously have a better offense even with our best lineup, but it’s closer than you’d think. Throw in that they’ve been MUCH worse on the road than at home and I think the Angels have a case. I also admit to bias in the matter, I have to.
I guess the real point here though is that I don’t think we’re as bad as the run differential says we are, and I don’t think the Sox are as good as their run differential says they are. Tampa, Boston and the Halos are all about on even footing, talent level wise, and I think whoever comes out AL champion will have a legitimate right to say they’re the best.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
I think Boston is better, but I agree with the rest of what you're saying.
I don’t think the Angels are as good as their record, but I don’t think they’re as bad as their run differential. I do think the Red Sox are every bit as good as theirs, though.
J.K.L.
by Aaron Campeau on Sep 11, 2008 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
















