Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


Sean Green Is At It Again

Memories of last year's horrific collapse will not soon be forgotten, and right in the middle of everything was a bullpen that started to struggle at the worst possible time. Sean Green was no exception; between August 5th and September 18th, he allowed 17 runs and 43 baserunners in 18.2 innings, tarnishing a strong campaign and playing a significant part in 2007's emphatic demise.

The same phenomenon looks to be repeating itself once more in 2008. In the month of August, Green's put 22 people on base in 9.1 innings, striking out just four batters over the same span and yielding an OBP of .449. Where earlier in the year he was one of the lone stable assets on the staff, recently he's been nothing short of an unpleasant adventure.

Here's what's most interesting to me, though - where it seems pretty easy to pinpoint exhaustion as the root cause behind Green's struggles (he's tied for the AL lead in appearances with 63), if he's tired, it's not showing up in his actual stuff. Check it out:

Speed pfx_x pfx_z
Fastball, Season 89.4 -10.4 -1.0
Fastball, Slump 89.7 -10.2 -0.3
Slurve, Season 76.0 5.8 0.3
Slurve, Slump 75.7 7.5 -0.7

Green's stuff has been pretty much of the same quality over this recent stretch as it has been all season. In fact, his breaking ball's actually been moving more.

The issue isn't with his stuff. It hasn't changed. And he's still been getting a bunch of groundballs, so it'd also be hard to argue that his results have been substantially different. No, the problem is this simple: since returning from his little break, Green hasn't been able to throw strikes. At all. His strike rate of 53% over the last few weeks is almost hilariously bad, well below his season rate of 61% (which is still pretty weak). Yeah, he's faced an inordinate number of lefties over that span, but he hasn't even been regularly finding the zone against righties.

Not throwing strikes is a great way to look like a bad pitcher. Well, no; not throwing strikes is a great way to be a bad pitcher. Which isn't to say that Sean Green is bad, but during August, he's been exactly that. What's curious to me is that his stuff has stayed about the same, which leads me to wonder about two things:

(1) Is he actually tired*, or is this just statistical noise?
(2) How does cumulative pitcher fatigue usually manifest itself - worse command, worse stuff, worse velocity, or some combination of the three?

#1 is something we'll just have to wait to find out. #2, meanwhile, seems like it'd be a fascinating area of research, although I imagine you'd run into a heck of a problem trying to come up with a data pool. How do you identify a pitcher who's worn down over the course of the season? Looking only at guys who're getting worse results is the nasty sort of selection bias, since it doesn't account for people who're pitching through fatigue effectively. I guess it's another one of those interesting ideas that's virtually impossible to investigate.

As far as Green's concerned, we can only hope that he's able to shake these struggles off, since he's a valuable component of the bullpen going forward. Personally, I'm not worried; he shook off similar struggles a year ago, and rosters expand in five days. But it'd be nice to see him get a couple strong outings under his belt before the end of the season. Just to be sure.

* as the life of the party he may simply be hungover all the time

0 recs | Comment 13 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Lookout Landing

Tuesdays With Sean Green

Dec 2008 by Jeff - 50 comments

Well Today Wasn't Boring

Dec 2008 by Jeff - 183 comments

Done Deal

Dec 2008 by Jeff - 587 comments

Tuesdays With Sean Green

Dec 2008 by Jeff - 50 comments

Tuesdays With Sean Green

Dec 2008 by Jeff - 32 comments

Comments

Display:

He wasn't very good immediately before it, either

I was just shooting for a convenient starting point. He only threw 10 strikes in 20 pitches on August 2nd.

by Jeff on Aug 28, 2008 8:42 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True, now that you mention it

I was admittedly just throwing it out there as a possibility.

by Gomez on Aug 28, 2008 8:59 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The 'z' break certainly looks different in relative terms

if not in absolute terms.

I’d be interested to see how well that correlates with his success; dropping the arm angle and getting more horiz. break certainly seemed to jump-start his MLB career…

I’m also really nervous about SSS measures of pitch FX break, given the discrepancies in measurement, esp. as one park might be overrepresented in this sample (Safeco).

by marc w on Aug 28, 2008 9:59 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

One of the things I've always wished could be measured

is how often a pitcher misses his target. Here’s a pet peeve of mine: a catcher sets up low and away and the pitcher misses the target by throwing a low and inside strike (the opposite side of the plate)… then the batter hits a homerun and Mike Blowers says, “Tip your cap to David Ortiz…. he just hit a great pitch, right on the corner.”

IT WAS THE WRONG CORNER MIKE. MAYBE THROWING A 2-0 FASTBALL LOW AND IN TO A LEFTY SLUGGER IS A BAD IDEA.

Sure, you can miss by 18 inches and get lucky… but if you’re missing your target that badly, you lose your ability to set up hitters, paint corners, and get marginal calls because the umpire respects your control (ala Maddux.)

When a pitcher struggles with command, especially mid-season, I always wonder if tiny injuries are interfering… if something has slipped in their mechanics, or if they’re simply mentally/physically tired. God knows, I would have a hard time concentrating and trying my best in every appearance if I pitched for the Mariners.

by johnbai on Aug 28, 2008 10:51 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There are so many things that it would be great to measure

but it would require a team of baseball-knowledgable statisticians watching every play of every game and making some subjective judgement calls about the actions of each participant. It could improve our defensive metrics as well.

But this stops being clean science as soon as subjective “judgment calls” enter into the picture… and inter-rater reliability goes out the window without a rigorous training program for the game evaluators.

by johnbai on Aug 28, 2008 1:50 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Strip Club Cleared to Open Near Safeco Field
Hms_surprise_small
SBN Suggestions Thread

Recent FanPosts

Small
Want to go to tonights game in Boston?  Please?
Small
Top 5 IFA Guillermo Pimentel signs with the Mariners?
Clemente_small
OT 7/2/05-- Flag Waving, Long Weekend, 4th of July Holiday edition
Small
Open Sounders vs. Timbers gamethread
Small
Happy Canada Day
Durer2_small
Who will be heir to the King?
Eyebrows_small
OFFTOP 6/29/09 - Avoiding Work Edition
Dscn1856_small
USA vs. Brazil Game Thread
Small
Anyone meeting up in NYC?
Small
NHL Draft Open Thread

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Sexy People

Hms_surprise_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports