36-56
Much like Brandon Morrow, I think I'll take today off.
Biggest Contribution: RA Dickey, +33.6%
Biggest Suckfest: Brandon Morrow, -47.0%
Most Important AB: Lopez DP, -14.2%
Most Important Pitch: Suzuki homer, -48.8%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): -4.7%
Total Contribution by Lineup: -48.8%
Total Contribution by Opposition: +3.5%
(What is this chart?)
1 recs |
114
comments
Comments
This is more in depth than any recap I could ever write
here, have a rec
by JI on Jul 10, 2008 11:10 PM PDT 0 recs
Tough to recap a game that took place while you were at work.
by Jeff on
Jul 10, 2008 11:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Actually, I'll amend that
I can usually tune in from work. Tough to recap a game when the bulk of it took place while you were out at lunch.
by Jeff on
Jul 10, 2008 11:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Dear God I've developed a completely irrational mancrush on Dickey.
Please give him a new contract.
by BrianL on Jul 10, 2008 11:14 PM PDT 0 recs
It's almost like he could conceivably be a decent #5 for nothing
by Jeff on
Jul 10, 2008 11:16 PM PDT
up
0 recs
He has the Body Language of someone who's worth 5/70
Unlike Bedard, who has the body language of some one who has lady parts
by joof on
Jul 10, 2008 11:28 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Unless I'm mistaken, Dickey's still going to be under team control
so I give him something in the high six figures and smile when his eyes light up.
by Jeff on
Jul 10, 2008 11:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I wasn't really sure what his contract situation was.
The whole Rule V thing, followed by the trade for his rights confused the living daylights out of me.
by BrianL on
Jul 10, 2008 11:28 PM PDT
up
0 recs
How many Rule V draftee's turn out successful (minus Hamilton and Santana)?
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
When I think Rule V, I think of Luis Ugueto.
I just don’t imagine them contributing as much as Dickey has this season. Dickey was a Mat Olkin suggested move, wasn’t he?
by BrianL on
Jul 10, 2008 11:32 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Ok, I think I get it
There is just of a good chance of a rule V draftee making it big as a regular draftee. But they get to stay on the big league roster, or go back on their old team, right? The whole rule V thing is confusing.
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:34 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think we're confusing the Rule V draft with the Rule 5 draft.
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think I am at least.
Because the roman numeral for 5 is V, so I assumed they were the same.
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Ok
Its hard to tell a joke apart through text.
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
It's a situation of
Well, he’s not one of your 40 best, but we think he’s one of our best 25.
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Or at least that's the intent
the idea is to keep certain teams from hoarding talent. Sometimes a team will draft a worthless player and then play 24 deep until they can make up a fake injury accompanied by a subsequent lengthy rehab assignment.
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Didn't the Mariners do that with Sean White last year?
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:43 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Didn't the fact he was on the 25-man drive Lou nuts?
by BrianL on
Jul 10, 2008 11:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Probably.
Considering Gipson was the other reserve… that’s a pretty punchless bench. Ruben Sierra and Desi Relaford be damned.
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:46 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Petagine was decent. >:(
Herb Washington would have been more useful.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/u/uguetlu01.shtml
http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=14831
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Man, how sad would it be to know you never had a hit in your two year major league career?
Both these guys make WFB look like an all-star.
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Drafted, but returned or traded before start of season Colter Bean
Frank Brooks
Cecil Cooper 1970 by St Louis Cardinals, returned to Boston 1971
Javier López
Mike Myers
James Vermilyea
Fernando Vina
John Wetteland
whoops-a-doodle
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:34 PM PDT
up
0 recs
"If they had killed Gillian they would have gotten off the island."
I think this applies to 3/5 of our rotation.
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'd offer him the $810,000 he didn't get when the Rangers discovered that missing ligament.
Although I’d seriously consider just giving him an even 1 million (provided he doesn’t completely fall apart).
by BrianL on
Jul 10, 2008 11:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Is there any easy way to find out the results of every at bat a pitcher pitched?
I want to see what percent of the time Morrow has pitched either a strikeout, walk, or homerun, and how that compares with other batters.. It seems that whenever he pitches, he gets one of the three true outcomes while he pitches, and rarely do batters put it in play when the ball isn’t heading over the fence.
by joof on Jul 10, 2008 11:21 PM PDT 0 recs
He is a true fielding independent pitcher.
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:22 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Coming into today, 45.4% of Morrow's PAs ended in a K, BB or HR.
by Matthew on
Jul 10, 2008 11:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Because I'm bored...
Putz, 2006-39.9%
Putz, 2007-38.8%
And, because I’m really, really bored….
Nolan Ryan, 1977-43.8%
by acblue on
Jul 10, 2008 11:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Nolan Ryan's pitching lines are ridiculous.
I knew this intuitively, but looking at them all at once…dear God.
by acblue on
Jul 10, 2008 11:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
His 1973 was batshit.
383 K, 162 BB, 2,48 FIP, 326 IP, 26 CG.
I know it was a different game, but that’s completely unfathomable to me.
by acblue on
Jul 10, 2008 11:46 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Even the 383 K seems unreachable in today's game
But god damn. At least knowing he played up until he was 45 gives me hope that Sean Green’s arm doesn’t fall off.
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Randy Johnson = Today's Nolan Ryan?
Maybe without all the no hitters?
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
RJ is better than Nolan, relative to the rest of the league.
by acblue on
Jul 10, 2008 11:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You mean since he was in his prime during the supposed "steroid era"?
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 10, 2008 11:54 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Or juiced ball era?
Or smaller park era?
Nolan Ryan isn’t anywhere close to being as good as Randy Johnson.
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:57 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, I'd say Randy's one of the best five or 10 to ever do it.
I don’t put Nolan Ryan in that group.
by Teej on
Jul 11, 2008 12:02 AM PDT
up
0 recs
so the Mariners were stupid for not extending his contract?
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 11, 2008 12:04 AM PDT
up
0 recs
If it weren't for longevity
Nolan Ryan wouldn’t be a HOFer. He was a very good pitcher for a very long time, but he never really was as good as people remember.
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 11, 2008 12:05 AM PDT
up
0 recs
And definitely worth something.
I’m cool with him being in the HOF, but yeah, he’s no Randy.
by Teej on
Jul 11, 2008 12:22 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Randy Johnson is in a whole different building than Ryan.
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Nolan Ryan really wasn't all that great of a pitcher.
by Matthew on
Jul 11, 2008 8:30 AM PDT
up
0 recs
wha?
Walter Johnson was deeply, deeply awesome. easily one of the best ever.
Why do you think he wasn’t all that great?
by marc w on
Jul 11, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I think you missed the sarcasm.
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 11, 2008 1:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Despite popular sentiment
I like this meme when used in moderation
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 11, 2008 3:14 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Isn't Ryan's durability part of his value?
It’s like what Dave Cameron was talking about with the Harden -> Cubs trade where Gallagher’s durability is nearly as valuable as a great, but injured pitcher, like Harden.
I’m not trying to argue Ryan is an all-time top 5 pitcher or even close to RJ, but the high number of better-than-average pitcher innings & long career has a lot of value. From age 25 – 45, his worst ERA + was 91 (I know it’s not a great stat, but I’m looking at BR) and he only had 4 other years below 100 (99, 98, 98, 94).
by Jed MC on
Jul 11, 2008 8:49 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Which would mean he had many years where he was ~average, no?
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 11, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, Ryan had a lot of average-ish years.
I think the high K numbers and lots of no hitters make people think he was a lot better than he really was. I think he’s a clear HOFer, but not the super-elite player like a Randy or Pedro.
by Jed MC on
Jul 11, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Doesn't Tom Glavine fall under this same category as Ryan in that respect?
JI/Robert '08!
by Fin on
Jul 11, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
up
0 recs
That's a good example too.
Although, after taking a quick look, Glavine appears to be more consistently better than Ryan was.
by Jed MC on
Jul 11, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
up
0 recs
That was ridiculous
Me, following RJ’s stats that year:
June: Oh, he’ll slow down.
July: Oh, he’ll slow down.
August: GOOD LORD
by Gomez on
Jul 11, 2008 8:39 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I was a bit bummed when he didn't make it
but I had two very good teams to distract me.
See what JI started by dropping the periods?
by JI on
Jul 11, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
1973 was an obscene year for pitchers
as far as overall effectiveness he was much more Kerry Wood than Roger Clemens.
by JI on
Jul 10, 2008 11:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Sure. But I had Nolan Ryan's numbers in front of me and was flabbergasted.
by acblue on
Jul 10, 2008 11:56 PM PDT
up
0 recs
And also, considering the amount of strikeouts and BBs
coupled with the IP and batters faced, imagine how many pitches he must have thrown.
by acblue on
Jul 10, 2008 11:57 PM PDT
up
0 recs





