Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The 2009-2010 Card Chronicle Big East basketball preview

More Baseball Card BS

So I just made a purchase of Adobe Creative Suite 3 and I'm trying to learn more about how to use it. To that end, I recreated the template for Donruss' 1991 baseball cards.

Photobucket

I need more projects. I do have a few other cards sitting on my desk, and I'm trying to come up with some other potential designs, but as yet I haven't had much luck. Any thoughts on the matter?

4 recs  |  Comment 52 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nice!

/rec

Free Stephen Awesome Strasburg!

by thejew4u on Jun 27, 2008 11:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

How about recreating the back side of the cards too?

That would give you a better chance to play with tables, text, etc… Plus if there was an easy template to work with, I have a feeling it would lead to some pretty entertaining results here.

Free Stephen Awesome Strasburg!

by thejew4u on Jun 27, 2008 11:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good Call

for now I’ve been playing with the pen tool and some of the shapes, just to see what I can do. Back-of-card text sucks to do… which is why I’ve only done the one for Jeff so far.

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jun 27, 2008 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those were terrible baseball cards.

Give you're propers to the all time rec leader.

by JI on Jun 27, 2008 11:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ouch.

1988-1992 were the height of my collecting. I remember this set very fondly.

by AnotherAaron on Jun 27, 2008 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

'91 Donruss were terrible

Actually, most of the Donruss were bad. Shoot, if you are going to do something, do the ‘89 Upper Deck. Or ‘88 Topps. ‘85 Fleer wasn’t bad. Or do a classic. ‘58 Topps.

by TheEmrys on Jun 27, 2008 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would have to get some closeups for '58 Topps...

88 is a no, 89 Upper Deck would be ok, but I probably don’t have any to work off of, and I do like the look of ‘85 Fleer, I might see what I can do.

I’m amused by the general hate toward Donruss going on here. What, you guys don’t like the Jackson Pollock splotches in the background?

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jun 27, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Topps of 1958

Not a handsome man…... but he sure could hit and fight in wars.

by TheEmrys on Jun 27, 2008 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a proven veteran.

Jl/Robert '08: Promise for a CoachCage tomorrow!

by Fin on Jun 27, 2008 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Young'in.

Yes, I'm a girl. Yes, I know baseball. Yes, I even drink beer.

by NOLAmarinergirl on Jun 27, 2008 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's when I gave it up. $1 per pack of cards is an outrage I tell you!

I still have my 1987 complete Topps set compiled solely from packs – gum stains and everything on the back.

by Jed MC on Jun 27, 2008 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never understood why people were mad about the 86ing of the gum.

The gum is fucking terrible.

Give you're propers to the all time rec leader.

by JI on Jun 27, 2008 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tradition.

AKA "BRO-RAY" according to drunk Graham...

by Thingray on Jul 3, 2008 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

'88-'92

I think that was the peak for baseball cards. Topps, Donruss, and Fleer were the big ones and Upper Deck and Score were new. Then they all decided to come up with 3 extra sets each and it was impossible to keep up with.

by speedomike on Jun 27, 2008 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They're not worth anything because too many were printed.

I collected some of those retroactively.

Give you're propers to the all time rec leader.

by JI on Jun 27, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are we going to make baseball cards of this sunday's softball event

I want a baseball card of myself.

Jl/Robert '08: Promise for a CoachCage tomorrow!

by Fin on Jun 27, 2008 1:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I know most people hated them

but I LOVED 1991 and 1992 Donruss. That may have something to do with the fact that I was 8 and they were all my local drugstore had….

I’d love to see a M’s team set in that design!

--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog

by Addicted to Quack on Jun 27, 2008 1:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I never understood baseball cards.

My cousin buys and sells them as a hobby, and I can see why they were cool before the internet, but I’m not sure why someone would pay half a million dollars for a piece of paper just because it was printed in 1950 and there are only a few left that are in “mint” condition (Don’t really get autographs either). Too put this in a more ridiculous perspective, my cousin bought a $15,000 Magic card the other week. He doesn’t play, he just collects in hopes of selling when the value is higher, but who the hell would pay 15+ grand for a magic card?

by LantermanC on Jun 27, 2008 2:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This painting went for $135 million.

And this painting holds the record at $140 million:

Whether it’s a baseball card or a painting, it’s considered artwork. I think it is ridiculous to pay such outrageous prices, but they do hold value to some people. Ask yourself why housing prices go up? The land becomes rare just like the a piece of printed art. You can always build the same house somewhere else, but you lose the value of location. With art, you can have it reprinted, but you lose the value of the original material.

by Wilder. on Jun 27, 2008 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's... I don't even...

did you really just compare Klimt and Pollock to baseball cards? I…

the artist formerly known as Mere Tantalisers.

by Bearskin Rugburn on Jun 27, 2008 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I know, the awesomeness of baseball captured in picture form

cannot be compared to random paint splatterings (Pollack, the other one can actually be classified as art, since I cannot paint a woman, but can splotch paint on a giant canvas)...

by LantermanC on Jun 27, 2008 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pollack is awesome.

As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.

by acblue on Jun 27, 2008 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also... Location matters

because I want good neighbors, good schooling, and to not drive far distances to go to work. Originality… eh, I can do without. Give me a Pujols clone, and you won’t hear a peep out of me about whether or not he’s an original player.

by LantermanC on Jun 27, 2008 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some of those magic cards are bank.

I still have all mine and have an online collection as well that I still play with. Magic the Gathering online FTW!

I have to agree though, 90-92 donruss really sucked. 1997 Fleer in my opinion is a really nice set.

by aestivalis on Jun 27, 2008 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you're not a collector, you won't understand

collecting.
It’s not just “visuals” like artwork, baseball cards, stamps, famous letters, autographs (Pablo Picasso became fascinated by the fact that he could sit at a cafe table and make a lot of money, simply drawing anything on anything, (napkins) and signing, and instantly people gave him money for it!). People also collect cars, war metals, guns, fossils, meteorites…even gold nuggets are more valuable than just their weight in gold. An extraordinary nugget can cost 2x or more its intrinsic gold value.

Until you get above a certain income level, collecting means nothing beyond the intrinsic nature of “owning” something, and you will be stopped by financial considerations. Also, many enjoy the support of other collectors, which makes your collection “worthwhile” and raises your own self-esteem. For people buying a Klimt, it is the esteem they feel, owning it in the face of others wanting it. In my opinion, it is that reason the bidding goes so high, not the artistic merit, but the popular collecting merit.

Personally, I have modest collections. My baseball cards are from 1960-62 and personally bought at only 2-3 stores that carried cards. I rarely pull them out. They were worth more in 1989 by 4x or 5x. I have two or three Mickey Mantle 1961 cards that were worth thousands then, now down to less than $500. The internet pulled many collections out of attics and storage, and the flooded market dropped prices. Fleer was just getting in, in my 1960s days, and their gum was exotic-tasting and different from Topps gum (which, could be good, or unbelievably old-tasting).

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Jul 10, 2008 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Same favorite card designs from that era

86 Donruss

85 Topps Football

89 Fleer Basketball

by johnbai on Jun 27, 2008 4:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I paid for a quarter of college tuition

By selling the original Fleer NBA set. Most of the value was in the Jordan Rookie card of course.

by Sec 108 on Jun 27, 2008 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had a huge collection of hockey cards from the 90s.

I wish I kept them all of these years and drove up to Vancouver to sell them.

Jl/Robert '08: Promise for a CoachCage tomorrow!

by Fin on Jun 27, 2008 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I personally like 84 and 85 topps

84 Fleer was good as well.

My quick smells like french toast.

by RED29 on Jun 27, 2008 5:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

1994

That’s pretty much what stopped my card-collecting. That and when cards got over $2 a pack, which I just thought was exorbitant. My dad didn’t pay allowance in money in those days, I got packs of baseball cards. Sadly, as some mentioned above, I was heavy into the collecting right when companies were busy overproducing the cards. I remember one of the Score sets went from $30-plus to below $10, and I think there were like 893 cards in one of those sets. Topps’ number was 792 in a set for a while there…

I think the 1987 Topps cards were my first pack (with the bubblegum stick). I also remember all the Royals cards from the 1992 Fleer set since you could barely read their names because of the light blue/gradient green color clash.

When I was collecting, companies were just starting to do subsets and parallel sets, going borderless was a big deal, and gold-foil embossing was friggin’ incredible. Now they’re cutting up chunks of uniform, ball, and base and throwing them into the cards…

I’d like to see the original poster to use the 1986 Fleer Update cards as a template—it was one of the most sought-after sets, but I’m sure the steroid revelations had their say about that.

Does anyone else have any of those Denny’s hologram cards? I have a couple dozen of those at the parents’ bunker in B-town.

Sports and Bremertonians. Because we can.

by wackomann on Jul 2, 2008 11:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You know, I didn't think I would ever get a request for those.

Design’s pretty simple, though. I could probably whip something up.

by Two Rs and Two Ls on Jul 3, 2008 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why not some 85 topps football love

those black borders are awesome

by johnbai on Jul 3, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh.

All of those game-used rookie cards crack me up. Um, this prospect is 2+ years away from the majors. This card in particular, for instance (I actually have 2 of them):

It was issued BEFORE the 2004 season got underway. George made his MLB debut in 2004. Which game was it used in, in 2003? An R’s jersey? A spring training jersey? Hmmm…

My layout.spellcheckDefault goes to 11

by PositivePaul on Jul 3, 2008 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i see the plight

I think it’s Xciting Rookies, brought to us by the fine folks at (Upper Deck) SP, who neglected to imagine using the same font around the symbol might make it all seem like one word. They could have at least put a little space in there or something.

Sports and Bremertonians. Because we can.

by wackomann on Jul 3, 2008 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
FootbaLL III (Nov 7th)

Recent FanPosts

Ichiro_small
Ackley and Triunfel on MLB TV right now
Small
Xbox LLive, Pt 3
Clemente_small
OT on a friday morning 11/6
Curry_small
Curiously wondering what the plan is...
Griffeys_last_game_1_small
Is anyone else going to make fun of this picture?
Sth70021_small
Exploring Hit f/x, Albeit Badly.
Hunter_small
Somewhat OT: Kid dies from aluminum bat, family now rich
Small
OFFTOP: 10/30/09
Commproj08_ajones_small
Sounders Playoffs Gamethread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

1_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff